Clinical Trial Design Feasibility Assessment
Systematically assess clinical trial feasibility by analyzing 6 research dimensions. Produces comprehensive feasibility reports with quantitative enrollment projections, endpoint recommendations, and regulatory pathway analysis.
IMPORTANT: Always use English terms in tool calls (drug names, disease names, biomarker names), even if the user writes in another language. Only try original-language terms as a fallback if English returns no results. Respond in the user's language.
Reasoning Before Searching
Trial design starts with the question, not the methods. Answer these four questions before running any tools — they determine everything else:
- What is the primary endpoint? Is it overall survival (gold standard but slow), PFS (faster but surrogate), ORR (single-arm friendly but not always accepted), or a biomarker (needs validation as surrogate first)? The endpoint determines FDA pathway, statistical design, and duration.
- Who is the population? Broad unselected vs. biomarker-enriched. Enriched populations have higher response rates, allowing smaller trials — but require a validated companion diagnostic and reduce the eligible patient pool.
- What is the comparator? Placebo (only if no standard of care exists), active control (requires non-inferiority or superiority framing), or single-arm with historical control (acceptable for rare diseases or breakthrough designations, but FDA scrutiny is high).
- Is the effect size realistic given the mechanism? A 20% improvement in ORR over SOC requires ~100 patients per arm. A 50% improvement requires ~30. If the mechanism only justifies a 10% improvement, the trial may be underpowered regardless of design. Check precedent effect sizes in similar trials before committing to an endpoint.
These four answers determine sample size, duration, and trial design. Look them up from precedent trials and FDA guidance — do not derive them from first principles.
LOOK UP DON'T GUESS: Never assume what the standard of care is for an indication — look it up with DrugBank and FDA tools. Never assume an endpoint is FDA-accepted — verify with search_clinical_trials precedents and OpenFDA_get_approval_history. Never estimate prevalence from memory — use OpenTargets, gnomAD, or COSMIC.
Core Principles
1. Report-First Approach (MANDATORY)
DO NOT show tool outputs to user. Instead:
- Create
[INDICATION]_trial_feasibility_report.md FIRST
- Initialize with all section headers
- Progressively update as data arrives
- Present only the final report
2. Evidence Grading System
| Grade |
Symbol |
Criteria |
Examples |
| A |
3-star |
Regulatory acceptance, multiple precedents |
FDA-approved endpoint in same indication |
| B |
2-star |
Clinical validation, single precedent |
Phase 3 trial in related indication |
| C |
1-star |
Preclinical or exploratory |
Phase 1 use, biomarker validation ongoing |
| D |
0-star |
Proposed, no validation |
Novel endpoint, no precedent |
3. Feasibility Score (0-100)
Weighted composite score:
- Patient Availability (30%): Population size x biomarker prevalence x geography
- Endpoint Precedent (25%): Historical use, regulatory acceptance
- Regulatory Clarity (20%): Pathway defined, precedents exist
- Comparator Feasibility (15%): Standard of care availability
- Safety Monitoring (10%): Known risks, monitoring established
Interpretation: >=75 HIGH (proceed), 50-74 MODERATE (additional validation), <50 LOW (de-risking required)
When to Use This Skill
Apply when users:
- Plan early-phase trials (Phase 1/2 emphasis)
- Need enrollment feasibility assessment
- Design biomarker-selected trials
- Evaluate endpoint strategies
- Assess regulatory pathways
- Compare trial design options
- Need safety monitoring plans
Trigger phrases: "clinical trial design", "trial feasibility", "enrollment projections", "endpoint selection", "trial planning", "Phase 1/2 design", "basket trial", "biomarker trial"
Core Strategy: 6 Research Paths
Execute 6 parallel research dimensions. See STUDY_DESIGN_PROCEDURES.md for detailed steps per path.
Trial Design Query
|
+-- PATH 1: Patient Population Sizing
| Disease prevalence, biomarker prevalence, geographic distribution,
| eligibility criteria impact, enrollment projections
|
+-- PATH 2: Biomarker Prevalence & Testing
| Mutation frequency, testing availability, turnaround time,
| cost/reimbursement, alternative biomarkers
|
+-- PATH 3: Comparator Selection
| Standard of care, approved comparators, historical controls,
| placebo appropriateness, combination therapy
|
+-- PATH 4: Endpoint Selection
| Primary endpoint precedents, FDA acceptance history,
| measurement feasibility, surrogate vs clinical endpoints
|
+-- PATH 5: Safety Endpoints & Monitoring
| Mechanism-based toxicity, class effects, organ-specific monitoring,
| DLT history, safety monitoring plan
|
+-- PATH 6: Regulatory Pathway
Regulatory precedents (505(b)(1), 505(b)(2)), breakthrough therapy,
orphan drug, fast track, FDA guidance
Report Structure (14 Sections)
Create [INDICATION]_trial_feasibility_report.md with all 14 sections. See REPORT_TEMPLATE.md for full templates with fillable fields.
- Executive Summary - Feasibility score, key findings, go/no-go recommendation
- Disease Background - Prevalence, incidence, SOC, unmet need
- Patient Population Analysis - Base population, biomarker selection, eligibility funnel, enrollment projections
- Biomarker Strategy - Primary biomarker, alternatives, testing logistics
- Endpoint Selection & Justification - Primary/secondary/exploratory endpoints, statistical considerations
- Comparator Analysis - SOC, trial design options (single-arm vs randomized vs non-inferiority), drug sourcing
- Safety Endpoints & Monitoring Plan - DLT definition, mechanism-based toxicities, organ monitoring, SMC
- Study Design Recommendations - Phase, design type, schema, eligibility, treatment plan, assessment schedule
- Enrollment & Site Strategy - Site selection, enrollment projections, recruitment strategies
- Regulatory Pathway - FDA pathway, precedents, pre-IND meeting, IND timeline
- Budget & Resource Considerations - Cost drivers, timeline, FTE requirements
- Risk Assessment - Feasibility risks, scientific risks, mitigation strategies
- Success Criteria & Go/No-Go Decision - Phase 1/2 criteria, interim analysis, feasibility scorecard
- Recommendations & Next Steps - Final recommendation, critical path to IND, alternative designs
Tool Reference by Research Path
PATH 1: Patient Population Sizing
OpenTargets_get_disease_id_description_by_name - Disease lookup
OpenTargets_get_diseases_phenotypes_by_target_ensembl - Prevalence data
ClinVar_search_variants - Biomarker mutation frequency
gnomad_search_variants - Population allele frequencies
PubMed_search_articles - Epidemiology literature
search_clinical_trials - Enrollment feasibility from past trials
PATH 2: Biomarker Prevalence & Testing
ClinVar_get_variant_details - Variant pathogenicity
COSMIC_search_mutations - Cancer-specific mutation frequencies
gnomad_get_variant - Population genetics
PubMed_search_articles - CDx test performance, guidelines
PATH 3: Comparator Selection
drugbank_get_drug_basic_info_by_drug_name_or_id - Drug info
drugbank_get_indications_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id - Approved indications
drugbank_get_pharmacology_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id - Mechanism
FDA_OrangeBook_search_drug - Generic availability
OpenFDA_get_approval_history - Approval details
search_clinical_trials - Historical control data
PATH 4: Endpoint Selection
search_clinical_trials - Precedent trials, endpoints used
PubMed_search_articles - FDA acceptance history, endpoint validation
OpenFDA_get_approval_history - Approved endpoints by indication
PATH 5: Safety Endpoints & Monitoring
drugbank_get_pharmacology_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id - Mechanism toxicity
FDA_get_warnings_and_cautions_by_drug_name - FDA black box warnings
FAERS_search_reports_by_drug_and_reaction - Real-world adverse events
FAERS_count_reactions_by_drug_event - AE frequency
FAERS_count_death_related_by_drug - Serious outcomes
PubMed_search_articles - DLT definitions, monitoring strategies
PATH 6: Regulatory Pathway
OpenFDA_get_approval_history - Precedent approvals
PubMed_search_articles - Breakthrough designations, FDA guidance
search_clinical_trials - Regulatory precedents (accelerated approval)
Quick Start Example
from tooluniverse import ToolUniverse
tu = ToolUniverse(use_cache=True)
tu.load_tools()
# Example: EGFR+ NSCLC trial feasibility
# Step 1: Disease prevalence
disease_info = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_disease_id_description_by_name(
diseaseName="non-small cell lung cancer"
)
prevalence = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_diseases_phenotypes(
efoId=disease_info['data']['id']
)
# Step 2: Biomarker prevalence
variants = tu.tools.ClinVar_search_variants(gene="EGFR", significance="pathogenic")
# Step 3: Precedent trials
trials = tu.tools.search_clinical_trials(
condition="EGFR positive non-small cell lung cancer",
status="completed", phase="2"
)
# Step 4: Standard of care comparator
soc = tu.tools.FDA_OrangeBook_search_drug(ingredient="osimertinib")
# Compile into feasibility report...
See WORKFLOW_DETAILS.md for the complete 6-path Python workflow and use case examples.
Integration with Other Skills
- tooluniverse-drug-research: Investigate mechanism, preclinical data
- tooluniverse-disease-research: Deep dive on disease biology
- tooluniverse-target-research: Validate drug target, essentiality
- tooluniverse-pharmacovigilance: Post-market safety for comparator drugs
- tooluniverse-precision-oncology: Biomarker biology, resistance mechanisms
Programmatic Access (Beyond Tools)
When ToolUniverse tools return limited trial metadata, use the ClinicalTrials.gov v2 API directly:
import requests, pandas as pd
# Search with pagination (all lung cancer immunotherapy trials with results)
all_studies = []
token = None
while True:
params = {"query.cond": "lung cancer", "query.intr": "immunotherapy",
"filter.overallStatus": "COMPLETED", "filter.results": "WITH_RESULTS", "pageSize": 100}
if token: params["pageToken"] = token
resp = requests.get("https://clinicaltrials.gov/api/v2/studies", params=params).json()
all_studies.extend(resp.get("studies", []))
token = resp.get("nextPageToken")
if not token: break
# Extract structured data
rows = []
for s in all_studies:
proto = s.get("protocolSection", {})
rows.append({
"nctId": proto.get("identificationModule", {}).get("nctId"),
"title": proto.get("identificationModule", {}).get("briefTitle"),
"enrollment": proto.get("designModule", {}).get("enrollmentInfo", {}).get("count"),
"phase": proto.get("designModule", {}).get("phases", [None])[0] if proto.get("designModule", {}).get("phases") else None,
})
df = pd.DataFrame(rows)
# FDA drug approval history
drug = "pembrolizumab"
fda = requests.get(f"https://api.fda.gov/drug/drugsfda.json?search=openfda.brand_name:{drug}&limit=10").json()
See tooluniverse-data-wrangling skill for pagination, error handling, and bulk download patterns.
Reference Files
| File |
Content |
REPORT_TEMPLATE.md |
Full 14-section report template with fillable fields |
STUDY_DESIGN_PROCEDURES.md |
Detailed steps for each of the 6 research paths |
WORKFLOW_DETAILS.md |
Complete Python example workflow and 5 use case summaries |
BEST_PRACTICES.md |
Best practices, common pitfalls, output format requirements |
EXAMPLES.md |
Additional examples |
QUICK_START.md |
Quick start guide |
Version Information
- Version: 1.0.0
- Last Updated: February 2026
- Compatible with: ToolUniverse 0.5+
- Focus: Phase 1/2 early clinical development
1---2name: tooluniverse-clinical-trial-design3description: Strategic clinical trial design feasibility assessment. Analyzes 6 dimensions (endpoint, population, comparator, effect size, duration, regulatory pathway) using precedent trials and FDA guidance. Produces enrollment projections, endpoint recommendations, and approval-pathway analysis. Use for trial-protocol design, power/sample-size estimation, comparator selection, and FDA submission strategy. Driven by precedent-based reasoning rather than first-principles math.4---5
6# Clinical Trial Design Feasibility Assessment
7
8Systematically assess clinical trial feasibility by analyzing 6 research dimensions. Produces comprehensive feasibility reports with quantitative enrollment projections, endpoint recommendations, and regulatory pathway analysis.
9
10**IMPORTANT**: Always use English terms in tool calls (drug names, disease names, biomarker names), even if the user writes in another language. Only try original-language terms as a fallback if English returns no results. Respond in the user's language.
11
12## Reasoning Before Searching
13
14Trial design starts with the question, not the methods. Answer these four questions before running any tools — they determine everything else:
15
161. **What is the primary endpoint?** Is it overall survival (gold standard but slow), PFS (faster but surrogate), ORR (single-arm friendly but not always accepted), or a biomarker (needs validation as surrogate first)? The endpoint determines FDA pathway, statistical design, and duration.
172. **Who is the population?** Broad unselected vs. biomarker-enriched. Enriched populations have higher response rates, allowing smaller trials — but require a validated companion diagnostic and reduce the eligible patient pool.
183. **What is the comparator?** Placebo (only if no standard of care exists), active control (requires non-inferiority or superiority framing), or single-arm with historical control (acceptable for rare diseases or breakthrough designations, but FDA scrutiny is high).
194. **Is the effect size realistic given the mechanism?** A 20% improvement in ORR over SOC requires ~100 patients per arm. A 50% improvement requires ~30. If the mechanism only justifies a 10% improvement, the trial may be underpowered regardless of design. Check precedent effect sizes in similar trials before committing to an endpoint.
20
21These four answers determine sample size, duration, and trial design. Look them up from precedent trials and FDA guidance — do not derive them from first principles.
22
23**LOOK UP DON'T GUESS**: Never assume what the standard of care is for an indication — look it up with DrugBank and FDA tools. Never assume an endpoint is FDA-accepted — verify with `search_clinical_trials` precedents and `OpenFDA_get_approval_history`. Never estimate prevalence from memory — use OpenTargets, gnomAD, or COSMIC.
24
25## Core Principles
26
27### 1. Report-First Approach (MANDATORY)
28**DO NOT** show tool outputs to user. Instead:
291. Create `[INDICATION]_trial_feasibility_report.md` FIRST
302. Initialize with all section headers
313. Progressively update as data arrives
324. Present only the final report
33
34### 2. Evidence Grading System
35
36| Grade | Symbol | Criteria | Examples |
37|-------|--------|----------|----------|
38| **A** | 3-star | Regulatory acceptance, multiple precedents | FDA-approved endpoint in same indication |
39| **B** | 2-star | Clinical validation, single precedent | Phase 3 trial in related indication |
40| **C** | 1-star | Preclinical or exploratory | Phase 1 use, biomarker validation ongoing |
41| **D** | 0-star | Proposed, no validation | Novel endpoint, no precedent |
42
43### 3. Feasibility Score (0-100)
44Weighted composite score:
45- **Patient Availability** (30%): Population size x biomarker prevalence x geography
46- **Endpoint Precedent** (25%): Historical use, regulatory acceptance
47- **Regulatory Clarity** (20%): Pathway defined, precedents exist
48- **Comparator Feasibility** (15%): Standard of care availability
49- **Safety Monitoring** (10%): Known risks, monitoring established
50
51**Interpretation**: >=75 HIGH (proceed), 50-74 MODERATE (additional validation), <50 LOW (de-risking required)
52
53---
54
55## When to Use This Skill
56
57Apply when users:
58- Plan early-phase trials (Phase 1/2 emphasis)
59- Need enrollment feasibility assessment
60- Design biomarker-selected trials
61- Evaluate endpoint strategies
62- Assess regulatory pathways
63- Compare trial design options
64- Need safety monitoring plans
65
66**Trigger phrases**: "clinical trial design", "trial feasibility", "enrollment projections", "endpoint selection", "trial planning", "Phase 1/2 design", "basket trial", "biomarker trial"
67
68---
69
70## Core Strategy: 6 Research Paths
71
72Execute 6 parallel research dimensions. See `STUDY_DESIGN_PROCEDURES.md` for detailed steps per path.
73
74```
75Trial Design Query
76|
77+-- PATH 1: Patient Population Sizing
78| Disease prevalence, biomarker prevalence, geographic distribution,
79| eligibility criteria impact, enrollment projections
80|
81+-- PATH 2: Biomarker Prevalence & Testing
82| Mutation frequency, testing availability, turnaround time,
83| cost/reimbursement, alternative biomarkers
84|
85+-- PATH 3: Comparator Selection
86| Standard of care, approved comparators, historical controls,
87| placebo appropriateness, combination therapy
88|
89+-- PATH 4: Endpoint Selection
90| Primary endpoint precedents, FDA acceptance history,
91| measurement feasibility, surrogate vs clinical endpoints
92|
93+-- PATH 5: Safety Endpoints & Monitoring
94| Mechanism-based toxicity, class effects, organ-specific monitoring,
95| DLT history, safety monitoring plan
96|
97+-- PATH 6: Regulatory Pathway
98 Regulatory precedents (505(b)(1), 505(b)(2)), breakthrough therapy,
99 orphan drug, fast track, FDA guidance
100```
101
102---
103
104## Report Structure (14 Sections)
105
106Create `[INDICATION]_trial_feasibility_report.md` with all 14 sections. See `REPORT_TEMPLATE.md` for full templates with fillable fields.
107
1081. **Executive Summary** - Feasibility score, key findings, go/no-go recommendation
1092. **Disease Background** - Prevalence, incidence, SOC, unmet need
1103. **Patient Population Analysis** - Base population, biomarker selection, eligibility funnel, enrollment projections
1114. **Biomarker Strategy** - Primary biomarker, alternatives, testing logistics
1125. **Endpoint Selection & Justification** - Primary/secondary/exploratory endpoints, statistical considerations
1136. **Comparator Analysis** - SOC, trial design options (single-arm vs randomized vs non-inferiority), drug sourcing
1147. **Safety Endpoints & Monitoring Plan** - DLT definition, mechanism-based toxicities, organ monitoring, SMC
1158. **Study Design Recommendations** - Phase, design type, schema, eligibility, treatment plan, assessment schedule
1169. **Enrollment & Site Strategy** - Site selection, enrollment projections, recruitment strategies
11710. **Regulatory Pathway** - FDA pathway, precedents, pre-IND meeting, IND timeline
11811. **Budget & Resource Considerations** - Cost drivers, timeline, FTE requirements
11912. **Risk Assessment** - Feasibility risks, scientific risks, mitigation strategies
12013. **Success Criteria & Go/No-Go Decision** - Phase 1/2 criteria, interim analysis, feasibility scorecard
12114. **Recommendations & Next Steps** - Final recommendation, critical path to IND, alternative designs
122
123---
124
125## Tool Reference by Research Path
126
127### PATH 1: Patient Population Sizing
128- `OpenTargets_get_disease_id_description_by_name` - Disease lookup
129- `OpenTargets_get_diseases_phenotypes_by_target_ensembl` - Prevalence data
130- `ClinVar_search_variants` - Biomarker mutation frequency
131- `gnomad_search_variants` - Population allele frequencies
132- `PubMed_search_articles` - Epidemiology literature
133- `search_clinical_trials` - Enrollment feasibility from past trials
134
135### PATH 2: Biomarker Prevalence & Testing
136- `ClinVar_get_variant_details` - Variant pathogenicity
137- `COSMIC_search_mutations` - Cancer-specific mutation frequencies
138- `gnomad_get_variant` - Population genetics
139- `PubMed_search_articles` - CDx test performance, guidelines
140
141### PATH 3: Comparator Selection
142- `drugbank_get_drug_basic_info_by_drug_name_or_id` - Drug info
143- `drugbank_get_indications_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id` - Approved indications
144- `drugbank_get_pharmacology_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id` - Mechanism
145- `FDA_OrangeBook_search_drug` - Generic availability
146- `OpenFDA_get_approval_history` - Approval details
147- `search_clinical_trials` - Historical control data
148
149### PATH 4: Endpoint Selection
150- `search_clinical_trials` - Precedent trials, endpoints used
151- `PubMed_search_articles` - FDA acceptance history, endpoint validation
152- `OpenFDA_get_approval_history` - Approved endpoints by indication
153
154### PATH 5: Safety Endpoints & Monitoring
155- `drugbank_get_pharmacology_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id` - Mechanism toxicity
156- `FDA_get_warnings_and_cautions_by_drug_name` - FDA black box warnings
157- `FAERS_search_reports_by_drug_and_reaction` - Real-world adverse events
158- `FAERS_count_reactions_by_drug_event` - AE frequency
159- `FAERS_count_death_related_by_drug` - Serious outcomes
160- `PubMed_search_articles` - DLT definitions, monitoring strategies
161
162### PATH 6: Regulatory Pathway
163- `OpenFDA_get_approval_history` - Precedent approvals
164- `PubMed_search_articles` - Breakthrough designations, FDA guidance
165- `search_clinical_trials` - Regulatory precedents (accelerated approval)
166
167---
168
169## Quick Start Example
170
171```python
172from tooluniverse import ToolUniverse
173
174tu = ToolUniverse(use_cache=True)
175tu.load_tools()
176
177# Example: EGFR+ NSCLC trial feasibility
178# Step 1: Disease prevalence
179disease_info = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_disease_id_description_by_name(
180 diseaseName="non-small cell lung cancer"
181)
182prevalence = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_diseases_phenotypes(
183 efoId=disease_info['data']['id']
184)
185
186# Step 2: Biomarker prevalence
187variants = tu.tools.ClinVar_search_variants(gene="EGFR", significance="pathogenic")
188
189# Step 3: Precedent trials
190trials = tu.tools.search_clinical_trials(
191 condition="EGFR positive non-small cell lung cancer",
192 status="completed", phase="2"
193)
194
195# Step 4: Standard of care comparator
196soc = tu.tools.FDA_OrangeBook_search_drug(ingredient="osimertinib")
197
198# Compile into feasibility report...
199```
200
201See `WORKFLOW_DETAILS.md` for the complete 6-path Python workflow and use case examples.
202
203---
204
205## Integration with Other Skills
206
207- **tooluniverse-drug-research**: Investigate mechanism, preclinical data
208- **tooluniverse-disease-research**: Deep dive on disease biology
209- **tooluniverse-target-research**: Validate drug target, essentiality
210- **tooluniverse-pharmacovigilance**: Post-market safety for comparator drugs
211- **tooluniverse-precision-oncology**: Biomarker biology, resistance mechanisms
212
213---
214
215## Programmatic Access (Beyond Tools)
216
217When ToolUniverse tools return limited trial metadata, use the ClinicalTrials.gov v2 API directly:
218
219```python
220import requests, pandas as pd
221
222# Search with pagination (all lung cancer immunotherapy trials with results)
223all_studies = []
224token = None
225while True:
226 params = {"query.cond": "lung cancer", "query.intr": "immunotherapy",
227 "filter.overallStatus": "COMPLETED", "filter.results": "WITH_RESULTS", "pageSize": 100}
228 if token: params["pageToken"] = token
229 resp = requests.get("https://clinicaltrials.gov/api/v2/studies", params=params).json()
230 all_studies.extend(resp.get("studies", []))
231 token = resp.get("nextPageToken")
232 if not token: break
233
234# Extract structured data
235rows = []
236for s in all_studies:
237 proto = s.get("protocolSection", {})
238 rows.append({
239 "nctId": proto.get("identificationModule", {}).get("nctId"),
240 "title": proto.get("identificationModule", {}).get("briefTitle"),
241 "enrollment": proto.get("designModule", {}).get("enrollmentInfo", {}).get("count"),
242 "phase": proto.get("designModule", {}).get("phases", [None])[0] if proto.get("designModule", {}).get("phases") else None,
243 })
244df = pd.DataFrame(rows)
245
246# FDA drug approval history
247drug = "pembrolizumab"
248fda = requests.get(f"https://api.fda.gov/drug/drugsfda.json?search=openfda.brand_name:{drug}&limit=10").json()
249```
250
251See `tooluniverse-data-wrangling` skill for pagination, error handling, and bulk download patterns.
252
253---
254
255## Reference Files
256
257| File | Content |
258|------|---------|
259| `REPORT_TEMPLATE.md` | Full 14-section report template with fillable fields |
260| `STUDY_DESIGN_PROCEDURES.md` | Detailed steps for each of the 6 research paths |
261| `WORKFLOW_DETAILS.md` | Complete Python example workflow and 5 use case summaries |
262| `BEST_PRACTICES.md` | Best practices, common pitfalls, output format requirements |
263| `EXAMPLES.md` | Additional examples |
264| `QUICK_START.md` | Quick start guide |
265
266---
267
268## Version Information
269
270- **Version**: 1.0.0
271- **Last Updated**: February 2026
272- **Compatible with**: ToolUniverse 0.5+
273- **Focus**: Phase 1/2 early clinical development