Clinical Trial Design Feasibility Assessment
Systematically assess clinical trial feasibility by analyzing 6 research dimensions. Produces comprehensive feasibility reports with quantitative enrollment projections, endpoint recommendations, and regulatory pathway analysis.
IMPORTANT: Always use English terms in tool calls (drug names, disease names, biomarker names), even if the user writes in another language. Only try original-language terms as a fallback if English returns no results. Respond in the user's language.
Reasoning Before Searching
Trial design starts with the question, not the methods. Answer these four questions before running any tools — they determine everything else:
- What is the primary endpoint? Is it overall survival (gold standard but slow), PFS (faster but surrogate), ORR (single-arm friendly but not always accepted), or a biomarker (needs validation as surrogate first)? The endpoint determines FDA pathway, statistical design, and duration.
- Who is the population? Broad unselected vs. biomarker-enriched. Enriched populations have higher response rates, allowing smaller trials — but require a validated companion diagnostic and reduce the eligible patient pool.
- What is the comparator? Placebo (only if no standard of care exists), active control (requires non-inferiority or superiority framing), or single-arm with historical control (acceptable for rare diseases or breakthrough designations, but FDA scrutiny is high).
- Is the effect size realistic given the mechanism? A 20% improvement in ORR over SOC requires ~100 patients per arm. A 50% improvement requires ~30. If the mechanism only justifies a 10% improvement, the trial may be underpowered regardless of design. Check precedent effect sizes in similar trials before committing to an endpoint.
These four answers determine sample size, duration, and trial design. Look them up from precedent trials and FDA guidance — do not derive them from first principles.
LOOK UP DON'T GUESS: Never assume what the standard of care is for an indication — look it up with DrugBank and FDA tools. Never assume an endpoint is FDA-accepted — verify with search_clinical_trials precedents and OpenFDA_get_approval_history. Never estimate prevalence from memory — use OpenTargets, gnomAD, or COSMIC.
Core Principles
1. Report-First Approach (MANDATORY)
DO NOT show tool outputs to user. Instead:
- Create
[INDICATION]_trial_feasibility_report.md FIRST
- Initialize with all section headers
- Progressively update as data arrives
- Present only the final report
2. Evidence Grading System
| Grade |
Symbol |
Criteria |
Examples |
| A |
3-star |
Regulatory acceptance, multiple precedents |
FDA-approved endpoint in same indication |
| B |
2-star |
Clinical validation, single precedent |
Phase 3 trial in related indication |
| C |
1-star |
Preclinical or exploratory |
Phase 1 use, biomarker validation ongoing |
| D |
0-star |
Proposed, no validation |
Novel endpoint, no precedent |
3. Feasibility Score (0-100)
Weighted composite score:
- Patient Availability (30%): Population size x biomarker prevalence x geography
- Endpoint Precedent (25%): Historical use, regulatory acceptance
- Regulatory Clarity (20%): Pathway defined, precedents exist
- Comparator Feasibility (15%): Standard of care availability
- Safety Monitoring (10%): Known risks, monitoring established
Interpretation: >=75 HIGH (proceed), 50-74 MODERATE (additional validation), <50 LOW (de-risking required)
When to Use This Skill
Apply when users:
- Plan early-phase trials (Phase 1/2 emphasis)
- Need enrollment feasibility assessment
- Design biomarker-selected trials
- Evaluate endpoint strategies
- Assess regulatory pathways
- Compare trial design options
- Need safety monitoring plans
Trigger phrases: "clinical trial design", "trial feasibility", "enrollment projections", "endpoint selection", "trial planning", "Phase 1/2 design", "basket trial", "biomarker trial"
Core Strategy: 6 Research Paths
Execute 6 parallel research dimensions. See STUDY_DESIGN_PROCEDURES.md for detailed steps per path.
Trial Design Query
|
+-- PATH 1: Patient Population Sizing
| Disease prevalence, biomarker prevalence, geographic distribution,
| eligibility criteria impact, enrollment projections
|
+-- PATH 2: Biomarker Prevalence & Testing
| Mutation frequency, testing availability, turnaround time,
| cost/reimbursement, alternative biomarkers
|
+-- PATH 3: Comparator Selection
| Standard of care, approved comparators, historical controls,
| placebo appropriateness, combination therapy
|
+-- PATH 4: Endpoint Selection
| Primary endpoint precedents, FDA acceptance history,
| measurement feasibility, surrogate vs clinical endpoints
|
+-- PATH 5: Safety Endpoints & Monitoring
| Mechanism-based toxicity, class effects, organ-specific monitoring,
| DLT history, safety monitoring plan
|
+-- PATH 6: Regulatory Pathway
Regulatory precedents (505(b)(1), 505(b)(2)), breakthrough therapy,
orphan drug, fast track, FDA guidance
Report Structure (14 Sections)
Create [INDICATION]_trial_feasibility_report.md with all 14 sections. See REPORT_TEMPLATE.md for full templates with fillable fields.
- Executive Summary - Feasibility score, key findings, go/no-go recommendation
- Disease Background - Prevalence, incidence, SOC, unmet need
- Patient Population Analysis - Base population, biomarker selection, eligibility funnel, enrollment projections
- Biomarker Strategy - Primary biomarker, alternatives, testing logistics
- Endpoint Selection & Justification - Primary/secondary/exploratory endpoints, statistical considerations
- Comparator Analysis - SOC, trial design options (single-arm vs randomized vs non-inferiority), drug sourcing
- Safety Endpoints & Monitoring Plan - DLT definition, mechanism-based toxicities, organ monitoring, SMC
- Study Design Recommendations - Phase, design type, schema, eligibility, treatment plan, assessment schedule
- Enrollment & Site Strategy - Site selection, enrollment projections, recruitment strategies
- Regulatory Pathway - FDA pathway, precedents, pre-IND meeting, IND timeline
- Budget & Resource Considerations - Cost drivers, timeline, FTE requirements
- Risk Assessment - Feasibility risks, scientific risks, mitigation strategies
- Success Criteria & Go/No-Go Decision - Phase 1/2 criteria, interim analysis, feasibility scorecard
- Recommendations & Next Steps - Final recommendation, critical path to IND, alternative designs
Tool Reference by Research Path
PATH 1: Patient Population Sizing
OpenTargets_get_disease_id_description_by_name - Disease lookup
OpenTargets_get_diseases_phenotypes_by_target_ensembl - Prevalence data
ClinVar_search_variants - Biomarker mutation frequency
gnomad_search_variants - Population allele frequencies
PubMed_search_articles - Epidemiology literature
search_clinical_trials - Enrollment feasibility from past trials
PATH 2: Biomarker Prevalence & Testing
ClinVar_get_variant_details - Variant pathogenicity
COSMIC_search_mutations - Cancer-specific mutation frequencies
gnomad_get_variant - Population genetics
PubMed_search_articles - CDx test performance, guidelines
PATH 3: Comparator Selection
drugbank_get_drug_basic_info_by_drug_name_or_id - Drug info
drugbank_get_indications_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id - Approved indications
drugbank_get_pharmacology_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id - Mechanism
FDA_OrangeBook_search_drug - Generic availability
OpenFDA_get_approval_history - Approval details
search_clinical_trials - Historical control data
PATH 4: Endpoint Selection
search_clinical_trials - Precedent trials, endpoints used
PubMed_search_articles - FDA acceptance history, endpoint validation
OpenFDA_get_approval_history - Approved endpoints by indication
PATH 5: Safety Endpoints & Monitoring
drugbank_get_pharmacology_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id - Mechanism toxicity
FDA_get_warnings_and_cautions_by_drug_name - FDA black box warnings
FAERS_search_reports_by_drug_and_reaction - Real-world adverse events
FAERS_count_reactions_by_drug_event - AE frequency
FAERS_count_death_related_by_drug - Serious outcomes
PubMed_search_articles - DLT definitions, monitoring strategies
PATH 6: Regulatory Pathway
OpenFDA_get_approval_history - Precedent approvals
PubMed_search_articles - Breakthrough designations, FDA guidance
search_clinical_trials - Regulatory precedents (accelerated approval)
Quick Start Example
from tooluniverse import ToolUniverse
tu = ToolUniverse(use_cache=True)
tu.load_tools()
# Example: EGFR+ NSCLC trial feasibility
# Step 1: Disease prevalence
disease_info = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_disease_id_description_by_name(
diseaseName="non-small cell lung cancer"
)
prevalence = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_diseases_phenotypes(
efoId=disease_info['data']['id']
)
# Step 2: Biomarker prevalence
variants = tu.tools.ClinVar_search_variants(gene="EGFR", significance="pathogenic")
# Step 3: Precedent trials
trials = tu.tools.search_clinical_trials(
condition="EGFR positive non-small cell lung cancer",
status="completed", phase="2"
)
# Step 4: Standard of care comparator
soc = tu.tools.FDA_OrangeBook_search_drug(ingredient="osimertinib")
# Compile into feasibility report...
See WORKFLOW_DETAILS.md for the complete 6-path Python workflow and use case examples.
Integration with Other Skills
- tooluniverse-drug-research: Investigate mechanism, preclinical data
- tooluniverse-disease-research: Deep dive on disease biology
- tooluniverse-target-research: Validate drug target, essentiality
- tooluniverse-pharmacovigilance: Post-market safety for comparator drugs
- tooluniverse-precision-oncology: Biomarker biology, resistance mechanisms
Programmatic Access (Beyond Tools)
When ToolUniverse tools return limited trial metadata, use the ClinicalTrials.gov v2 API directly:
import requests, pandas as pd
# Search with pagination (all lung cancer immunotherapy trials with results)
all_studies = []
token = None
while True:
params = {"query.cond": "lung cancer", "query.intr": "immunotherapy",
"filter.overallStatus": "COMPLETED", "filter.results": "WITH_RESULTS", "pageSize": 100}
if token: params["pageToken"] = token
resp = requests.get("https://clinicaltrials.gov/api/v2/studies", params=params).json()
all_studies.extend(resp.get("studies", []))
token = resp.get("nextPageToken")
if not token: break
# Extract structured data
rows = []
for s in all_studies:
proto = s.get("protocolSection", {})
rows.append({
"nctId": proto.get("identificationModule", {}).get("nctId"),
"title": proto.get("identificationModule", {}).get("briefTitle"),
"enrollment": proto.get("designModule", {}).get("enrollmentInfo", {}).get("count"),
"phase": proto.get("designModule", {}).get("phases", [None])[0] if proto.get("designModule", {}).get("phases") else None,
})
df = pd.DataFrame(rows)
# FDA drug approval history
drug = "pembrolizumab"
fda = requests.get(f"https://api.fda.gov/drug/drugsfda.json?search=openfda.brand_name:{drug}&limit=10").json()
See tooluniverse-data-wrangling skill for pagination, error handling, and bulk download patterns.
Reference Files
| File |
Content |
REPORT_TEMPLATE.md |
Full 14-section report template with fillable fields |
STUDY_DESIGN_PROCEDURES.md |
Detailed steps for each of the 6 research paths |
WORKFLOW_DETAILS.md |
Complete Python example workflow and 5 use case summaries |
BEST_PRACTICES.md |
Best practices, common pitfalls, output format requirements |
EXAMPLES.md |
Additional examples |
QUICK_START.md |
Quick start guide |
Version Information
- Version: 1.0.0
- Last Updated: February 2026
- Compatible with: ToolUniverse 0.5+
- Focus: Phase 1/2 early clinical development
1---
2name: tooluniverse-clinical-trial-design
3description: Strategic clinical trial design feasibility assessment. Analyzes 6 dimensions (endpoint, population, comparator, effect size, duration, regulatory pathway) using precedent trials and FDA guidance. Produces enrollment projections, endpoint recommendations, and approval-pathway analysis. Use for trial-protocol design, power/sample-size estimation, comparator selection, and FDA submission strategy. Driven by precedent-based reasoning rather than first-principles math.
4disable-model-invocation: true
5---
6
7# Clinical Trial Design Feasibility Assessment
8
9Systematically assess clinical trial feasibility by analyzing 6 research dimensions. Produces comprehensive feasibility reports with quantitative enrollment projections, endpoint recommendations, and regulatory pathway analysis.
10
11**IMPORTANT**: Always use English terms in tool calls (drug names, disease names, biomarker names), even if the user writes in another language. Only try original-language terms as a fallback if English returns no results. Respond in the user's language.
12
13## Reasoning Before Searching
14
15Trial design starts with the question, not the methods. Answer these four questions before running any tools — they determine everything else:
16
171. **What is the primary endpoint?** Is it overall survival (gold standard but slow), PFS (faster but surrogate), ORR (single-arm friendly but not always accepted), or a biomarker (needs validation as surrogate first)? The endpoint determines FDA pathway, statistical design, and duration.
182. **Who is the population?** Broad unselected vs. biomarker-enriched. Enriched populations have higher response rates, allowing smaller trials — but require a validated companion diagnostic and reduce the eligible patient pool.
193. **What is the comparator?** Placebo (only if no standard of care exists), active control (requires non-inferiority or superiority framing), or single-arm with historical control (acceptable for rare diseases or breakthrough designations, but FDA scrutiny is high).
204. **Is the effect size realistic given the mechanism?** A 20% improvement in ORR over SOC requires ~100 patients per arm. A 50% improvement requires ~30. If the mechanism only justifies a 10% improvement, the trial may be underpowered regardless of design. Check precedent effect sizes in similar trials before committing to an endpoint.
21
22These four answers determine sample size, duration, and trial design. Look them up from precedent trials and FDA guidance — do not derive them from first principles.
23
24**LOOK UP DON'T GUESS**: Never assume what the standard of care is for an indication — look it up with DrugBank and FDA tools. Never assume an endpoint is FDA-accepted — verify with `search_clinical_trials` precedents and `OpenFDA_get_approval_history`. Never estimate prevalence from memory — use OpenTargets, gnomAD, or COSMIC.
25
26## Core Principles
27
28### 1. Report-First Approach (MANDATORY)
29**DO NOT** show tool outputs to user. Instead:
301. Create `[INDICATION]_trial_feasibility_report.md` FIRST
312. Initialize with all section headers
323. Progressively update as data arrives
334. Present only the final report
34
35### 2. Evidence Grading System
36
37| Grade | Symbol | Criteria | Examples |
38|-------|--------|----------|----------|
39| **A** | 3-star | Regulatory acceptance, multiple precedents | FDA-approved endpoint in same indication |
40| **B** | 2-star | Clinical validation, single precedent | Phase 3 trial in related indication |
41| **C** | 1-star | Preclinical or exploratory | Phase 1 use, biomarker validation ongoing |
42| **D** | 0-star | Proposed, no validation | Novel endpoint, no precedent |
43
44### 3. Feasibility Score (0-100)
45Weighted composite score:
46- **Patient Availability** (30%): Population size x biomarker prevalence x geography
47- **Endpoint Precedent** (25%): Historical use, regulatory acceptance
48- **Regulatory Clarity** (20%): Pathway defined, precedents exist
49- **Comparator Feasibility** (15%): Standard of care availability
50- **Safety Monitoring** (10%): Known risks, monitoring established
51
52**Interpretation**: >=75 HIGH (proceed), 50-74 MODERATE (additional validation), <50 LOW (de-risking required)
53
54---
55
56## When to Use This Skill
57
58Apply when users:
59- Plan early-phase trials (Phase 1/2 emphasis)
60- Need enrollment feasibility assessment
61- Design biomarker-selected trials
62- Evaluate endpoint strategies
63- Assess regulatory pathways
64- Compare trial design options
65- Need safety monitoring plans
66
67**Trigger phrases**: "clinical trial design", "trial feasibility", "enrollment projections", "endpoint selection", "trial planning", "Phase 1/2 design", "basket trial", "biomarker trial"
68
69---
70
71## Core Strategy: 6 Research Paths
72
73Execute 6 parallel research dimensions. See `STUDY_DESIGN_PROCEDURES.md` for detailed steps per path.
74
75```
76Trial Design Query
77|
78+-- PATH 1: Patient Population Sizing
79| Disease prevalence, biomarker prevalence, geographic distribution,
80| eligibility criteria impact, enrollment projections
81|
82+-- PATH 2: Biomarker Prevalence & Testing
83| Mutation frequency, testing availability, turnaround time,
84| cost/reimbursement, alternative biomarkers
85|
86+-- PATH 3: Comparator Selection
87| Standard of care, approved comparators, historical controls,
88| placebo appropriateness, combination therapy
89|
90+-- PATH 4: Endpoint Selection
91| Primary endpoint precedents, FDA acceptance history,
92| measurement feasibility, surrogate vs clinical endpoints
93|
94+-- PATH 5: Safety Endpoints & Monitoring
95| Mechanism-based toxicity, class effects, organ-specific monitoring,
96| DLT history, safety monitoring plan
97|
98+-- PATH 6: Regulatory Pathway
99 Regulatory precedents (505(b)(1), 505(b)(2)), breakthrough therapy,
100 orphan drug, fast track, FDA guidance
101```
102
103---
104
105## Report Structure (14 Sections)
106
107Create `[INDICATION]_trial_feasibility_report.md` with all 14 sections. See `REPORT_TEMPLATE.md` for full templates with fillable fields.
108
1091. **Executive Summary** - Feasibility score, key findings, go/no-go recommendation
1102. **Disease Background** - Prevalence, incidence, SOC, unmet need
1113. **Patient Population Analysis** - Base population, biomarker selection, eligibility funnel, enrollment projections
1124. **Biomarker Strategy** - Primary biomarker, alternatives, testing logistics
1135. **Endpoint Selection & Justification** - Primary/secondary/exploratory endpoints, statistical considerations
1146. **Comparator Analysis** - SOC, trial design options (single-arm vs randomized vs non-inferiority), drug sourcing
1157. **Safety Endpoints & Monitoring Plan** - DLT definition, mechanism-based toxicities, organ monitoring, SMC
1168. **Study Design Recommendations** - Phase, design type, schema, eligibility, treatment plan, assessment schedule
1179. **Enrollment & Site Strategy** - Site selection, enrollment projections, recruitment strategies
11810. **Regulatory Pathway** - FDA pathway, precedents, pre-IND meeting, IND timeline
11911. **Budget & Resource Considerations** - Cost drivers, timeline, FTE requirements
12012. **Risk Assessment** - Feasibility risks, scientific risks, mitigation strategies
12113. **Success Criteria & Go/No-Go Decision** - Phase 1/2 criteria, interim analysis, feasibility scorecard
12214. **Recommendations & Next Steps** - Final recommendation, critical path to IND, alternative designs
123
124---
125
126## Tool Reference by Research Path
127
128### PATH 1: Patient Population Sizing
129- `OpenTargets_get_disease_id_description_by_name` - Disease lookup
130- `OpenTargets_get_diseases_phenotypes_by_target_ensembl` - Prevalence data
131- `ClinVar_search_variants` - Biomarker mutation frequency
132- `gnomad_search_variants` - Population allele frequencies
133- `PubMed_search_articles` - Epidemiology literature
134- `search_clinical_trials` - Enrollment feasibility from past trials
135
136### PATH 2: Biomarker Prevalence & Testing
137- `ClinVar_get_variant_details` - Variant pathogenicity
138- `COSMIC_search_mutations` - Cancer-specific mutation frequencies
139- `gnomad_get_variant` - Population genetics
140- `PubMed_search_articles` - CDx test performance, guidelines
141
142### PATH 3: Comparator Selection
143- `drugbank_get_drug_basic_info_by_drug_name_or_id` - Drug info
144- `drugbank_get_indications_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id` - Approved indications
145- `drugbank_get_pharmacology_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id` - Mechanism
146- `FDA_OrangeBook_search_drug` - Generic availability
147- `OpenFDA_get_approval_history` - Approval details
148- `search_clinical_trials` - Historical control data
149
150### PATH 4: Endpoint Selection
151- `search_clinical_trials` - Precedent trials, endpoints used
152- `PubMed_search_articles` - FDA acceptance history, endpoint validation
153- `OpenFDA_get_approval_history` - Approved endpoints by indication
154
155### PATH 5: Safety Endpoints & Monitoring
156- `drugbank_get_pharmacology_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id` - Mechanism toxicity
157- `FDA_get_warnings_and_cautions_by_drug_name` - FDA black box warnings
158- `FAERS_search_reports_by_drug_and_reaction` - Real-world adverse events
159- `FAERS_count_reactions_by_drug_event` - AE frequency
160- `FAERS_count_death_related_by_drug` - Serious outcomes
161- `PubMed_search_articles` - DLT definitions, monitoring strategies
162
163### PATH 6: Regulatory Pathway
164- `OpenFDA_get_approval_history` - Precedent approvals
165- `PubMed_search_articles` - Breakthrough designations, FDA guidance
166- `search_clinical_trials` - Regulatory precedents (accelerated approval)
167
168---
169
170## Quick Start Example
171
172```python
173from tooluniverse import ToolUniverse
174
175tu = ToolUniverse(use_cache=True)
176tu.load_tools()
177
178# Example: EGFR+ NSCLC trial feasibility
179# Step 1: Disease prevalence
180disease_info = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_disease_id_description_by_name(
181 diseaseName="non-small cell lung cancer"
182)
183prevalence = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_diseases_phenotypes(
184 efoId=disease_info['data']['id']
185)
186
187# Step 2: Biomarker prevalence
188variants = tu.tools.ClinVar_search_variants(gene="EGFR", significance="pathogenic")
189
190# Step 3: Precedent trials
191trials = tu.tools.search_clinical_trials(
192 condition="EGFR positive non-small cell lung cancer",
193 status="completed", phase="2"
194)
195
196# Step 4: Standard of care comparator
197soc = tu.tools.FDA_OrangeBook_search_drug(ingredient="osimertinib")
198
199# Compile into feasibility report...
200```
201
202See `WORKFLOW_DETAILS.md` for the complete 6-path Python workflow and use case examples.
203
204---
205
206## Integration with Other Skills
207
208- **tooluniverse-drug-research**: Investigate mechanism, preclinical data
209- **tooluniverse-disease-research**: Deep dive on disease biology
210- **tooluniverse-target-research**: Validate drug target, essentiality
211- **tooluniverse-pharmacovigilance**: Post-market safety for comparator drugs
212- **tooluniverse-precision-oncology**: Biomarker biology, resistance mechanisms
213
214---
215
216## Programmatic Access (Beyond Tools)
217
218When ToolUniverse tools return limited trial metadata, use the ClinicalTrials.gov v2 API directly:
219
220```python
221import requests, pandas as pd
222
223# Search with pagination (all lung cancer immunotherapy trials with results)
224all_studies = []
225token = None
226while True:
227 params = {"query.cond": "lung cancer", "query.intr": "immunotherapy",
228 "filter.overallStatus": "COMPLETED", "filter.results": "WITH_RESULTS", "pageSize": 100}
229 if token: params["pageToken"] = token
230 resp = requests.get("https://clinicaltrials.gov/api/v2/studies", params=params).json()
231 all_studies.extend(resp.get("studies", []))
232 token = resp.get("nextPageToken")
233 if not token: break
234
235# Extract structured data
236rows = []
237for s in all_studies:
238 proto = s.get("protocolSection", {})
239 rows.append({
240 "nctId": proto.get("identificationModule", {}).get("nctId"),
241 "title": proto.get("identificationModule", {}).get("briefTitle"),
242 "enrollment": proto.get("designModule", {}).get("enrollmentInfo", {}).get("count"),
243 "phase": proto.get("designModule", {}).get("phases", [None])[0] if proto.get("designModule", {}).get("phases") else None,
244 })
245df = pd.DataFrame(rows)
246
247# FDA drug approval history
248drug = "pembrolizumab"
249fda = requests.get(f"https://api.fda.gov/drug/drugsfda.json?search=openfda.brand_name:{drug}&limit=10").json()
250```
251
252See `tooluniverse-data-wrangling` skill for pagination, error handling, and bulk download patterns.
253
254---
255
256## Reference Files
257
258| File | Content |
259|------|---------|
260| `REPORT_TEMPLATE.md` | Full 14-section report template with fillable fields |
261| `STUDY_DESIGN_PROCEDURES.md` | Detailed steps for each of the 6 research paths |
262| `WORKFLOW_DETAILS.md` | Complete Python example workflow and 5 use case summaries |
263| `BEST_PRACTICES.md` | Best practices, common pitfalls, output format requirements |
264| `EXAMPLES.md` | Additional examples |
265| `QUICK_START.md` | Quick start guide |
266
267---
268
269## Version Information
270
271- **Version**: 1.0.0
272- **Last Updated**: February 2026
273- **Compatible with**: ToolUniverse 0.5+
274- **Focus**: Phase 1/2 early clinical development