Single-Cell Genomics and Expression Matrix Analysis
RULE ZERO — Check for pre-computed results FIRST
Before following any instruction below, scan the data folder for:
*_executed.ipynb → read with tu run read_executed_notebook '{"data_folder":"<path>","search":"<keyword>"}' and cite its cell outputs as the authoritative answer
- Pre-computed result files (CSV/TSV with names like
*results*, *deseq*, *enrich*, *stats*, *_simplified.csv) → read directly and report the requested value
- Canonical analysis scripts (
analysis.R, run_*.py, find_*.R, *.Rmd) → execute as-is and read the output
Only follow this skill's re-analysis recipe below if none of the above exist. Re-running from raw data produces different numbers than the published answer and is much slower (often 5-10× turn count).
Comprehensive single-cell RNA-seq analysis and expression matrix processing using scanpy, anndata, scipy, and ToolUniverse.
LOOK UP, DON'T GUESS
When uncertain about any scientific fact, SEARCH databases first (PubMed, UniProt, ChEMBL, ClinVar, etc.) rather than reasoning from memory. A database-verified answer is always more reliable than a guess.
When to Use This Skill
Apply when users:
- Have scRNA-seq data (h5ad, 10X, CSV count matrices) and want analysis
- Need scRNA-seq quality control / QC gating: deciding cell filters by
mito % (pct_counts_mt), gene/UMI counts, doublets, ambient RNA, empty droplets
- Ask about cell type identification, clustering, or annotation
- Need differential expression analysis by cell type or condition
- Want gene-expression correlation analysis (e.g., gene length vs expression by cell type)
- Ask about PCA, UMAP, t-SNE for expression data
- Need Leiden/Louvain clustering on expression matrices
- Want statistical comparisons between cell types (t-test, ANOVA, fold change)
- Ask about marker genes, batch correction, trajectory, or cell-cell communication
NOT for (use other skills instead):
- Bulk RNA-seq DESeq2 only ->
tooluniverse-rnaseq-deseq2
- Gene enrichment only ->
tooluniverse-gene-enrichment
- VCF/variant analysis ->
tooluniverse-variant-analysis
Core Principles
- Data-first - Load, inspect, validate before analysis
- AnnData-centric - All data flows through anndata objects
- Cell type awareness - Per-cell-type subsetting when needed
- Statistical rigor - Normalization, multiple testing correction, effect sizes
- Question-driven - Parse what the user is actually asking
Required Packages
import scanpy as sc, anndata as ad, pandas as pd, numpy as np
from scipy import stats
from scipy.cluster.hierarchy import linkage, fcluster
from sklearn.decomposition import PCA
from statsmodels.stats.multitest import multipletests
import gseapy as gp # enrichment
import harmonypy # batch correction (optional)
Install: pip install scanpy anndata leidenalg umap-learn harmonypy gseapy pandas numpy scipy scikit-learn statsmodels
Workflow Decision Tree
START: User question about scRNA-seq data
|
+-- FULL PIPELINE (raw counts -> annotated clusters)
| Workflow: QC -> Normalize -> HVG -> PCA -> Cluster -> Annotate -> DE
| See: references/scanpy_workflow.md
|
+-- DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION (per-cell-type comparison)
| Most common pattern: per-cell-type DE
| See: analysis_patterns.md "Pattern 1"
|
+-- CORRELATION ANALYSIS (gene property vs expression)
| Pattern: Gene length vs expression correlation
| See: analysis_patterns.md "Pattern 2"
|
+-- CLUSTERING & PCA (expression matrix analysis)
| See: references/clustering_guide.md
|
+-- CELL COMMUNICATION (ligand-receptor interactions)
| See: references/cell_communication.md
|
+-- TRAJECTORY ANALYSIS (pseudotime)
See: references/trajectory_analysis.md
Data format handling:
- h5ad ->
sc.read_h5ad()
- 10X ->
sc.read_10x_mtx() or sc.read_10x_h5()
- CSV/TSV ->
pd.read_csv() -> Convert to AnnData (check orientation!)
Data Loading
AnnData expects: cells/samples as rows (obs), genes as columns (var)
adata = sc.read_h5ad("data.h5ad") # h5ad already oriented
# CSV/TSV: check orientation
df = pd.read_csv("counts.csv", index_col=0)
if df.shape[0] > df.shape[1] * 5: # genes > samples by 5x => transpose
df = df.T
adata = ad.AnnData(df)
# Load metadata
meta = pd.read_csv("metadata.csv", index_col=0)
common = adata.obs_names.intersection(meta.index)
adata = adata[common].copy()
for col in meta.columns:
adata.obs[col] = meta.loc[common, col]
Quality Control and QC Gating (do this BEFORE downstream analysis)
QC gating decides which cells and genes are real before normalization,
clustering, or DE. Skipping or rushing it propagates silently: doublets become
fake "intermediate" states, ambient RNA smears markers across clusters, and
empty droplets inflate cell counts. Never report a filtered cell count without
the gates applied, and never report cutoffs you did not actually run.
HONEST EXECUTION: QC runs scanpy/AnnData via Bash/Python. If scanpy is not
installed, do NOT fabricate metrics — print the install plan and stop:
python scripts/scrna_qc.py --install-plan (exits 0, lists what is missing,
suggests pip install scanpy anndata scrublet).
Per-cell QC metrics (what to compute)
vn = adata.var_names.str.upper()
adata.var['mt'] = vn.str.startswith('MT-') # mitochondrial
adata.var['ribo'] = vn.str.startswith(('RPS', 'RPL')) # ribosomal protein
adata.var['hb'] = vn.str.contains(r'^HB[^P]', regex=True) # hemoglobin (RBC)
sc.pp.calculate_qc_metrics(
adata, qc_vars=['mt', 'ribo', 'hb'],
percent_top=None, # REQUIRED for small gene panels (<500) — else IndexError
log1p=True, inplace=True)
Key metrics in adata.obs: n_genes_by_counts, total_counts,
pct_counts_mt, pct_counts_ribo, pct_counts_hb.
WHY each metric flags a problem (reason from biology, not magic numbers)
- High
pct_counts_mt -> dying / stressed cell. A ruptured membrane lets
cytoplasmic mRNA leak out while mito transcripts stay trapped, enriching the
captured RNA for mito. Cutoff is tissue-dependent (cardiomyocytes/hepatocytes
are mito-rich at baseline — a blanket 10% would discard healthy cells).
- Low
n_genes_by_counts / total_counts -> empty droplet or debris
(only ambient RNA captured; few genes, low depth).
- Very high counts/genes -> doublet (two transcriptomes ~double depth and
diversity) — but high count alone is weak; use a doublet caller (below).
- High
pct_counts_hb -> RBC/blood contamination in solid tissue.
Choosing thresholds — distribution-aware (MAD), not hardcoded
Hardcoded cutoffs (mt<5%, n_genes<2500) are a starting point only; they
break on mito-rich tissues and on shallow vs deep libraries. Prefer a
MAD-based rule (robust to the very outliers you are removing): flag cells
nmads median-absolute-deviations from the median. Use nmads=5 on
log1p counts/genes (both tails), nmads=3 upper-only on pct_counts_mt, and
pair mito with a biological ceiling so a uniformly degraded sample doesn't pass.
Always visualize distributions first (violin + total_counts vs
pct_counts_mt scatter — dying cells sit in the low-count/high-mito corner).
Run the helper (computes metrics + MAD gating, reports per-step removals):
python scripts/scrna_qc.py data.h5ad --doublets # or --install-plan first
Doublets, ambient RNA, empty droplets (per-cell metrics miss these)
- Doublets: Scrublet (
sc.pp.scrublet, scanpy >=1.10) or scDblFinder (R).
Run per sample before merging; flag-cluster-drop (doublets form bridge
clusters). expected_doublet_rate ~0.8%/1,000 cells recovered (10x).
- Ambient RNA: cell-free "soup" mRNA in every droplet — a count-correction
step (SoupX / DecontX, R), NOT a cell filter. Per-cell QC cannot detect it;
suspect it when markers look implausibly ubiquitous.
- Empty droplets: upstream of per-cell QC. CellRanger's filtered matrix
already applies an EmptyDrops-style call; with only the raw matrix, run
EmptyDrops (DropletUtils, R) or a barcode-rank knee before per-cell QC.
QC Interpretation Table (metric -> concern -> action)
| QC metric |
Direction |
Typical concern |
Suggested action |
pct_counts_mt |
high |
Dying / stressed cell (membrane rupture) |
Filter (MAD upper + tissue-aware ceiling; raise ceiling for mito-rich tissue) |
n_genes_by_counts |
very low |
Empty droplet / debris |
Filter (min_genes ~200 + low-tail MAD) |
total_counts |
very low |
Shallow / failed capture |
Filter (low-tail MAD; check barcode-rank knee) |
n_genes_by_counts / total_counts |
very high |
Doublet (two cells in one droplet) |
Flag, run Scrublet/scDblFinder, then drop — don't hard-cap on counts alone |
predicted_doublet (Scrublet) |
True |
Multiplet |
Filter per sample; cluster-then-drop if unsure |
pct_counts_hb |
high |
RBC / blood contamination |
Filter in non-blood tissue; investigate in blood |
pct_counts_ribo |
very high/low |
Low-complexity / stressed, or cell-type signal |
Flag / investigate (ribo is cell-type-specific; rarely a hard filter) |
| markers ubiquitous across clusters |
— |
Ambient RNA contamination |
Investigate — run SoupX/DecontX, do not silently proceed |
| many cells, low median counts |
— |
Empty droplets not removed |
Investigate — apply EmptyDrops / knee, re-filter |
Full reasoning, MAD code, Scrublet/SoupX/EmptyDrops recipes, and order of
operations: references/scrna_qc.md. Inline pipeline QC:
references/scanpy_workflow.md Phase 2.
Complete Pipeline (Quick Reference)
import scanpy as sc
adata = sc.read_10x_h5("filtered_feature_bc_matrix.h5")
# QC
adata.var['mt'] = adata.var_names.str.startswith('MT-')
sc.pp.calculate_qc_metrics(adata, qc_vars=['mt'], inplace=True)
adata = adata[adata.obs['pct_counts_mt'] < 20].copy()
sc.pp.filter_cells(adata, min_genes=200)
sc.pp.filter_genes(adata, min_cells=3)
# Normalize + HVG + PCA
sc.pp.normalize_total(adata, target_sum=1e4)
sc.pp.log1p(adata)
adata.raw = adata.copy()
sc.pp.highly_variable_genes(adata, n_top_genes=2000)
sc.tl.pca(adata, n_comps=50)
# Cluster + UMAP
sc.pp.neighbors(adata, n_pcs=30)
sc.tl.leiden(adata, resolution=0.5)
sc.tl.umap(adata)
# Find markers + Annotate + Per-cell-type DE
sc.tl.rank_genes_groups(adata, groupby='leiden', method='wilcoxon')
Differential Expression Decision Tree
Single-Cell DE (many cells per condition):
Use: sc.tl.rank_genes_groups(), methods: wilcoxon, t-test, logreg
Best for: Per-cell-type DE, marker gene finding
Pseudo-Bulk DE (aggregate counts by sample):
Use: R DESeq2 via `tu run run_deseq2_analysis` or Rscript (NOT pydeseq2 — gives different DEG counts)
Best for: Sample-level comparisons with replicates
Statistical Tests Only:
Use: scipy.stats (ttest_ind, f_oneway, pearsonr)
Best for: Correlation, ANOVA, t-tests on summaries
Statistical Tests (Quick Reference)
from scipy import stats
from statsmodels.stats.multitest import multipletests
# Pearson/Spearman correlation
r, p = stats.pearsonr(gene_lengths, mean_expression)
# Welch's t-test
t_stat, p_val = stats.ttest_ind(group1, group2, equal_var=False)
# ANOVA
f_stat, p_val = stats.f_oneway(group1, group2, group3)
# Multiple testing correction (BH)
reject, pvals_adj, _, _ = multipletests(pvals, method='fdr_bh')
Batch Correction (Harmony)
import harmonypy
sc.tl.pca(adata, n_comps=50)
ho = harmonypy.run_harmony(adata.obsm['X_pca'][:, :30], adata.obs, 'batch', random_state=0)
adata.obsm['X_pca_harmony'] = ho.Z_corr.T
sc.pp.neighbors(adata, use_rep='X_pca_harmony')
sc.tl.leiden(adata, resolution=0.5)
sc.tl.umap(adata)
ToolUniverse Integration
Data Discovery (before analysis)
- CxGDisc_search_datasets: Search CELLxGENE Discover for scRNA-seq datasets by disease, tissue, organism. Use broad disease terms (e.g., "breast cancer" not "triple-negative").
- GEO_search_rnaseq_datasets / geo_search_datasets: Search GEO for scRNA-seq studies
- NCBI_SRA_search_runs: Search SRA for sequencing runs (query="single cell RNA-seq [disease]")
- OmicsDI_search_datasets: Cross-repository dataset search
Cell Type Markers
- CellMarker_search_by_cell_type: Tissue-specific cell markers (use
CellMarker_list_cell_types first — exact names required, e.g., "Regulatory T(Treg) cell" not "Regulatory T cell")
- CellMarker_search_cancer_markers: Cancer-context markers with experimental evidence
- CellMarker_search_by_gene: Reverse lookup — which cell types express a gene?
- HPA_search_genes_by_query: Cell-type marker gene search
Gene Annotation
- MyGene_query_genes / MyGene_batch_query: Gene ID conversion
- ensembl_lookup_gene: Ensembl gene details
- UniProt_get_function_by_accession: Protein function
Cell-Cell Communication
- OmniPath_get_ligand_receptor_interactions: L-R pairs (CellPhoneDB, CellChatDB)
- OmniPath_get_signaling_interactions: Downstream signaling
- OmniPath_get_complexes: Multi-subunit receptors
Enrichment (Post-DE)
- PANTHER_enrichment: GO enrichment (BP, MF, CC)
- STRING_functional_enrichment: Network-based enrichment
- ReactomeAnalysis_pathway_enrichment: Reactome pathways
Clinical Context (for tumor immunology)
- DGIdb_get_drug_gene_interactions: Drug interactions for immune checkpoint targets (genes=["CD274"] for PD-L1)
- civic_search_evidence_items: Clinical evidence for mutations/biomarkers
- TIMER2_immune_estimation: TCGA immune infiltration correlation
- search_clinical_trials: Clinical trial matching
- GTEx_get_expression_summary: Normal tissue baseline expression
- PubMed_search_articles: Literature context
Scanpy vs Seurat Equivalents
| Operation |
Seurat (R) |
Scanpy (Python) |
| Load data |
Read10X() |
sc.read_10x_mtx() |
| Normalize |
NormalizeData() |
sc.pp.normalize_total() + sc.pp.log1p() |
| Find HVGs |
FindVariableFeatures() |
sc.pp.highly_variable_genes() |
| PCA |
RunPCA() |
sc.tl.pca() |
| Cluster |
FindClusters() |
sc.tl.leiden() |
| UMAP |
RunUMAP() |
sc.tl.umap() |
| Find markers |
FindMarkers() |
sc.tl.rank_genes_groups() |
| Batch correction |
RunHarmony() |
harmonypy.run_harmony() |
Reasoning Framework for Result Interpretation
Evidence Grading
| Grade |
Criteria |
Example |
| High confidence |
Marker padj < 0.01, log2FC > 1, expressed in > 25% of cluster cells |
CD3D as T-cell marker with padj = 1e-50, log2FC = 3.2, pct = 0.85 |
| Moderate confidence |
padj < 0.05, log2FC > 0.5, or expressed in 10-25% of cluster |
FOXP3 in Treg cluster with padj = 0.001, pct = 0.18 |
| Low confidence |
padj < 0.05 but log2FC < 0.5 or low pct_diff between clusters |
Ubiquitously expressed gene with marginal enrichment |
| Unreliable |
Fewer than 20 cells in cluster, or QC metrics suggest doublets |
Cluster with mean nGenes > 6000 and high doublet score |
Interpretation Guidance
- QC metric thresholds: Standard filters are nGenes > 200 (remove empty droplets), nGenes < 5000-6000 (remove doublets), pct_counts_mt < 20% (remove dying cells). These thresholds are tissue-dependent: immune cells tolerate stricter nGene filters; neurons may have higher mitochondrial content naturally. Always visualize distributions before setting cutoffs.
- Cluster resolution guidance: Leiden resolution 0.3-0.5 yields broad cell types (T cells, B cells, myeloid). Resolution 0.8-1.2 resolves subtypes (CD4 naive, CD4 memory, Treg). Resolution > 2.0 risks over-clustering (splitting biologically homogeneous populations). Validate by checking that each cluster has distinct marker genes.
- Marker gene confidence levels: A strong marker is highly specific (high pct_diff between cluster and rest) and highly expressed (high log2FC). Genes expressed in many clusters with small fold changes are poor markers. Cross-reference with known markers from CellMarker or HPA databases.
- Pseudo-bulk vs single-cell DE: For comparing conditions (treatment vs control), pseudo-bulk DE (aggregate by sample, then DESeq2) is more statistically valid than single-cell DE, which inflates significance due to non-independence of cells from the same sample.
- Batch effects: If samples cluster by batch rather than biology on UMAP, apply Harmony or other correction before biological interpretation.
Synthesis Questions
- Do the identified clusters correspond to known cell types based on canonical markers, or do some clusters lack clear biological identity (potentially doublets or low-quality cells)?
- At the chosen clustering resolution, are there clusters that merge when resolution is lowered, suggesting they may be a single cell type split by technical noise?
- For differential expression between conditions, are the results consistent between single-cell and pseudo-bulk approaches, and do the top DE genes have known biological relevance?
- Do QC-flagged cells (high mito, extreme gene counts) concentrate in specific clusters, and does removing them change the clustering structure?
- If batch correction was applied, do post-correction clusters still maintain expected cell-type-specific marker expression?
Troubleshooting
| Issue |
Solution |
ModuleNotFoundError: leidenalg |
pip install leidenalg |
| Sparse matrix errors |
.toarray(): X = adata.X.toarray() if issparse(adata.X) else adata.X |
| Wrong matrix orientation |
More genes than samples? Transpose |
| NaN in correlation |
Filter: valid = ~np.isnan(x) & ~np.isnan(y) |
| Too few cells for DE |
Need >= 3 cells per condition per cell type |
| Memory error |
Use sc.pp.highly_variable_genes() to reduce features |
Reference Documentation
Detailed Analysis Patterns: analysis_patterns.md (per-cell-type DE, correlation, PCA, ANOVA, cell communication)
Core Workflows:
- references/scrna_qc.md - scRNA-seq QC gating (mito%, doublets, ambient RNA, empty droplets, MAD thresholds)
- references/scanpy_workflow.md - Complete scanpy pipeline
- references/seurat_workflow.md - Seurat to Scanpy translation
- references/clustering_guide.md - Clustering methods
- references/marker_identification.md - Marker genes, annotation
- references/trajectory_analysis.md - Pseudotime
- references/cell_communication.md - OmniPath/CellPhoneDB workflow
- references/troubleshooting.md - Detailed error solutions
Analysis Conventions
DESeq2 library choice: match the authoritative script
If the data folder contains an authoritative script (run_*.py, analysis.R), use whichever DESeq2 library it uses (pydeseq2 or R DESeq2). The two libraries give slightly different DEG counts (~2-10% at the same thresholds), so matching matters. If no script exists, prefer R DESeq2 via the run_deseq2_analysis tool or Rscript:
tu run run_deseq2_analysis '{"operation":"deseq2","counts_file":"pseudo_bulk_counts.csv","metadata_file":"sample_meta.csv","design":"~ sex","contrast":"sex, M, F","lfc_shrinkage":true}'
1---2name: tooluniverse-single-cell3description: Single-cell RNA-seq analysis with scanpy/anndata — h5ad data loading, scRNA-seq quality control and QC gating (n_genes_by_counts, total_counts, mitochondrial percent / pct_counts_mt, pct_counts_ribo, doublet detection with Scrublet/scDblFinder, ambient RNA / SoupX awareness, empty-droplet filtering, MAD-based thresholds), normalization, dimensionality reduction (PCA, UMAP, t-SNE), clustering (Leiden, Louvain), marker gene identification, cell-type annotation, pseudotime/trajectory analysis. Use for any scRNA-seq workflow, including deciding which cells to filter, flag, or investigate before downstream analysis.4---5
6# Single-Cell Genomics and Expression Matrix Analysis
7
8## RULE ZERO — Check for pre-computed results FIRST
9
10Before following any instruction below, scan the data folder for:
11- `*_executed.ipynb` → read with `tu run read_executed_notebook '{"data_folder":"<path>","search":"<keyword>"}'` and cite its cell outputs as the authoritative answer
12- Pre-computed result files (CSV/TSV with names like `*results*`, `*deseq*`, `*enrich*`, `*stats*`, `*_simplified.csv`) → read directly and report the requested value
13- Canonical analysis scripts (`analysis.R`, `run_*.py`, `find_*.R`, `*.Rmd`) → execute as-is and read the output
14
15Only follow this skill's re-analysis recipe below if **none** of the above exist. Re-running from raw data produces different numbers than the published answer and is much slower (often 5-10× turn count).
16
17---
18
19Comprehensive single-cell RNA-seq analysis and expression matrix processing using scanpy, anndata, scipy, and ToolUniverse.
20
21---
22
23## LOOK UP, DON'T GUESS
24When uncertain about any scientific fact, SEARCH databases first (PubMed, UniProt, ChEMBL, ClinVar, etc.) rather than reasoning from memory. A database-verified answer is always more reliable than a guess.
25
26---
27
28## When to Use This Skill
29
30Apply when users:
31- Have scRNA-seq data (h5ad, 10X, CSV count matrices) and want analysis
32- Need scRNA-seq quality control / QC gating: deciding cell filters by
33 mito % (pct_counts_mt), gene/UMI counts, doublets, ambient RNA, empty droplets
34- Ask about cell type identification, clustering, or annotation
35- Need differential expression analysis by cell type or condition
36- Want gene-expression correlation analysis (e.g., gene length vs expression by cell type)
37- Ask about PCA, UMAP, t-SNE for expression data
38- Need Leiden/Louvain clustering on expression matrices
39- Want statistical comparisons between cell types (t-test, ANOVA, fold change)
40- Ask about marker genes, batch correction, trajectory, or cell-cell communication
41
42**NOT for** (use other skills instead):
43- Bulk RNA-seq DESeq2 only -> `tooluniverse-rnaseq-deseq2`
44- Gene enrichment only -> `tooluniverse-gene-enrichment`
45- VCF/variant analysis -> `tooluniverse-variant-analysis`
46
47---
48
49## Core Principles
50
511. **Data-first** - Load, inspect, validate before analysis
522. **AnnData-centric** - All data flows through anndata objects
533. **Cell type awareness** - Per-cell-type subsetting when needed
544. **Statistical rigor** - Normalization, multiple testing correction, effect sizes
555. **Question-driven** - Parse what the user is actually asking
56
57---
58
59## Required Packages
60
61```python
62import scanpy as sc, anndata as ad, pandas as pd, numpy as np
63from scipy import stats
64from scipy.cluster.hierarchy import linkage, fcluster
65from sklearn.decomposition import PCA
66from statsmodels.stats.multitest import multipletests
67import gseapy as gp # enrichment
68import harmonypy # batch correction (optional)
69```
70
71Install: `pip install scanpy anndata leidenalg umap-learn harmonypy gseapy pandas numpy scipy scikit-learn statsmodels`
72
73---
74
75## Workflow Decision Tree
76
77```
78START: User question about scRNA-seq data
79|
80+-- FULL PIPELINE (raw counts -> annotated clusters)
81| Workflow: QC -> Normalize -> HVG -> PCA -> Cluster -> Annotate -> DE
82| See: references/scanpy_workflow.md
83|
84+-- DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION (per-cell-type comparison)
85| Most common pattern: per-cell-type DE
86| See: analysis_patterns.md "Pattern 1"
87|
88+-- CORRELATION ANALYSIS (gene property vs expression)
89| Pattern: Gene length vs expression correlation
90| See: analysis_patterns.md "Pattern 2"
91|
92+-- CLUSTERING & PCA (expression matrix analysis)
93| See: references/clustering_guide.md
94|
95+-- CELL COMMUNICATION (ligand-receptor interactions)
96| See: references/cell_communication.md
97|
98+-- TRAJECTORY ANALYSIS (pseudotime)
99 See: references/trajectory_analysis.md
100```
101
102**Data format handling**:
103- h5ad -> `sc.read_h5ad()`
104- 10X -> `sc.read_10x_mtx()` or `sc.read_10x_h5()`
105- CSV/TSV -> `pd.read_csv()` -> Convert to AnnData (check orientation!)
106
107---
108
109## Data Loading
110
111AnnData expects: **cells/samples as rows (obs), genes as columns (var)**
112
113```python
114adata = sc.read_h5ad("data.h5ad") # h5ad already oriented
115
116# CSV/TSV: check orientation
117df = pd.read_csv("counts.csv", index_col=0)
118if df.shape[0] > df.shape[1] * 5: # genes > samples by 5x => transpose
119 df = df.T
120adata = ad.AnnData(df)
121
122# Load metadata
123meta = pd.read_csv("metadata.csv", index_col=0)
124common = adata.obs_names.intersection(meta.index)
125adata = adata[common].copy()
126for col in meta.columns:
127 adata.obs[col] = meta.loc[common, col]
128```
129
130---
131
132## Quality Control and QC Gating (do this BEFORE downstream analysis)
133
134QC gating decides **which cells and genes are real** before normalization,
135clustering, or DE. Skipping or rushing it propagates silently: doublets become
136fake "intermediate" states, ambient RNA smears markers across clusters, and
137empty droplets inflate cell counts. Never report a filtered cell count without
138the gates applied, and never report cutoffs you did not actually run.
139
140**HONEST EXECUTION**: QC runs scanpy/AnnData via Bash/Python. If scanpy is not
141installed, do NOT fabricate metrics — print the install plan and stop:
142`python scripts/scrna_qc.py --install-plan` (exits 0, lists what is missing,
143suggests `pip install scanpy anndata scrublet`).
144
145### Per-cell QC metrics (what to compute)
146
147```python
148vn = adata.var_names.str.upper()
149adata.var['mt'] = vn.str.startswith('MT-') # mitochondrial
150adata.var['ribo'] = vn.str.startswith(('RPS', 'RPL')) # ribosomal protein
151adata.var['hb'] = vn.str.contains(r'^HB[^P]', regex=True) # hemoglobin (RBC)
152sc.pp.calculate_qc_metrics(
153 adata, qc_vars=['mt', 'ribo', 'hb'],
154 percent_top=None, # REQUIRED for small gene panels (<500) — else IndexError
155 log1p=True, inplace=True)
156```
157
158Key metrics in `adata.obs`: `n_genes_by_counts`, `total_counts`,
159`pct_counts_mt`, `pct_counts_ribo`, `pct_counts_hb`.
160
161### WHY each metric flags a problem (reason from biology, not magic numbers)
162
163- **High `pct_counts_mt` -> dying / stressed cell.** A ruptured membrane lets
164 cytoplasmic mRNA leak out while mito transcripts stay trapped, enriching the
165 captured RNA for mito. Cutoff is tissue-dependent (cardiomyocytes/hepatocytes
166 are mito-rich at baseline — a blanket 10% would discard healthy cells).
167- **Low `n_genes_by_counts` / `total_counts` -> empty droplet or debris**
168 (only ambient RNA captured; few genes, low depth).
169- **Very high counts/genes -> doublet** (two transcriptomes ~double depth and
170 diversity) — but high count alone is weak; use a doublet caller (below).
171- **High `pct_counts_hb` -> RBC/blood contamination** in solid tissue.
172
173### Choosing thresholds — distribution-aware (MAD), not hardcoded
174
175Hardcoded cutoffs (`mt<5%`, `n_genes<2500`) are a starting point only; they
176break on mito-rich tissues and on shallow vs deep libraries. Prefer a
177**MAD-based** rule (robust to the very outliers you are removing): flag cells
178> `nmads` median-absolute-deviations from the median. Use `nmads=5` on
179log1p counts/genes (both tails), `nmads=3` upper-only on `pct_counts_mt`, and
180pair mito with a biological ceiling so a uniformly degraded sample doesn't pass.
181**Always visualize distributions first** (violin + `total_counts` vs
182`pct_counts_mt` scatter — dying cells sit in the low-count/high-mito corner).
183
184Run the helper (computes metrics + MAD gating, reports per-step removals):
185
186```bash
187python scripts/scrna_qc.py data.h5ad --doublets # or --install-plan first
188```
189
190### Doublets, ambient RNA, empty droplets (per-cell metrics miss these)
191
192- **Doublets**: Scrublet (`sc.pp.scrublet`, scanpy >=1.10) or scDblFinder (R).
193 Run **per sample** before merging; flag-cluster-drop (doublets form bridge
194 clusters). `expected_doublet_rate` ~0.8%/1,000 cells recovered (10x).
195- **Ambient RNA**: cell-free "soup" mRNA in every droplet — a count-correction
196 step (SoupX / DecontX, R), NOT a cell filter. Per-cell QC cannot detect it;
197 suspect it when markers look implausibly ubiquitous.
198- **Empty droplets**: upstream of per-cell QC. CellRanger's filtered matrix
199 already applies an EmptyDrops-style call; with only the raw matrix, run
200 EmptyDrops (DropletUtils, R) or a barcode-rank knee before per-cell QC.
201
202### QC Interpretation Table (metric -> concern -> action)
203
204| QC metric | Direction | Typical concern | Suggested action |
205|-----------|-----------|-----------------|------------------|
206| `pct_counts_mt` | high | Dying / stressed cell (membrane rupture) | **Filter** (MAD upper + tissue-aware ceiling; raise ceiling for mito-rich tissue) |
207| `n_genes_by_counts` | very low | Empty droplet / debris | **Filter** (`min_genes` ~200 + low-tail MAD) |
208| `total_counts` | very low | Shallow / failed capture | **Filter** (low-tail MAD; check barcode-rank knee) |
209| `n_genes_by_counts` / `total_counts` | very high | Doublet (two cells in one droplet) | **Flag**, run Scrublet/scDblFinder, then drop — don't hard-cap on counts alone |
210| `predicted_doublet` (Scrublet) | True | Multiplet | **Filter** per sample; cluster-then-drop if unsure |
211| `pct_counts_hb` | high | RBC / blood contamination | **Filter** in non-blood tissue; **investigate** in blood |
212| `pct_counts_ribo` | very high/low | Low-complexity / stressed, or cell-type signal | **Flag / investigate** (ribo is cell-type-specific; rarely a hard filter) |
213| markers ubiquitous across clusters | — | Ambient RNA contamination | **Investigate** — run SoupX/DecontX, do not silently proceed |
214| many cells, low median counts | — | Empty droplets not removed | **Investigate** — apply EmptyDrops / knee, re-filter |
215
216Full reasoning, MAD code, Scrublet/SoupX/EmptyDrops recipes, and order of
217operations: **references/scrna_qc.md**. Inline pipeline QC:
218**references/scanpy_workflow.md** Phase 2.
219
220---
221
222## Complete Pipeline (Quick Reference)
223
224```python
225import scanpy as sc
226
227adata = sc.read_10x_h5("filtered_feature_bc_matrix.h5")
228
229# QC
230adata.var['mt'] = adata.var_names.str.startswith('MT-')
231sc.pp.calculate_qc_metrics(adata, qc_vars=['mt'], inplace=True)
232adata = adata[adata.obs['pct_counts_mt'] < 20].copy()
233sc.pp.filter_cells(adata, min_genes=200)
234sc.pp.filter_genes(adata, min_cells=3)
235
236# Normalize + HVG + PCA
237sc.pp.normalize_total(adata, target_sum=1e4)
238sc.pp.log1p(adata)
239adata.raw = adata.copy()
240sc.pp.highly_variable_genes(adata, n_top_genes=2000)
241sc.tl.pca(adata, n_comps=50)
242
243# Cluster + UMAP
244sc.pp.neighbors(adata, n_pcs=30)
245sc.tl.leiden(adata, resolution=0.5)
246sc.tl.umap(adata)
247
248# Find markers + Annotate + Per-cell-type DE
249sc.tl.rank_genes_groups(adata, groupby='leiden', method='wilcoxon')
250```
251
252---
253
254## Differential Expression Decision Tree
255
256```
257Single-Cell DE (many cells per condition):
258 Use: sc.tl.rank_genes_groups(), methods: wilcoxon, t-test, logreg
259 Best for: Per-cell-type DE, marker gene finding
260
261Pseudo-Bulk DE (aggregate counts by sample):
262 Use: R DESeq2 via `tu run run_deseq2_analysis` or Rscript (NOT pydeseq2 — gives different DEG counts)
263 Best for: Sample-level comparisons with replicates
264
265Statistical Tests Only:
266 Use: scipy.stats (ttest_ind, f_oneway, pearsonr)
267 Best for: Correlation, ANOVA, t-tests on summaries
268```
269
270---
271
272## Statistical Tests (Quick Reference)
273
274```python
275from scipy import stats
276from statsmodels.stats.multitest import multipletests
277
278# Pearson/Spearman correlation
279r, p = stats.pearsonr(gene_lengths, mean_expression)
280
281# Welch's t-test
282t_stat, p_val = stats.ttest_ind(group1, group2, equal_var=False)
283
284# ANOVA
285f_stat, p_val = stats.f_oneway(group1, group2, group3)
286
287# Multiple testing correction (BH)
288reject, pvals_adj, _, _ = multipletests(pvals, method='fdr_bh')
289```
290
291---
292
293## Batch Correction (Harmony)
294
295```python
296import harmonypy
297sc.tl.pca(adata, n_comps=50)
298ho = harmonypy.run_harmony(adata.obsm['X_pca'][:, :30], adata.obs, 'batch', random_state=0)
299adata.obsm['X_pca_harmony'] = ho.Z_corr.T
300sc.pp.neighbors(adata, use_rep='X_pca_harmony')
301sc.tl.leiden(adata, resolution=0.5)
302sc.tl.umap(adata)
303```
304
305---
306
307## ToolUniverse Integration
308
309### Data Discovery (before analysis)
310- **CxGDisc_search_datasets**: Search CELLxGENE Discover for scRNA-seq datasets by disease, tissue, organism. Use broad disease terms (e.g., "breast cancer" not "triple-negative").
311- **GEO_search_rnaseq_datasets** / **geo_search_datasets**: Search GEO for scRNA-seq studies
312- **NCBI_SRA_search_runs**: Search SRA for sequencing runs (query="single cell RNA-seq [disease]")
313- **OmicsDI_search_datasets**: Cross-repository dataset search
314
315### Cell Type Markers
316- **CellMarker_search_by_cell_type**: Tissue-specific cell markers (use `CellMarker_list_cell_types` first — exact names required, e.g., "Regulatory T(Treg) cell" not "Regulatory T cell")
317- **CellMarker_search_cancer_markers**: Cancer-context markers with experimental evidence
318- **CellMarker_search_by_gene**: Reverse lookup — which cell types express a gene?
319- **HPA_search_genes_by_query**: Cell-type marker gene search
320
321### Gene Annotation
322- **MyGene_query_genes** / **MyGene_batch_query**: Gene ID conversion
323- **ensembl_lookup_gene**: Ensembl gene details
324- **UniProt_get_function_by_accession**: Protein function
325
326### Cell-Cell Communication
327- **OmniPath_get_ligand_receptor_interactions**: L-R pairs (CellPhoneDB, CellChatDB)
328- **OmniPath_get_signaling_interactions**: Downstream signaling
329- **OmniPath_get_complexes**: Multi-subunit receptors
330
331### Enrichment (Post-DE)
332- **PANTHER_enrichment**: GO enrichment (BP, MF, CC)
333- **STRING_functional_enrichment**: Network-based enrichment
334- **ReactomeAnalysis_pathway_enrichment**: Reactome pathways
335
336### Clinical Context (for tumor immunology)
337- **DGIdb_get_drug_gene_interactions**: Drug interactions for immune checkpoint targets (genes=["CD274"] for PD-L1)
338- **civic_search_evidence_items**: Clinical evidence for mutations/biomarkers
339- **TIMER2_immune_estimation**: TCGA immune infiltration correlation
340- **search_clinical_trials**: Clinical trial matching
341- **GTEx_get_expression_summary**: Normal tissue baseline expression
342- **PubMed_search_articles**: Literature context
343
344---
345
346## Scanpy vs Seurat Equivalents
347
348| Operation | Seurat (R) | Scanpy (Python) |
349|-----------|------------|-----------------|
350| Load data | `Read10X()` | `sc.read_10x_mtx()` |
351| Normalize | `NormalizeData()` | `sc.pp.normalize_total() + sc.pp.log1p()` |
352| Find HVGs | `FindVariableFeatures()` | `sc.pp.highly_variable_genes()` |
353| PCA | `RunPCA()` | `sc.tl.pca()` |
354| Cluster | `FindClusters()` | `sc.tl.leiden()` |
355| UMAP | `RunUMAP()` | `sc.tl.umap()` |
356| Find markers | `FindMarkers()` | `sc.tl.rank_genes_groups()` |
357| Batch correction | `RunHarmony()` | `harmonypy.run_harmony()` |
358
359---
360
361## Reasoning Framework for Result Interpretation
362
363### Evidence Grading
364
365| Grade | Criteria | Example |
366|-------|----------|---------|
367| **High confidence** | Marker padj < 0.01, log2FC > 1, expressed in > 25% of cluster cells | CD3D as T-cell marker with padj = 1e-50, log2FC = 3.2, pct = 0.85 |
368| **Moderate confidence** | padj < 0.05, log2FC > 0.5, or expressed in 10-25% of cluster | FOXP3 in Treg cluster with padj = 0.001, pct = 0.18 |
369| **Low confidence** | padj < 0.05 but log2FC < 0.5 or low pct_diff between clusters | Ubiquitously expressed gene with marginal enrichment |
370| **Unreliable** | Fewer than 20 cells in cluster, or QC metrics suggest doublets | Cluster with mean nGenes > 6000 and high doublet score |
371
372### Interpretation Guidance
373
374- **QC metric thresholds**: Standard filters are nGenes > 200 (remove empty droplets), nGenes < 5000-6000 (remove doublets), pct_counts_mt < 20% (remove dying cells). These thresholds are tissue-dependent: immune cells tolerate stricter nGene filters; neurons may have higher mitochondrial content naturally. Always visualize distributions before setting cutoffs.
375- **Cluster resolution guidance**: Leiden resolution 0.3-0.5 yields broad cell types (T cells, B cells, myeloid). Resolution 0.8-1.2 resolves subtypes (CD4 naive, CD4 memory, Treg). Resolution > 2.0 risks over-clustering (splitting biologically homogeneous populations). Validate by checking that each cluster has distinct marker genes.
376- **Marker gene confidence levels**: A strong marker is highly specific (high pct_diff between cluster and rest) and highly expressed (high log2FC). Genes expressed in many clusters with small fold changes are poor markers. Cross-reference with known markers from CellMarker or HPA databases.
377- **Pseudo-bulk vs single-cell DE**: For comparing conditions (treatment vs control), pseudo-bulk DE (aggregate by sample, then DESeq2) is more statistically valid than single-cell DE, which inflates significance due to non-independence of cells from the same sample.
378- **Batch effects**: If samples cluster by batch rather than biology on UMAP, apply Harmony or other correction before biological interpretation.
379
380### Synthesis Questions
381
3821. Do the identified clusters correspond to known cell types based on canonical markers, or do some clusters lack clear biological identity (potentially doublets or low-quality cells)?
3832. At the chosen clustering resolution, are there clusters that merge when resolution is lowered, suggesting they may be a single cell type split by technical noise?
3843. For differential expression between conditions, are the results consistent between single-cell and pseudo-bulk approaches, and do the top DE genes have known biological relevance?
3854. Do QC-flagged cells (high mito, extreme gene counts) concentrate in specific clusters, and does removing them change the clustering structure?
3865. If batch correction was applied, do post-correction clusters still maintain expected cell-type-specific marker expression?
387
388---
389
390## Troubleshooting
391
392| Issue | Solution |
393|-------|----------|
394| `ModuleNotFoundError: leidenalg` | `pip install leidenalg` |
395| Sparse matrix errors | `.toarray()`: `X = adata.X.toarray() if issparse(adata.X) else adata.X` |
396| Wrong matrix orientation | More genes than samples? Transpose |
397| NaN in correlation | Filter: `valid = ~np.isnan(x) & ~np.isnan(y)` |
398| Too few cells for DE | Need >= 3 cells per condition per cell type |
399| Memory error | Use `sc.pp.highly_variable_genes()` to reduce features |
400
401---
402
403## Reference Documentation
404
405**Detailed Analysis Patterns**: analysis_patterns.md (per-cell-type DE, correlation, PCA, ANOVA, cell communication)
406
407**Core Workflows**:
408- references/scrna_qc.md - scRNA-seq QC gating (mito%, doublets, ambient RNA, empty droplets, MAD thresholds)
409- references/scanpy_workflow.md - Complete scanpy pipeline
410- references/seurat_workflow.md - Seurat to Scanpy translation
411- references/clustering_guide.md - Clustering methods
412- references/marker_identification.md - Marker genes, annotation
413- references/trajectory_analysis.md - Pseudotime
414- references/cell_communication.md - OmniPath/CellPhoneDB workflow
415- references/troubleshooting.md - Detailed error solutions
416
417---
418
419## Analysis Conventions
420
421### DESeq2 library choice: match the authoritative script
422If the data folder contains an authoritative script (`run_*.py`, `analysis.R`), use whichever DESeq2 library it uses (pydeseq2 or R DESeq2). The two libraries give slightly different DEG counts (~2-10% at the same thresholds), so matching matters. If no script exists, prefer R DESeq2 via the `run_deseq2_analysis` tool or `Rscript`:
423
424```bash
425tu run run_deseq2_analysis '{"operation":"deseq2","counts_file":"pseudo_bulk_counts.csv","metadata_file":"sample_meta.csv","design":"~ sex","contrast":"sex, M, F","lfc_shrinkage":true}'
426```