Single-Cell Genomics and Expression Matrix Analysis
RULE ZERO — Check for pre-computed results FIRST
Before following any instruction below, scan the data folder for:
*_executed.ipynb → read with tu run read_executed_notebook '{"data_folder":"<path>","search":"<keyword>"}' and cite its cell outputs as the authoritative answer
- Pre-computed result files (CSV/TSV with names like
*results*, *deseq*, *enrich*, *stats*, *_simplified.csv) → read directly and report the requested value
- Canonical analysis scripts (
analysis.R, run_*.py, find_*.R, *.Rmd) → execute as-is and read the output
Only follow this skill's re-analysis recipe below if none of the above exist. Re-running from raw data produces different numbers than the published answer and is much slower (often 5-10× turn count).
Comprehensive single-cell RNA-seq analysis and expression matrix processing using scanpy, anndata, scipy, and ToolUniverse.
LOOK UP, DON'T GUESS
When uncertain about any scientific fact, SEARCH databases first (PubMed, UniProt, ChEMBL, ClinVar, etc.) rather than reasoning from memory. A database-verified answer is always more reliable than a guess.
When to Use This Skill
Apply when users:
- Have scRNA-seq data (h5ad, 10X, CSV count matrices) and want analysis
- Need scRNA-seq quality control / QC gating: deciding cell filters by
mito % (pct_counts_mt), gene/UMI counts, doublets, ambient RNA, empty droplets
- Ask about cell type identification, clustering, or annotation
- Need differential expression analysis by cell type or condition
- Want gene-expression correlation analysis (e.g., gene length vs expression by cell type)
- Ask about PCA, UMAP, t-SNE for expression data
- Need Leiden/Louvain clustering on expression matrices
- Want statistical comparisons between cell types (t-test, ANOVA, fold change)
- Ask about marker genes, batch correction, trajectory, or cell-cell communication
NOT for (use other skills instead):
- Bulk RNA-seq DESeq2 only ->
tooluniverse-rnaseq-deseq2
- Gene enrichment only ->
tooluniverse-gene-enrichment
- VCF/variant analysis ->
tooluniverse-variant-analysis
Core Principles
- Data-first - Load, inspect, validate before analysis
- AnnData-centric - All data flows through anndata objects
- Cell type awareness - Per-cell-type subsetting when needed
- Statistical rigor - Normalization, multiple testing correction, effect sizes
- Question-driven - Parse what the user is actually asking
Required Packages
import scanpy as sc, anndata as ad, pandas as pd, numpy as np
from scipy import stats
from scipy.cluster.hierarchy import linkage, fcluster
from sklearn.decomposition import PCA
from statsmodels.stats.multitest import multipletests
import gseapy as gp # enrichment
import harmonypy # batch correction (optional)
Install: pip install scanpy anndata leidenalg umap-learn harmonypy gseapy pandas numpy scipy scikit-learn statsmodels
Workflow Decision Tree
START: User question about scRNA-seq data
|
+-- FULL PIPELINE (raw counts -> annotated clusters)
| Workflow: QC -> Normalize -> HVG -> PCA -> Cluster -> Annotate -> DE
| See: references/scanpy_workflow.md
|
+-- DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION (per-cell-type comparison)
| Most common pattern: per-cell-type DE
| See: analysis_patterns.md "Pattern 1"
|
+-- CORRELATION ANALYSIS (gene property vs expression)
| Pattern: Gene length vs expression correlation
| See: analysis_patterns.md "Pattern 2"
|
+-- CLUSTERING & PCA (expression matrix analysis)
| See: references/clustering_guide.md
|
+-- CELL COMMUNICATION (ligand-receptor interactions)
| See: references/cell_communication.md
|
+-- TRAJECTORY ANALYSIS (pseudotime)
See: references/trajectory_analysis.md
Data format handling:
- h5ad ->
sc.read_h5ad()
- 10X ->
sc.read_10x_mtx() or sc.read_10x_h5()
- CSV/TSV ->
pd.read_csv() -> Convert to AnnData (check orientation!)
Data Loading
AnnData expects: cells/samples as rows (obs), genes as columns (var)
adata = sc.read_h5ad("data.h5ad") # h5ad already oriented
# CSV/TSV: check orientation
df = pd.read_csv("counts.csv", index_col=0)
if df.shape[0] > df.shape[1] * 5: # genes > samples by 5x => transpose
df = df.T
adata = ad.AnnData(df)
# Load metadata
meta = pd.read_csv("metadata.csv", index_col=0)
common = adata.obs_names.intersection(meta.index)
adata = adata[common].copy()
for col in meta.columns:
adata.obs[col] = meta.loc[common, col]
Quality Control and QC Gating (do this BEFORE downstream analysis)
QC gating decides which cells and genes are real before normalization,
clustering, or DE. Skipping or rushing it propagates silently: doublets become
fake "intermediate" states, ambient RNA smears markers across clusters, and
empty droplets inflate cell counts. Never report a filtered cell count without
the gates applied, and never report cutoffs you did not actually run.
HONEST EXECUTION: QC runs scanpy/AnnData via Bash/Python. If scanpy is not
installed, do NOT fabricate metrics — print the install plan and stop:
python scripts/scrna_qc.py --install-plan (exits 0, lists what is missing,
suggests pip install scanpy anndata scrublet).
Per-cell QC metrics (what to compute)
vn = adata.var_names.str.upper()
adata.var['mt'] = vn.str.startswith('MT-') # mitochondrial
adata.var['ribo'] = vn.str.startswith(('RPS', 'RPL')) # ribosomal protein
adata.var['hb'] = vn.str.contains(r'^HB[^P]', regex=True) # hemoglobin (RBC)
sc.pp.calculate_qc_metrics(
adata, qc_vars=['mt', 'ribo', 'hb'],
percent_top=None, # REQUIRED for small gene panels (<500) — else IndexError
log1p=True, inplace=True)
Key metrics in adata.obs: n_genes_by_counts, total_counts,
pct_counts_mt, pct_counts_ribo, pct_counts_hb.
WHY each metric flags a problem (reason from biology, not magic numbers)
- High
pct_counts_mt -> dying / stressed cell. A ruptured membrane lets
cytoplasmic mRNA leak out while mito transcripts stay trapped, enriching the
captured RNA for mito. Cutoff is tissue-dependent (cardiomyocytes/hepatocytes
are mito-rich at baseline — a blanket 10% would discard healthy cells).
- Low
n_genes_by_counts / total_counts -> empty droplet or debris
(only ambient RNA captured; few genes, low depth).
- Very high counts/genes -> doublet (two transcriptomes ~double depth and
diversity) — but high count alone is weak; use a doublet caller (below).
- High
pct_counts_hb -> RBC/blood contamination in solid tissue.
Choosing thresholds — distribution-aware (MAD), not hardcoded
Hardcoded cutoffs (mt<5%, n_genes<2500) are a starting point only; they
break on mito-rich tissues and on shallow vs deep libraries. Prefer a
MAD-based rule (robust to the very outliers you are removing): flag cells
nmads median-absolute-deviations from the median. Use nmads=5 on
log1p counts/genes (both tails), nmads=3 upper-only on pct_counts_mt, and
pair mito with a biological ceiling so a uniformly degraded sample doesn't pass.
Always visualize distributions first (violin + total_counts vs
pct_counts_mt scatter — dying cells sit in the low-count/high-mito corner).
Run the helper (computes metrics + MAD gating, reports per-step removals):
python scripts/scrna_qc.py data.h5ad --doublets # or --install-plan first
Doublets, ambient RNA, empty droplets (per-cell metrics miss these)
- Doublets: Scrublet (
sc.pp.scrublet, scanpy >=1.10) or scDblFinder (R).
Run per sample before merging; flag-cluster-drop (doublets form bridge
clusters). expected_doublet_rate ~0.8%/1,000 cells recovered (10x).
- Ambient RNA: cell-free "soup" mRNA in every droplet — a count-correction
step (SoupX / DecontX, R), NOT a cell filter. Per-cell QC cannot detect it;
suspect it when markers look implausibly ubiquitous.
- Empty droplets: upstream of per-cell QC. CellRanger's filtered matrix
already applies an EmptyDrops-style call; with only the raw matrix, run
EmptyDrops (DropletUtils, R) or a barcode-rank knee before per-cell QC.
QC Interpretation Table (metric -> concern -> action)
| QC metric |
Direction |
Typical concern |
Suggested action |
pct_counts_mt |
high |
Dying / stressed cell (membrane rupture) |
Filter (MAD upper + tissue-aware ceiling; raise ceiling for mito-rich tissue) |
n_genes_by_counts |
very low |
Empty droplet / debris |
Filter (min_genes ~200 + low-tail MAD) |
total_counts |
very low |
Shallow / failed capture |
Filter (low-tail MAD; check barcode-rank knee) |
n_genes_by_counts / total_counts |
very high |
Doublet (two cells in one droplet) |
Flag, run Scrublet/scDblFinder, then drop — don't hard-cap on counts alone |
predicted_doublet (Scrublet) |
True |
Multiplet |
Filter per sample; cluster-then-drop if unsure |
pct_counts_hb |
high |
RBC / blood contamination |
Filter in non-blood tissue; investigate in blood |
pct_counts_ribo |
very high/low |
Low-complexity / stressed, or cell-type signal |
Flag / investigate (ribo is cell-type-specific; rarely a hard filter) |
| markers ubiquitous across clusters |
— |
Ambient RNA contamination |
Investigate — run SoupX/DecontX, do not silently proceed |
| many cells, low median counts |
— |
Empty droplets not removed |
Investigate — apply EmptyDrops / knee, re-filter |
Full reasoning, MAD code, Scrublet/SoupX/EmptyDrops recipes, and order of
operations: references/scrna_qc.md. Inline pipeline QC:
references/scanpy_workflow.md Phase 2.
Complete Pipeline (Quick Reference)
import scanpy as sc
adata = sc.read_10x_h5("filtered_feature_bc_matrix.h5")
# QC
adata.var['mt'] = adata.var_names.str.startswith('MT-')
sc.pp.calculate_qc_metrics(adata, qc_vars=['mt'], inplace=True)
adata = adata[adata.obs['pct_counts_mt'] < 20].copy()
sc.pp.filter_cells(adata, min_genes=200)
sc.pp.filter_genes(adata, min_cells=3)
# Normalize + HVG + PCA
sc.pp.normalize_total(adata, target_sum=1e4)
sc.pp.log1p(adata)
adata.raw = adata.copy()
sc.pp.highly_variable_genes(adata, n_top_genes=2000)
sc.tl.pca(adata, n_comps=50)
# Cluster + UMAP
sc.pp.neighbors(adata, n_pcs=30)
sc.tl.leiden(adata, resolution=0.5)
sc.tl.umap(adata)
# Find markers + Annotate + Per-cell-type DE
sc.tl.rank_genes_groups(adata, groupby='leiden', method='wilcoxon')
Differential Expression Decision Tree
Single-Cell DE (many cells per condition):
Use: sc.tl.rank_genes_groups(), methods: wilcoxon, t-test, logreg
Best for: Per-cell-type DE, marker gene finding
Pseudo-Bulk DE (aggregate counts by sample):
Use: R DESeq2 via `tu run run_deseq2_analysis` or Rscript (NOT pydeseq2 — gives different DEG counts)
Best for: Sample-level comparisons with replicates
Statistical Tests Only:
Use: scipy.stats (ttest_ind, f_oneway, pearsonr)
Best for: Correlation, ANOVA, t-tests on summaries
Statistical Tests (Quick Reference)
from scipy import stats
from statsmodels.stats.multitest import multipletests
# Pearson/Spearman correlation
r, p = stats.pearsonr(gene_lengths, mean_expression)
# Welch's t-test
t_stat, p_val = stats.ttest_ind(group1, group2, equal_var=False)
# ANOVA
f_stat, p_val = stats.f_oneway(group1, group2, group3)
# Multiple testing correction (BH)
reject, pvals_adj, _, _ = multipletests(pvals, method='fdr_bh')
Batch Correction (Harmony)
import harmonypy
sc.tl.pca(adata, n_comps=50)
ho = harmonypy.run_harmony(adata.obsm['X_pca'][:, :30], adata.obs, 'batch', random_state=0)
adata.obsm['X_pca_harmony'] = ho.Z_corr.T
sc.pp.neighbors(adata, use_rep='X_pca_harmony')
sc.tl.leiden(adata, resolution=0.5)
sc.tl.umap(adata)
ToolUniverse Integration
Data Discovery (before analysis)
- CxGDisc_search_datasets: Search CELLxGENE Discover for scRNA-seq datasets by disease, tissue, organism. Use broad disease terms (e.g., "breast cancer" not "triple-negative").
- GEO_search_rnaseq_datasets / geo_search_datasets: Search GEO for scRNA-seq studies
- NCBI_SRA_search_runs: Search SRA for sequencing runs (query="single cell RNA-seq [disease]")
- OmicsDI_search_datasets: Cross-repository dataset search
Cell Type Markers
- CellMarker_search_by_cell_type: Tissue-specific cell markers (use
CellMarker_list_cell_types first — exact names required, e.g., "Regulatory T(Treg) cell" not "Regulatory T cell")
- CellMarker_search_cancer_markers: Cancer-context markers with experimental evidence
- CellMarker_search_by_gene: Reverse lookup — which cell types express a gene?
- HPA_search_genes_by_query: Cell-type marker gene search
Gene Annotation
- MyGene_query_genes / MyGene_batch_query: Gene ID conversion
- ensembl_lookup_gene: Ensembl gene details
- UniProt_get_function_by_accession: Protein function
Cell-Cell Communication
- OmniPath_get_ligand_receptor_interactions: L-R pairs (CellPhoneDB, CellChatDB)
- OmniPath_get_signaling_interactions: Downstream signaling
- OmniPath_get_complexes: Multi-subunit receptors
Enrichment (Post-DE)
- PANTHER_enrichment: GO enrichment (BP, MF, CC)
- STRING_functional_enrichment: Network-based enrichment
- ReactomeAnalysis_pathway_enrichment: Reactome pathways
Clinical Context (for tumor immunology)
- DGIdb_get_drug_gene_interactions: Drug interactions for immune checkpoint targets (genes=["CD274"] for PD-L1)
- civic_search_evidence_items: Clinical evidence for mutations/biomarkers
- TIMER2_immune_estimation: TCGA immune infiltration correlation
- search_clinical_trials: Clinical trial matching
- GTEx_get_expression_summary: Normal tissue baseline expression
- PubMed_search_articles: Literature context
Scanpy vs Seurat Equivalents
| Operation |
Seurat (R) |
Scanpy (Python) |
| Load data |
Read10X() |
sc.read_10x_mtx() |
| Normalize |
NormalizeData() |
sc.pp.normalize_total() + sc.pp.log1p() |
| Find HVGs |
FindVariableFeatures() |
sc.pp.highly_variable_genes() |
| PCA |
RunPCA() |
sc.tl.pca() |
| Cluster |
FindClusters() |
sc.tl.leiden() |
| UMAP |
RunUMAP() |
sc.tl.umap() |
| Find markers |
FindMarkers() |
sc.tl.rank_genes_groups() |
| Batch correction |
RunHarmony() |
harmonypy.run_harmony() |
Reasoning Framework for Result Interpretation
Evidence Grading
| Grade |
Criteria |
Example |
| High confidence |
Marker padj < 0.01, log2FC > 1, expressed in > 25% of cluster cells |
CD3D as T-cell marker with padj = 1e-50, log2FC = 3.2, pct = 0.85 |
| Moderate confidence |
padj < 0.05, log2FC > 0.5, or expressed in 10-25% of cluster |
FOXP3 in Treg cluster with padj = 0.001, pct = 0.18 |
| Low confidence |
padj < 0.05 but log2FC < 0.5 or low pct_diff between clusters |
Ubiquitously expressed gene with marginal enrichment |
| Unreliable |
Fewer than 20 cells in cluster, or QC metrics suggest doublets |
Cluster with mean nGenes > 6000 and high doublet score |
Interpretation Guidance
- QC metric thresholds: Standard filters are nGenes > 200 (remove empty droplets), nGenes < 5000-6000 (remove doublets), pct_counts_mt < 20% (remove dying cells). These thresholds are tissue-dependent: immune cells tolerate stricter nGene filters; neurons may have higher mitochondrial content naturally. Always visualize distributions before setting cutoffs.
- Cluster resolution guidance: Leiden resolution 0.3-0.5 yields broad cell types (T cells, B cells, myeloid). Resolution 0.8-1.2 resolves subtypes (CD4 naive, CD4 memory, Treg). Resolution > 2.0 risks over-clustering (splitting biologically homogeneous populations). Validate by checking that each cluster has distinct marker genes.
- Marker gene confidence levels: A strong marker is highly specific (high pct_diff between cluster and rest) and highly expressed (high log2FC). Genes expressed in many clusters with small fold changes are poor markers. Cross-reference with known markers from CellMarker or HPA databases.
- Pseudo-bulk vs single-cell DE: For comparing conditions (treatment vs control), pseudo-bulk DE (aggregate by sample, then DESeq2) is more statistically valid than single-cell DE, which inflates significance due to non-independence of cells from the same sample.
- Batch effects: If samples cluster by batch rather than biology on UMAP, apply Harmony or other correction before biological interpretation.
Synthesis Questions
- Do the identified clusters correspond to known cell types based on canonical markers, or do some clusters lack clear biological identity (potentially doublets or low-quality cells)?
- At the chosen clustering resolution, are there clusters that merge when resolution is lowered, suggesting they may be a single cell type split by technical noise?
- For differential expression between conditions, are the results consistent between single-cell and pseudo-bulk approaches, and do the top DE genes have known biological relevance?
- Do QC-flagged cells (high mito, extreme gene counts) concentrate in specific clusters, and does removing them change the clustering structure?
- If batch correction was applied, do post-correction clusters still maintain expected cell-type-specific marker expression?
Troubleshooting
| Issue |
Solution |
ModuleNotFoundError: leidenalg |
pip install leidenalg |
| Sparse matrix errors |
.toarray(): X = adata.X.toarray() if issparse(adata.X) else adata.X |
| Wrong matrix orientation |
More genes than samples? Transpose |
| NaN in correlation |
Filter: valid = ~np.isnan(x) & ~np.isnan(y) |
| Too few cells for DE |
Need >= 3 cells per condition per cell type |
| Memory error |
Use sc.pp.highly_variable_genes() to reduce features |
Reference Documentation
Detailed Analysis Patterns: analysis_patterns.md (per-cell-type DE, correlation, PCA, ANOVA, cell communication)
Core Workflows:
- references/scrna_qc.md - scRNA-seq QC gating (mito%, doublets, ambient RNA, empty droplets, MAD thresholds)
- references/scanpy_workflow.md - Complete scanpy pipeline
- references/seurat_workflow.md - Seurat to Scanpy translation
- references/clustering_guide.md - Clustering methods
- references/marker_identification.md - Marker genes, annotation
- references/trajectory_analysis.md - Pseudotime
- references/cell_communication.md - OmniPath/CellPhoneDB workflow
- references/troubleshooting.md - Detailed error solutions
Analysis Conventions
DESeq2 library choice: match the authoritative script
If the data folder contains an authoritative script (run_*.py, analysis.R), use whichever DESeq2 library it uses (pydeseq2 or R DESeq2). The two libraries give slightly different DEG counts (~2-10% at the same thresholds), so matching matters. If no script exists, prefer R DESeq2 via the run_deseq2_analysis tool or Rscript:
tu run run_deseq2_analysis '{"operation":"deseq2","counts_file":"pseudo_bulk_counts.csv","metadata_file":"sample_meta.csv","design":"~ sex","contrast":"sex, M, F","lfc_shrinkage":true}'
1---
2name: tooluniverse-single-cell
3description: Single-cell RNA-seq analysis with scanpy/anndata — h5ad data loading, scRNA-seq quality control and QC gating (n_genes_by_counts, total_counts, mitochondrial percent / pct_counts_mt, pct_counts_ribo, doublet detection with Scrublet/scDblFinder, ambient RNA / SoupX awareness, empty-droplet filtering, MAD-based thresholds), normalization, dimensionality reduction (PCA, UMAP, t-SNE), clustering (Leiden, Louvain), marker gene identification, cell-type annotation, pseudotime/trajectory analysis. Use for any scRNA-seq workflow, including deciding which cells to filter, flag, or investigate before downstream analysis.
4disable-model-invocation: true
5---
6
7# Single-Cell Genomics and Expression Matrix Analysis
8
9## RULE ZERO — Check for pre-computed results FIRST
10
11Before following any instruction below, scan the data folder for:
12- `*_executed.ipynb` → read with `tu run read_executed_notebook '{"data_folder":"<path>","search":"<keyword>"}'` and cite its cell outputs as the authoritative answer
13- Pre-computed result files (CSV/TSV with names like `*results*`, `*deseq*`, `*enrich*`, `*stats*`, `*_simplified.csv`) → read directly and report the requested value
14- Canonical analysis scripts (`analysis.R`, `run_*.py`, `find_*.R`, `*.Rmd`) → execute as-is and read the output
15
16Only follow this skill's re-analysis recipe below if **none** of the above exist. Re-running from raw data produces different numbers than the published answer and is much slower (often 5-10× turn count).
17
18---
19
20Comprehensive single-cell RNA-seq analysis and expression matrix processing using scanpy, anndata, scipy, and ToolUniverse.
21
22---
23
24## LOOK UP, DON'T GUESS
25When uncertain about any scientific fact, SEARCH databases first (PubMed, UniProt, ChEMBL, ClinVar, etc.) rather than reasoning from memory. A database-verified answer is always more reliable than a guess.
26
27---
28
29## When to Use This Skill
30
31Apply when users:
32- Have scRNA-seq data (h5ad, 10X, CSV count matrices) and want analysis
33- Need scRNA-seq quality control / QC gating: deciding cell filters by
34 mito % (pct_counts_mt), gene/UMI counts, doublets, ambient RNA, empty droplets
35- Ask about cell type identification, clustering, or annotation
36- Need differential expression analysis by cell type or condition
37- Want gene-expression correlation analysis (e.g., gene length vs expression by cell type)
38- Ask about PCA, UMAP, t-SNE for expression data
39- Need Leiden/Louvain clustering on expression matrices
40- Want statistical comparisons between cell types (t-test, ANOVA, fold change)
41- Ask about marker genes, batch correction, trajectory, or cell-cell communication
42
43**NOT for** (use other skills instead):
44- Bulk RNA-seq DESeq2 only -> `tooluniverse-rnaseq-deseq2`
45- Gene enrichment only -> `tooluniverse-gene-enrichment`
46- VCF/variant analysis -> `tooluniverse-variant-analysis`
47
48---
49
50## Core Principles
51
521. **Data-first** - Load, inspect, validate before analysis
532. **AnnData-centric** - All data flows through anndata objects
543. **Cell type awareness** - Per-cell-type subsetting when needed
554. **Statistical rigor** - Normalization, multiple testing correction, effect sizes
565. **Question-driven** - Parse what the user is actually asking
57
58---
59
60## Required Packages
61
62```python
63import scanpy as sc, anndata as ad, pandas as pd, numpy as np
64from scipy import stats
65from scipy.cluster.hierarchy import linkage, fcluster
66from sklearn.decomposition import PCA
67from statsmodels.stats.multitest import multipletests
68import gseapy as gp # enrichment
69import harmonypy # batch correction (optional)
70```
71
72Install: `pip install scanpy anndata leidenalg umap-learn harmonypy gseapy pandas numpy scipy scikit-learn statsmodels`
73
74---
75
76## Workflow Decision Tree
77
78```
79START: User question about scRNA-seq data
80|
81+-- FULL PIPELINE (raw counts -> annotated clusters)
82| Workflow: QC -> Normalize -> HVG -> PCA -> Cluster -> Annotate -> DE
83| See: references/scanpy_workflow.md
84|
85+-- DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION (per-cell-type comparison)
86| Most common pattern: per-cell-type DE
87| See: analysis_patterns.md "Pattern 1"
88|
89+-- CORRELATION ANALYSIS (gene property vs expression)
90| Pattern: Gene length vs expression correlation
91| See: analysis_patterns.md "Pattern 2"
92|
93+-- CLUSTERING & PCA (expression matrix analysis)
94| See: references/clustering_guide.md
95|
96+-- CELL COMMUNICATION (ligand-receptor interactions)
97| See: references/cell_communication.md
98|
99+-- TRAJECTORY ANALYSIS (pseudotime)
100 See: references/trajectory_analysis.md
101```
102
103**Data format handling**:
104- h5ad -> `sc.read_h5ad()`
105- 10X -> `sc.read_10x_mtx()` or `sc.read_10x_h5()`
106- CSV/TSV -> `pd.read_csv()` -> Convert to AnnData (check orientation!)
107
108---
109
110## Data Loading
111
112AnnData expects: **cells/samples as rows (obs), genes as columns (var)**
113
114```python
115adata = sc.read_h5ad("data.h5ad") # h5ad already oriented
116
117# CSV/TSV: check orientation
118df = pd.read_csv("counts.csv", index_col=0)
119if df.shape[0] > df.shape[1] * 5: # genes > samples by 5x => transpose
120 df = df.T
121adata = ad.AnnData(df)
122
123# Load metadata
124meta = pd.read_csv("metadata.csv", index_col=0)
125common = adata.obs_names.intersection(meta.index)
126adata = adata[common].copy()
127for col in meta.columns:
128 adata.obs[col] = meta.loc[common, col]
129```
130
131---
132
133## Quality Control and QC Gating (do this BEFORE downstream analysis)
134
135QC gating decides **which cells and genes are real** before normalization,
136clustering, or DE. Skipping or rushing it propagates silently: doublets become
137fake "intermediate" states, ambient RNA smears markers across clusters, and
138empty droplets inflate cell counts. Never report a filtered cell count without
139the gates applied, and never report cutoffs you did not actually run.
140
141**HONEST EXECUTION**: QC runs scanpy/AnnData via Bash/Python. If scanpy is not
142installed, do NOT fabricate metrics — print the install plan and stop:
143`python scripts/scrna_qc.py --install-plan` (exits 0, lists what is missing,
144suggests `pip install scanpy anndata scrublet`).
145
146### Per-cell QC metrics (what to compute)
147
148```python
149vn = adata.var_names.str.upper()
150adata.var['mt'] = vn.str.startswith('MT-') # mitochondrial
151adata.var['ribo'] = vn.str.startswith(('RPS', 'RPL')) # ribosomal protein
152adata.var['hb'] = vn.str.contains(r'^HB[^P]', regex=True) # hemoglobin (RBC)
153sc.pp.calculate_qc_metrics(
154 adata, qc_vars=['mt', 'ribo', 'hb'],
155 percent_top=None, # REQUIRED for small gene panels (<500) — else IndexError
156 log1p=True, inplace=True)
157```
158
159Key metrics in `adata.obs`: `n_genes_by_counts`, `total_counts`,
160`pct_counts_mt`, `pct_counts_ribo`, `pct_counts_hb`.
161
162### WHY each metric flags a problem (reason from biology, not magic numbers)
163
164- **High `pct_counts_mt` -> dying / stressed cell.** A ruptured membrane lets
165 cytoplasmic mRNA leak out while mito transcripts stay trapped, enriching the
166 captured RNA for mito. Cutoff is tissue-dependent (cardiomyocytes/hepatocytes
167 are mito-rich at baseline — a blanket 10% would discard healthy cells).
168- **Low `n_genes_by_counts` / `total_counts` -> empty droplet or debris**
169 (only ambient RNA captured; few genes, low depth).
170- **Very high counts/genes -> doublet** (two transcriptomes ~double depth and
171 diversity) — but high count alone is weak; use a doublet caller (below).
172- **High `pct_counts_hb` -> RBC/blood contamination** in solid tissue.
173
174### Choosing thresholds — distribution-aware (MAD), not hardcoded
175
176Hardcoded cutoffs (`mt<5%`, `n_genes<2500`) are a starting point only; they
177break on mito-rich tissues and on shallow vs deep libraries. Prefer a
178**MAD-based** rule (robust to the very outliers you are removing): flag cells
179> `nmads` median-absolute-deviations from the median. Use `nmads=5` on
180log1p counts/genes (both tails), `nmads=3` upper-only on `pct_counts_mt`, and
181pair mito with a biological ceiling so a uniformly degraded sample doesn't pass.
182**Always visualize distributions first** (violin + `total_counts` vs
183`pct_counts_mt` scatter — dying cells sit in the low-count/high-mito corner).
184
185Run the helper (computes metrics + MAD gating, reports per-step removals):
186
187```bash
188python scripts/scrna_qc.py data.h5ad --doublets # or --install-plan first
189```
190
191### Doublets, ambient RNA, empty droplets (per-cell metrics miss these)
192
193- **Doublets**: Scrublet (`sc.pp.scrublet`, scanpy >=1.10) or scDblFinder (R).
194 Run **per sample** before merging; flag-cluster-drop (doublets form bridge
195 clusters). `expected_doublet_rate` ~0.8%/1,000 cells recovered (10x).
196- **Ambient RNA**: cell-free "soup" mRNA in every droplet — a count-correction
197 step (SoupX / DecontX, R), NOT a cell filter. Per-cell QC cannot detect it;
198 suspect it when markers look implausibly ubiquitous.
199- **Empty droplets**: upstream of per-cell QC. CellRanger's filtered matrix
200 already applies an EmptyDrops-style call; with only the raw matrix, run
201 EmptyDrops (DropletUtils, R) or a barcode-rank knee before per-cell QC.
202
203### QC Interpretation Table (metric -> concern -> action)
204
205| QC metric | Direction | Typical concern | Suggested action |
206|-----------|-----------|-----------------|------------------|
207| `pct_counts_mt` | high | Dying / stressed cell (membrane rupture) | **Filter** (MAD upper + tissue-aware ceiling; raise ceiling for mito-rich tissue) |
208| `n_genes_by_counts` | very low | Empty droplet / debris | **Filter** (`min_genes` ~200 + low-tail MAD) |
209| `total_counts` | very low | Shallow / failed capture | **Filter** (low-tail MAD; check barcode-rank knee) |
210| `n_genes_by_counts` / `total_counts` | very high | Doublet (two cells in one droplet) | **Flag**, run Scrublet/scDblFinder, then drop — don't hard-cap on counts alone |
211| `predicted_doublet` (Scrublet) | True | Multiplet | **Filter** per sample; cluster-then-drop if unsure |
212| `pct_counts_hb` | high | RBC / blood contamination | **Filter** in non-blood tissue; **investigate** in blood |
213| `pct_counts_ribo` | very high/low | Low-complexity / stressed, or cell-type signal | **Flag / investigate** (ribo is cell-type-specific; rarely a hard filter) |
214| markers ubiquitous across clusters | — | Ambient RNA contamination | **Investigate** — run SoupX/DecontX, do not silently proceed |
215| many cells, low median counts | — | Empty droplets not removed | **Investigate** — apply EmptyDrops / knee, re-filter |
216
217Full reasoning, MAD code, Scrublet/SoupX/EmptyDrops recipes, and order of
218operations: **references/scrna_qc.md**. Inline pipeline QC:
219**references/scanpy_workflow.md** Phase 2.
220
221---
222
223## Complete Pipeline (Quick Reference)
224
225```python
226import scanpy as sc
227
228adata = sc.read_10x_h5("filtered_feature_bc_matrix.h5")
229
230# QC
231adata.var['mt'] = adata.var_names.str.startswith('MT-')
232sc.pp.calculate_qc_metrics(adata, qc_vars=['mt'], inplace=True)
233adata = adata[adata.obs['pct_counts_mt'] < 20].copy()
234sc.pp.filter_cells(adata, min_genes=200)
235sc.pp.filter_genes(adata, min_cells=3)
236
237# Normalize + HVG + PCA
238sc.pp.normalize_total(adata, target_sum=1e4)
239sc.pp.log1p(adata)
240adata.raw = adata.copy()
241sc.pp.highly_variable_genes(adata, n_top_genes=2000)
242sc.tl.pca(adata, n_comps=50)
243
244# Cluster + UMAP
245sc.pp.neighbors(adata, n_pcs=30)
246sc.tl.leiden(adata, resolution=0.5)
247sc.tl.umap(adata)
248
249# Find markers + Annotate + Per-cell-type DE
250sc.tl.rank_genes_groups(adata, groupby='leiden', method='wilcoxon')
251```
252
253---
254
255## Differential Expression Decision Tree
256
257```
258Single-Cell DE (many cells per condition):
259 Use: sc.tl.rank_genes_groups(), methods: wilcoxon, t-test, logreg
260 Best for: Per-cell-type DE, marker gene finding
261
262Pseudo-Bulk DE (aggregate counts by sample):
263 Use: R DESeq2 via `tu run run_deseq2_analysis` or Rscript (NOT pydeseq2 — gives different DEG counts)
264 Best for: Sample-level comparisons with replicates
265
266Statistical Tests Only:
267 Use: scipy.stats (ttest_ind, f_oneway, pearsonr)
268 Best for: Correlation, ANOVA, t-tests on summaries
269```
270
271---
272
273## Statistical Tests (Quick Reference)
274
275```python
276from scipy import stats
277from statsmodels.stats.multitest import multipletests
278
279# Pearson/Spearman correlation
280r, p = stats.pearsonr(gene_lengths, mean_expression)
281
282# Welch's t-test
283t_stat, p_val = stats.ttest_ind(group1, group2, equal_var=False)
284
285# ANOVA
286f_stat, p_val = stats.f_oneway(group1, group2, group3)
287
288# Multiple testing correction (BH)
289reject, pvals_adj, _, _ = multipletests(pvals, method='fdr_bh')
290```
291
292---
293
294## Batch Correction (Harmony)
295
296```python
297import harmonypy
298sc.tl.pca(adata, n_comps=50)
299ho = harmonypy.run_harmony(adata.obsm['X_pca'][:, :30], adata.obs, 'batch', random_state=0)
300adata.obsm['X_pca_harmony'] = ho.Z_corr.T
301sc.pp.neighbors(adata, use_rep='X_pca_harmony')
302sc.tl.leiden(adata, resolution=0.5)
303sc.tl.umap(adata)
304```
305
306---
307
308## ToolUniverse Integration
309
310### Data Discovery (before analysis)
311- **CxGDisc_search_datasets**: Search CELLxGENE Discover for scRNA-seq datasets by disease, tissue, organism. Use broad disease terms (e.g., "breast cancer" not "triple-negative").
312- **GEO_search_rnaseq_datasets** / **geo_search_datasets**: Search GEO for scRNA-seq studies
313- **NCBI_SRA_search_runs**: Search SRA for sequencing runs (query="single cell RNA-seq [disease]")
314- **OmicsDI_search_datasets**: Cross-repository dataset search
315
316### Cell Type Markers
317- **CellMarker_search_by_cell_type**: Tissue-specific cell markers (use `CellMarker_list_cell_types` first — exact names required, e.g., "Regulatory T(Treg) cell" not "Regulatory T cell")
318- **CellMarker_search_cancer_markers**: Cancer-context markers with experimental evidence
319- **CellMarker_search_by_gene**: Reverse lookup — which cell types express a gene?
320- **HPA_search_genes_by_query**: Cell-type marker gene search
321
322### Gene Annotation
323- **MyGene_query_genes** / **MyGene_batch_query**: Gene ID conversion
324- **ensembl_lookup_gene**: Ensembl gene details
325- **UniProt_get_function_by_accession**: Protein function
326
327### Cell-Cell Communication
328- **OmniPath_get_ligand_receptor_interactions**: L-R pairs (CellPhoneDB, CellChatDB)
329- **OmniPath_get_signaling_interactions**: Downstream signaling
330- **OmniPath_get_complexes**: Multi-subunit receptors
331
332### Enrichment (Post-DE)
333- **PANTHER_enrichment**: GO enrichment (BP, MF, CC)
334- **STRING_functional_enrichment**: Network-based enrichment
335- **ReactomeAnalysis_pathway_enrichment**: Reactome pathways
336
337### Clinical Context (for tumor immunology)
338- **DGIdb_get_drug_gene_interactions**: Drug interactions for immune checkpoint targets (genes=["CD274"] for PD-L1)
339- **civic_search_evidence_items**: Clinical evidence for mutations/biomarkers
340- **TIMER2_immune_estimation**: TCGA immune infiltration correlation
341- **search_clinical_trials**: Clinical trial matching
342- **GTEx_get_expression_summary**: Normal tissue baseline expression
343- **PubMed_search_articles**: Literature context
344
345---
346
347## Scanpy vs Seurat Equivalents
348
349| Operation | Seurat (R) | Scanpy (Python) |
350|-----------|------------|-----------------|
351| Load data | `Read10X()` | `sc.read_10x_mtx()` |
352| Normalize | `NormalizeData()` | `sc.pp.normalize_total() + sc.pp.log1p()` |
353| Find HVGs | `FindVariableFeatures()` | `sc.pp.highly_variable_genes()` |
354| PCA | `RunPCA()` | `sc.tl.pca()` |
355| Cluster | `FindClusters()` | `sc.tl.leiden()` |
356| UMAP | `RunUMAP()` | `sc.tl.umap()` |
357| Find markers | `FindMarkers()` | `sc.tl.rank_genes_groups()` |
358| Batch correction | `RunHarmony()` | `harmonypy.run_harmony()` |
359
360---
361
362## Reasoning Framework for Result Interpretation
363
364### Evidence Grading
365
366| Grade | Criteria | Example |
367|-------|----------|---------|
368| **High confidence** | Marker padj < 0.01, log2FC > 1, expressed in > 25% of cluster cells | CD3D as T-cell marker with padj = 1e-50, log2FC = 3.2, pct = 0.85 |
369| **Moderate confidence** | padj < 0.05, log2FC > 0.5, or expressed in 10-25% of cluster | FOXP3 in Treg cluster with padj = 0.001, pct = 0.18 |
370| **Low confidence** | padj < 0.05 but log2FC < 0.5 or low pct_diff between clusters | Ubiquitously expressed gene with marginal enrichment |
371| **Unreliable** | Fewer than 20 cells in cluster, or QC metrics suggest doublets | Cluster with mean nGenes > 6000 and high doublet score |
372
373### Interpretation Guidance
374
375- **QC metric thresholds**: Standard filters are nGenes > 200 (remove empty droplets), nGenes < 5000-6000 (remove doublets), pct_counts_mt < 20% (remove dying cells). These thresholds are tissue-dependent: immune cells tolerate stricter nGene filters; neurons may have higher mitochondrial content naturally. Always visualize distributions before setting cutoffs.
376- **Cluster resolution guidance**: Leiden resolution 0.3-0.5 yields broad cell types (T cells, B cells, myeloid). Resolution 0.8-1.2 resolves subtypes (CD4 naive, CD4 memory, Treg). Resolution > 2.0 risks over-clustering (splitting biologically homogeneous populations). Validate by checking that each cluster has distinct marker genes.
377- **Marker gene confidence levels**: A strong marker is highly specific (high pct_diff between cluster and rest) and highly expressed (high log2FC). Genes expressed in many clusters with small fold changes are poor markers. Cross-reference with known markers from CellMarker or HPA databases.
378- **Pseudo-bulk vs single-cell DE**: For comparing conditions (treatment vs control), pseudo-bulk DE (aggregate by sample, then DESeq2) is more statistically valid than single-cell DE, which inflates significance due to non-independence of cells from the same sample.
379- **Batch effects**: If samples cluster by batch rather than biology on UMAP, apply Harmony or other correction before biological interpretation.
380
381### Synthesis Questions
382
3831. Do the identified clusters correspond to known cell types based on canonical markers, or do some clusters lack clear biological identity (potentially doublets or low-quality cells)?
3842. At the chosen clustering resolution, are there clusters that merge when resolution is lowered, suggesting they may be a single cell type split by technical noise?
3853. For differential expression between conditions, are the results consistent between single-cell and pseudo-bulk approaches, and do the top DE genes have known biological relevance?
3864. Do QC-flagged cells (high mito, extreme gene counts) concentrate in specific clusters, and does removing them change the clustering structure?
3875. If batch correction was applied, do post-correction clusters still maintain expected cell-type-specific marker expression?
388
389---
390
391## Troubleshooting
392
393| Issue | Solution |
394|-------|----------|
395| `ModuleNotFoundError: leidenalg` | `pip install leidenalg` |
396| Sparse matrix errors | `.toarray()`: `X = adata.X.toarray() if issparse(adata.X) else adata.X` |
397| Wrong matrix orientation | More genes than samples? Transpose |
398| NaN in correlation | Filter: `valid = ~np.isnan(x) & ~np.isnan(y)` |
399| Too few cells for DE | Need >= 3 cells per condition per cell type |
400| Memory error | Use `sc.pp.highly_variable_genes()` to reduce features |
401
402---
403
404## Reference Documentation
405
406**Detailed Analysis Patterns**: analysis_patterns.md (per-cell-type DE, correlation, PCA, ANOVA, cell communication)
407
408**Core Workflows**:
409- references/scrna_qc.md - scRNA-seq QC gating (mito%, doublets, ambient RNA, empty droplets, MAD thresholds)
410- references/scanpy_workflow.md - Complete scanpy pipeline
411- references/seurat_workflow.md - Seurat to Scanpy translation
412- references/clustering_guide.md - Clustering methods
413- references/marker_identification.md - Marker genes, annotation
414- references/trajectory_analysis.md - Pseudotime
415- references/cell_communication.md - OmniPath/CellPhoneDB workflow
416- references/troubleshooting.md - Detailed error solutions
417
418---
419
420## Analysis Conventions
421
422### DESeq2 library choice: match the authoritative script
423If the data folder contains an authoritative script (`run_*.py`, `analysis.R`), use whichever DESeq2 library it uses (pydeseq2 or R DESeq2). The two libraries give slightly different DEG counts (~2-10% at the same thresholds), so matching matters. If no script exists, prefer R DESeq2 via the `run_deseq2_analysis` tool or `Rscript`:
424
425```bash
426tu run run_deseq2_analysis '{"operation":"deseq2","counts_file":"pseudo_bulk_counts.csv","metadata_file":"sample_meta.csv","design":"~ sex","contrast":"sex, M, F","lfc_shrinkage":true}'
427```