Claude Intel Monitor

Claude Intel Monitor

Problem → Solution

The problem: You're coding with Claude and suddenly it feels... off. Code completions are simpler. Reasoning skips steps. Math answers are wrong. You wonder: "Did they nerf the model?" Anthropic and OpenAI don't announce degradations. You're left guessing if it's you or them.

The solution: Standardized 30-question benchmark across Math, Reasoning, and Code. Run it daily, track scores over time. When scores drop >10%, you get an alert. Response quality analysis detects thinking-skipping. ZenMux routes to backup models when your primary degrades.

Quick Start

pip install git+https://github.com/minirr890112-byte/claude-intel-monitor.git

claude-intel-monitor test --model claude-sonnet-4 --provider anthropic
claude-intel-monitor watch --model claude-sonnet-4 --interval 6h
claude-intel-monitor quality -f response.txt -c code
claude-intel-monitor history
claude-intel-monitor zenmux
claude-intel-monitor switch -s degraded

Real Output

$ claude-intel-monitor test --model claude-sonnet-4

🧠 Claude Intel Monitor v1.1.0
Model: claude-sonnet-4 (anthropic)
────────────────────────────────────
Math:      8/10 (80%) ████████░░
Reasoning: 7/10 (70%) ███████░░░
Code:      9/10 (90%) █████████░
────────────────────────────────────
Total:     24/30 (80%)
Status: ✅ Normal (within 5% of baseline)

$ claude-intel-monitor quality -f response.txt
Response Quality: 0.62/1.00 ⚠️
├─ Thinking depth:   0.45  ⚠️ Shallow
├─ Code completeness: 0.85  ✅
└─ Hallucination:    0.55  ⚠️ Suspect

Commands

⭐ Star this repo if you've felt the model get dumber: github.com/minirr890112-byte/claude-intel-monitor