competitor-mapper-pmm
Agent: PMM
L2 product marketing manager responsible for competitive intelligence, positioning, GTM planning, pricing strategy, launch narrative, and sales enablement.
Department ethos: ideal-product.md
Skill Description
Maps the competitive landscape including positioning, pricing, and feature differentiation, producing a structured view of the market that informs positioning, GTM, and product strategy decisions.
When to Use
- Entering a new market segment or vertical where the competitive field is unknown.
- Annual or quarterly competitive strategy refresh.
- A new competitor emerges in active deals or analyst reports.
- An existing competitor pivots positioning, acquires a company, or raises significant funding.
- Product leadership requests a landscape view to inform roadmap prioritisation.
- Preparing for a board presentation or investor update that requires market context.
- Sales encounters competitors in deals that PMM has no battle card for.
Workflow
- Define the mapping scope. Specify the market category, buyer persona, and use-case boundaries so the map does not sprawl into adjacent segments.
- Identify competitors. Pull from win/loss data, sales CRM tags, G2/Gartner/Forrester reports, and customer interview mentions. Separate into primary (appear in >10% of deals), secondary (occasional), and emerging (early-stage or adjacent).
- For each competitor, collect: company overview, target ICP, core positioning statement, pricing model and published tiers, key differentiators, known weaknesses, recent funding or M&A activity, and product release velocity.
- Build the competitive matrix. Rows are competitors; columns are evaluation dimensions (positioning, pricing, feature breadth, integration ecosystem, market perception, customer base size). Score each dimension on a consistent rubric.
- Plot a positioning map. Use two axes that matter most to your ICP (e.g., ease-of-use vs. enterprise depth, or breadth vs. specialisation). Place each competitor and your own product on the map.
- Identify white space. Flag positioning gaps where no competitor is strong and assess whether those gaps align with your product's strengths or roadmap direction.
- Write a competitive landscape brief summarising top threats, positioning overlaps, and recommended differentiation moves.
- Peer-review the map with sales leadership and product strategy. Validate that field experience matches the research.
- Publish the map to the competitive intelligence repository and link from each relevant battle card.
- Set a refresh cadence. Full refresh quarterly; incremental updates monthly or on significant competitive signals.
Anti-Patterns
- Mapping every company that tangentially overlaps. Why: An unfocused map dilutes attention from the competitors that actually appear in pipeline deals and confuses sales prioritisation.
- Relying solely on competitor marketing copy for positioning data. Why: Marketing sites present aspirational positioning; real positioning shows up in how competitors sell, price, and win deals.
- Creating the map once and never updating it. Why: Competitive landscapes shift quarterly; a stale map is actively misleading and erodes PMM credibility with sales.
- Scoring competitors without a consistent rubric. Why: Subjective scores make the matrix unreliable for cross-competitor comparison and impossible to track over time.
- Keeping the map in a PMM silo. Why: The map's value is proportional to how many decision-makers reference it; product, sales, and leadership all need access.
Output
Success:
- A competitive matrix covering primary and secondary competitors with consistent scoring across defined dimensions.
- A positioning map with clear axis definitions and placement rationale.
- A landscape brief with top-three threats, white-space opportunities, and recommended actions.
- Published to the competitive intelligence repository with links from relevant battle cards.
Failure:
- A list of competitors with no structured comparison or scoring.
- A map that includes so many players it provides no signal about who matters.
- A landscape document that has not been validated by sales and contains field-inaccurate assessments.
Related Skills
- competitive-response-monitor-pmm
- positioning-crafter
- pmm-market-intelligence
- pricing-strategy-pmm
sales-playbook-messaging — sibling skill under the same agent — combine with sales-playbook-messaging for end-to-end coverage
launch-narrative-builder — sibling skill under the same agent — combine with launch-narrative-builder for end-to-end coverage
positioning-crafter — sibling skill under the same agent — combine with positioning-crafter for end-to-end coverage
1---2name: competitor-mapper-pmm3description: Maps the competitive landscape including positioning, pricing, and feature differentiation. Use when entering a new market segment or preparing annual competitive strategy. Also consider when a new competitor emerges or an existing one pivots significantly. Suggest when sales encounters unfamiliar competitors in pipeline deals.4---56# competitor-mapper-pmm78## Agent: PMM9L2 product marketing manager responsible for competitive intelligence, positioning, GTM planning, pricing strategy, launch narrative, and sales enablement.1011Department ethos: [ideal-product.md](../../../../departments/product/ideal-product.md)1213## Skill Description14Maps the competitive landscape including positioning, pricing, and feature differentiation, producing a structured view of the market that informs positioning, GTM, and product strategy decisions.1516## When to Use17- Entering a new market segment or vertical where the competitive field is unknown.18- Annual or quarterly competitive strategy refresh.19- A new competitor emerges in active deals or analyst reports.20- An existing competitor pivots positioning, acquires a company, or raises significant funding.21- Product leadership requests a landscape view to inform roadmap prioritisation.22- Preparing for a board presentation or investor update that requires market context.23- Sales encounters competitors in deals that PMM has no battle card for.2425## Workflow261. Define the mapping scope. Specify the market category, buyer persona, and use-case boundaries so the map does not sprawl into adjacent segments.272. Identify competitors. Pull from win/loss data, sales CRM tags, G2/Gartner/Forrester reports, and customer interview mentions. Separate into primary (appear in >10% of deals), secondary (occasional), and emerging (early-stage or adjacent).283. For each competitor, collect: company overview, target ICP, core positioning statement, pricing model and published tiers, key differentiators, known weaknesses, recent funding or M&A activity, and product release velocity.294. Build the competitive matrix. Rows are competitors; columns are evaluation dimensions (positioning, pricing, feature breadth, integration ecosystem, market perception, customer base size). Score each dimension on a consistent rubric.305. Plot a positioning map. Use two axes that matter most to your ICP (e.g., ease-of-use vs. enterprise depth, or breadth vs. specialisation). Place each competitor and your own product on the map.316. Identify white space. Flag positioning gaps where no competitor is strong and assess whether those gaps align with your product's strengths or roadmap direction.327. Write a competitive landscape brief summarising top threats, positioning overlaps, and recommended differentiation moves.338. Peer-review the map with sales leadership and product strategy. Validate that field experience matches the research.349. Publish the map to the competitive intelligence repository and link from each relevant battle card.3510. Set a refresh cadence. Full refresh quarterly; incremental updates monthly or on significant competitive signals.3637## Anti-Patterns38- **Mapping every company that tangentially overlaps.** *Why: An unfocused map dilutes attention from the competitors that actually appear in pipeline deals and confuses sales prioritisation.*39- **Relying solely on competitor marketing copy for positioning data.** *Why: Marketing sites present aspirational positioning; real positioning shows up in how competitors sell, price, and win deals.*40- **Creating the map once and never updating it.** *Why: Competitive landscapes shift quarterly; a stale map is actively misleading and erodes PMM credibility with sales.*41- **Scoring competitors without a consistent rubric.** *Why: Subjective scores make the matrix unreliable for cross-competitor comparison and impossible to track over time.*42- **Keeping the map in a PMM silo.** *Why: The map's value is proportional to how many decision-makers reference it; product, sales, and leadership all need access.*4344## Output4546**Success:**47- A competitive matrix covering primary and secondary competitors with consistent scoring across defined dimensions.48- A positioning map with clear axis definitions and placement rationale.49- A landscape brief with top-three threats, white-space opportunities, and recommended actions.50- Published to the competitive intelligence repository with links from relevant battle cards.5152**Failure:**53- A list of competitors with no structured comparison or scoring.54- A map that includes so many players it provides no signal about who matters.55- A landscape document that has not been validated by sales and contains field-inaccurate assessments.5657## Related Skills58- competitive-response-monitor-pmm59- positioning-crafter60- pmm-market-intelligence61- pricing-strategy-pmm62- [`sales-playbook-messaging`](../sales-playbook-messaging/SKILL.md) — sibling skill under the same agent — combine with sales-playbook-messaging for end-to-end coverage63- [`launch-narrative-builder`](../launch-narrative-builder/SKILL.md) — sibling skill under the same agent — combine with launch-narrative-builder for end-to-end coverage64- [`positioning-crafter`](../positioning-crafter/SKILL.md) — sibling skill under the same agent — combine with positioning-crafter for end-to-end coverage