Construction Estimator Pro
Complete construction estimating methodology — from quantity takeoff to bid submission. Zero dependencies.
Phase 1: Project Classification & Estimate Type
Estimate Type Decision Matrix
| Project Stage |
Estimate Type |
Accuracy |
Basis |
Use Case |
| Concept |
Order of Magnitude |
-30% to +50% |
SF/unit costs |
Go/no-go decisions |
| Schematic |
Conceptual/Budget |
-15% to +30% |
Assembly costs |
Budget approval |
| Design Dev |
Detailed |
-10% to +15% |
Quantity takeoff |
GMP/bid preparation |
| Construction Docs |
Definitive/Bid |
-5% to +10% |
Full QTO + subs |
Lump sum bid |
| Construction |
Control |
Actual costs |
Committed + forecast |
Cost management |
Project Brief YAML
project:
name: ""
number: ""
type: residential | commercial | industrial | infrastructure | renovation
delivery: design-bid-build | design-build | CM-at-risk | IPD
location:
city: ""
state: ""
zip: ""
location_factor: 1.00 # RSMeans city cost index / national average
owner: ""
architect: ""
scope:
gross_sf: 0
stories: 0
site_acres: 0
description: ""
schedule:
bid_date: ""
construction_start: ""
substantial_completion: ""
duration_months: 0
estimate:
type: order-of-magnitude | conceptual | detailed | definitive
base_date: "" # Date costs are based on
escalation_rate: 0.04 # Annual construction cost escalation
assumptions:
- ""
exclusions:
- ""
allowances:
- item: ""
amount: 0
Project Type Quick Reference
| Type |
Key Considerations |
Typical $/SF Range (2024-2026) |
| Single Family Residential |
Foundation type, finishes grade, energy code |
$150-$400/SF |
| Multi-Family |
Unit mix, parking ratio, amenities |
$200-$450/SF |
| Office (Class A) |
Curtain wall, MEP density, TI allowance |
$250-$550/SF |
| Retail |
Shell vs TI, storefront, grease traps |
$150-$350/SF |
| Healthcare/Hospital |
Life safety, med gas, shielding |
$400-$900/SF |
| K-12 Education |
Prevailing wage, hazmat, phasing |
$300-$600/SF |
| Warehouse/Distribution |
Clear height, slab flatness, dock count |
$80-$180/SF |
| Hotel |
Star rating drives finish, FF&E budget |
$200-$500/SF |
| Infrastructure (road/mile) |
Soil conditions, utilities, traffic control |
$2M-$10M/mile |
Phase 2: Quantity Takeoff (QTO)
CSI MasterFormat Division Structure
Use CSI MasterFormat 2018 for ALL estimates. Every line item maps to a division.
| Division |
Name |
Typical % of Total |
| 01 |
General Requirements |
8-12% |
| 02 |
Existing Conditions |
1-5% |
| 03 |
Concrete |
8-15% |
| 04 |
Masonry |
2-6% |
| 05 |
Metals (Structural Steel) |
8-15% |
| 06 |
Wood, Plastics, Composites |
3-8% |
| 07 |
Thermal & Moisture Protection |
4-8% |
| 08 |
Openings (Doors/Windows) |
3-7% |
| 09 |
Finishes |
8-15% |
| 10 |
Specialties |
1-3% |
| 11 |
Equipment |
1-5% |
| 12 |
Furnishings |
1-5% |
| 13 |
Special Construction |
0-3% |
| 14 |
Conveying Equipment (Elevators) |
1-4% |
| 21 |
Fire Suppression |
2-4% |
| 22 |
Plumbing |
4-8% |
| 23 |
HVAC |
8-15% |
| 26 |
Electrical |
8-15% |
| 27 |
Communications |
1-3% |
| 28 |
Electronic Safety & Security |
1-3% |
| 31 |
Earthwork |
3-8% |
| 32 |
Exterior Improvements |
2-6% |
| 33 |
Utilities |
2-5% |
QTO Best Practices
- Measure twice, price once — QTO errors cascade through the entire estimate
- Use consistent units — SF for areas, LF for linear, CY for volume, EA for items
- Add waste factors by material:
- Concrete: 5-8%
- Masonry: 3-5%
- Drywall: 10-12%
- Roofing: 8-10%
- Flooring (tile): 10-15%
- Lumber: 8-10%
- Rebar: 5-7%
- Paint: 10-15%
- Document measurement methodology — so anyone can verify
- Cross-check totals — SF of drywall ≈ 2.5-3x floor area (both sides of walls + ceilings)
QTO Line Item Template
line_item:
division: "03"
spec_section: "03 30 00"
description: "Cast-in-Place Concrete - Elevated Slabs"
quantity: 450
unit: CY
unit_cost:
labor: 85.00
material: 165.00
equipment: 25.00
subcontractor: 0.00
total_unit_cost: 275.00
extended_cost: 123750.00
waste_factor: 0.07
adjusted_quantity: 481.5
notes: "4500 PSI, #5 rebar @ 12\" OC EW, 6\" slab"
source: "Sub quote - ABC Concrete (02/15/2026)"
confidence: high | medium | low
Quantity Verification Cross-Checks
| Check |
Formula |
Flag If |
| Concrete per SF |
Total CY ÷ Building SF |
>0.15 CY/SF (unless heavy structure) |
| Steel per SF |
Total tons ÷ Building SF |
>15 PSF (unless high-rise) |
| Drywall SF |
Total drywall SF ÷ Floor SF |
<2.0 or >4.0 ratio |
| Electrical per SF |
Electrical $ ÷ Building SF |
>$35/SF (standard office) |
| Plumbing fixtures |
Count vs occupancy |
Missing fixtures for code compliance |
| Parking spaces |
Per local code requirements |
Below minimum ratio |
Phase 3: Pricing & Cost Assembly
Unit Cost Development
Cost source hierarchy (most reliable first):
- Subcontractor quotes (3 minimum per trade) — best for bid estimates
- Historical project data — adjusted for location, time, scope
- RSMeans/Gordian data — industry standard reference
- Vendor quotes — for specific materials/equipment
- Published cost guides — Marshall & Swift, Craftsman
Labor Cost Build-Up
labor_rate_build_up:
trade: "Carpenter"
base_wage: 42.50
fringe_benefits: 18.75 # Health, pension, vacation, training
payroll_taxes: 8.90 # FICA, FUTA, SUTA, workers comp
total_burden: 27.65
burdened_rate: 70.15
productivity_factors:
weather: 1.00 # 1.0 = normal, 1.15 = winter
overtime: 1.00 # 1.0 = straight time, 1.5 = OT
height: 1.00 # 1.0 = ground, 1.10 = >30ft
congestion: 1.00 # 1.0 = open, 1.15 = tight
shift: 1.00 # 1.0 = day, 1.10 = swing, 1.15 = night
adjusted_rate: 70.15
Subcontractor Quote Evaluation
Score each sub quote (use minimum 3 per trade):
| Factor |
Weight |
1-5 Score |
| Price competitiveness |
30% |
|
| Scope completeness (covers all spec sections?) |
25% |
|
| Qualifications/exclusions (red flags?) |
20% |
|
| Past performance/reputation |
15% |
|
| Bond capacity/insurance |
10% |
|
| Weighted Total |
100% |
|
Red flags in sub quotes:
- "As needed" or "TBD" line items (scope gap)
- Short validity period (<30 days)
- Unusual exclusions (e.g., electrician excluding wire)
- No reference to spec sections
- Price significantly below others (they missed something)
Crew Rate Assembly
Crew Daily Cost = Σ(Workers × Daily Rate) + Equipment Daily Cost
Crew Daily Output = Units per 8-hour day (from labor standards)
Unit Cost = Crew Daily Cost ÷ Crew Daily Output
Example — Concrete Placement Crew:
- 1 Foreman @ $75/hr × 8 = $600
- 4 Laborers @ $55/hr × 8 = $1,760
- 1 Vibrator operator @ $60/hr × 8 = $480
- Concrete pump (daily rental) = $1,200
- Crew Daily Cost = $4,040
- Daily output: 50 CY
- Unit Labor+Equipment Cost = $80.80/CY
- Material (concrete delivered) = $165/CY
- Total in-place cost = $245.80/CY
Phase 4: Indirect Costs & Markups
General Conditions (Division 01) Checklist
| Item |
Duration-Based? |
Typical Range |
| Project Manager |
Yes |
$12K-$18K/month |
| Superintendent |
Yes |
$10K-$16K/month |
| Project Engineer |
Yes |
$8K-$12K/month |
| Field Office (trailer) |
Yes |
$1K-$3K/month |
| Temporary utilities |
Yes |
$2K-$5K/month |
| Temporary toilets |
Yes |
$200-$500/month each |
| Dumpsters/waste removal |
Yes |
$1K-$4K/month |
| Safety equipment/supplies |
Yes |
$500-$2K/month |
| Small tools & consumables |
Lump |
1-2% of labor |
| Final cleaning |
Lump |
$0.15-$0.50/SF |
| Permits (building) |
Lump |
Varies by jurisdiction |
| Insurance (Builder's Risk) |
Lump |
0.5-1.5% of cost |
| Performance/Payment Bond |
Lump |
1-3% of contract |
| Testing & inspection |
Lump |
0.5-1.5% of cost |
| As-built documentation |
Lump |
$5K-$25K |
| Commissioning support |
Lump |
$10K-$50K |
Rule of thumb: General conditions = 8-15% of direct costs (lower for large projects, higher for small/complex).
Markup Stack
markup_calculation:
direct_costs: 2500000
general_conditions:
percentage: 0.10
amount: 250000
subtotal_1: 2750000
overhead:
percentage: 0.05 # Home office overhead
amount: 137500
subtotal_2: 2887500
profit:
percentage: 0.05 # Varies by market/risk
amount: 144375
subtotal_3: 3031875
contingency:
design_contingency: 0.05 # For incomplete drawings
construction_contingency: 0.03 # For unforeseen conditions
amount: 242550
bond:
percentage: 0.015
amount: 49118
escalation:
rate: 0.04 # Annual
months_to_midpoint: 8
amount: 88536
total_estimate: 3412079
cost_per_sf: 341.21 # For 10,000 SF building
Contingency Guide
| Estimate Type |
Design Contingency |
Construction Contingency |
| Order of Magnitude |
15-25% |
10-15% |
| Conceptual |
10-15% |
5-10% |
| Detailed |
3-8% |
3-5% |
| Definitive/Bid |
0-3% |
2-3% |
Contingency is NOT profit padding. Track and justify every contingency draw.
Phase 5: Bid Preparation & Strategy
Bid/No-Bid Decision Scorecard
Score 1-5 for each (minimum 30 to bid):
| Factor |
Weight |
Score |
| Project type experience |
3x |
|
| Client relationship/history |
2x |
|
| Current workload capacity |
3x |
|
| Geographic fit |
2x |
|
| Profit potential |
3x |
|
| Competition level (fewer = better) |
2x |
|
| Risk profile (lower = better) |
3x |
|
| Schedule feasibility |
2x |
|
| Bonding capacity available |
2x |
|
| Weighted Total |
/110 |
|
Bid Day Checklist
48 hours before:
Day of bid:
Competitive Bid Strategy
Market conditions affect markup:
- Hot market (lots of work): Markup 8-12% (O&P combined)
- Normal market: Markup 6-10%
- Slow market: Markup 3-6%
- Must-win/strategic: Markup 2-4% (minimum to cover overhead)
Bid spread analysis (track your results):
Bid Spread = (Your Bid - Low Bid) ÷ Low Bid × 100
- Consistently >10% high → Your costs are inflated or productivity assumptions too conservative
- Consistently <2% from low → You might be leaving money on the table
- Target: Within 3-5% of winning bid
Phase 6: Value Engineering (VE)
VE Opportunity Matrix
| System |
VE Opportunity |
Typical Savings |
Risk Level |
| Structural |
Steel vs concrete frame |
5-15% of structure |
Medium |
| Foundations |
Spread vs mat vs piles |
10-30% of foundation |
High (geotech dependent) |
| Envelope |
Curtain wall vs storefront |
15-30% of facade |
Low-Medium |
| Roofing |
TPO vs modified bitumen |
10-20% of roofing |
Low |
| Mechanical |
VAV vs VRF |
10-25% of HVAC |
Medium |
| Electrical |
LED fixtures, panel optimization |
5-15% of electrical |
Low |
| Finishes |
Material substitutions |
10-40% of finishes |
Low |
| Site |
Reduce import/export of soil |
10-30% of sitework |
Medium |
VE Proposal Template
ve_item:
number: VE-001
description: "Substitute VRF system for conventional VAV"
division: "23"
original:
description: "VAV air handling system with ductwork"
cost: 850000
proposed:
description: "Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) with DOAS"
cost: 680000
savings: 170000
savings_pct: 20%
impact:
schedule: "Reduces mechanical rough-in by 2 weeks"
quality: "Better zone control, lower operating cost"
maintenance: "Higher per-unit cost but less ductwork"
code_compliance: "Meets ASHRAE 90.1, verify local amendments"
risk: medium
recommendation: accept | reject | modify
requires_redesign: yes | no
redesign_cost: 15000
net_savings: 155000
VE Decision Rules
- Never VE life safety — fire protection, structural integrity, egress
- Calculate lifecycle cost — cheap upfront ≠ cheap over 20 years
- Get architect/engineer sign-off before bidding VE alternates
- Document everything — VE that isn't documented becomes a scope gap
- Owner decides — present options with data, let them choose
Phase 7: Change Order Management
Change Order Pricing Rules
Contractor markup on changes (typical):
| Tier |
Self-Performed Work |
Subcontractor Work |
| Overhead |
10% |
5% |
| Profit |
10% |
5% |
| Bond |
Add actual % |
Add actual % |
Time & Material (T&M) documentation requirements:
- Daily time sheets signed by owner's rep
- Material invoices with delivery tickets
- Equipment logs with hours
- Photos of work in progress
Change Order YAML Template
change_order:
number: CO-001
date: ""
description: ""
reason:
type: owner-directed | unforeseen-condition | design-error | code-change | scope-clarification
rfi_number: ""
cost_breakdown:
labor:
hours: 0
rate: 0
total: 0
material:
items: []
total: 0
equipment:
items: []
total: 0
subcontractor:
items: []
total: 0
direct_cost: 0
markup: 0.15
total_cost: 0
schedule_impact:
days: 0
critical_path: yes | no
explanation: ""
status: pending | approved | rejected | negotiating
Change Order Negotiation Tips
- Price it immediately — delay weakens your position
- Submit with backup — labor rates, material quotes, productivity analysis
- Separate time from money — negotiate schedule impact independently
- Track cumulative impact — 20 small changes = major schedule disruption (even if each is "0 days")
- Constructive acceleration — if owner delays approval but expects same completion, document it
- Unit price book — agree on unit prices at contract start for common change types
Phase 8: Cost Control During Construction
Earned Value Management (EVM)
Budget at Completion (BAC) = Total budget
Planned Value (PV) = Budgeted cost of work scheduled
Earned Value (EV) = Budgeted cost of work performed
Actual Cost (AC) = Actual cost of work performed
Schedule Performance Index (SPI) = EV / PV
>1.0 = ahead of schedule
<1.0 = behind schedule
Cost Performance Index (CPI) = EV / AC
>1.0 = under budget
<1.0 = over budget
Estimate at Completion (EAC) = BAC / CPI
Variance at Completion (VAC) = BAC - EAC
Monthly Cost Report Template
cost_report:
project: ""
period: ""
report_date: ""
summary:
original_contract: 0
approved_changes: 0
pending_changes: 0
current_budget: 0
committed_cost: 0 # Subcontracts + POs
actual_cost_to_date: 0
forecast_to_complete: 0
estimate_at_completion: 0
variance: 0
contingency_remaining: 0
schedule:
percent_complete: 0
spi: 0
cpi: 0
days_ahead_behind: 0
cash_flow:
billed_to_date: 0
collected_to_date: 0
retention_held: 0
risk_items:
- description: ""
potential_cost: 0
probability: high | medium | low
mitigation: ""
Cost Control Red Flags
| Signal |
What It Means |
Action |
| CPI < 0.95 in first 25% |
Systemic cost overrun |
Root cause analysis NOW |
| Contingency burn > schedule % |
Burning contingency too fast |
Tighten change management |
| >5 pending COs unsigned |
Cash flow risk, scope dispute |
Escalate to PM/owner |
| Sub invoices > committed |
Sub performing extra work |
Verify scope, issue CO or stop work |
| Retainage release requests early |
Sub cash flow problems |
Monitor closely, check lien waivers |
Phase 9: Specialty Estimate Types
Renovation/Remodel Estimating
Add these factors to renovation estimates:
- Selective demolition: Price item-by-item (never lump sum)
- Hazmat survey: Asbestos ($3-5K), lead paint ($2-4K) — MANDATORY before bid
- Abatement: 2-5x removal cost vs new construction equivalent
- Protection of existing: Dust barriers, floor protection, HVAC isolation
- Working hours: Occupied buildings = nights/weekends = premium labor
- Discovery allowance: 10-15% for hidden conditions behind walls
- Temporary facilities: HVAC, power, restrooms during renovation
- Phasing/sequencing: Adds 15-30% management overhead
Sitework Estimating
Critical factors:
sitework_checklist:
geotechnical:
- Soil bearing capacity
- Water table depth
- Rock depth (blasting vs mechanical?)
- Contamination (Phase I/II ESA results)
earthwork:
cut_cy: 0
fill_cy: 0
import_export: 0 # Net CY to haul
haul_distance_miles: 0
compaction_required: standard | proctor_95 | proctor_98
utilities:
water_tap_fee: 0
sewer_tap_fee: 0
fire_line: 0
storm_detention: required | not_required
paving:
asphalt_sy: 0
concrete_sy: 0
curb_lf: 0
striping_lf: 0
landscape:
sod_sf: 0
trees_ea: 0
irrigation: yes | no
erosion_control: silt_fence | inlet_protection | retention_pond
MEP (Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing) Quick Checks
| System |
$/SF Benchmark (Commercial Office) |
Flag If |
| HVAC |
$25-$50/SF |
>$55 or <$20 |
| Plumbing |
$12-$25/SF |
>$30 or <$8 |
| Fire Protection |
$4-$8/SF |
>$10 or <$3 |
| Electrical (power) |
$18-$35/SF |
>$40 or <$12 |
| Low voltage/data |
$5-$12/SF |
>$15 or <$3 |
| Total MEP |
$64-$130/SF |
>$150 or <$46 |
Phase 10: Escalation & Location Adjustments
Construction Cost Escalation
Future Cost = Current Cost × (1 + Annual Rate) ^ (Months to Midpoint ÷ 12)
Recent escalation trends (US):
- 2020-2022: 8-15% annually (pandemic/supply chain)
- 2023-2024: 4-6% annually (normalizing)
- 2025-2026 forecast: 3-5% annually
- Long-term average: 3-4% annually
Always escalate to the MIDPOINT of construction, not the start.
Location Factor Application
Local Cost = National Average Cost × City Cost Index
Sample RSMeans City Cost Indices (100 = national average):
| City |
Index |
|
City |
Index |
| New York, NY |
130-145 |
|
Dallas, TX |
88-95 |
| San Francisco, CA |
125-140 |
|
Atlanta, GA |
90-97 |
| Boston, MA |
115-130 |
|
Phoenix, AZ |
88-94 |
| Chicago, IL |
110-120 |
|
Denver, CO |
95-105 |
| Seattle, WA |
108-118 |
|
Nashville, TN |
88-95 |
| Washington, DC |
100-110 |
|
Charlotte, NC |
85-92 |
| Miami, FL |
92-100 |
|
Houston, TX |
85-93 |
| Minneapolis, MN |
105-112 |
|
Rural areas |
70-85 |
Phase 11: Estimate Quality Review
100-Point Estimate Quality Rubric
| Dimension |
Weight |
Criteria |
| Scope completeness |
20 |
All spec sections priced, no gaps, exclusions documented |
| Quantity accuracy |
20 |
QTO verified, cross-checks pass, waste factors applied |
| Pricing basis |
15 |
3+ sub quotes per trade, current material prices, documented sources |
| Indirect costs |
10 |
GCs detailed (not lump), schedule-based items tied to duration |
| Markup appropriateness |
10 |
Market-competitive, risk-adjusted, contingency justified |
| Documentation |
10 |
Assumptions listed, basis of estimate narrative, organized by division |
| Adjustments |
10 |
Location factor applied, escalation to midpoint, seasonal factors |
| Presentation |
5 |
Professional format, clear summary, alternates separated |
Grading: 90+ = Bid-ready | 75-89 = Needs refinement | 60-74 = Major gaps | <60 = Redo
Peer Review Checklist
Phase 12: Common Mistakes & Edge Cases
10 Estimate-Killing Mistakes
| # |
Mistake |
Prevention |
| 1 |
Missing addenda |
Checklist: log every addendum, initial when incorporated |
| 2 |
Incomplete sub scope |
Write scope sheets with inclusions AND exclusions |
| 3 |
Wrong labor rates |
Verify union vs open shop, prevailing wage, location |
| 4 |
No escalation |
ALWAYS escalate to construction midpoint |
| 5 |
Lump sum general conditions |
Detail every line item tied to schedule |
| 6 |
Ignoring phasing |
Multi-phase = mobilize/demobilize multiple times |
| 7 |
Missing temporary work |
Shoring, dewatering, winter protection, dust control |
| 8 |
Under-priced site conditions |
Get geotech report BEFORE estimating foundations |
| 9 |
Scope gaps between trades |
Who installs the backing for the TV mount? |
| 10 |
Not reading the fine print |
Liquidated damages, retainage, payment terms |
Edge Cases
Occupied building renovation:
- Work hours restriction → labor premium 15-40%
- Dust/noise control → add $2-5/SF
- Security/escort requirements → add supervision cost
- Existing condition discovery → 10-15% allowance minimum
Remote/rural project:
- Travel/per diem for crews → $150-$250/worker/day
- Material delivery premium → 5-15% depending on distance
- Limited sub market → fewer quotes, less competitive pricing
- Equipment mobilization → long haul costs for cranes, excavators
Fast-track schedule:
- Overtime premium → plan 20-30% labor cost increase
- Acceleration costs → additional supervision, equipment
- Out-of-sequence work → productivity losses 10-25%
- Premium material delivery → expediting fees
Public/government work:
- Prevailing wages → 20-40% labor cost increase
- DBE/MBE/WBE goals → subcontracting requirements, good faith effort
- Buy American/Buy America → material cost premium 10-30%
- Bid protest risk → ensure perfect compliance with ITB
Design-Build:
- Design contingency higher (incomplete docs at pricing)
- Self-perform vs sub trade-offs
- Design liability insurance (professional liability)
- Allowances for owner decisions not yet made
Natural Language Commands
| Command |
Action |
| "Estimate this project" |
Run full estimate workflow from Phase 1 |
| "Price [division/trade]" |
Develop unit costs for specific trade |
| "Check my quantities" |
Run QTO verification cross-checks |
| "Value engineer [system]" |
Generate VE alternatives with savings |
| "Write change order for [scope]" |
Generate CO with pricing and backup |
| "Compare sub quotes for [trade]" |
Score and compare subcontractor bids |
| "Monthly cost report" |
Generate EVM-based cost report |
| "Bid/no-bid analysis for [project]" |
Run decision scorecard |
| "Location adjust to [city]" |
Apply RSMeans location factor |
| "Escalate costs to [date]" |
Calculate escalation to future midpoint |
| "Review my estimate" |
Run 100-point quality rubric |
| "Generate bid summary" |
Format estimate for bid submission |
1---2name: afrexai-construction-estimator3description: Complete construction estimating and cost management system. Use when preparing project estimates, bid proposals, cost breakdowns, value engineering, change order management, or construction budget tracking. Covers residential, commercial, and infrastructure projects. Trigger on 'estimate', 'construction cost', 'bid', 'takeoff', 'cost breakdown', 'change order', 'value engineering', 'construction budget', 'unit pricing', 'RSMeans'.4---5
6# Construction Estimator Pro
7
8> Complete construction estimating methodology — from quantity takeoff to bid submission. Zero dependencies.
9
10---
11
12## Phase 1: Project Classification & Estimate Type
13
14### Estimate Type Decision Matrix
15
16| Project Stage | Estimate Type | Accuracy | Basis | Use Case |
17|---|---|---|---|---|
18| Concept | Order of Magnitude | -30% to +50% | SF/unit costs | Go/no-go decisions |
19| Schematic | Conceptual/Budget | -15% to +30% | Assembly costs | Budget approval |
20| Design Dev | Detailed | -10% to +15% | Quantity takeoff | GMP/bid preparation |
21| Construction Docs | Definitive/Bid | -5% to +10% | Full QTO + subs | Lump sum bid |
22| Construction | Control | Actual costs | Committed + forecast | Cost management |
23
24### Project Brief YAML
25
26```yaml
27project:
28 name: ""
29 number: ""
30 type: residential | commercial | industrial | infrastructure | renovation
31 delivery: design-bid-build | design-build | CM-at-risk | IPD
32 location:
33 city: ""
34 state: ""
35 zip: ""
36 location_factor: 1.00 # RSMeans city cost index / national average
37 owner: ""
38 architect: ""
39
40scope:
41 gross_sf: 0
42 stories: 0
43 site_acres: 0
44 description: ""
45
46schedule:
47 bid_date: ""
48 construction_start: ""
49 substantial_completion: ""
50 duration_months: 0
51
52estimate:
53 type: order-of-magnitude | conceptual | detailed | definitive
54 base_date: "" # Date costs are based on
55 escalation_rate: 0.04 # Annual construction cost escalation
56
57assumptions:
58 - ""
59exclusions:
60 - ""
61allowances:
62 - item: ""
63 amount: 0
64```
65
66### Project Type Quick Reference
67
68| Type | Key Considerations | Typical $/SF Range (2024-2026) |
69|---|---|---|
70| Single Family Residential | Foundation type, finishes grade, energy code | $150-$400/SF |
71| Multi-Family | Unit mix, parking ratio, amenities | $200-$450/SF |
72| Office (Class A) | Curtain wall, MEP density, TI allowance | $250-$550/SF |
73| Retail | Shell vs TI, storefront, grease traps | $150-$350/SF |
74| Healthcare/Hospital | Life safety, med gas, shielding | $400-$900/SF |
75| K-12 Education | Prevailing wage, hazmat, phasing | $300-$600/SF |
76| Warehouse/Distribution | Clear height, slab flatness, dock count | $80-$180/SF |
77| Hotel | Star rating drives finish, FF&E budget | $200-$500/SF |
78| Infrastructure (road/mile) | Soil conditions, utilities, traffic control | $2M-$10M/mile |
79
80---
81
82## Phase 2: Quantity Takeoff (QTO)
83
84### CSI MasterFormat Division Structure
85
86Use CSI MasterFormat 2018 for ALL estimates. Every line item maps to a division.
87
88| Division | Name | Typical % of Total |
89|---|---|---|
90| 01 | General Requirements | 8-12% |
91| 02 | Existing Conditions | 1-5% |
92| 03 | Concrete | 8-15% |
93| 04 | Masonry | 2-6% |
94| 05 | Metals (Structural Steel) | 8-15% |
95| 06 | Wood, Plastics, Composites | 3-8% |
96| 07 | Thermal & Moisture Protection | 4-8% |
97| 08 | Openings (Doors/Windows) | 3-7% |
98| 09 | Finishes | 8-15% |
99| 10 | Specialties | 1-3% |
100| 11 | Equipment | 1-5% |
101| 12 | Furnishings | 1-5% |
102| 13 | Special Construction | 0-3% |
103| 14 | Conveying Equipment (Elevators) | 1-4% |
104| 21 | Fire Suppression | 2-4% |
105| 22 | Plumbing | 4-8% |
106| 23 | HVAC | 8-15% |
107| 26 | Electrical | 8-15% |
108| 27 | Communications | 1-3% |
109| 28 | Electronic Safety & Security | 1-3% |
110| 31 | Earthwork | 3-8% |
111| 32 | Exterior Improvements | 2-6% |
112| 33 | Utilities | 2-5% |
113
114### QTO Best Practices
115
1161. **Measure twice, price once** — QTO errors cascade through the entire estimate
1172. **Use consistent units** — SF for areas, LF for linear, CY for volume, EA for items
1183. **Add waste factors by material:**
119 - Concrete: 5-8%
120 - Masonry: 3-5%
121 - Drywall: 10-12%
122 - Roofing: 8-10%
123 - Flooring (tile): 10-15%
124 - Lumber: 8-10%
125 - Rebar: 5-7%
126 - Paint: 10-15%
1274. **Document measurement methodology** — so anyone can verify
1285. **Cross-check totals** — SF of drywall ≈ 2.5-3x floor area (both sides of walls + ceilings)
129
130### QTO Line Item Template
131
132```yaml
133line_item:
134 division: "03"
135 spec_section: "03 30 00"
136 description: "Cast-in-Place Concrete - Elevated Slabs"
137 quantity: 450
138 unit: CY
139 unit_cost:
140 labor: 85.00
141 material: 165.00
142 equipment: 25.00
143 subcontractor: 0.00
144 total_unit_cost: 275.00
145 extended_cost: 123750.00
146 waste_factor: 0.07
147 adjusted_quantity: 481.5
148 notes: "4500 PSI, #5 rebar @ 12\" OC EW, 6\" slab"
149 source: "Sub quote - ABC Concrete (02/15/2026)"
150 confidence: high | medium | low
151```
152
153### Quantity Verification Cross-Checks
154
155| Check | Formula | Flag If |
156|---|---|---|
157| Concrete per SF | Total CY ÷ Building SF | >0.15 CY/SF (unless heavy structure) |
158| Steel per SF | Total tons ÷ Building SF | >15 PSF (unless high-rise) |
159| Drywall SF | Total drywall SF ÷ Floor SF | <2.0 or >4.0 ratio |
160| Electrical per SF | Electrical $ ÷ Building SF | >$35/SF (standard office) |
161| Plumbing fixtures | Count vs occupancy | Missing fixtures for code compliance |
162| Parking spaces | Per local code requirements | Below minimum ratio |
163
164---
165
166## Phase 3: Pricing & Cost Assembly
167
168### Unit Cost Development
169
170**Cost source hierarchy (most reliable first):**
1711. **Subcontractor quotes** (3 minimum per trade) — best for bid estimates
1722. **Historical project data** — adjusted for location, time, scope
1733. **RSMeans/Gordian data** — industry standard reference
1744. **Vendor quotes** — for specific materials/equipment
1755. **Published cost guides** — Marshall & Swift, Craftsman
176
177### Labor Cost Build-Up
178
179```yaml
180labor_rate_build_up:
181 trade: "Carpenter"
182 base_wage: 42.50
183 fringe_benefits: 18.75 # Health, pension, vacation, training
184 payroll_taxes: 8.90 # FICA, FUTA, SUTA, workers comp
185 total_burden: 27.65
186 burdened_rate: 70.15
187
188 productivity_factors:
189 weather: 1.00 # 1.0 = normal, 1.15 = winter
190 overtime: 1.00 # 1.0 = straight time, 1.5 = OT
191 height: 1.00 # 1.0 = ground, 1.10 = >30ft
192 congestion: 1.00 # 1.0 = open, 1.15 = tight
193 shift: 1.00 # 1.0 = day, 1.10 = swing, 1.15 = night
194 adjusted_rate: 70.15
195```
196
197### Subcontractor Quote Evaluation
198
199Score each sub quote (use minimum 3 per trade):
200
201| Factor | Weight | 1-5 Score |
202|---|---|---|
203| Price competitiveness | 30% | |
204| Scope completeness (covers all spec sections?) | 25% | |
205| Qualifications/exclusions (red flags?) | 20% | |
206| Past performance/reputation | 15% | |
207| Bond capacity/insurance | 10% | |
208| **Weighted Total** | 100% | |
209
210**Red flags in sub quotes:**
211- "As needed" or "TBD" line items (scope gap)
212- Short validity period (<30 days)
213- Unusual exclusions (e.g., electrician excluding wire)
214- No reference to spec sections
215- Price significantly below others (they missed something)
216
217### Crew Rate Assembly
218
219```
220Crew Daily Cost = Σ(Workers × Daily Rate) + Equipment Daily Cost
221Crew Daily Output = Units per 8-hour day (from labor standards)
222Unit Cost = Crew Daily Cost ÷ Crew Daily Output
223```
224
225**Example — Concrete Placement Crew:**
226- 1 Foreman @ $75/hr × 8 = $600
227- 4 Laborers @ $55/hr × 8 = $1,760
228- 1 Vibrator operator @ $60/hr × 8 = $480
229- Concrete pump (daily rental) = $1,200
230- **Crew Daily Cost = $4,040**
231- Daily output: 50 CY
232- **Unit Labor+Equipment Cost = $80.80/CY**
233- Material (concrete delivered) = $165/CY
234- **Total in-place cost = $245.80/CY**
235
236---
237
238## Phase 4: Indirect Costs & Markups
239
240### General Conditions (Division 01) Checklist
241
242| Item | Duration-Based? | Typical Range |
243|---|---|---|
244| Project Manager | Yes | $12K-$18K/month |
245| Superintendent | Yes | $10K-$16K/month |
246| Project Engineer | Yes | $8K-$12K/month |
247| Field Office (trailer) | Yes | $1K-$3K/month |
248| Temporary utilities | Yes | $2K-$5K/month |
249| Temporary toilets | Yes | $200-$500/month each |
250| Dumpsters/waste removal | Yes | $1K-$4K/month |
251| Safety equipment/supplies | Yes | $500-$2K/month |
252| Small tools & consumables | Lump | 1-2% of labor |
253| Final cleaning | Lump | $0.15-$0.50/SF |
254| Permits (building) | Lump | Varies by jurisdiction |
255| Insurance (Builder's Risk) | Lump | 0.5-1.5% of cost |
256| Performance/Payment Bond | Lump | 1-3% of contract |
257| Testing & inspection | Lump | 0.5-1.5% of cost |
258| As-built documentation | Lump | $5K-$25K |
259| Commissioning support | Lump | $10K-$50K |
260
261**Rule of thumb:** General conditions = 8-15% of direct costs (lower for large projects, higher for small/complex).
262
263### Markup Stack
264
265```yaml
266markup_calculation:
267 direct_costs: 2500000
268
269 general_conditions:
270 percentage: 0.10
271 amount: 250000
272
273 subtotal_1: 2750000
274
275 overhead:
276 percentage: 0.05 # Home office overhead
277 amount: 137500
278
279 subtotal_2: 2887500
280
281 profit:
282 percentage: 0.05 # Varies by market/risk
283 amount: 144375
284
285 subtotal_3: 3031875
286
287 contingency:
288 design_contingency: 0.05 # For incomplete drawings
289 construction_contingency: 0.03 # For unforeseen conditions
290 amount: 242550
291
292 bond:
293 percentage: 0.015
294 amount: 49118
295
296 escalation:
297 rate: 0.04 # Annual
298 months_to_midpoint: 8
299 amount: 88536
300
301 total_estimate: 3412079
302 cost_per_sf: 341.21 # For 10,000 SF building
303```
304
305### Contingency Guide
306
307| Estimate Type | Design Contingency | Construction Contingency |
308|---|---|---|
309| Order of Magnitude | 15-25% | 10-15% |
310| Conceptual | 10-15% | 5-10% |
311| Detailed | 3-8% | 3-5% |
312| Definitive/Bid | 0-3% | 2-3% |
313
314**Contingency is NOT profit padding.** Track and justify every contingency draw.
315
316---
317
318## Phase 5: Bid Preparation & Strategy
319
320### Bid/No-Bid Decision Scorecard
321
322Score 1-5 for each (minimum 30 to bid):
323
324| Factor | Weight | Score |
325|---|---|---|
326| Project type experience | 3x | |
327| Client relationship/history | 2x | |
328| Current workload capacity | 3x | |
329| Geographic fit | 2x | |
330| Profit potential | 3x | |
331| Competition level (fewer = better) | 2x | |
332| Risk profile (lower = better) | 3x | |
333| Schedule feasibility | 2x | |
334| Bonding capacity available | 2x | |
335| **Weighted Total** | /110 | |
336
337### Bid Day Checklist
338
339**48 hours before:**
340- [ ] All sub quotes received (minimum 3 per trade)
341- [ ] All material quotes current (check expiration dates)
342- [ ] Addenda reviewed and incorporated (ALL of them)
343- [ ] Scope gaps identified and plugged
344- [ ] Math verified (independent check)
345
346**Day of bid:**
347- [ ] Final sub quotes plugged in
348- [ ] Markup/profit decision finalized
349- [ ] Alternates priced if required
350- [ ] Unit prices calculated if required
351- [ ] Bid bond secured
352- [ ] Bid form completed correctly (every blank filled)
353- [ ] Acknowledge ALL addenda on bid form
354- [ ] Authorized signature
355- [ ] Delivered before deadline (allow 1+ hour buffer)
356
357### Competitive Bid Strategy
358
359**Market conditions affect markup:**
360- Hot market (lots of work): Markup 8-12% (O&P combined)
361- Normal market: Markup 6-10%
362- Slow market: Markup 3-6%
363- Must-win/strategic: Markup 2-4% (minimum to cover overhead)
364
365**Bid spread analysis** (track your results):
366```
367Bid Spread = (Your Bid - Low Bid) ÷ Low Bid × 100
368```
369- Consistently >10% high → Your costs are inflated or productivity assumptions too conservative
370- Consistently <2% from low → You might be leaving money on the table
371- Target: Within 3-5% of winning bid
372
373---
374
375## Phase 6: Value Engineering (VE)
376
377### VE Opportunity Matrix
378
379| System | VE Opportunity | Typical Savings | Risk Level |
380|---|---|---|---|
381| Structural | Steel vs concrete frame | 5-15% of structure | Medium |
382| Foundations | Spread vs mat vs piles | 10-30% of foundation | High (geotech dependent) |
383| Envelope | Curtain wall vs storefront | 15-30% of facade | Low-Medium |
384| Roofing | TPO vs modified bitumen | 10-20% of roofing | Low |
385| Mechanical | VAV vs VRF | 10-25% of HVAC | Medium |
386| Electrical | LED fixtures, panel optimization | 5-15% of electrical | Low |
387| Finishes | Material substitutions | 10-40% of finishes | Low |
388| Site | Reduce import/export of soil | 10-30% of sitework | Medium |
389
390### VE Proposal Template
391
392```yaml
393ve_item:
394 number: VE-001
395 description: "Substitute VRF system for conventional VAV"
396 division: "23"
397
398 original:
399 description: "VAV air handling system with ductwork"
400 cost: 850000
401
402 proposed:
403 description: "Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) with DOAS"
404 cost: 680000
405
406 savings: 170000
407 savings_pct: 20%
408
409 impact:
410 schedule: "Reduces mechanical rough-in by 2 weeks"
411 quality: "Better zone control, lower operating cost"
412 maintenance: "Higher per-unit cost but less ductwork"
413 code_compliance: "Meets ASHRAE 90.1, verify local amendments"
414
415 risk: medium
416 recommendation: accept | reject | modify
417 requires_redesign: yes | no
418 redesign_cost: 15000
419 net_savings: 155000
420```
421
422### VE Decision Rules
423
4241. **Never VE life safety** — fire protection, structural integrity, egress
4252. **Calculate lifecycle cost** — cheap upfront ≠ cheap over 20 years
4263. **Get architect/engineer sign-off** before bidding VE alternates
4274. **Document everything** — VE that isn't documented becomes a scope gap
4285. **Owner decides** — present options with data, let them choose
429
430---
431
432## Phase 7: Change Order Management
433
434### Change Order Pricing Rules
435
436**Contractor markup on changes (typical):**
437| Tier | Self-Performed Work | Subcontractor Work |
438|---|---|---|
439| Overhead | 10% | 5% |
440| Profit | 10% | 5% |
441| Bond | Add actual % | Add actual % |
442
443**Time & Material (T&M) documentation requirements:**
444- Daily time sheets signed by owner's rep
445- Material invoices with delivery tickets
446- Equipment logs with hours
447- Photos of work in progress
448
449### Change Order YAML Template
450
451```yaml
452change_order:
453 number: CO-001
454 date: ""
455 description: ""
456
457 reason:
458 type: owner-directed | unforeseen-condition | design-error | code-change | scope-clarification
459 rfi_number: ""
460
461 cost_breakdown:
462 labor:
463 hours: 0
464 rate: 0
465 total: 0
466 material:
467 items: []
468 total: 0
469 equipment:
470 items: []
471 total: 0
472 subcontractor:
473 items: []
474 total: 0
475 direct_cost: 0
476 markup: 0.15
477 total_cost: 0
478
479 schedule_impact:
480 days: 0
481 critical_path: yes | no
482 explanation: ""
483
484 status: pending | approved | rejected | negotiating
485```
486
487### Change Order Negotiation Tips
488
4891. **Price it immediately** — delay weakens your position
4902. **Submit with backup** — labor rates, material quotes, productivity analysis
4913. **Separate time from money** — negotiate schedule impact independently
4924. **Track cumulative impact** — 20 small changes = major schedule disruption (even if each is "0 days")
4935. **Constructive acceleration** — if owner delays approval but expects same completion, document it
4946. **Unit price book** — agree on unit prices at contract start for common change types
495
496---
497
498## Phase 8: Cost Control During Construction
499
500### Earned Value Management (EVM)
501
502```
503Budget at Completion (BAC) = Total budget
504Planned Value (PV) = Budgeted cost of work scheduled
505Earned Value (EV) = Budgeted cost of work performed
506Actual Cost (AC) = Actual cost of work performed
507
508Schedule Performance Index (SPI) = EV / PV
509 >1.0 = ahead of schedule
510 <1.0 = behind schedule
511
512Cost Performance Index (CPI) = EV / AC
513 >1.0 = under budget
514 <1.0 = over budget
515
516Estimate at Completion (EAC) = BAC / CPI
517Variance at Completion (VAC) = BAC - EAC
518```
519
520### Monthly Cost Report Template
521
522```yaml
523cost_report:
524 project: ""
525 period: ""
526 report_date: ""
527
528 summary:
529 original_contract: 0
530 approved_changes: 0
531 pending_changes: 0
532 current_budget: 0
533 committed_cost: 0 # Subcontracts + POs
534 actual_cost_to_date: 0
535 forecast_to_complete: 0
536 estimate_at_completion: 0
537 variance: 0
538 contingency_remaining: 0
539
540 schedule:
541 percent_complete: 0
542 spi: 0
543 cpi: 0
544 days_ahead_behind: 0
545
546 cash_flow:
547 billed_to_date: 0
548 collected_to_date: 0
549 retention_held: 0
550
551 risk_items:
552 - description: ""
553 potential_cost: 0
554 probability: high | medium | low
555 mitigation: ""
556```
557
558### Cost Control Red Flags
559
560| Signal | What It Means | Action |
561|---|---|---|
562| CPI < 0.95 in first 25% | Systemic cost overrun | Root cause analysis NOW |
563| Contingency burn > schedule % | Burning contingency too fast | Tighten change management |
564| >5 pending COs unsigned | Cash flow risk, scope dispute | Escalate to PM/owner |
565| Sub invoices > committed | Sub performing extra work | Verify scope, issue CO or stop work |
566| Retainage release requests early | Sub cash flow problems | Monitor closely, check lien waivers |
567
568---
569
570## Phase 9: Specialty Estimate Types
571
572### Renovation/Remodel Estimating
573
574**Add these factors to renovation estimates:**
575- Selective demolition: Price item-by-item (never lump sum)
576- Hazmat survey: Asbestos ($3-5K), lead paint ($2-4K) — MANDATORY before bid
577- Abatement: 2-5x removal cost vs new construction equivalent
578- Protection of existing: Dust barriers, floor protection, HVAC isolation
579- Working hours: Occupied buildings = nights/weekends = premium labor
580- Discovery allowance: 10-15% for hidden conditions behind walls
581- Temporary facilities: HVAC, power, restrooms during renovation
582- Phasing/sequencing: Adds 15-30% management overhead
583
584### Sitework Estimating
585
586**Critical factors:**
587```yaml
588sitework_checklist:
589 geotechnical:
590 - Soil bearing capacity
591 - Water table depth
592 - Rock depth (blasting vs mechanical?)
593 - Contamination (Phase I/II ESA results)
594
595 earthwork:
596 cut_cy: 0
597 fill_cy: 0
598 import_export: 0 # Net CY to haul
599 haul_distance_miles: 0
600 compaction_required: standard | proctor_95 | proctor_98
601
602 utilities:
603 water_tap_fee: 0
604 sewer_tap_fee: 0
605 fire_line: 0
606 storm_detention: required | not_required
607
608 paving:
609 asphalt_sy: 0
610 concrete_sy: 0
611 curb_lf: 0
612 striping_lf: 0
613
614 landscape:
615 sod_sf: 0
616 trees_ea: 0
617 irrigation: yes | no
618 erosion_control: silt_fence | inlet_protection | retention_pond
619```
620
621### MEP (Mechanical/Electrical/Plumbing) Quick Checks
622
623| System | $/SF Benchmark (Commercial Office) | Flag If |
624|---|---|---|
625| HVAC | $25-$50/SF | >$55 or <$20 |
626| Plumbing | $12-$25/SF | >$30 or <$8 |
627| Fire Protection | $4-$8/SF | >$10 or <$3 |
628| Electrical (power) | $18-$35/SF | >$40 or <$12 |
629| Low voltage/data | $5-$12/SF | >$15 or <$3 |
630| **Total MEP** | **$64-$130/SF** | **>$150 or <$46** |
631
632---
633
634## Phase 10: Escalation & Location Adjustments
635
636### Construction Cost Escalation
637
638```
639Future Cost = Current Cost × (1 + Annual Rate) ^ (Months to Midpoint ÷ 12)
640```
641
642**Recent escalation trends (US):**
643- 2020-2022: 8-15% annually (pandemic/supply chain)
644- 2023-2024: 4-6% annually (normalizing)
645- 2025-2026 forecast: 3-5% annually
646- Long-term average: 3-4% annually
647
648**Always escalate to the MIDPOINT of construction**, not the start.
649
650### Location Factor Application
651
652```
653Local Cost = National Average Cost × City Cost Index
654```
655
656**Sample RSMeans City Cost Indices (100 = national average):**
657
658| City | Index | | City | Index |
659|---|---|---|---|---|
660| New York, NY | 130-145 | | Dallas, TX | 88-95 |
661| San Francisco, CA | 125-140 | | Atlanta, GA | 90-97 |
662| Boston, MA | 115-130 | | Phoenix, AZ | 88-94 |
663| Chicago, IL | 110-120 | | Denver, CO | 95-105 |
664| Seattle, WA | 108-118 | | Nashville, TN | 88-95 |
665| Washington, DC | 100-110 | | Charlotte, NC | 85-92 |
666| Miami, FL | 92-100 | | Houston, TX | 85-93 |
667| Minneapolis, MN | 105-112 | | Rural areas | 70-85 |
668
669---
670
671## Phase 11: Estimate Quality Review
672
673### 100-Point Estimate Quality Rubric
674
675| Dimension | Weight | Criteria |
676|---|---|---|
677| **Scope completeness** | 20 | All spec sections priced, no gaps, exclusions documented |
678| **Quantity accuracy** | 20 | QTO verified, cross-checks pass, waste factors applied |
679| **Pricing basis** | 15 | 3+ sub quotes per trade, current material prices, documented sources |
680| **Indirect costs** | 10 | GCs detailed (not lump), schedule-based items tied to duration |
681| **Markup appropriateness** | 10 | Market-competitive, risk-adjusted, contingency justified |
682| **Documentation** | 10 | Assumptions listed, basis of estimate narrative, organized by division |
683| **Adjustments** | 10 | Location factor applied, escalation to midpoint, seasonal factors |
684| **Presentation** | 5 | Professional format, clear summary, alternates separated |
685
686**Grading:** 90+ = Bid-ready | 75-89 = Needs refinement | 60-74 = Major gaps | <60 = Redo
687
688### Peer Review Checklist
689
690- [ ] All addenda acknowledged and incorporated?
691- [ ] Spec sections cross-referenced to QTO? (no orphan specs)
692- [ ] Sub quotes match scope of work? (read exclusions!)
693- [ ] General conditions duration matches schedule?
694- [ ] Bond premium calculated on TOTAL including markups?
695- [ ] Sales tax applied correctly? (varies by state, some exempt)
696- [ ] Prevailing wage rates used if required? (Davis-Bacon, state)
697- [ ] Owner-furnished items excluded from pricing?
698- [ ] Alternates priced separately and clearly?
699- [ ] Math checked independently? (not just formula check — spot-check quantities)
700
701---
702
703## Phase 12: Common Mistakes & Edge Cases
704
705### 10 Estimate-Killing Mistakes
706
707| # | Mistake | Prevention |
708|---|---|---|
709| 1 | Missing addenda | Checklist: log every addendum, initial when incorporated |
710| 2 | Incomplete sub scope | Write scope sheets with inclusions AND exclusions |
711| 3 | Wrong labor rates | Verify union vs open shop, prevailing wage, location |
712| 4 | No escalation | ALWAYS escalate to construction midpoint |
713| 5 | Lump sum general conditions | Detail every line item tied to schedule |
714| 6 | Ignoring phasing | Multi-phase = mobilize/demobilize multiple times |
715| 7 | Missing temporary work | Shoring, dewatering, winter protection, dust control |
716| 8 | Under-priced site conditions | Get geotech report BEFORE estimating foundations |
717| 9 | Scope gaps between trades | Who installs the backing for the TV mount? |
718| 10 | Not reading the fine print | Liquidated damages, retainage, payment terms |
719
720### Edge Cases
721
722**Occupied building renovation:**
723- Work hours restriction → labor premium 15-40%
724- Dust/noise control → add $2-5/SF
725- Security/escort requirements → add supervision cost
726- Existing condition discovery → 10-15% allowance minimum
727
728**Remote/rural project:**
729- Travel/per diem for crews → $150-$250/worker/day
730- Material delivery premium → 5-15% depending on distance
731- Limited sub market → fewer quotes, less competitive pricing
732- Equipment mobilization → long haul costs for cranes, excavators
733
734**Fast-track schedule:**
735- Overtime premium → plan 20-30% labor cost increase
736- Acceleration costs → additional supervision, equipment
737- Out-of-sequence work → productivity losses 10-25%
738- Premium material delivery → expediting fees
739
740**Public/government work:**
741- Prevailing wages → 20-40% labor cost increase
742- DBE/MBE/WBE goals → subcontracting requirements, good faith effort
743- Buy American/Buy America → material cost premium 10-30%
744- Bid protest risk → ensure perfect compliance with ITB
745
746**Design-Build:**
747- Design contingency higher (incomplete docs at pricing)
748- Self-perform vs sub trade-offs
749- Design liability insurance (professional liability)
750- Allowances for owner decisions not yet made
751
752---
753
754## Natural Language Commands
755
756| Command | Action |
757|---|---|
758| "Estimate this project" | Run full estimate workflow from Phase 1 |
759| "Price [division/trade]" | Develop unit costs for specific trade |
760| "Check my quantities" | Run QTO verification cross-checks |
761| "Value engineer [system]" | Generate VE alternatives with savings |
762| "Write change order for [scope]" | Generate CO with pricing and backup |
763| "Compare sub quotes for [trade]" | Score and compare subcontractor bids |
764| "Monthly cost report" | Generate EVM-based cost report |
765| "Bid/no-bid analysis for [project]" | Run decision scorecard |
766| "Location adjust to [city]" | Apply RSMeans location factor |
767| "Escalate costs to [date]" | Calculate escalation to future midpoint |
768| "Review my estimate" | Run 100-point quality rubric |
769| "Generate bid summary" | Format estimate for bid submission |