READ BEFORE USE
READ BEFORE USE
LinkedIn Post Engine
Overview
This skill helps you create strong LinkedIn posts that feel human, useful, and credible.
It combines:
- proven hook frameworks,
- clear narrative structures,
- proof-first writing,
- and practical CTA design.
Keywords: linkedin, thought leadership, personal brand, founder posts, b2b content, storytelling, case study, hooks, engagement, authority
Process Workflow
Phase 1: Audience + Positioning (CRITICAL)
Before writing, define:
- Audience — Who is this for? (founders, recruiters, engineers, operators, marketers, sales leaders, etc.)
- Goal — Reach, authority, leads, hiring, trust, replies, profile visits?
- Core insight — What is the one thing worth remembering?
- Proof — What makes this believable (numbers, before/after, constraints, mistakes, outcomes)?
If proof is missing, use placeholders like [X%], [Y hours] and request exact values.
Phase 2: Structure + Hook Selection
Choose a format first, then write:
- Story
- Framework
- Contrarian
- Case study
- Teardown
- Build-in-public
Then select 2-3 hooks and finalize one.
Phase 3: Draft + Polish
- Keep paragraphs short (1-2 lines)
- Front-load specifics
- Remove generic filler
- End with one clear CTA
- Add 3-6 hashtags max
LinkedIn Feed Dynamics (Practical)
What usually performs best:
- Strong first two lines (stops the scroll)
- Specificity (numbers > adjectives)
- Credible vulnerability (mistakes + lessons)
- Clear structure (easy to skim on mobile)
- Conversation CTA (quality comments over empty likes)
Avoid:
- Buzzword soup
- Generic motivation posts
- Overlong hashtag blocks
- Fake certainty without evidence
Hook Formulas (Most Important)
The Contrarian Hook
- “Most people do [X]. That’s exactly why they stay stuck.”
- “Unpopular opinion: [industry belief] is outdated.”
The Specific Result Hook
- “In [timeframe], we improved [metric] by [number]. Here’s how.”
- “We cut [cost/time] by [X%]. Not with a new tool—by changing this one workflow.”
The Mistake Hook
- “I made this [role]-mistake for months. It cost us [outcome].”
- “We shipped the wrong thing fast. Here’s what fixed it.”
The Framework Hook
- “The [3-step/4-step] framework I use for [outcome].”
- “If I had to restart as [role], I’d follow these 5 rules.”
The Question Hook
- “Would you let your team do [X] without [Y]?”
- “What’s your biggest bottleneck in [domain] right now?”
High-Performing Post Formats
1) “This runs now” (Operational Story)
Best for real systems, workflows, and automations.
Template:
- bold claim
- “Not as a demo. As an actual [responsibility/workflow].”
- “Here’s what it does:” with 4-6 concrete bullets
- measurable result
- perspective line + CTA question
2) Case Study
Template:
- starting problem
- constraints
- intervention
- before/after metrics
- key lesson
- optional “comment TEMPLATE” CTA
3) Contrarian Opinion
Template:
- challenge popular view
- explain why it fails in practice
- give 3 practical principles
- ask a polarizing but constructive question
4) Framework Post
Template:
- name framework
- 3-5 steps
- one mistake to avoid
- one practical “do this today” action
5) Build-in-Public Update
Template:
- what shipped this week
- what worked
- what broke
- what changed next
- ask for informed feedback
Persuasion Principles
Use these to increase clarity and trust:
- Specificity: “Saved 3.2 hours/week” beats “saved time.”
- Mechanism: Explain how, not just outcomes.
- Credibility: Mention tradeoffs, not only wins.
- Relevance: Tie insight to audience reality.
- Clarity: One post = one core idea.
Writing Rules
- Hook in first 1-2 lines
- 1-2 sentence paragraphs
- Prefer plain language over hype
- Use emojis sparingly as section markers
- Keep claims realistic
- Never invent outcomes, clients, or credentials
Hashtags:
- 3-6 max
- niche + function + audience mix
- avoid spammy broad tags only
Output Contract
By default, provide:
- 3 hook options
- 1 full post
- 1 spicier variant
- 3 first-comment ideas (to deepen discussion)
Optional on request:
- NL / EN / NL-EN mixed variants
- X/Twitter adaptation
- Short + long versions
- Carousel text outline
Quick Prompt Template
When user gives a raw idea, ask/fill:
- Audience:
- Goal:
- Topic:
- Proof points:
- Tone:
- CTA preference:
Then generate outputs per contract above.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Generic “AI changed everything” without concrete examples
- No proof signals
- Too many ideas in one post
- CTA mismatch (asking for leads on a pure thought-leadership post)
- Over-formatting with noisy symbols
Execution Checklist
Before finalizing:
1---2name: linkedin-post-engine3description: Write high-performing, persuasive, and authentic LinkedIn posts across any professional niche. Uses research-backed hooks, proven post structures, and LinkedIn-specific formatting to maximize reach, saves, comments, and profile actions. Use when creating LinkedIn posts, carousels-by-text, thought leadership, founder updates, case studies, hiring posts, launch posts, or converting X/Twitter ideas into LinkedIn content.4---5
6`READ BEFORE USE`
7# [HOW TO USE THIS SKILL EFFECTIVELY](https://www.linkedin.com/)
8`READ BEFORE USE`
9
10# LinkedIn Post Engine
11
12## Overview
13
14This skill helps you create strong LinkedIn posts that feel human, useful, and credible.
15
16It combines:
17- proven hook frameworks,
18- clear narrative structures,
19- proof-first writing,
20- and practical CTA design.
21
22**Keywords**: linkedin, thought leadership, personal brand, founder posts, b2b content, storytelling, case study, hooks, engagement, authority
23
24---
25
26## Process Workflow
27
28### Phase 1: Audience + Positioning (CRITICAL)
29
30Before writing, define:
31
321. **Audience** — Who is this for? (founders, recruiters, engineers, operators, marketers, sales leaders, etc.)
332. **Goal** — Reach, authority, leads, hiring, trust, replies, profile visits?
343. **Core insight** — What is the one thing worth remembering?
354. **Proof** — What makes this believable (numbers, before/after, constraints, mistakes, outcomes)?
36
37If proof is missing, use placeholders like `[X%]`, `[Y hours]` and request exact values.
38
39### Phase 2: Structure + Hook Selection
40
41Choose a format first, then write:
42- Story
43- Framework
44- Contrarian
45- Case study
46- Teardown
47- Build-in-public
48
49Then select 2-3 hooks and finalize one.
50
51### Phase 3: Draft + Polish
52
53- Keep paragraphs short (1-2 lines)
54- Front-load specifics
55- Remove generic filler
56- End with one clear CTA
57- Add 3-6 hashtags max
58
59---
60
61## LinkedIn Feed Dynamics (Practical)
62
63What usually performs best:
64
651. **Strong first two lines** (stops the scroll)
662. **Specificity** (numbers > adjectives)
673. **Credible vulnerability** (mistakes + lessons)
684. **Clear structure** (easy to skim on mobile)
695. **Conversation CTA** (quality comments over empty likes)
70
71Avoid:
72- Buzzword soup
73- Generic motivation posts
74- Overlong hashtag blocks
75- Fake certainty without evidence
76
77---
78
79## Hook Formulas (Most Important)
80
81### The Contrarian Hook
82- “Most people do [X]. That’s exactly why they stay stuck.”
83- “Unpopular opinion: [industry belief] is outdated.”
84
85### The Specific Result Hook
86- “In [timeframe], we improved [metric] by [number]. Here’s how.”
87- “We cut [cost/time] by [X%]. Not with a new tool—by changing this one workflow.”
88
89### The Mistake Hook
90- “I made this [role]-mistake for months. It cost us [outcome].”
91- “We shipped the wrong thing fast. Here’s what fixed it.”
92
93### The Framework Hook
94- “The [3-step/4-step] framework I use for [outcome].”
95- “If I had to restart as [role], I’d follow these 5 rules.”
96
97### The Question Hook
98- “Would you let your team do [X] without [Y]?”
99- “What’s your biggest bottleneck in [domain] right now?”
100
101---
102
103## High-Performing Post Formats
104
105### 1) “This runs now” (Operational Story)
106Best for real systems, workflows, and automations.
107
108Template:
109- bold claim
110- “Not as a demo. As an actual [responsibility/workflow].”
111- “Here’s what it does:” with 4-6 concrete bullets
112- measurable result
113- perspective line + CTA question
114
115### 2) Case Study
116Template:
117- starting problem
118- constraints
119- intervention
120- before/after metrics
121- key lesson
122- optional “comment TEMPLATE” CTA
123
124### 3) Contrarian Opinion
125Template:
126- challenge popular view
127- explain why it fails in practice
128- give 3 practical principles
129- ask a polarizing but constructive question
130
131### 4) Framework Post
132Template:
133- name framework
134- 3-5 steps
135- one mistake to avoid
136- one practical “do this today” action
137
138### 5) Build-in-Public Update
139Template:
140- what shipped this week
141- what worked
142- what broke
143- what changed next
144- ask for informed feedback
145
146---
147
148## Persuasion Principles
149
150Use these to increase clarity and trust:
151
152- **Specificity**: “Saved 3.2 hours/week” beats “saved time.”
153- **Mechanism**: Explain how, not just outcomes.
154- **Credibility**: Mention tradeoffs, not only wins.
155- **Relevance**: Tie insight to audience reality.
156- **Clarity**: One post = one core idea.
157
158---
159
160## Writing Rules
161
162- Hook in first 1-2 lines
163- 1-2 sentence paragraphs
164- Prefer plain language over hype
165- Use emojis sparingly as section markers
166- Keep claims realistic
167- Never invent outcomes, clients, or credentials
168
169Hashtags:
170- 3-6 max
171- niche + function + audience mix
172- avoid spammy broad tags only
173
174---
175
176## Output Contract
177
178By default, provide:
179
1801. 3 hook options
1812. 1 full post
1823. 1 spicier variant
1834. 3 first-comment ideas (to deepen discussion)
184
185Optional on request:
186- NL / EN / NL-EN mixed variants
187- X/Twitter adaptation
188- Short + long versions
189- Carousel text outline
190
191---
192
193## Quick Prompt Template
194
195When user gives a raw idea, ask/fill:
196
197- Audience:
198- Goal:
199- Topic:
200- Proof points:
201- Tone:
202- CTA preference:
203
204Then generate outputs per contract above.
205
206---
207
208## Common Pitfalls to Avoid
209
210- Generic “AI changed everything” without concrete examples
211- No proof signals
212- Too many ideas in one post
213- CTA mismatch (asking for leads on a pure thought-leadership post)
214- Over-formatting with noisy symbols
215
216---
217
218## Execution Checklist
219
220Before finalizing:
221
222- [ ] Hook is strong and specific
223- [ ] Core claim is clear
224- [ ] Includes at least one proof signal
225- [ ] Easy to skim on mobile
226- [ ] CTA invites real conversation
227- [ ] Hashtags are relevant and limited
228- [ ] Tone feels authentic to author