Stripping AI Tells
Workflow: Three-Pass Edit
Apply these three passes in order to any text.
Calibrate edit intensity from user intent. If the user asks for a light polish,
make minimal edits. If they ask to fully humanize or aggressively strip AI
language, rewrite more deeply while preserving meaning.
If the user specifies explicit format constraints (template, required bullets,
required headings, word count, or tone), keep those constraints and edit within
them.
Pass 1: Vocabulary Sweep
Scan for flagged AI words and phrases. For each hit: delete if possible,
replace with a simpler or more specific word, or check whether the sentence
survives without it.
Top offenders: delve, tapestry, landscape (as metaphor), robust, pivotal,
nuanced, multifaceted, meticulous, underscore, leverage, foster, embark,
vibrant, intricate, paramount, seamless, testament, holistic, garner, bolster.
Filler phrases — delete or simplify:
- "Moreover" / "Furthermore" / "Additionally" → delete, or use "And," "Also"
- "It's important to note that" / "It's worth noting" → delete
- "In today's rapidly evolving [X]" → delete (throat-clearing)
- "In conclusion" / "In summary" → delete unless 20+ page document
- "Due to the fact that" → "because"
- "In order to" → "to"
- "Plays a crucial role" → say what it actually does
- "Harness the power of" / "Unlock the potential of" → "use"
For complete vocabulary tables with replacements and era-specific markers, see
references/01-detection.md.
Pass 2: Structural Cleanup
Check for and fix these patterns:
- Tricolon abuse — three-item lists used reflexively. Use two items, four,
or pick the best one.
- Synonym cycling — same concept renamed every paragraph. Pick one term,
stick with it.
- Trailing participles — sentences ending in "-ing" clauses that add vague
significance ("highlighting its commitment to innovation"). Cut or
substantiate.
- False ranges — "From X to Y" where X and Y don't form a real spectrum.
Name the actual things instead.
- Uniform paragraph/sentence length — vary deliberately. Follow long
sentences with short ones. Allow one-sentence paragraphs.
- Template intro/conclusion — cut throat-clearing openers and reflexive
summaries.
- Em-dash overuse — more than 2–3 per 1000 words is suspicious. Replace
with commas, colons, periods, or split into two sentences.
- Bullet lists as default — convert to prose where argumentation or
narrative would serve better, unless the user explicitly requires list
format.
For detailed explanations and detection techniques, see
references/01-detection.md.
Pass 3: Voice and Tone
- Cut sycophantic or over-eager phrasing ("Great question!", "Certainly!")
- Remove excessive hedging — allow one caveat per claim, not three
("arguably," "potentially," "it could be said that")
- Deflate importance puffery — delete "watershed moment," "pivotal shift,"
"landmark achievement" unless backed by evidence
- Add specific examples, anecdotes, or concrete details where the text makes
abstract claims
- Preserve the author's intended stance — remove faux-neutral filler, but do
not invent stronger claims than the source supports
- Check for rhythm uniformity — if three consecutive paragraphs have similar
sentence lengths and cadence, vary them
For before/after examples and the Top 10 tells summary, see
references/02-editing-and-quick-reference.md.
Quick smell test
Read the first and last paragraphs. If the first can be deleted without losing
anything, and the last restates what was already said — AI structure. If
neither contains a specific fact, name, number, or opinion — AI tone.
Edge cases
- Formal writing is not an AI tell. Legal, academic, and medical writing
is naturally formal. Do not strip legitimate register.
- Em dashes in moderation are fine. Writers have used them for centuries.
Only flag density (3+ per 1000 words).
- "However" and "therefore" are normal. Standard academic and professional
transitions — not AI tells.
- Oxford commas are a style choice, not an AI tell.
- Structured documents need structure. Reports and proposals should have
headers and sections — do not flatten them.
- Explicit format requirements come first. If the user requires bullets,
section headers, or a specific template, preserve that structure and strip AI
tells inside it.
- Pattern density is the real signal. Any single tell is meaningless. A
piece with "delve," three tricolons, six em dashes, a throat-clearing intro,
and uniform paragraph length is almost certainly AI-assisted. A piece with
one em dash and the word "robust" is probably fine.
- Overcorrection erodes voice. Strip patterns, not personality. Preserve
the author's intentional style choices.
1---2name: stripping-ai-tells3description: Detects and removes AI writing tells (ChatGPT-isms, Claude-isms) from text using a three-pass editing workflow: vocabulary sweep, structural cleanup, and voice/tone adjustment. Identifies flagged words (delve, tapestry, robust, pivotal), structural patterns (tricolon abuse, synonym cycling, trailing participles, em-dash overuse), and tonal issues (sycophancy, hedging, importance puffery). Use when the user asks to remove AI tells, humanize AI text, make writing sound less like AI, edit for ChatGPT-isms or Claude-isms, strip AI language, clean up AI-generated content, or review text for machine-generated patterns.4---56# Stripping AI Tells78## Workflow: Three-Pass Edit910Apply these three passes in order to any text.1112Calibrate edit intensity from user intent. If the user asks for a light polish,13make minimal edits. If they ask to fully humanize or aggressively strip AI14language, rewrite more deeply while preserving meaning.1516If the user specifies explicit format constraints (template, required bullets,17required headings, word count, or tone), keep those constraints and edit within18them.1920### Pass 1: Vocabulary Sweep2122Scan for flagged AI words and phrases. For each hit: delete if possible,23replace with a simpler or more specific word, or check whether the sentence24survives without it.2526**Top offenders:** delve, tapestry, landscape (as metaphor), robust, pivotal,27nuanced, multifaceted, meticulous, underscore, leverage, foster, embark,28vibrant, intricate, paramount, seamless, testament, holistic, garner, bolster.2930**Filler phrases — delete or simplify:**3132- "Moreover" / "Furthermore" / "Additionally" → delete, or use "And," "Also"33- "It's important to note that" / "It's worth noting" → delete34- "In today's rapidly evolving [X]" → delete (throat-clearing)35- "In conclusion" / "In summary" → delete unless 20+ page document36- "Due to the fact that" → "because"37- "In order to" → "to"38- "Plays a crucial role" → say what it actually does39- "Harness the power of" / "Unlock the potential of" → "use"4041For complete vocabulary tables with replacements and era-specific markers, see42[references/01-detection.md](references/01-detection.md).4344### Pass 2: Structural Cleanup4546Check for and fix these patterns:4748- **Tricolon abuse** — three-item lists used reflexively. Use two items, four,49 or pick the best one.50- **Synonym cycling** — same concept renamed every paragraph. Pick one term,51 stick with it.52- **Trailing participles** — sentences ending in "-ing" clauses that add vague53 significance ("highlighting its commitment to innovation"). Cut or54 substantiate.55- **False ranges** — "From X to Y" where X and Y don't form a real spectrum.56 Name the actual things instead.57- **Uniform paragraph/sentence length** — vary deliberately. Follow long58 sentences with short ones. Allow one-sentence paragraphs.59- **Template intro/conclusion** — cut throat-clearing openers and reflexive60 summaries.61- **Em-dash overuse** — more than 2–3 per 1000 words is suspicious. Replace62 with commas, colons, periods, or split into two sentences.63- **Bullet lists as default** — convert to prose where argumentation or64 narrative would serve better, unless the user explicitly requires list65 format.6667For detailed explanations and detection techniques, see68[references/01-detection.md](references/01-detection.md).6970### Pass 3: Voice and Tone7172- Cut sycophantic or over-eager phrasing ("Great question!", "Certainly!")73- Remove excessive hedging — allow one caveat per claim, not three74 ("arguably," "potentially," "it could be said that")75- Deflate importance puffery — delete "watershed moment," "pivotal shift,"76 "landmark achievement" unless backed by evidence77- Add specific examples, anecdotes, or concrete details where the text makes78 abstract claims79- Preserve the author's intended stance — remove faux-neutral filler, but do80 not invent stronger claims than the source supports81- Check for rhythm uniformity — if three consecutive paragraphs have similar82 sentence lengths and cadence, vary them8384For before/after examples and the Top 10 tells summary, see85[references/02-editing-and-quick-reference.md](references/02-editing-and-quick-reference.md).8687## Quick smell test8889Read the first and last paragraphs. If the first can be deleted without losing90anything, and the last restates what was already said — AI structure. If91neither contains a specific fact, name, number, or opinion — AI tone.9293## Edge cases9495- **Formal writing is not an AI tell.** Legal, academic, and medical writing96 is naturally formal. Do not strip legitimate register.97- **Em dashes in moderation are fine.** Writers have used them for centuries.98 Only flag density (3+ per 1000 words).99- **"However" and "therefore" are normal.** Standard academic and professional100 transitions — not AI tells.101- **Oxford commas are a style choice,** not an AI tell.102- **Structured documents need structure.** Reports and proposals *should* have103 headers and sections — do not flatten them.104- **Explicit format requirements come first.** If the user requires bullets,105 section headers, or a specific template, preserve that structure and strip AI106 tells inside it.107- **Pattern density is the real signal.** Any single tell is meaningless. A108 piece with "delve," three tricolons, six em dashes, a throat-clearing intro,109 and uniform paragraph length is almost certainly AI-assisted. A piece with110 one em dash and the word "robust" is probably fine.111- **Overcorrection erodes voice.** Strip patterns, not personality. Preserve112 the author's intentional style choices.