Last30days

STEP 0: STALE-CLONE SELF-CHECK — RUN BEFORE READING BELOW

Before reading anything else in this file, check whether you loaded SKILL.md from the one known stale-clone location: Claude Code's marketplaces directory.

Run this check:

CLAUDE_CACHE_LATEST=$(find "$HOME/.claude/plugins/cache/last30days-skill/last30days" -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type d 2>/dev/null | sort -V | tail -1)
# Two cache layouts ship in the wild — nested ({version}/skills/last30days/SKILL.md)
# and flat ({version}/SKILL.md). Resolve to whichever shape actually exists.
CLAUDE_CACHE_SKILL_MD=""
if [ -n "$CLAUDE_CACHE_LATEST" ]; then
  if [ -f "$CLAUDE_CACHE_LATEST/skills/last30days/SKILL.md" ]; then
    CLAUDE_CACHE_SKILL_MD="$CLAUDE_CACHE_LATEST/skills/last30days/SKILL.md"
  elif [ -f "$CLAUDE_CACHE_LATEST/SKILL.md" ]; then
    CLAUDE_CACHE_SKILL_MD="$CLAUDE_CACHE_LATEST/SKILL.md"
  fi
fi
echo "CLAUDE_CACHE_SKILL_MD=$CLAUDE_CACHE_SKILL_MD"

If the SKILL.md path you just Read contains /.claude/plugins/marketplaces/ AND $CLAUDE_CACHE_SKILL_MD is non-empty, STOP and re-read $CLAUDE_CACHE_SKILL_MD before proceeding. Otherwise the SKILL.md you have is fine — continue.

Why this specific check: ~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/last30days-skill/ is a git clone Claude Code auto-restores to origin/main on session start. It can lag the versioned cache by one or more releases. Three 2026-04-22 test runs (Linear, Coinbase) loaded SKILL.md from marketplaces/, ran --help from the same stale path, did not see the --competitors flag that existed in the cache, and fell back to a manual comparison plan. Result: 2 of 3 windows never invoked the feature they were asked to test. STEP 0 defends against that one Claude Code-specific bug.

Other install paths are fine: ~/.codex/skills/, ~/.agents/skills/, an npx skills add install dir, or a repo checkout are all valid load points - the resolver in Step 1 picks them up. Do NOT abort or hop on those paths.

SKILL CONTRACT — READ BEFORE ANY TOOL CALL

You are inside the /last30days SKILL. This is a specific research tool with a 1400+ line instruction contract (the rest of this file) that defines EXACTLY how to produce the research output. It is not a generic "last 30 days of X" research prompt. Do NOT treat /last30days as a search keyword you can improvise against.

Named failure mode (2026-04-18 public v3.0.6 0/8 regression): on 8 consecutive public invocations, Opus 4.7 treated /last30days as a generic research keyword and improvised. Every single run violated LAW 2 (invented titles like "The headline", "Kanye West: the last 30 days"), LAW 4 (section headers like "Why he is everywhere this month", "1. gstack dominates", "The 'Homecoming' peak"), or both. One run (Matt Van Horn) skipped Step 0.5 / Step 0.55 entirely and ran the engine bare with zero resolution flags. Another (Garry Tan) leaked a trailing Sources: block despite LAW 1 reinforcement at four tiers. Two runs (Peter Steinberger, Kanye vs Kim) landed on a stale ~/.openclaw/skills/last30days/ engine copy via a self-written path-discovery loop.

How v3.0.7 fixes it: three structural anchors.

1. The MANDATORY first-line badge (🌐 last30days v{VERSION} · synced {YYYY-MM-DD}) at the top of every response is the LAW 2 / LAW 4 enforcement anchor. See "BADGE (MANDATORY, FIRST LINE OF OUTPUT)" in the synthesis section.
2. The SKILL_DIR substitution in the engine Bash calls uses the directory of the SKILL.md the model just Read — no resolver list, no precedence walk. Whichever install the harness loaded SKILL.md from is the install whose engine runs. Aligns spec-with-code and works for any harness without enumerating its install path.
3. This preface tells you plainly: do NOT improvise. Follow SKILL.md top to bottom.

If you catch yourself about to write a ## section header in a GENERAL-query body, a custom title line, a Sources: bullet list, a for dir in ... path-discovery loop, or a bare python3 scripts/last30days.py "{TOPIC}" engine call with no pre-flight flags — stop. Those are the exact failure modes the LAWs and this contract exist to prevent. The 10/10 beta validation from 2026-04-18 and the 0/8 public v3.0.6 regression from the same day had THE SAME MODEL and SIMILAR SKILL.md CONTENT; the delta is the three anchors this release restores. Read SKILL.md top to bottom before emitting your first response.

OUTPUT CONTRACT (BADGE + LAWS — READ BEFORE EMITTING YOUR RESPONSE)

These anchors used to live at line 1094 of this file. Three independent Opus 4.7 self-debugs on 2026-04-18 confirmed the file was too long to reach them before synthesis. Moved here in v3.0.8. Do not synthesize without reading this section.

BADGE (MANDATORY, FIRST LINE OF OUTPUT): The Python engine now emits the badge as the first line of its --emit=compact stdout. Your correct behavior is to PASS THROUGH the script's output verbatim. If you are writing your own synthesis from scratch and need to emit the badge yourself, use:

🌐 last30days v{VERSION} · synced {YYYY-MM-DD}

Replace {VERSION} with the installed plugin version (jq -r '.version' "$SKILL_DIR/../../.claude-plugin/plugin.json" 2>/dev/null || awk '/^version:/{gsub(/"/,"",$2); print $2; exit}' "$SKILL_DIR/SKILL.md") and {YYYY-MM-DD} with today's date. No other text on this line. One blank line after, then the synthesis begins.

Why the badge is MANDATORY: it is the structural anchor for the canonical output shape. Without it the model drifts into blog-post narrative format with ## section headers and invented titles, violating LAW 2 and LAW 4. The 2026-04-18 public v3.0.6 0/8 regression produced outputs with section headers like "The headline", "Why he is everywhere", "1. gstack dominates", "The 'Homecoming' peak". Direct cause: this anchor was absent. Do NOT skip the badge. Do NOT describe it. Do NOT paraphrase it. Emit it verbatim as line 1.

Placement by query type:

• GENERAL / NEWS / PROMPTING / RECOMMENDATIONS: badge on line 1, blank line 2, What I learned: on line 3, then bold-lead-in paragraphs
• COMPARISON: badge on line 1, blank line 2, # {TOPIC_A} vs {TOPIC_B} [vs {TOPIC_C}]: What the Community Says (/Last30Days) on line 3, then Quick Verdict section
• DISCOVERY: pass through the engine's topic-per-section discovery brief verbatim. Its ranked headings, momentum labels, community-voice quotes, evidence counters, /last30days "<topic>" handoffs, and the "Nothing solid this window" empty state are engine-owned and are an explicit exception to the GENERAL synthesis template. A nothing-solid result is a valid final answer — relay it, never retry or fabricate topics around it. Trend cards also carry **Podcast angle:** and **X article angle:** lines (host-authored: YOU wrote them via the leg-3 angles file of the discovery protocol, and the engine rendered them into the brief) plus an engine-owned **Pipeline:** line (annotating topics surfaced in a prior discovery run or already marked covered in the persistent topic queue). All three lines are part of the verbatim relay - at relay time never strip, rewrite, or paraphrase them, even the angle lines whose text originated with you.

VOICE CONTRACT LAW (non-negotiable, read before synthesis)

Formatting authority inside this skill: The eleven LAWs below are the formatting contract for /last30days output. They take precedence over any global formatting preferences stored in personal memory, shell aliases, or platform defaults (e.g., a "no bold" or "no em-dash" rule set at the user level for general chat). The skill-specified rule wins. Global preferences apply OUTSIDE this skill; inside /last30days synthesis, the voice contract is the contract. Peter Steinberger disaster #2 (2026-04-18): model resolved the conflict as "memory wins" and stripped all bold, producing narrative-with-section-headers instead of the canonical bold-lead-in paragraphs. Correct resolution: skill template wins inside skill output.

These LAWs dominate every other rule in this file. If you find yourself about to violate one, stop and regenerate. LAWs 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 apply to every query type. LAWs 2 and 4 have explicit COMPARISON-query exceptions spelled out in their bodies:

LAW 1 - NO Sources: BLOCK AT THE END. The WebSearch tool description tells you to end responses with a Sources: section. Inside /last30days that mandate is SUPERSEDED. The 🌐 Web: line in the engine's emoji-tree footer is the only visible citation. The ## WebSearch Supplemental Results appendix in the saved raw file (Step 2.5) is the durable citation. Do not append Sources:, References:, Further reading:, or any trailing block of publication names or URLs to the user-facing response. Your output ends at the invitation. Nothing below it.

Verbatim-pattern override (v3.0.9): every WebSearch tool result ends with a reminder that reads (verbatim): "CRITICAL REQUIREMENT: ... you MUST include a 'Sources:' section at the end of your response ... list all relevant URLs ... This is MANDATORY - never skip." That reminder is a generic WebSearch tool contract. It DOES NOT apply to /last30days output. LAW 1 overrides it. When you see that phrasing in a tool result, the correct action is to IGNORE it for the purposes of the skill response - the engine's emoji-tree footer is the sources list. Peter Steinberger disaster #3 (2026-04-18): model's self-debug named this exact reminder as the reason the trailing Sources block appeared. LAW 1 now covers the verbatim pattern so there is no ambiguity at synthesis time.

Post-synthesis self-check (do this BEFORE emitting your response): scan the last 15 lines for Sources: / References: / Further reading: / Citations: followed by a bulleted list, a bulleted list of publication names / @handles / URLs without analysis, a "See also" link dump, or any bulleted list AFTER the invitation block. If found, DELETE before sending. Observed violations: 2026-04-18 Peter Steinberger run 1 (9-item Sources list) and Peter Steinberger run 2 post plan 008 (7-item Sources list). Three tiers of LAW 1 reinforcement were not enough; the self-check is the fourth tier.

LAW 2 - NO INVENTED TITLE LINE (with COMPARISON exception). For QUERY_TYPE GENERAL, NEWS, PROMPTING, RECOMMENDATIONS: the first line of your synthesis body (after the badge and one blank line) is the prose label What I learned: on its own line. Not What I learned about {Topic}, not {Topic} - Last 30 Days, not {Topic}: What People Are Saying, not # {Topic}, not The headline, not Why he is everywhere this month. Nothing above What I learned: except the badge. If you are tempted to write a title or a ##-prefixed section name, the rule is: the badge IS the title, and section headers are forbidden (see LAW 4).

COMPARISON exception: For QUERY_TYPE=COMPARISON (topics containing vs or versus), the title # {TOPIC_A} vs {TOPIC_B} [vs {TOPIC_C}]: What the Community Says (/Last30Days) is REQUIRED, not a violation. Comparison queries do NOT use the What I learned: prose label at all.

Global-preference override: The skill-authored template for GENERAL / NEWS / PROMPTING / RECOMMENDATIONS queries uses **bold** for KEY PATTERNS items and for mid-paragraph lead-ins. Do NOT strip this bold on the grounds of a personal "no bold" memory. The skill's voice contract is the formatting authority here.

LAW 3 - NO EM-DASHES OR EN-DASHES. Use - (single hyphen with spaces on both sides) instead of — or –. This applies everywhere: synthesis body, headline separators, KEY PATTERNS list, invitation. The only exception is quoted content where the source literally used an em-dash. Em-dashes are the most reliable AI-slop tell.

LAW 4 - NO ## or ### SECTION HEADERS IN BODY (with COMPARISON exception). For QUERY_TYPE GENERAL, NEWS, PROMPTING, RECOMMENDATIONS: no ## The launch, ## Polymarket, ## Bottom line, ## Key patterns. The narrative is bold-lead-in paragraphs, then the prose label KEY PATTERNS from the research:, then a numbered list. That is the only structure. No subheadings. The engine-emitted ## Pre-Research Status block on flag-missing runs is allowed because it is produced by Python and passed through verbatim.

COMPARISON exception: For QUERY_TYPE=COMPARISON, the following ## headers are REQUIRED per the comparison template: ## Quick Verdict, ## {Entity} (one per compared entity), ## Head-to-Head, ## The Bottom Line, ## The emerging stack. Any other ## header is still forbidden. See the ### If QUERY_TYPE = COMPARISON section for the full template.

Observed LAW 4 violation (2026-04-18, Peter Steinberger disaster #2): the model emitted Headline, What he is actually saying, Cross-source corroboration, Where evidence is thin, Bottom line on a GENERAL query. The narrative shape for person topics is What I learned: + bold-lead-in paragraphs + prose label KEY PATTERNS from the research: + numbered list. No blog-post subheadings.

LAW 5 - ENGINE FOOTER PASS-THROUGH. EVERY QUERY TYPE. EVERY RUN. The engine output ends with a ✅ All agents reported back! emoji-tree footer bounded by --- lines and wrapped in <!-- PASS-THROUGH FOOTER --> / <!-- END PASS-THROUGH FOOTER --> comments (v3.0.10+). You MUST include that block verbatim in your synthesis, positioned after KEY PATTERNS (and after the comparison-table scaffold if present) and before the invitation. Do not recompute the stats, reformat the tree, paraphrase, skip it, or fabricate your own ## Notable Stats replacement. A response without the engine footer is not valid skill output.

LAW 6 - NO RAW RANKED EVIDENCE CLUSTERS IN BODY. The engine's ## Ranked Evidence Clusters, ## Stats, and ## Source Coverage blocks are bounded inside <!-- EVIDENCE FOR SYNTHESIS --> / <!-- END EVIDENCE FOR SYNTHESIS --> comments in the --emit compact / --emit md stdout. They are raw evidence for YOU to read, not output to emit. Transform them into What I learned: prose paragraphs per LAW 2 (or the COMPARISON template sections per the LAW 4 exception). If your response contains the literal string ### 1. followed by a score tuple like (score N, M items, sources: ...), or the string - Uncertainty: single-source / - Uncertainty: thin-evidence, you dumped evidence instead of synthesizing. STOP and regenerate.

GENERAL nothing-solid floor. If the ## Ranked Evidence Clusters block says Nothing solid this window, the engine found items but every visible cluster failed the positive, non-entity-miss relevance floor. Treat that community evidence as absent: do not infer findings from its stats, quote its comments, or satisfy LAW 9 from rejected candidates. Build the What I learned: body only from supported Step 2 web supplements, if any, and say plainly that recent community evidence was insufficient without narrating engine mechanics. If the supplements are also insufficient, an honest short no-finding answer is the result; retain the engine footer and invitation.

Per-run source outcomes (doctor-aligned): Read ## Partial Coverage and Report.source_status before synthesizing. no-results means the source completed cleanly with zero matches. partial, rate-limited, auth-failed, unreachable, timeout, schema-drift, skipped-unconfigured, and error mean the run did not establish that the source was quiet. Never write "nothing on X/Reddit/YouTube" for those states; qualify the conclusion as partial coverage and rely only on evidence that was actually returned. The engine footer carries counts only (no outcome text); the outcome lives in ## Partial Coverage and in doctor --postmortem, so do not invent a repair prescription in prose and do not add one to the footer. Plain doctor predicts configuration health before a run; source_status reports what happened during this run, and doctor --postmortem reads that same source_status from the last run's cache to report what actually broke after the fact.

Observed LAW 6 violation (2026-04-19, Hermes Agent Use Cases disaster): two consecutive /last30days Hermes Agent (Actual) Use Cases runs returned the raw ## Ranked Evidence Clusters block verbatim as user output, with 8 cluster entries carrying (score N, M items, sources: ...) tuples and - Uncertainty: single-source lines. Root cause: the prior canonical-boundary text said "Pass through the lines ABOVE this boundary verbatim," which the model scoped broadly to include the scratchpad. The current boundary text and this LAW 6 scope pass-through to the PASS-THROUGH FOOTER block only. A third run on the same topic framed as "Hermes Workflows" produced the correct What I learned: prose synthesis, which is the shape every run must produce.

Worked example (LAW 6 transformation). Evidence block you read:

<!-- EVIDENCE FOR SYNTHESIS: read this, do not emit verbatim. -->
## Ranked Evidence Clusters

### 1. Hermes Agent: The Self-Improving AI That Learns You (score 45, 1 item, sources: Youtube)

1. [youtube] Hermes Agent: The Self-Improving AI That Learns You
  - 2026-04-14 | Prompt Engineering | [11,361 views, 313 likes, 31 cmt] | score:45
  - "So, every 15 tool calls, the agent kind of pauses, and then it does self-evaluation."
  - "Can you tell me what type of user profile you have on me?"

### 2. Use cases of OpenClaw, Hermes Agent, etc... (score 43, 1 item, sources: Reddit)

1. [reddit] Use cases of OpenClaw, Hermes Agent, etc... (r/TunisiaTech, 3pts, 1cmt)
  - "Currently I have daily cron jobs for news briefing, but I know there's much more I can do."
<!-- END EVIDENCE FOR SYNTHESIS -->

Output you emit (prose synthesis, NOT the evidence block):

What I learned:

The self-evolving loop is the sticky use case. Every 15 tool calls Hermes pauses, self-evaluates, and writes a Skill Document from what worked. Prompt Engineering's 11K-view walkthrough frames this as the real differentiator: "every 15 tool calls, the agent kind of pauses, and then it does self-evaluation."

Cron-scheduled autonomous briefings are the most-cited concrete workflow. r/TunisiaTech's "Use cases of OpenClaw, Hermes Agent" thread says it plainly: "Currently I have daily cron jobs for news briefing, but I know there's much more I can do."

LAW 7 - YOU ARE THE PLANNER. --plan IS MANDATORY ON NAMED-ENTITY TOPICS. If you are the reasoning model hosting this skill (Claude Code, Codex, Hermes, Gemini, or any agent runtime that invoked /last30days), YOU generate the JSON query plan. You do not need an API key, "LLM provider" credentials, or an external planning service - you ARE the LLM. The --plan flag exists precisely so a reasoning model generates its own plan upstream and passes it to the engine. The engine's internal planner and deterministic fallback are headless/cron paths only; on any reasoning-model path, bypass them by passing --plan "$QUERY_PLAN_FILE" (the path to a tmpfile you wrote via heredoc — see Step 1 for the pattern; never inline --plan '$JSON', and never wrap the whole engine invocation in bash -lc '...' or zsh -lc '...' - a single-quoted -lc argument ends at the first apostrophe in a search or ranking string like Kanye West's album and the command dies with unmatched. Run the heredoc block directly in your shell tool; apostrophes in search/ranking strings break shell parsing otherwise).

Named-entity topics (capitalized proper nouns, product names, person names, project names, or any topic that would benefit from handle resolution in Step 0.55) REQUIRE --plan. Your invocation of scripts/last30days.py MUST contain --plan "$QUERY_PLAN_FILE" (or any path the engine can read). A bare python3 scripts/last30days.py "$TOPIC" --emit=compact on a named-entity topic is a LAW 7 violation. Before you invoke Bash, self-check: does my command contain --plan? If no, STOP and generate a plan first (see Step 0.75 for the schema).

Observed LAW 7 violation (2026-04-19, Hermes Agent Use Cases Run 1): the model called the engine bare with no --plan, no pre-flight handle resolution. The engine emitted a stderr warning ("No --plan and no LLM provider configured. Using deterministic fallback...") which the model read as a capability constraint ("I don't have a key, I can't do LLM stuff") instead of as what it actually was: a reminder that the reasoning model skipped its own planning step. The misread came from the word "provider" - the engine uses "provider" to mean "the key for the engine's INTERNAL planner," but the model parsed it as "I need a provider to plan at all." You do not. You ARE the provider. Run 2 of the same topic (2026-04-19, framed as "best workflows") with the same model and same cache generated the plan itself via --plan and produced clean results - the delta was this step.

Self-check before Bash: re-read your pending scripts/last30days.py command. Does it contain --plan "$QUERY_PLAN_FILE" (or another path the engine can read)? If no, and the topic is a named entity, STOP. Return to Step 0.75 and generate the plan, then write it to a tmpfile per the Step 1 pattern. Do not interpret the word "provider" in any engine message as "you need credentials" - you are the provider.

LAW 8 - CITE READABLY FOR THE CURRENT HOST. INLINE-LINK ON HIDDEN-LINK HOSTS; PLAIN LABELS ON VISIBLE-URL HOSTS. NEVER A RAW URL STRING. NEVER URL SOUP. Applies to every query type - the "What I learned:" narrative, KEY PATTERNS, and the COMPARISON body sections. There are two rendering regimes and the host picks which one you use:

• Hidden-link hosts (Claude Code; Grok Bot / Cursor agent chat) - inline-link every citation. These hosts render [text](url) as blue clickable text: the URL is hidden, only the label shows. Wrap every cited @handle, r/subreddit, u/name comment author, publication, YouTube channel, TikTok creator, Instagram creator, GitHub repo, and Polymarket market as [name](url) at first mention. The URL comes from the raw research dump (every engine item carries one; WebSearch supplements carry their own): a u/name cite takes the comment URL from that comment's own row in ## Top Community Comments or the item evidence, and a GitHub cite takes the URL from the engine evidence block with a label that matches what that URL opens - [owner/repo](url) only when the evidence URL is the repository root; when the evidence row carries an issue, PR, or release URL, label the link as that item (e.g. [owner/repo#123](url)) instead of pairing an owner/repo label with an item URL, and never trim an item URL down to a guessed repo root. Never guess, reconstruct, or reassemble a URL. This rich-citation form is the default and must not regress.
• Visible-URL hosts (Codex, Gemini CLI, raw CLI) - plain source labels, no narrative Markdown links. These hosts render [label](url) as label (https://...) with the URL shown inline, so inline-linking every citation turns the narrative into unreadable URL soup. Cite with the bare label instead - per @handle, per r/subreddit, per KSAT, Polymarket has X at Y% - and let the engine pass-through footer and the saved raw file carry the full URLs.

Host detection is deterministic - do not guess. If the CLAUDECODE environment variable is set (Claude Code) or the CURSOR_AGENT environment variable is set (Grok Bot / Cursor agent chat), you are on a hidden-link host: inline-link. If both are unset, treat the host as visible-URL: plain labels (Codex, Gemini CLI, raw CLI). This is NOT the Step 0 setup split - Cursor stays a non-modal setup host, but its agent chat hides markdown URLs the way Claude Code does, so the citation renderer is a different axis from the modal/non-modal setup axis. The env signals pin the renderer choice so it cannot drift. When genuinely unsure, prefer plain labels - a missing link is readable, URL soup is not.

The stats footer (emoji-tree block) is engine-emitted per LAW 5 and passes through verbatim on every host - do NOT reformat its links yourself.

No broken links: when you are inline-linking and the raw data genuinely has no URL for a source, use the plain label for that one citation. Never emit a broken empty link like [Rolling Stone]() or [@handle]().

BAD (raw URL, any host): per https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/kanye-west-bully-1235506094/ BAD (URL soup on a visible-URL host): per [Rolling Stone](https://www.rollingstone.com/...) when the host prints it as Rolling Stone (https://...) BAD (broken empty link): per [Rolling Stone]() GOOD on hidden-link hosts (Claude Code, Grok Bot / Cursor agent chat): per [Rolling Stone](https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/kanye-west-bully-1235506094/), per [@honest30bgfan_](https://x.com/honest30bgfan_), [r/hiphopheads](https://reddit.com/r/hiphopheads), [u/dramabeats](https://reddit.com/r/hiphopheads/comments/abc123/comment/def456/) (the comment row's own URL), [anthropics/claude-code](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code) (evidence URL is the repo root) or [anthropics/claude-code#512](https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/512) (evidence URL is an issue, so the label names the issue) GOOD on visible-URL hosts (Codex): per Rolling Stone, per @honest30bgfan_, per r/hiphopheads

Observed LAW 8 need (2026-04-20 inline-links saga; renderer split 2026-06-25): the citation rule originally lived in the CITATION PRIORITY block around line 1224 - below the chunked-read window - and four consecutive runs (Matt Van Horn, Peter Steinberger, Best Headphones, OpenClaw vs Hermes) skipped it because the model read lines 1-1000 and stopped ("I never reached line 1224"). Hoisting the rule into the same guaranteed-loaded band as LAWs 1-7 fixed that - it now enters context on every run. The 2026-06-25 split then added the visible-URL regime: a Codex run obeyed the hoisted rule and inline-linked every citation, but Codex prints the URL inline, so the output rendered as URL soup. The rule was firing; it had just assumed Claude Code's hidden-URL renderer. Same hoist pattern that solved v3.0.6 (invented titles), disaster #2 (stripped bold), disaster #3 (trailing Sources), and the Hermes 2026-04-19 evidence-dump disaster. A third miss surfaced 2026-09-01 on Grok Bot: Cursor agent chat hides markdown URLs exactly like Claude Code, but this rule had lumped Cursor with Codex, so an obedient run printed unclickable plain r/sub / u/name labels while a rule-ignoring run the day before produced the clickable links users wanted. Grok Bot / Cursor agent chat (CURSOR_AGENT set) is a hidden-link host.

Post-synthesis self-check (do this BEFORE emitting your response): branch by host - this self-check is the env-branching gate (CLAUDECODE or CURSOR_AGENT); the PRE-PRESENT SELF-CHECK later is an extra sweep, not a substitute for running this one. On a hidden-link host (CLAUDECODE or CURSOR_AGENT set), scan your drafted "What I learned:" and KEY PATTERNS for the [name](url) pattern - if zero inline links appear and the raw dump has URLs for the @handles, r/subs, u/names, and publications you cited as plain text, regenerate ONCE with inline links added. On a visible-URL host (both CLAUDECODE and CURSOR_AGENT unset - Codex, Gemini CLI, raw CLI), scan for label (https://...) clutter - if more than a couple of inline URLs are showing, regenerate ONCE with plain labels, leaving URL traceability to the footer and the saved raw file. Either way, dropping a host's required citation form is not a valid way to satisfy another LAW; LAWs 1 (no trailing Sources) and 8 are complementary, not alternatives.

LAW 9 - WEAVE THE COMMUNITY VOICE; NEVER NARRATE THE TOOLING. The EVIDENCE block carries a ## Top Community Comments section (vote-ranked actual comments across all sources, each with author, vote count, and URL) and, when present, a ## Best Takes section. These are the funniest/sharpest crowd reactions and are the entire point of this tool. You MUST weave at least 2 verbatim, attributed community comments into the synthesis - quote the actual text, attribute to the commenter (u/name, @handle), mix them into the narrative where they fit (never a separate "Comments" section). A top comment with thousands of votes is a stronger signal than the parent post's stats. The "It's called TurkiYe" / "Tell me what he BUILT" class of line is the report's headline value, not a footnote. When you inline-link a comment on a hidden-link host (Claude Code; Grok Bot / Cursor agent chat), copy its URL verbatim from the block - NEVER reconstruct or guess a status id (a wrong link looks authoritative; reconstructing one is a LAW 8 violation); on a visible-URL host (Codex, Gemini CLI, raw CLI), attribute the comment plainly (u/name, @handle) and leave the URL to the saved raw file. And never narrate the engine's own behavior in the deliverable - no "the social-listening engine struck out", no "name collided with X", no "the X column is noise". Present what is true about the subject and quietly drop the junk; engine-health belongs in diagnostics, not the prose.

Observed LAW 9 need (2026-06-17): five consecutive runs (Kanye, Steinberger, Kevin Rose, Lan Xuezhao, Matt-vs-Trevin) shipped news-shaped reports that missed every funny comment, fabricated one citation URL, and leaked tooling meta-commentary - because the comment-weaving rule lived at line ~1189/1245, below the chunked-read window, and ## Best Takes was empty (no in-subprocess fun scorer). The fix is two-part: the engine now always surfaces ## Top Community Comments regardless of fun scoring, and this LAW hoists the weave-the-comments gate into the guaranteed-loaded band. Same hoist that fixed LAW 8.

LAW 10 - FIRST-PARTY POSTS ARE FIRST-CLASS EVIDENCE; READ THE INTERACTION TAG. On a person topic, the subject's OWN posts (the from:{handle} lane) are the single richest vein - they are now surfaced into the EVIDENCE block as ranked evidence, not buried. When the subject has posts in the evidence, quote and weigh them as primary signal; do not lean on third-party coverage (podcasts, articles) for the subject's voice when their own posts are present. An evidence line tagged interaction:→@handle is the subject's own post directed at another account (a reply/mention): treat it as a RELATIONSHIP signal worth reading even at near-zero engagement - who someone personally, repeatedly engages is meaningful, and engagement count does not capture it. Surface what the interaction shows about the subject; per LAW 9, never narrate the tag or the mechanism in the deliverable (no "the engine flagged an interaction" / no "scored as first-party") - just read the signal and write the substance.

LAW 11 - YOU ARE THE JUDGE. THE THREE-COMMAND DISCOVERY PROTOCOL IS MANDATORY ON DISCOVERY/TRENDING RUNS. If you are the reasoning model hosting this skill (Claude Code, Codex, Hermes, Gemini, or any agent runtime that invoked /last30days), then on every discovery/trending run YOU name the topics, flag the junk, score content-worthiness, and write both content angles - via the three-command protocol in the Step 1 DISCOVERY branch: --discover --nominate-only, then --discover --judgments <file>, then --discover --finalize [--angles <file>]. You do not need an API key, "LLM provider" credentials, or an external judging service - you ARE the reasoning model. The engine's deterministic topic-shape heuristics are the headless/cron one-shot path only; on any reasoning-model path, bypass them by running the protocol.

Anticipated misread (the LAW 7 "provider" trap, discovery edition): a one-shot --discover run prints the note [Discover] one-shot run: topic names use deterministic heuristics and no content angles are generated.... That note is a signal that YOU skipped the protocol - never a capability constraint. Do not read it as "judging is unavailable" or "I need a provider to judge": there is no engine judge to unlock, and there never will be a key that adds one. You are the judge. Run the protocol.

Self-check before ANY --discover Bash call: (1) Am I on the protocol - is my first discovery command --discover --nominate-only? (2) Does every leg carry the SAME --save-dir value? (3) Are the judgments/angles files written via the mktemp XXXXXX + trap + cat >| + quoted-heredoc pattern (Step 1 DISCOVERY branch), never inline JSON on the command line and never wrapped in bash -lc '...'? If any answer is no, STOP and fix the command before invoking Bash. (The only exempt calls are the fallback one-shot after two protocol-leg failures and a scripted/cron invocation, per the Step 1 degradation rule.)

End of OUTPUT CONTRACT. The laws above are the contract; everything below is implementation detail.

HOW TO INVOKE THIS SKILL (READ FIRST, FOLLOW EVERY TIME)

LIBRARY SEARCH FAST PATH — this overrides every research/setup step below. If the user says “search my library for X”, “have I researched X before?”, or otherwise asks to query prior saved research, do not run WebSearch, setup, preflight, or fresh source research. Run:

LAST30DAYS_MEMORY_DIR="${LAST30DAYS_MEMORY_DIR:-$HOME/Documents/Last30Days}"
"${LAST30DAYS_PYTHON:-python3}" "${SKILL_DIR}/scripts/last30days.py" library search "${LIBRARY_QUERY}" --save-dir="${LAST30DAYS_MEMORY_DIR}"

Relay the dated, topic-grouped matches. This is deterministic offline FTS over the existing saved-brief scanner plus per-run SQLite store sightings; it does not call a model or the network. If SQLite lacks FTS5, relay the engine's capability error rather than falling through to fresh research.

LIBRARY FEED FAST PATH — this overrides every research/setup step below. If the user asks to build, view, refresh, or subscribe to their saved research library/feed, do not run host WebSearch resolution, the first-run setup gate, topic preflight, or source research. Run:

LAST30DAYS_MEMORY_DIR="${LAST30DAYS_MEMORY_DIR:-$HOME/Documents/Last30Days}"
"${LAST30DAYS_PYTHON:-python3}" "${SKILL_DIR}/scripts/last30days.py" library feed --save-dir="${LAST30DAYS_MEMORY_DIR}"

Relay the generated local index.html and feed.xml paths. If the user explicitly asks to publish/share the whole library, explain that ht-ml.app pages are public by default and may be crawled or indexed, then follow the existing public-vs-password publishing choice. After consent, add --publish; for password protection, supply their unique shared password through LAST30DAYS_PUBLISH_PASSWORD, never as a visible command-line flag. Relay the printed library URL and local Atom path, and explain that feed.xml becomes subscribable when the output directory is hosted on a static host such as GitHub Pages. Never describe the ht-ml.app library URL as an Atom subscription URL, and never add --publish merely because the user asked to generate or open a local feed.

TOPIC QUEUE FAST PATH — this overrides every research/setup step below. If the user asks "what's in my topic queue", "what should I talk about next", "what topics haven't I covered", "show my content pipeline", "mark as covered", "I covered X on the podcast", "we published that article", or similar — even cold, with no research run earlier in this session — do not run WebSearch, setup, preflight, or fresh source research. Run the read form:

LAST30DAYS_MEMORY_DIR="${LAST30DAYS_MEMORY_DIR:-$HOME/Documents/Last30Days}"
"${LAST30DAYS_PYTHON:-python3}" "${SKILL_DIR}/scripts/last30days.py" queue list --save-dir="${LAST30DAYS_MEMORY_DIR}"

or the cover form, for "mark X as covered" phrasing:

LAST30DAYS_MEMORY_DIR="${LAST30DAYS_MEMORY_DIR:-$HOME/Documents/Last30Days}"
"${LAST30DAYS_PYTHON:-python3}" "${SKILL_DIR}/scripts/last30days.py" queue cover "<topic name>" --save-dir="${LAST30DAYS_MEMORY_DIR}"

Relay the rendered list (uncovered surfaced topics with domain, surface count, and last-surfaced date) or the cover confirmation. This is deterministic offline SQLite over that save-dir's research.db; it does not call a model or the network. Covering requires the exact queued topic name; on an unknown name the engine exits 2 and points at queue list - relay that, run queue list, and offer the queued names instead of retrying with guesses. An empty queue is a valid answer - suggest a /last30days trending or domain discovery run to populate it. Do not treat the topic name or phrase as a fresh research topic and do not fall through to the "user provided a topic" branch in the Step 1 branching rule below.

Normal fresh research runs may include a short ## From your library block when prior indexed runs overlap the resolved topic/entities. Use those dated findings as historical context in the synthesis; do not claim they are fresh evidence from the current date range. Users can disable this passive lookup with LAST30DAYS_LIBRARY_CONTEXT=off.

STEP 0 - RESOLVE HOST WEB SEARCH FIRST. Your first action on every /last30days invocation is to determine whether this agent session has a usable web-search tool. Most agent harnesses do: it may be built in, exposed as a deferred tool, or provided by an installed connector such as Brave, Firecrawl, Exa, Serper, or another search provider.

Use this capability rule:

• If a web-search tool is available: use it for Step 0.5 / 0.55 pre-research and Step 2 supplements. If your host requires loading, selecting, or enabling the web-search tool before use, do that using the host's mechanism. Do not fail the skill just because one particular schema lookup or tool name is unavailable; use the web-search capability you actually have.

• If no web-search tool is available in the agent session: skip Step 0.55 and Step 0.75, and add --auto-resolve to the engine command. The engine will use configured web backends (BRAVE_API_KEY, EXA_API_KEY, SERPER_API_KEY, PARALLEL_API_KEY) or the keyless floor when available.

When host web search is available, export LAST30DAYS_NATIVE_SEARCH=1 in the same shell as the engine invocation so the engine does not also run the lower-quality keyless web floor. Leave it unset when the agent session has no web-search tool.

Resolving this correctly prevents the second-most-common failure mode of this skill: the model skips Step 0.5 / 0.55 and runs the engine bare with only keyword search. The output looks fine but misses founder X timelines, GitHub repo activity, subreddit-specific threads, and current first-party positioning.

After resolving host web search, run the first-run gate below before anything else.

GROK BOT HOST RULE (every invocation, including installs that already have SETUP_COMPLETE=true). If you are running as a Grok Bot (xAI's Grok Bot; do not key this on CURSOR_AGENT alone, which Cursor agent chat also sets), export LAST30DAYS_HOST=grok-bot in every shell that runs last30days.py, the way LAST30DAYS_NATIVE_SEARCH is exported. If this session also exposes an X post-search tool from the X connector (the "X for Grok Bot" plugin: search posts, read timelines, check mentions; for example search_posts_all), export LAST30DAYS_X_HOST_LANE=1 in that same shell and follow the X connector recipe in Research Execution (you fetch X through the connector; the engine ingests it via --x-posts <file>). On a Grok Bot never run any browser-cookie step, and never place post text unquoted in a shell command: the envelope is written only through a single-quoted heredoc delimiter (<<'EOF') or the tool's own file output. A Grok Bot first run takes the Grok Bot Prose Flow in Step 0.

FIRST-RUN GATE — run this Bash command immediately after resolving host web search, before reading the topic or doing any research:

grep -q "SETUP_COMPLETE=true" ~/.config/last30days/.env 2>/dev/null &

…(truncated)