mypropper Compare contract versions
Read two versions of the same document and report every substantive difference, with locations and both wordings. This runs entirely locally and calls no Propper tools, so it works with or without an account.
For a single document about to go out, use signature-ready-check. For dates and
deadlines out of a final document, use extract-contract-dates.
Steps
1. Establish which version is which
Direction matters: "added" and "removed" are meaningless without a baseline. Take the earlier version as the baseline and the later one as the comparison.
When the filenames do not settle it, ask. Do not infer recency from a modification time, which reflects when a file was copied as often as when it was edited.
2. Extract the text before comparing
Pull plain text from both. Then discard differences that are not content:
- line wrapping, pagination, page numbers, headers and footers
- whitespace runs, smart quotes versus straight quotes, hyphenation at line ends
- font, spacing and styling changes carrying no text change
Reporting reflow as change buries the three edits that matter under two hundred that do not.
3. Align by clause, not by line
Match sections by their numbering and headings first, then compare within each matched pair. A line-by-line diff of a document where one paragraph was inserted early reports every subsequent line as changed.
Renumbering is itself a finding. When section 8 becomes section 9, say so, and check whether cross-references to "Section 8" elsewhere followed it.
4. Classify every difference
| Class | What it is |
|---|---|
| Added | Text present in the new version only |
| Removed | Text present in the baseline only |
| Reworded | The same clause, different wording |
| Value changed | A number, date, period, currency amount or percentage differs |
| Party changed | An entity name, address, jurisdiction or notice recipient differs |
| Renumbered | The same text under a different section number |
| Moved | The same text in a different place in the document |
5. Report
Group by class, most concrete first: value and party changes, then added and removed clauses, then rewordings, then renumbering and moves.
For each difference give the section, the baseline text and the new text verbatim. Never compress a value change into "the fee was updated" — give both numbers.
Say explicitly when a section is unchanged if the user asked about it. "Nothing changed in the indemnity section" is an answer; silence is not.
Look hardest at these
They are the changes most often missed on a read-through:
- Negation and modality.
shalltomay,musttoshould, an inserted or deletednot,includingtoincluding without limitation. One word, inverted obligation. - Defined terms. A changed definition alters every clause using it, none of which show as changed themselves. When a definition moves, list the sections relying on it.
- Cross-references. After renumbering, a reference to "Section 8" may now point somewhere else entirely. Check every internal reference resolves.
- Numbers and units. 30 days versus 30 business days. Net 30 versus net 45. A percentage that moved a decimal place.
- Carve-outs and exceptions. An added "except" clause narrows an obligation without touching the sentence that states it.
- Signature blocks and exhibits. A removed signature block, a renamed exhibit, an exhibit referenced but no longer attached.
Limits — state them rather than guessing
- A scanned PDF with no text layer cannot be compared. Say so; do not report "no changes found" for a document that was never read.
- Tracked changes and comments in a DOCX may carry edits that the accepted text does not show. Note when a file contains them.
- An encrypted or password-protected file cannot be opened.
- Two documents that are not versions of each other produce a meaningless diff. If the structures do not correspond, say that instead of reporting every clause as changed.
Boundary
Report what changed. Do not rank the changes by how bad they are, say whether a change is acceptable, standard, favourable, one-sided or safe to accept, or advise on whether to sign, push back or accept the redline.
Those are the user's calls, and they need the facts to make them: every change, its location and both wordings. If asked which changes matter, give the classification and say the significance call belongs to them or their counsel.