/idiolect:humanize — from slop to person
Two modes. Both end with before/after scanner scores, because "sounds better to me" is not a receipt.
Voice references can be fuzzy and human ("make it sound like the diner guy", "like me" → the self voice): resolve against $IDIO voices --json and proceed, mentioning the match in passing. No voice mentioned → Mode A.
Setup
ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-${CODEX_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$IDIOLECT_ROOT}}"
# unset everywhere (opencode)? ROOT = two directories up from this SKILL.md
IDIO="python3 $ROOT/scripts/idiolect.py"
Input text goes to a scratch file via the Write tool, never inline in shell.
Mode A — scrub and soul (no voice given)
The goal is the same author, minus the generator fingerprints, plus a pulse.
- Save input to
orig.txt; run $IDIO scan --file orig.txt [--platform <p>]. Show the user the score and the top tells found — this is the "before" receipt and it teaches them what was wrong.
- Rewrite with three obligations:
- Kill every flagged tell (the report gives line numbers): the lexical slop, the constructions ("It's not X. It's Y."), the metronomic sentence lengths, the wrap-up ending, the bold-header bullets.
- Preserve every factual claim exactly. Scrubbing is not summarizing; if the original has five specifics, the rewrite has five specifics. NEVER add facts that aren't in the original — if it's thin on specifics, tell the user that's the real problem (specificity is the strongest human signal there is) and ask for two or three true details worth adding.
- Restore a pulse: vary sentence lengths (target CV ≥ 0.55), let one opinion or ambivalence through, cut the throat-clearing, end without a bow. Register stays the author's own — formal text stays formal; don't inflict aggressive casualness (that's the "humanizer house style," and it's the next tell).
- Re-scan the rewrite. Target ≤ 15 (≤ 20 for formal registers). Iterate to 3 times.
- Deliver: rewrite in a fenced block +
receipt: 68 → 9 (clean) + one line on the biggest change.
Mode B — re-voice (voice slug given)
The text's CONTENT survives; its author is replaced.
- Scan the original (before-receipt), then read the voice profile in full, plus
_shared/craft.md and the platform row of _shared/platforms.md if a platform is stated.
- Rewrite as that person would have written it from scratch: their opener habits, their syntax, their systematic flaws, their stance where the content touches something they'd have an opinion about. Facts and commitments from the original are preserved; framing, rhythm, and lexicon are theirs.
- Verify:
$IDIO scan (≤ 15) AND $IDIO conform --voice <slug> (PASS). Iterate to 3.
- Deliver with both receipts and, if invented interior texture crept in, the
texture: line.
What this skill refuses to do
- Manufacture fake specifics to lower the score (invented numbers are worse than slop — they're lies).
- "Humanize" text for deception-sensitive contexts when the user says so explicitly (academic submissions, legal filings). Say why and offer honest editing instead.
- Chase detector scores. The target is reads like a person wrote it, which is measured by the linter and your ear together — when they disagree, say so and let the ear win.
1---2name: humanize3description: Rewrite existing text so it reads human — either scrubbed-and-souled in its own register, or fully re-voiced as one of the roster's people. Use when the user has a draft that "sounds like AI" or wants existing copy converted into a specific voice.4---56# /idiolect:humanize — from slop to person78Two modes. Both end with before/after scanner scores, because "sounds better to me" is not a receipt.910Voice references can be fuzzy and human ("make it sound like the diner guy", "like me" → the `self` voice): resolve against `$IDIO voices --json` and proceed, mentioning the match in passing. No voice mentioned → Mode A.1112## Setup1314```bash15ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-${CODEX_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$IDIOLECT_ROOT}}"16# unset everywhere (opencode)? ROOT = two directories up from this SKILL.md17IDIO="python3 $ROOT/scripts/idiolect.py"18```1920Input text goes to a scratch file via the Write tool, never inline in shell.2122## Mode A — scrub and soul (no voice given)2324The goal is the same author, minus the generator fingerprints, plus a pulse.25261. Save input to `orig.txt`; run `$IDIO scan --file orig.txt [--platform <p>]`. Show the user the score and the top tells found — this is the "before" receipt and it teaches them what was wrong.272. Rewrite with three obligations:28 - **Kill every flagged tell** (the report gives line numbers): the lexical slop, the constructions ("It's not X. It's Y."), the metronomic sentence lengths, the wrap-up ending, the bold-header bullets.29 - **Preserve every factual claim exactly.** Scrubbing is not summarizing; if the original has five specifics, the rewrite has five specifics. NEVER add facts that aren't in the original — if it's thin on specifics, tell the user that's the real problem (specificity is the strongest human signal there is) and ask for two or three true details worth adding.30 - **Restore a pulse**: vary sentence lengths (target CV ≥ 0.55), let one opinion or ambivalence through, cut the throat-clearing, end without a bow. Register stays the author's own — formal text stays formal; don't inflict aggressive casualness (that's the "humanizer house style," and it's the next tell).313. Re-scan the rewrite. Target ≤ 15 (≤ 20 for formal registers). Iterate to 3 times.324. Deliver: rewrite in a fenced block + `receipt: 68 → 9 (clean)` + one line on the biggest change.3334## Mode B — re-voice (voice slug given)3536The text's CONTENT survives; its author is replaced.37381. Scan the original (before-receipt), then read the voice profile in full, plus `_shared/craft.md` and the platform row of `_shared/platforms.md` if a platform is stated.392. Rewrite as that person would have written it from scratch: their opener habits, their syntax, their systematic flaws, their stance where the content touches something they'd have an opinion about. Facts and commitments from the original are preserved; framing, rhythm, and lexicon are theirs.403. Verify: `$IDIO scan` (≤ 15) AND `$IDIO conform --voice <slug>` (PASS). Iterate to 3.414. Deliver with both receipts and, if invented interior texture crept in, the `texture:` line.4243## What this skill refuses to do4445- Manufacture fake specifics to lower the score (invented numbers are worse than slop — they're lies).46- "Humanize" text for deception-sensitive contexts when the user says so explicitly (academic submissions, legal filings). Say why and offer honest editing instead.47- Chase detector scores. The target is *reads like a person wrote it*, which is measured by the linter and your ear together — when they disagree, say so and let the ear win.
nagisanzenin