Design queued and scheduled work so it survives duplicates, retries, crashes and restarts — job contract, idempotency, transactional enqueue, backoff, dead letters, leases and the ordering guarantees you actually have. Use when moving work off a request path, adding a worker or cron, or debugging a job that ran twice, never ran, ran out of order, or is stuck retrying forever. Not for in-request async concurrency, and not for stream processing topology design.
Every queue gives you at-least-once delivery and no useful ordering. Everything else — exactly
once, in order, eventually — is something you build on top, or something you are assuming and
will be paged about. Design for the guarantee you have, not the one you want.
When this fires
Work is being moved out of a request path; a queue, worker, scheduler or cron entry is being
added or changed; or a job misbehaved — ran twice, silently vanished, processed stale data,
or filled a dead-letter queue. It does not fire for concurrency inside a single request, and
not for designing a streaming topology.
Procedure
Check it belongs off the request path. If the caller needs the result to respond, it is
not a job — making it one just moves the wait somewhere the user cannot see. Enqueue work
that is slow, retryable, and whose completion the caller can learn about later.
Define the job contract. Small, serializable payload. Prefer passing an identifier and
re-reading current state in the worker over embedding a snapshot — with one exception: when
the job must act on the values as they were at enqueue time, embed them and say why. Never
enqueue a live object, a connection, or anything whose meaning depends on the sender's memory.
Make the handler idempotent before anything else. Assume every job runs at least twice,
sometimes concurrently. Give the work a natural idempotency key, and either guard with a
unique constraint on the effect, or check-and-claim the row before acting. "It only runs
twice if something crashes" is a statement about how often, not whether.
Enqueue transactionally. Enqueue inside the transaction and the worker can pick up a job
for a row that never committed; enqueue after commit and a crash in the gap loses the job
silently. Pick one and cover the gap: write the job to an outbox table in the same
transaction and have a relay publish it, or enqueue after commit and add a sweep that finds
rows whose job never ran. Say which you chose; both are acceptable, silence is not.
Separate retryable from permanent failures. A timeout, a 503 and a deadlock are worth
retrying. A validation error, a 404 and a malformed payload are not — retrying them burns
the queue and delays everything behind them. Fail those immediately and visibly.
Set backoff, jitter and a cap. Exponential backoff with random jitter, so a downstream
outage does not produce a synchronized retry wave that keeps it down. Cap the attempts; an
uncapped retry is an infinite loop with a network bill.
Give poison messages somewhere to land, and someone to read it. After the cap, move the
job to a dead-letter queue or a failed-jobs table carrying the payload, the error and the
attempt count. A dead-letter queue nobody monitors is a deletion with extra steps, so name
the alert in the same change. Replaying a dead-letter queue re-executes real side effects —
charges, emails, webhooks — so it stops and asks before replay, every time.
Match the lease to the work. Queues hand out a message with a visibility timeout or
lease; if the handler is still running when it expires, the message is redelivered and you
now have two workers on the same job. Set the lease above the p99 runtime, extend it by
heartbeat for long jobs, or split the job until it fits. This is the single most common
source of "it ran twice".
State the ordering you actually have. Across a queue: none. Within a partition or a FIFO
group key: order holds only while concurrency is one and nothing is retried — one retry puts
a message behind its successor. So either serialize per entity with a key and a single
consumer, or make the updates order-independent: carry a version or timestamp and ignore
anything older than what is already applied. Do not design around order you cannot name.
For scheduled work, handle the four schedule failures. Cron running on N instances fires
N times — take a lock or have exactly one scheduler. Decide whether a run missed during
downtime is skipped or caught up, because the default is skip and nobody notices. Guard
overlap when a run outlives its interval. Pin the timezone explicitly: local-time schedules
lose or repeat an hour at DST transitions.
Emit the four numbers. Queue depth, age of the oldest unprocessed message, failure rate,
and attempts per job. Alert on age, not depth — a deep queue that is draining is fine, a
shallow queue whose oldest message is an hour old is broken.
Test the handler directly. It is a function: call it twice with the same input and assert
the effect happened once; make its dependency throw and assert the retry classification; feed
it the payload that killed it in production. Enqueuing a job in a test asserts nothing about
the handler.
Checklist
The caller genuinely does not need the result inline
Payload is small, serializable, and either an id or a justified snapshot
Handler is idempotent, with the guard named (unique constraint, claim, idempotency key)
Enqueue is transactional, or the gap is covered by an outbox or a sweep
Retryable vs permanent failures are distinguished in code, not by hope
Backoff has jitter and an attempt cap
Dead letters land somewhere and an alert names them
Lease/visibility timeout exceeds p99 runtime, or is heartbeated
The ordering guarantee is stated, and the design does not need more than it has
Queue age is monitored and alerted, not just depth
Handler tested twice-called and failure-path tested
Failure handling
Job ran twice — look at the lease before the enqueue code. A handler that outlives its
visibility timeout is redelivered, and no amount of enqueue-side deduplication prevents it.
Fix idempotency first; it is the only durable fix.
Job never ran — establish which it is: never enqueued, enqueued and lost, or consumed and
failed silently. These have different fixes, and the logs distinguish them. Check the
dead-letter queue before concluding it vanished.
Queue backing up — check age of oldest and failure rate together. Rising age with a rising
failure rate is a retry storm feeding itself, not a capacity problem; adding workers makes it
worse. Stop the retry storm first.
Worker stuck on one message — a poison message with no attempt cap. Find it, cap the
attempts, and route it to dead letters. Purging the queue to clear it is destructive and
discards unrelated work: stop and ask, and say how many messages would be lost.
Cannot reproduce locally — expected. Single-worker local runs hide every concurrency,
redelivery and ordering failure this skill exists for. Report it as unreproduced, not as fixed.
Evidence to report
Distinguish plainly: the job was created (code written), executed (a worker picked it up
and the run is in the logs), succeeded (the effect is visible in the data), and tested
(the handler was called twice and the duplicate was absorbed). Report the delivery guarantee, the
idempotency key, the retry policy and cap, the lease value against measured runtime, the ordering
guarantee relied on, and where dead letters go and who is alerted. Name what was not exercised —
concurrent duplicate delivery, the enqueue crash gap, and DST behaviour are usually among them.
1---2name: background-jobs3description: Design queued and scheduled work so it survives duplicates, retries, crashes and restarts — job contract, idempotency, transactional enqueue, backoff, dead letters, leases and the ordering guarantees you actually have. Use when moving work off a request path, adding a worker or cron, or debugging a job that ran twice, never ran, ran out of order, or is stuck retrying forever. Not for in-request async concurrency, and not for stream processing topology design.4---56# Background jobs78Every queue gives you at-least-once delivery and no useful ordering. Everything else — exactly9once, in order, eventually — is something you build on top, or something you are assuming and10will be paged about. Design for the guarantee you have, not the one you want.1112## When this fires1314Work is being moved out of a request path; a queue, worker, scheduler or cron entry is being15added or changed; or a job misbehaved — ran twice, silently vanished, processed stale data,16or filled a dead-letter queue. It does not fire for concurrency inside a single request, and17not for designing a streaming topology.1819## Procedure20211. **Check it belongs off the request path.** If the caller needs the result to respond, it is22 not a job — making it one just moves the wait somewhere the user cannot see. Enqueue work23 that is slow, retryable, and whose completion the caller can learn about later.242. **Define the job contract.** Small, serializable payload. Prefer passing an identifier and25 re-reading current state in the worker over embedding a snapshot — with one exception: when26 the job must act on the values as they were at enqueue time, embed them and say why. Never27 enqueue a live object, a connection, or anything whose meaning depends on the sender's memory.283. **Make the handler idempotent before anything else.** Assume every job runs at least twice,29 sometimes concurrently. Give the work a natural idempotency key, and either guard with a30 unique constraint on the effect, or check-and-claim the row before acting. "It only runs31 twice if something crashes" is a statement about how often, not whether.324. **Enqueue transactionally.** Enqueue inside the transaction and the worker can pick up a job33 for a row that never committed; enqueue after commit and a crash in the gap loses the job34 silently. Pick one and cover the gap: write the job to an outbox table in the same35 transaction and have a relay publish it, or enqueue after commit and add a sweep that finds36 rows whose job never ran. Say which you chose; both are acceptable, silence is not.375. **Separate retryable from permanent failures.** A timeout, a 503 and a deadlock are worth38 retrying. A validation error, a 404 and a malformed payload are not — retrying them burns39 the queue and delays everything behind them. Fail those immediately and visibly.406. **Set backoff, jitter and a cap.** Exponential backoff with random jitter, so a downstream41 outage does not produce a synchronized retry wave that keeps it down. Cap the attempts; an42 uncapped retry is an infinite loop with a network bill.437. **Give poison messages somewhere to land, and someone to read it.** After the cap, move the44 job to a dead-letter queue or a failed-jobs table carrying the payload, the error and the45 attempt count. A dead-letter queue nobody monitors is a deletion with extra steps, so name46 the alert in the same change. Replaying a dead-letter queue re-executes real side effects —47 charges, emails, webhooks — so it stops and asks before replay, every time.488. **Match the lease to the work.** Queues hand out a message with a visibility timeout or49 lease; if the handler is still running when it expires, the message is redelivered and you50 now have two workers on the same job. Set the lease above the p99 runtime, extend it by51 heartbeat for long jobs, or split the job until it fits. This is the single most common52 source of "it ran twice".539. **State the ordering you actually have.** Across a queue: none. Within a partition or a FIFO54 group key: order holds only while concurrency is one and nothing is retried — one retry puts55 a message behind its successor. So either serialize per entity with a key and a single56 consumer, or make the updates order-independent: carry a version or timestamp and ignore57 anything older than what is already applied. Do not design around order you cannot name.5810. **For scheduled work, handle the four schedule failures.** Cron running on N instances fires59 N times — take a lock or have exactly one scheduler. Decide whether a run missed during60 downtime is skipped or caught up, because the default is skip and nobody notices. Guard61 overlap when a run outlives its interval. Pin the timezone explicitly: local-time schedules62 lose or repeat an hour at DST transitions.6311. **Emit the four numbers.** Queue depth, age of the oldest unprocessed message, failure rate,64 and attempts per job. Alert on **age**, not depth — a deep queue that is draining is fine, a65 shallow queue whose oldest message is an hour old is broken.6612. **Test the handler directly.** It is a function: call it twice with the same input and assert67 the effect happened once; make its dependency throw and assert the retry classification; feed68 it the payload that killed it in production. Enqueuing a job in a test asserts nothing about69 the handler.7071## Checklist7273- [ ] The caller genuinely does not need the result inline74- [ ] Payload is small, serializable, and either an id or a justified snapshot75- [ ] Handler is idempotent, with the guard named (unique constraint, claim, idempotency key)76- [ ] Enqueue is transactional, or the gap is covered by an outbox or a sweep77- [ ] Retryable vs permanent failures are distinguished in code, not by hope78- [ ] Backoff has jitter and an attempt cap79- [ ] Dead letters land somewhere and an alert names them80- [ ] Lease/visibility timeout exceeds p99 runtime, or is heartbeated81- [ ] The ordering guarantee is stated, and the design does not need more than it has82- [ ] Scheduled work: single-firing, missed-run policy, overlap guard, explicit timezone83- [ ] Queue age is monitored and alerted, not just depth84- [ ] Handler tested twice-called and failure-path tested8586## Failure handling8788- **Job ran twice** — look at the lease before the enqueue code. A handler that outlives its89 visibility timeout is redelivered, and no amount of enqueue-side deduplication prevents it.90 Fix idempotency first; it is the only durable fix.91- **Job never ran** — establish which it is: never enqueued, enqueued and lost, or consumed and92 failed silently. These have different fixes, and the logs distinguish them. Check the93 dead-letter queue before concluding it vanished.94- **Queue backing up** — check age of oldest and failure rate together. Rising age with a rising95 failure rate is a retry storm feeding itself, not a capacity problem; adding workers makes it96 worse. Stop the retry storm first.97- **Worker stuck on one message** — a poison message with no attempt cap. Find it, cap the98 attempts, and route it to dead letters. Purging the queue to clear it is destructive and99 discards unrelated work: stop and ask, and say how many messages would be lost.100- **Cannot reproduce locally** — expected. Single-worker local runs hide every concurrency,101 redelivery and ordering failure this skill exists for. Report it as unreproduced, not as fixed.102103## Evidence to report104105Distinguish plainly: the job was **created** (code written), **executed** (a worker picked it up106and the run is in the logs), **succeeded** (the effect is visible in the data), and **tested**107(the handler was called twice and the duplicate was absorbed). Report the delivery guarantee, the108idempotency key, the retry policy and cap, the lease value against measured runtime, the ordering109guarantee relied on, and where dead letters go and who is alerted. Name what was not exercised —110concurrent duplicate delivery, the enqueue crash gap, and DST behaviour are usually among them.
Run npx skillmds@latest add nahid-sparktales/background-jobs in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.
Design queued and scheduled work so it survives duplicates, retries, crashes and restarts — job contract, idempotency, transactional enqueue, backoff, dead letters, leases and the ordering guarantees you actually have. Use when moving work off a request path, adding a worker or cron, or debugging a job that ran twice, never ran, ran out of order, or is stuck retrying forever. Not for in-request async concurrency, and not for stream processing topology design. It is listed under Coding & Dev Tools on SkillMD.
This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. Capability flags: docs only. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.
This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.
Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.
nahid-sparktales (@nahid-sparktales) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.