Literature Review
Systematic literature search, screening, and evidence synthesis.
Use This Skill When
- Searching for prior research on a topic.
- Conducting a PRISMA-compliant systematic review.
- Screening and evaluating source quality.
- Synthesizing findings across multiple studies.
- Identifying research gaps.
Workflow
Define search strategy:
- Keywords and Boolean operators
- Target databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar)
- Inclusion/exclusion criteria
- Date range and language filters
Execute search and screen results:
- Title/abstract screening
- Full-text screening
- Quality assessment (risk of bias)
Extract and synthesize:
- Data extraction table
- Thematic analysis or narrative synthesis
- Gap identification
Generate PRISMA flow diagram data
Save all outputs to files
Deliverables
report.md: synthesis narrative with key findings.results/search-strategy.md: documented search methodology.results/screening-table.csv: inclusion/exclusion decisions.results/extraction-table.csv: extracted data from included studies.figures/prisma-flow.md: PRISMA flow diagram data.
Available Tools (MCP)
External tools available via ToolUniverse MCP server. Falls back to Python
requests+ public REST APIs when MCP is unavailable.
| Source | Tool | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PubMed | PubMed_search |
PubMed API |
| PubMed | PubMed_get_article |
PubMed API |
| Semantic Scholar | SemanticScholar_search |
Semantic Scholar API |
| Semantic Scholar | SemanticScholar_get_paper |
Semantic Scholar API |
| Crossref | Crossref_search_works |
Crossref API |
- Read
references/prisma-guide.mdwhen conducting PRISMA-compliant systematic reviews.
Quality Gates
- Search strategy is documented and reproducible.
- Inclusion/exclusion criteria are explicit.
- At least 3 sources are cross-validated for key claims.
- Single-source findings are marked with ⚠️.
- Research gaps are identified with supporting evidence.
If any gate fails: identify the specific failing check, fix the issue, and re-validate before proceeding.
Gotchas
- Google Scholar の検索結果は網羅性が低い。必ず PubMed/Scopus と併用すること
- 単一ソースの情報は ⚠️ マークを付け、断定的な結論に使用しないこと
- プレプリント(bioRxiv, arXiv)は査読前であることを明記すること
- 検索語の日英バイリンガル展開を行うと、非英語圏の重要な研究を見落とさない
- スクリーニング結果は逐次ファイルに保存すること。コンパクションで中間結果が消失する
Validation Loop
- 検索戦略とスクリーニング結果を生成
- チェック:
- 検索語が研究目的をカバーしているか
- 2つ以上のデータベースを使用しているか
- 単一ソースの主張に ⚠️ が付いているか
- 不合格なら検索戦略を修正して再実行
- 合格後のみ合成フェーズへ進む