Purpose
Guide a team through building a product positioning statement step-by-step using adaptive questions. Combines Geoffrey Moore's classic template with April Dunford's Obviously Awesome methodology for a modern, thorough positioning exercise.
Key Concepts
Workshop Flow (5-7 turns)
- Competitive Alternatives — What would customers do if you didn't exist?
- Unique Attributes — What do you have that alternatives don't?
- Value Themes — What value do those attributes enable?
- Target Segments — Who cares most about that value?
- Market Category — What frame of reference makes your value obvious?
- Validation — Does it pass the "so what?" test?
Facilitation Protocol
Use skills/communication/workshop-facilitation/SKILL.md as the interaction protocol.
Application
Turn 1: Competitive Alternatives
Agent asks: "If your product didn't exist, what would your best customers do instead?"
Options:
- Use a direct competitor — Name them
- Use a general-purpose tool — Spreadsheets, email, etc.
- Hire someone — Consultant, contractor, intern
- Do nothing — Live with the problem
- Build it themselves — Internal tool
- Other (describe)
Follow-up: "What specifically falls short about that alternative?"
Turn 2: Unique Attributes
Agent asks: "What does your product have or do that those alternatives cannot match?"
Prompts:
- "Think about features, capabilities, expertise, data, network..."
- "Be specific — not 'better UX' but 'onboarding in under 5 minutes without SQL'"
Turn 3: Value Themes
Agent asks: "For each unique attribute, what value does it create for the customer?"
Agent maps: Attribute → Value
| Unique Attribute | Value for Customer |
|---|---|
| [Attribute 1] | → [Value 1] |
| [Attribute 2] | → [Value 2] |
Agent clusters: Values into 2-3 themes
Turn 4: Target Segments
Agent asks: "Which customer segments care most about these value themes?"
Prompts:
- "Who gets the most desperate about the problem you solve?"
- "Who has budget, authority, and urgency?"
- "Who would be devastated if you disappeared?"
Turn 5: Market Category
Agent asks: "If you overheard someone describing your product, what would they say you ARE?"
Options:
- Existing category — "It's a [known category]" (e.g., "CRM")
- Subcategory — "It's a [known category] but for [specific use]" (e.g., "CRM for agencies")
- New category — "There's nothing quite like it" (risky but potentially powerful)
Turn 6: Assemble & Validate
Agent assembles the positioning statement and asks:
Agent asks: "Here's your positioning. Does this pass the 'so what?' test?"
For [target segment]
who [need],
[product] is a [category]
that [value theme].
Unlike [competitive alternative],
our product [unique attribute → value].
Validation questions:
- "Would a sales rep remember this tomorrow?"
- "Would a customer nod and say 'yes, exactly!'?"
- "Does this differentiate you from the top competitor?"
Quality Rubric
| Dimension | 0 | 1 | 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives | Not identified | Generic "competitors" | Specific alternatives with gaps |
| Uniqueness | "We're better" | Real but vague attributes | Specific, defensible attributes |
| Value | Features listed | Benefits stated | Customer outcomes quantified |
| Segment | "Everyone" | Named segment | Specific + who it's NOT for |
| Category | No framing | Existing category | Strategic category choice with rationale |
References
Related Skills
skills/strategy/positioning-statement/SKILL.md— The component this workshop producesskills/discovery/proto-persona/SKILL.md— Input for target segmentskills/discovery/competitive-battle-card/SKILL.md— Competitive context
External Frameworks
- April Dunford, Obviously Awesome (2019)
- Geoffrey Moore, Crossing the Chasm (1991)
Skill type: Interactive Domain: Strategy & Vision