api-test-pytest (EN)
Chinese version: See the corresponding Chinese skill.
When to Use
- Need API outputs that should land in pytest-based automation.
- The project is already Python-first or wants pytest-style structure.
Workflow
- Read and follow the main prompt listed under Progressive disclosure (coverage, structure, quality bar).
- Add only project context that changes the result: scope, environment, constraints, risks, dependencies, expected deliverable.
- If input is incomplete, return a usable first draft and explicitly mark assumptions and gaps.
- Default to Markdown; switch formats only when the user asks.
Core Constraints
- Prioritize by risk / business impact — do not treat everything equally.
- Separate confirmed facts from current assumptions.
- Do not invent endpoints, fields, environments, or root causes the user did not provide.
- Use placeholders or env-var semantics for auth/secrets; never hardcode real credentials.
- Keep output executable: concrete scenarios, clear priority, clear next steps.
Progressive Disclosure
- Before producing output, read and follow
prompts/api-test-pytest.md(minimum coverage, output structure, quality bar). - When a ready-made template fits: use matching files under
output-templates/. - When the user wants examples or alignment with existing assets: read relevant
examples/. - For deep framework/troubleshoot/schema notes: read only the relevant file(s) under
references/, do not load the whole directory. - For format conversion or helper checks: prefer existing
scripts/over reinventing. - For evaluating/regressing this skill: use
evals/with skill-up.
Pre-delivery Checklist
- Followed the main prompt's output structure
- Minimum coverage focus: module structure, fixture strategy, auth handling, priority endpoints, positive scenarios, negative and boundary scenarios, assertion focus, test data strategy, ... (details in main prompt)
- Covered the minimum checklist, or explained omissions
- High-risk items have explicit priority
- Did not invent details the user did not provide
- Assumptions and gaps are marked
Common Pitfalls
- Do not pretend completeness when scope/context is missing.
- Do not treat every item as equally important.
- Do not skip assumptions and information gaps.
- Do not dump generic theory unrelated to the current toolchain.