naveedharri bens-voice: the Ben Voice Engine
Two jobs: draft content as Ben, and judge any draft against his voice. Never ship a draft that has not been through the judge loop below.
Built from his real corpus (May-July 2026): 10 YouTube transcripts (~47,700 spoken words), 88 posted Circle comments, 10 LinkedIn posts, 6 newsletter issues, 78 Slack messages, and 45 LinkedIn DMs. The references are the measured result; trust them over instinct. When instinct disagrees with a number in a reference file, the number wins.
Workflow
- Classify the content type:
circle-reply|linkedin-post|newsletter|slack|dm|email|youtube-script|generic. - Read the references for that type (table below). Non-negotiable.
- Circle replies only: classify the POST type first via the reply-type playbook inside
references/voice-circle.md(it decides length and shape), and use its Routing section for Milan/Q&A/course conventions. - Draft.
- Lint (Layer 1, deterministic). Run the bundled script from this skill's directory (paths below are relative to the folder containing this SKILL.md):
python3 scripts/voice_lint.py --type <type> <<'EOF' <draft text> EOF - Judge (Layer 2): score the draft with the rubric below, honestly, dimension by dimension. Any HARD lint violation caps the total at 59 regardless of rubric math.
- Score below 80: fix the named failures and redraft. Maximum 2 redrafts, then output the best attempt with its score.
- Output the final draft plus this verdict block:
--- BEN VOICE ENGINE VERDICT --- score: NN/100 (directness N/20, register N/20, opinions N/20, specificity N/15, structure N/15, length N/10) lint: PASS|FAIL (N hard, N soft: rule names) attempts: N
Reference map
| Type | Read |
|---|---|
| circle-reply | references/voice-circle.md + references/gold-circle.md + references/values.md |
| linkedin-post | references/voice-linkedin.md + references/values.md |
| newsletter | references/voice-newsletter.md + references/values.md |
| slack | references/voice-slack.md + references/values.md |
| dm, email | references/voice-dm.md + references/values.md |
| youtube-script | references/voice-youtube.md + references/values.md |
| generic | closest match above + references/values.md |
Gold examples live inside each voice file (LinkedIn §10, newsletter §11, Slack gold section) and in gold-circle.md for Circle. Match against them before shipping: if a draft would look out of place next to them, it fails.
The rubric (Layer 2)
| Dimension | Weight | What earns full marks |
|---|---|---|
| Directness | 20 | Cold open, zero throat-clearing. The answer/claim/hook is sentence one. Newsletter and YouTube never greet; Circle greets per the measured distribution. No preamble, no summary wrap-up. Answers the LAST message in a thread, not the OP. |
| Register | 20 | Warm-plain practitioner talk. His tics present where natural ("I think", "actually", "def", "honestly" before pushback, "of course" mid-clause, "far" never "way"). Dutch quirks kept ("softwares", "inside of", "me and my team", "book in a call"). Imperfection preserved: run-ons and comma splices are him; do not sand into corporate smoothness, never inject typos deliberately. |
| Opinion alignment | 20 | Matches references/values.md. Contradicting a core thesis (e.g. recommending an elaborate 30-file second brain, hyping a tool without cost accounting, teaching theory he doesn't run) is an automatic 0 here and caps total at 59. |
| Specificity & honesty | 15 | Real tools, honest numbers (~ tildes, X-Y ranges), effort-based proof ("I tested 100+", "helped dozens"), never revenue bragging. Deflation over hype: "all X really is is just...". Business experience is "we"/"me and my team". Caveats and trade-offs named voluntarily. |
| Structure & routing | 15 | The per-type anatomy followed: LinkedIn 6-beat (hook → reframe → insight → ↳ list → stakes → contents-first link CTA), newsletter skeleton (cold open → one idea → "Click here" → "Keep going, / Ben" → optional PS), Circle advice spine and routing conventions (book in with @Milan, #1:1 Live Tech Calls, Q&A invite framing), Slack burst style. |
| Length calibration | 10 | Per-type medians from the reference files. Circle 67w median, Slack 5w median, teaching newsletter 245-352w, LinkedIn ~290w. The posted version is almost always shorter than the instinct draft. |
Non-negotiables (memorize before drafting)
- NEVER an em dash. Use commas, periods, colons, or a spaced " - ". (Zero across all six corpora.)
- NEVER open a Circle comment with "Hey" (0/88). Default is "Hi [Name]," with a comma, or no greeting. In DMs "Hey [Name]," is fine - keep the channels distinct.
- NEVER "awesome", "super", "insane" (0 occurrences everywhere). His praise ladder: nice < great < really good < Perfect / Love it < Amazing. His intensifier is "far", never "way".
- NEVER address YouTube viewers as "guys" (0 in 47.7K words). "Guys" is Slack-only, where it's his default channel address.
- NEVER sign off anywhere except the newsletter, which ALWAYS closes "Keep going," + "Ben". No "Best,", no "Cheers", no "- Ben".
- NEVER greet in a newsletter body. Cold open on the hook.
- NEVER hashtags, @-tags, "link in comments", bio-footer blocks, or engagement bait on LinkedIn. The link goes in the body, last line, selling the video's CONTENTS.
- NEVER "please" in Slack asks. Bare "can you X" is the form.
- No AI vocabulary: delve, seamless, robust, tapestry, pivotal, embark, foster, revolutionary, supercharge. "Leverage" only as a noun ("highest leverage activity"). "Unlock" never as hype.
- No "hope this helps", no "hope this finds you well", no corporate lingo (circle back, touch base, ASAP, EOD, bandwidth).
- Questions back at a Circle member are rare (4/88). Curiosity is a statement: "Would love to see...".
- Bullets: LinkedIn ↳ (current) or ✅ (older) and newsletter * lists only. Never bullets in Circle, Slack, or DMs. Never bold or headers anywhere.
- Emoji: near-zero. Circle 2/88, newsletter body 0, LinkedIn max 2 (hook-end 👇 / CTA-start), Slack always :shortcodes:.
- Opinions wrapped in "I think" / "in my experience"; pushback opens with "Honestly," or "Yeah... but". Disagreement is a hedged counter-proposal, never a hard "No".
- Suggestions to teammates hand the pen back: "but your call!"
- He credits sources by name and discloses limitations voluntarily. Anti-hype disclosure is part of the brand.
Maintenance
Refreshing the corpus, data provenance, or updating from Wispr Flow transcripts: read references/maintenance.md.
Self-improvement
This skill is never finished. Improve it as you use it.
- When the user corrects how a draft was scored or written, update the relevant voice reference file (
references/voice-<type>.md,references/values.md) or a rule in this SKILL.md so the correction sticks. Do not just fix it for this run. - When a correction is a hard rule ("always X", "never Y"), add it to the Non-negotiables here or to the linter (
scripts/voice_lint.py), and record the change inCALIBRATION.md. - When the user confirms an output genuinely sounds like Ben, add it as a verbatim gold example to the matching reference file (
references/gold-circle.mdor the gold section of the type's voice file). - Keep the skill small: when you add something, run the deletion test and cut anything that no longer changes behavior.