Navinspire-ia Compliance Mapper
Overview
Translate security findings into the language of a standard. For a chosen framework, go control by control, mark each met / partial / gap / not-applicable with concrete evidence from the codebase, and give the work needed to close each gap. This is a readiness assessment, not a certification.
Supported frameworks
- OWASP ASVS - application-level verification (L1/L2), best default for a codebase.
- CIS Benchmarks - OS/container/cloud hardening baselines.
- SOC 2 (Trust Services Criteria) - security, availability, confidentiality controls.
- ISO 27001 Annex A - ISMS control set.
- PCI-DSS - if cardholder data is handled.
- GDPR - pair with the data-privacy-auditor for data-protection articles.
Workflow
- Confirm the target framework and scope (whole product, a service, or infra). If unclear, default to OWASP ASVS L2.
- Pull evidence from prior audits (
/fortify,/probe,/perimeter,/bastion,/vault) and the code itself - do not re-audit from scratch; synthesize. - For each control:
ID | requirement | status | evidence (file/config) | gap | remediation | effort. - Roll up a compliance scorecard per domain (authentication, access control, crypto, logging, config, data protection…).
- Produce a prioritized remediation roadmap: quick wins first, then structural gaps, with an owner suggestion per item.
- Save the report as a file in the workspace when substantial.
Anti-patterns
- Marking a control "met" without pointing to concrete evidence
- Claiming the system is "certified/compliant" - this is a gap assessment only
- Copying the full standard text instead of mapping it to this system
- Ignoring not-applicable controls (mark and justify them)