Overview
Use this optional family entrypoint when work is too large, interrupted, context-heavy, or
crosses operators and the right continuity building block is not yet clear. It selects the
smallest sufficient path through task-chunking, checkpoint-review, handoff-summary, and
communication.
Use a building block directly when the need is already specific. This family does not manage
tasks, persist state, schedule agents, or replace project governance.
When to Use
- A large request needs a safe first slice and explicit stop condition.
- Work may be resumed by another session, person, or agent.
- The task changed shape and needs a continue, stop, or handoff decision.
- A status, decision, failure, or handoff needs to become legible without carrying full context.
When NOT to Use
- The task is already a small, obvious execution pass.
- The work needs product, architecture, policy, or macro-gate judgment instead.
- The requester expects task tracking, scheduling, automatic persistence, or external actions.
- A direct building block already matches the question.
Core Moves
- Frame the continuity need. Identify the work state, current round, intended outcome,
next owner, unresolved uncertainty, and minimum proof.
- Classify the dominant need. Choose chunking, checkpointing, handoff, or communication;
do not treat all continuity concerns as the same problem.
- Select the smallest path. Activate one primary building block and add another only when
its output is necessary for safe continuation.
- Produce a bounded artifact. State what changed, what is proved, what remains open, and
the explicit stop, continue, or handoff condition.
- Verify resumability. Confirm that another operator can continue without reconstructing
the original context and without confusing assumptions with proof.
Building Blocks
task-chunking — smallest useful slice, dependencies, boundaries, and stop condition.
checkpoint-review — continue, stop, or handoff decision after a meaningful round.
handoff-summary — compact verified context for another round or owner.
communication — clear status, decision, failure, or handoff explanation.
Use only the blocks justified by the continuity need. Family membership does not load all four
contracts by default.
Optional Modules
- Continuity need framing — Bound the current round, intended outcome, next owner, and
minimum proof before selecting a path.
- Dominant need classification — Distinguish slicing, checkpointing, handoff, and
communication needs.
- Selective composition — Add a supporting building block only when its output is needed
for safe continuation.
- Resumability check — Test whether another operator can act without reconstructing the
original context.
Activation Triggers
- Activate
task-chunking when the task is oversized, fuzzy, or entangled.
- Activate
checkpoint-review when the task changed shape or continuation is uncertain.
- Activate
handoff-summary when another round, owner, or agent must resume the work.
- Activate
communication when the result must be made legible as status, decision, failure,
or handoff information.
Expected Output
work_continuity_review:
work_state: <current state>
intended_outcome: <outcome>
dominant_need: chunk | checkpoint | handoff | communication
primary_building_block: <skill>
supporting_building_blocks: [<only necessary skills>]
proved: [<validated facts or artifacts>]
open_items: [<unresolved items>]
decision: continue | stop | handoff
stop_condition: <condition>
next_step: <bounded next action>
handoff_owner: <owner or unknown>
risks_or_blockers: [<visible risks>]
Verification
- The current state and dominant continuity need are explicit.
- One primary building block is selected and justified.
- Supporting blocks are necessary rather than merely adjacent.
- Proven work is separated from assumptions and open items.
- Stop, continue, or handoff is explicit.
- The artifact is smaller than the context it replaces and sufficient to resume safely.
- No task tracking, scheduling, persistence, or external action is claimed.
Handoff Signals
- Product or feature scope is unresolved →
intent-clarification or feature-planning.
- A macro gate, authorization, or ownership decision is required → AletheIA or consumer governance.
- The next work needs a different specialty → hand off with
handoff-summary.
- The work is clear but only needs a direct slice → use the matching building block directly.
Pairs Well With
workflow
feature-planning
checkpoint-review
handoff-summary
communication
Anti-patterns
- Loading all continuity skills for every task.
- Calling a large task a slice without reducing it.
- Continuing only because the round has momentum.
- Writing a handoff that hides missing proof or unresolved ownership.
- Turning continuity guidance into a project-management runtime.
1---2name: work-continuity-efficiency3description: Make oversized or interrupted work smaller, resumable, reviewable, and clear to hand off through selective use of continuity building blocks.4---56# Overview78Use this optional family entrypoint when work is too large, interrupted, context-heavy, or9crosses operators and the right continuity building block is not yet clear. It selects the10smallest sufficient path through `task-chunking`, `checkpoint-review`, `handoff-summary`, and11`communication`.1213Use a building block directly when the need is already specific. This family does not manage14tasks, persist state, schedule agents, or replace project governance.1516# When to Use1718- A large request needs a safe first slice and explicit stop condition.19- Work may be resumed by another session, person, or agent.20- The task changed shape and needs a continue, stop, or handoff decision.21- A status, decision, failure, or handoff needs to become legible without carrying full context.2223# When NOT to Use2425- The task is already a small, obvious execution pass.26- The work needs product, architecture, policy, or macro-gate judgment instead.27- The requester expects task tracking, scheduling, automatic persistence, or external actions.28- A direct building block already matches the question.2930# Core Moves31321. **Frame the continuity need.** Identify the work state, current round, intended outcome,33 next owner, unresolved uncertainty, and minimum proof.342. **Classify the dominant need.** Choose chunking, checkpointing, handoff, or communication;35 do not treat all continuity concerns as the same problem.363. **Select the smallest path.** Activate one primary building block and add another only when37 its output is necessary for safe continuation.384. **Produce a bounded artifact.** State what changed, what is proved, what remains open, and39 the explicit stop, continue, or handoff condition.405. **Verify resumability.** Confirm that another operator can continue without reconstructing41 the original context and without confusing assumptions with proof.4243# Building Blocks4445- `task-chunking` — smallest useful slice, dependencies, boundaries, and stop condition.46- `checkpoint-review` — continue, stop, or handoff decision after a meaningful round.47- `handoff-summary` — compact verified context for another round or owner.48- `communication` — clear status, decision, failure, or handoff explanation.4950Use only the blocks justified by the continuity need. Family membership does not load all four51contracts by default.5253# Optional Modules5455- **Continuity need framing** — Bound the current round, intended outcome, next owner, and56 minimum proof before selecting a path.57- **Dominant need classification** — Distinguish slicing, checkpointing, handoff, and58 communication needs.59- **Selective composition** — Add a supporting building block only when its output is needed60 for safe continuation.61- **Resumability check** — Test whether another operator can act without reconstructing the62 original context.6364# Activation Triggers6566- Activate `task-chunking` when the task is oversized, fuzzy, or entangled.67- Activate `checkpoint-review` when the task changed shape or continuation is uncertain.68- Activate `handoff-summary` when another round, owner, or agent must resume the work.69- Activate `communication` when the result must be made legible as status, decision, failure,70 or handoff information.7172# Expected Output7374```yaml75work_continuity_review:76 work_state: <current state>77 intended_outcome: <outcome>78 dominant_need: chunk | checkpoint | handoff | communication79 primary_building_block: <skill>80 supporting_building_blocks: [<only necessary skills>]81 proved: [<validated facts or artifacts>]82 open_items: [<unresolved items>]83 decision: continue | stop | handoff84 stop_condition: <condition>85 next_step: <bounded next action>86 handoff_owner: <owner or unknown>87 risks_or_blockers: [<visible risks>]88```8990# Verification9192- The current state and dominant continuity need are explicit.93- One primary building block is selected and justified.94- Supporting blocks are necessary rather than merely adjacent.95- Proven work is separated from assumptions and open items.96- Stop, continue, or handoff is explicit.97- The artifact is smaller than the context it replaces and sufficient to resume safely.98- No task tracking, scheduling, persistence, or external action is claimed.99100# Handoff Signals101102- Product or feature scope is unresolved → `intent-clarification` or `feature-planning`.103- A macro gate, authorization, or ownership decision is required → AletheIA or consumer governance.104- The next work needs a different specialty → hand off with `handoff-summary`.105- The work is clear but only needs a direct slice → use the matching building block directly.106107# Pairs Well With108109- `workflow`110- `feature-planning`111- `checkpoint-review`112- `handoff-summary`113- `communication`114115# Anti-patterns116117- Loading all continuity skills for every task.118- Calling a large task a slice without reducing it.119- Continuing only because the round has momentum.120- Writing a handoff that hides missing proof or unresolved ownership.121- Turning continuity guidance into a project-management runtime.