Threat Modeling Techniques
Systematic framework for identifying, analyzing, and mitigating security threats during system design and architecture phases using proven methodologies like STRIDE, attack trees, and risk assessment frameworks.
When to Use This Skill
- Designing new systems or features with security requirements
- Conducting security architecture reviews
- Identifying attack vectors and threat scenarios
- Assessing security risks before implementation
- Creating security requirements and controls
- Evaluating third-party integrations for security impact
- Planning security testing strategies
- Documenting security design decisions
- Training teams on proactive security thinking
- Supporting security compliance initiatives (SOC 2, ISO 27001)
Core Process
Five-Stage Threat Modeling Process:
- Define - Understand the system and create architecture diagrams
- Identify - Enumerate threats using structured methodologies (STRIDE, attack trees)
- Assess - Evaluate risk severity and likelihood (DREAD scoring)
- Mitigate - Design controls and countermeasures
- Validate - Review and test security controls
Quick Reference
| Task |
Load reference |
| STRIDE: Spoofing Identity |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-spoofing.md |
| STRIDE: Tampering with Data |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-tampering.md |
| STRIDE: Repudiation |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-repudiation.md |
| STRIDE: Information Disclosure |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-disclosure.md |
| STRIDE: Denial of Service |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-dos.md |
| STRIDE: Elevation of Privilege |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-elevation.md |
| Attack Trees |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/attack-trees.md |
| Data Flow Diagrams (DFD) |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/data-flow-diagrams.md |
| DREAD Risk Scoring |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/dread-scoring.md |
| Mitigation Strategies |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/mitigation-strategies.md |
| Tools & Process |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/tools-and-process.md |
Core Concepts
STRIDE Methodology
STRIDE categorizes threats into six types:
- Spoofing: Pretending to be someone/something else (authentication bypass, credential theft)
- Tampering: Malicious modification of data (MITM attacks, data corruption)
- Repudiation: Denying actions without proof (lack of audit trails)
- Information Disclosure: Exposing sensitive data (data leaks, verbose errors)
- Denial of Service: Making systems unavailable (resource exhaustion, DDoS)
- Elevation of Privilege: Gaining unauthorized capabilities (privilege escalation, IDOR)
Apply STRIDE to:
- Each component in data flow diagrams
- Every trust boundary crossing
- All data stores and processes
- External integrations and APIs
Attack Trees
Hierarchical diagrams showing attack paths from goals to methods:
[Root: Attack Goal]
|
+-- [OR] Method 1 (alternative paths)
| |
| +-- [AND] Required Step 1.1
| +-- [AND] Required Step 1.2
|
+-- [OR] Method 2 (alternative paths)
Use attack trees to:
- Visualize attack scenarios
- Identify easiest attack paths
- Assign attributes (cost, skill, detection likelihood)
- Prioritize mitigations for high-risk paths
DREAD Risk Scoring
DREAD quantifies threat severity (each criterion scored 0-10, average = risk score):
- Damage Potential: How much damage if exploited?
- Reproducibility: How easy to reproduce?
- Exploitability: How easy to exploit?
- Affected Users: How many users affected?
- Discoverability: How easy to discover?
Risk Levels:
- 7.1-10.0: Critical (immediate action)
- 5.1-7.0: High (next sprint)
- 3.1-5.0: Medium (upcoming releases)
- 0.0-3.0: Low (backlog)
Trust Boundaries
Lines separating different trust levels:
- Network: Internet → DMZ → Internal
- Process: User Mode → Kernel, Container → Host
- User: Anonymous → Authenticated → Admin
At each boundary, verify:
- Authentication required?
- Authorization checks enforced?
- Data encrypted?
- Inputs validated?
- Actions logged?
Practical Workflow
1. Scope Definition (30 min)
- Identify system components in scope
- Define trust boundaries
- List assets requiring protection
- Identify compliance requirements
2. Architecture Decomposition (1 hour)
- Create data flow diagrams (DFDs)
- Document external dependencies
- Identify authentication/authorization points
- Map data storage locations
3. Threat Identification (1-2 hours)
- Apply STRIDE to each DFD element
- Create attack trees for high-value assets
- Brainstorm threat scenarios with team
- Use threat modeling tools for suggestions
4. Risk Assessment (1 hour)
- Apply DREAD scoring to each threat
- Prioritize threats by risk score
- Consider business context and compliance
- Identify quick wins vs. long-term efforts
5. Mitigation Planning (1 hour)
- Design security controls (eliminate, reduce, transfer, accept)
- Document mitigation strategies
- Create security requirements (SEC-### format)
- Assign ownership for implementation
6. Documentation (30 min)
- Export threat model diagrams
- Create security requirements document
- Document risk acceptance decisions
- Share with stakeholders
Common Mistakes
Avoid:
- Threat modeling too late (after implementation complete)
- Focusing only on external threats (ignore insider threats)
- Creating static threat models (never updating them)
- Over-complicating diagrams (too much detail)
- Ignoring low-likelihood, high-impact threats
- Failing to document assumptions and decisions
- Not following through on mitigations
Best Practices
Team Involvement:
- Developers: Implementation details, code-level threats
- Architects: System design, integration points
- Security Team: Threat expertise, attack scenarios
- Operations: Deployment, monitoring, incident response
- Product Owners: Business impact, risk acceptance decisions
Process Integration:
- Design phase: Threat model before implementation
- Development: Implement controls, create security tests
- Deployment: Verify controls, enable monitoring
- Maintenance: Update model when features change
Tools
Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool: Visual DFD editor, automated STRIDE threat generation
OWASP Threat Dragon: Open source, cross-platform, web and desktop versions
IriusRisk: Commercial platform, DevSecOps integration, compliance mapping
ThreatModeler: Collaborative, cloud architecture support
Resources
1---2name: threat-modeling-techniques3description: Threat modeling methodologies using STRIDE, attack trees, and risk assessment for proactive security analysis. Use when designing secure systems, conducting security reviews, or identifying potential attack vectors in applications.4---5
6# Threat Modeling Techniques
7
8Systematic framework for identifying, analyzing, and mitigating security threats during system design and architecture phases using proven methodologies like STRIDE, attack trees, and risk assessment frameworks.
9
10## When to Use This Skill
11
12- Designing new systems or features with security requirements
13- Conducting security architecture reviews
14- Identifying attack vectors and threat scenarios
15- Assessing security risks before implementation
16- Creating security requirements and controls
17- Evaluating third-party integrations for security impact
18- Planning security testing strategies
19- Documenting security design decisions
20- Training teams on proactive security thinking
21- Supporting security compliance initiatives (SOC 2, ISO 27001)
22
23## Core Process
24
25**Five-Stage Threat Modeling Process:**
26
271. **Define** - Understand the system and create architecture diagrams
282. **Identify** - Enumerate threats using structured methodologies (STRIDE, attack trees)
293. **Assess** - Evaluate risk severity and likelihood (DREAD scoring)
304. **Mitigate** - Design controls and countermeasures
315. **Validate** - Review and test security controls
32
33## Quick Reference
34
35| Task | Load reference |
36| --- | --- |
37| STRIDE: Spoofing Identity | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-spoofing.md` |
38| STRIDE: Tampering with Data | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-tampering.md` |
39| STRIDE: Repudiation | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-repudiation.md` |
40| STRIDE: Information Disclosure | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-disclosure.md` |
41| STRIDE: Denial of Service | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-dos.md` |
42| STRIDE: Elevation of Privilege | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-elevation.md` |
43| Attack Trees | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/attack-trees.md` |
44| Data Flow Diagrams (DFD) | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/data-flow-diagrams.md` |
45| DREAD Risk Scoring | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/dread-scoring.md` |
46| Mitigation Strategies | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/mitigation-strategies.md` |
47| Tools & Process | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/tools-and-process.md` |
48
49## Core Concepts
50
51### STRIDE Methodology
52
53**STRIDE** categorizes threats into six types:
54
55- **S**poofing: Pretending to be someone/something else (authentication bypass, credential theft)
56- **T**ampering: Malicious modification of data (MITM attacks, data corruption)
57- **R**epudiation: Denying actions without proof (lack of audit trails)
58- **I**nformation Disclosure: Exposing sensitive data (data leaks, verbose errors)
59- **D**enial of Service: Making systems unavailable (resource exhaustion, DDoS)
60- **E**levation of Privilege: Gaining unauthorized capabilities (privilege escalation, IDOR)
61
62**Apply STRIDE to:**
63- Each component in data flow diagrams
64- Every trust boundary crossing
65- All data stores and processes
66- External integrations and APIs
67
68### Attack Trees
69
70Hierarchical diagrams showing attack paths from goals to methods:
71
72```
73[Root: Attack Goal]
74 |
75 +-- [OR] Method 1 (alternative paths)
76 | |
77 | +-- [AND] Required Step 1.1
78 | +-- [AND] Required Step 1.2
79 |
80 +-- [OR] Method 2 (alternative paths)
81```
82
83**Use attack trees to:**
84- Visualize attack scenarios
85- Identify easiest attack paths
86- Assign attributes (cost, skill, detection likelihood)
87- Prioritize mitigations for high-risk paths
88
89### DREAD Risk Scoring
90
91**DREAD** quantifies threat severity (each criterion scored 0-10, average = risk score):
92
93- **D**amage Potential: How much damage if exploited?
94- **R**eproducibility: How easy to reproduce?
95- **E**xploitability: How easy to exploit?
96- **A**ffected Users: How many users affected?
97- **D**iscoverability: How easy to discover?
98
99**Risk Levels:**
100- 7.1-10.0: Critical (immediate action)
101- 5.1-7.0: High (next sprint)
102- 3.1-5.0: Medium (upcoming releases)
103- 0.0-3.0: Low (backlog)
104
105### Trust Boundaries
106
107Lines separating different trust levels:
108
109- **Network**: Internet → DMZ → Internal
110- **Process**: User Mode → Kernel, Container → Host
111- **User**: Anonymous → Authenticated → Admin
112
113**At each boundary, verify:**
114- Authentication required?
115- Authorization checks enforced?
116- Data encrypted?
117- Inputs validated?
118- Actions logged?
119
120## Practical Workflow
121
122### 1. Scope Definition (30 min)
123- Identify system components in scope
124- Define trust boundaries
125- List assets requiring protection
126- Identify compliance requirements
127
128### 2. Architecture Decomposition (1 hour)
129- Create data flow diagrams (DFDs)
130- Document external dependencies
131- Identify authentication/authorization points
132- Map data storage locations
133
134### 3. Threat Identification (1-2 hours)
135- Apply STRIDE to each DFD element
136- Create attack trees for high-value assets
137- Brainstorm threat scenarios with team
138- Use threat modeling tools for suggestions
139
140### 4. Risk Assessment (1 hour)
141- Apply DREAD scoring to each threat
142- Prioritize threats by risk score
143- Consider business context and compliance
144- Identify quick wins vs. long-term efforts
145
146### 5. Mitigation Planning (1 hour)
147- Design security controls (eliminate, reduce, transfer, accept)
148- Document mitigation strategies
149- Create security requirements (SEC-### format)
150- Assign ownership for implementation
151
152### 6. Documentation (30 min)
153- Export threat model diagrams
154- Create security requirements document
155- Document risk acceptance decisions
156- Share with stakeholders
157
158## Common Mistakes
159
160**Avoid:**
161- Threat modeling too late (after implementation complete)
162- Focusing only on external threats (ignore insider threats)
163- Creating static threat models (never updating them)
164- Over-complicating diagrams (too much detail)
165- Ignoring low-likelihood, high-impact threats
166- Failing to document assumptions and decisions
167- Not following through on mitigations
168
169## Best Practices
170
171**Team Involvement:**
172- Developers: Implementation details, code-level threats
173- Architects: System design, integration points
174- Security Team: Threat expertise, attack scenarios
175- Operations: Deployment, monitoring, incident response
176- Product Owners: Business impact, risk acceptance decisions
177
178**Process Integration:**
179- Design phase: Threat model before implementation
180- Development: Implement controls, create security tests
181- Deployment: Verify controls, enable monitoring
182- Maintenance: Update model when features change
183
184## Tools
185
186**Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool**: Visual DFD editor, automated STRIDE threat generation
187**OWASP Threat Dragon**: Open source, cross-platform, web and desktop versions
188**IriusRisk**: Commercial platform, DevSecOps integration, compliance mapping
189**ThreatModeler**: Collaborative, cloud architecture support
190
191## Resources
192
193- **Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool**: https://aka.ms/threatmodelingtool
194- **OWASP Threat Dragon**: https://owasp.org/www-project-threat-dragon/
195- **STRIDE Documentation**: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/security/develop/threat-modeling-tool-threats
196- **Threat Modeling Manifesto**: https://www.threatmodelingmanifesto.org/
197- **NIST Threat Modeling**: https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/threat-modeling