Threat Modeling Techniques
Systematic framework for identifying, analyzing, and mitigating security threats during system design and architecture phases using proven methodologies like STRIDE, attack trees, and risk assessment frameworks.
When to Use This Skill
- Designing new systems or features with security requirements
- Conducting security architecture reviews
- Identifying attack vectors and threat scenarios
- Assessing security risks before implementation
- Creating security requirements and controls
- Evaluating third-party integrations for security impact
- Planning security testing strategies
- Documenting security design decisions
- Training teams on proactive security thinking
- Supporting security compliance initiatives (SOC 2, ISO 27001)
Core Process
Five-Stage Threat Modeling Process:
- Define - Understand the system and create architecture diagrams
- Identify - Enumerate threats using structured methodologies (STRIDE, attack trees)
- Assess - Evaluate risk severity and likelihood (DREAD scoring)
- Mitigate - Design controls and countermeasures
- Validate - Review and test security controls
Quick Reference
| Task |
Load reference |
| STRIDE: Spoofing Identity |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-spoofing.md |
| STRIDE: Tampering with Data |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-tampering.md |
| STRIDE: Repudiation |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-repudiation.md |
| STRIDE: Information Disclosure |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-disclosure.md |
| STRIDE: Denial of Service |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-dos.md |
| STRIDE: Elevation of Privilege |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-elevation.md |
| Attack Trees |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/attack-trees.md |
| Data Flow Diagrams (DFD) |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/data-flow-diagrams.md |
| DREAD Risk Scoring |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/dread-scoring.md |
| Mitigation Strategies |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/mitigation-strategies.md |
| Tools & Process |
skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/tools-and-process.md |
Core Concepts
STRIDE Methodology
STRIDE categorizes threats into six types:
- Spoofing: Pretending to be someone/something else (authentication bypass, credential theft)
- Tampering: Malicious modification of data (MITM attacks, data corruption)
- Repudiation: Denying actions without proof (lack of audit trails)
- Information Disclosure: Exposing sensitive data (data leaks, verbose errors)
- Denial of Service: Making systems unavailable (resource exhaustion, DDoS)
- Elevation of Privilege: Gaining unauthorized capabilities (privilege escalation, IDOR)
Apply STRIDE to:
- Each component in data flow diagrams
- Every trust boundary crossing
- All data stores and processes
- External integrations and APIs
Attack Trees
Hierarchical diagrams showing attack paths from goals to methods:
[Root: Attack Goal]
|
+-- [OR] Method 1 (alternative paths)
| |
| +-- [AND] Required Step 1.1
| +-- [AND] Required Step 1.2
|
+-- [OR] Method 2 (alternative paths)
Use attack trees to:
- Visualize attack scenarios
- Identify easiest attack paths
- Assign attributes (cost, skill, detection likelihood)
- Prioritize mitigations for high-risk paths
DREAD Risk Scoring
DREAD quantifies threat severity (each criterion scored 0-10, average = risk score):
- Damage Potential: How much damage if exploited?
- Reproducibility: How easy to reproduce?
- Exploitability: How easy to exploit?
- Affected Users: How many users affected?
- Discoverability: How easy to discover?
Risk Levels:
- 7.1-10.0: Critical (immediate action)
- 5.1-7.0: High (next sprint)
- 3.1-5.0: Medium (upcoming releases)
- 0.0-3.0: Low (backlog)
Trust Boundaries
Lines separating different trust levels:
- Network: Internet → DMZ → Internal
- Process: User Mode → Kernel, Container → Host
- User: Anonymous → Authenticated → Admin
At each boundary, verify:
- Authentication required?
- Authorization checks enforced?
- Data encrypted?
- Inputs validated?
- Actions logged?
Practical Workflow
1. Scope Definition (30 min)
- Identify system components in scope
- Define trust boundaries
- List assets requiring protection
- Identify compliance requirements
2. Architecture Decomposition (1 hour)
- Create data flow diagrams (DFDs)
- Document external dependencies
- Identify authentication/authorization points
- Map data storage locations
3. Threat Identification (1-2 hours)
- Apply STRIDE to each DFD element
- Create attack trees for high-value assets
- Brainstorm threat scenarios with team
- Use threat modeling tools for suggestions
4. Risk Assessment (1 hour)
- Apply DREAD scoring to each threat
- Prioritize threats by risk score
- Consider business context and compliance
- Identify quick wins vs. long-term efforts
5. Mitigation Planning (1 hour)
- Design security controls (eliminate, reduce, transfer, accept)
- Document mitigation strategies
- Create security requirements (SEC-### format)
- Assign ownership for implementation
6. Documentation (30 min)
- Export threat model diagrams
- Create security requirements document
- Document risk acceptance decisions
- Share with stakeholders
Common Mistakes
Avoid:
- Threat modeling too late (after implementation complete)
- Focusing only on external threats (ignore insider threats)
- Creating static threat models (never updating them)
- Over-complicating diagrams (too much detail)
- Ignoring low-likelihood, high-impact threats
- Failing to document assumptions and decisions
- Not following through on mitigations
Best Practices
Team Involvement:
- Developers: Implementation details, code-level threats
- Architects: System design, integration points
- Security Team: Threat expertise, attack scenarios
- Operations: Deployment, monitoring, incident response
- Product Owners: Business impact, risk acceptance decisions
Process Integration:
- Design phase: Threat model before implementation
- Development: Implement controls, create security tests
- Deployment: Verify controls, enable monitoring
- Maintenance: Update model when features change
Tools
Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool: Visual DFD editor, automated STRIDE threat generation
OWASP Threat Dragon: Open source, cross-platform, web and desktop versions
IriusRisk: Commercial platform, DevSecOps integration, compliance mapping
ThreatModeler: Collaborative, cloud architecture support
Resources
1---
2name: threat-modeling-techniques
3description: Threat modeling methodologies using STRIDE, attack trees, and risk assessment for proactive security analysis. Use when designing secure systems, conducting security reviews, or identifying potential attack vectors in applications.
4keywords:
5 - STRIDE
6 - attack surface
7 - attack tree
8 - risk assessment
9 - security architecture
10 - security design
11 - threat analysis
12 - threat landscape
13 - threat modeling
14 - vulnerability analysis
15file_patterns:
16 - '**/*secret*.py'
17 - '**/*secret*.ts'
18 - '**/auth/**'
19 - '**/security/**'
20confidence: 0.82
21---
22
23# Threat Modeling Techniques
24
25Systematic framework for identifying, analyzing, and mitigating security threats during system design and architecture phases using proven methodologies like STRIDE, attack trees, and risk assessment frameworks.
26
27## When to Use This Skill
28
29- Designing new systems or features with security requirements
30- Conducting security architecture reviews
31- Identifying attack vectors and threat scenarios
32- Assessing security risks before implementation
33- Creating security requirements and controls
34- Evaluating third-party integrations for security impact
35- Planning security testing strategies
36- Documenting security design decisions
37- Training teams on proactive security thinking
38- Supporting security compliance initiatives (SOC 2, ISO 27001)
39
40## Core Process
41
42**Five-Stage Threat Modeling Process:**
43
441. **Define** - Understand the system and create architecture diagrams
452. **Identify** - Enumerate threats using structured methodologies (STRIDE, attack trees)
463. **Assess** - Evaluate risk severity and likelihood (DREAD scoring)
474. **Mitigate** - Design controls and countermeasures
485. **Validate** - Review and test security controls
49
50## Quick Reference
51
52| Task | Load reference |
53| --- | --- |
54| STRIDE: Spoofing Identity | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-spoofing.md` |
55| STRIDE: Tampering with Data | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-tampering.md` |
56| STRIDE: Repudiation | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-repudiation.md` |
57| STRIDE: Information Disclosure | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-disclosure.md` |
58| STRIDE: Denial of Service | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-dos.md` |
59| STRIDE: Elevation of Privilege | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/stride-elevation.md` |
60| Attack Trees | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/attack-trees.md` |
61| Data Flow Diagrams (DFD) | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/data-flow-diagrams.md` |
62| DREAD Risk Scoring | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/dread-scoring.md` |
63| Mitigation Strategies | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/mitigation-strategies.md` |
64| Tools & Process | `skills/threat-modeling-techniques/references/tools-and-process.md` |
65
66## Core Concepts
67
68### STRIDE Methodology
69
70**STRIDE** categorizes threats into six types:
71
72- **S**poofing: Pretending to be someone/something else (authentication bypass, credential theft)
73- **T**ampering: Malicious modification of data (MITM attacks, data corruption)
74- **R**epudiation: Denying actions without proof (lack of audit trails)
75- **I**nformation Disclosure: Exposing sensitive data (data leaks, verbose errors)
76- **D**enial of Service: Making systems unavailable (resource exhaustion, DDoS)
77- **E**levation of Privilege: Gaining unauthorized capabilities (privilege escalation, IDOR)
78
79**Apply STRIDE to:**
80- Each component in data flow diagrams
81- Every trust boundary crossing
82- All data stores and processes
83- External integrations and APIs
84
85### Attack Trees
86
87Hierarchical diagrams showing attack paths from goals to methods:
88
89```
90[Root: Attack Goal]
91 |
92 +-- [OR] Method 1 (alternative paths)
93 | |
94 | +-- [AND] Required Step 1.1
95 | +-- [AND] Required Step 1.2
96 |
97 +-- [OR] Method 2 (alternative paths)
98```
99
100**Use attack trees to:**
101- Visualize attack scenarios
102- Identify easiest attack paths
103- Assign attributes (cost, skill, detection likelihood)
104- Prioritize mitigations for high-risk paths
105
106### DREAD Risk Scoring
107
108**DREAD** quantifies threat severity (each criterion scored 0-10, average = risk score):
109
110- **D**amage Potential: How much damage if exploited?
111- **R**eproducibility: How easy to reproduce?
112- **E**xploitability: How easy to exploit?
113- **A**ffected Users: How many users affected?
114- **D**iscoverability: How easy to discover?
115
116**Risk Levels:**
117- 7.1-10.0: Critical (immediate action)
118- 5.1-7.0: High (next sprint)
119- 3.1-5.0: Medium (upcoming releases)
120- 0.0-3.0: Low (backlog)
121
122### Trust Boundaries
123
124Lines separating different trust levels:
125
126- **Network**: Internet → DMZ → Internal
127- **Process**: User Mode → Kernel, Container → Host
128- **User**: Anonymous → Authenticated → Admin
129
130**At each boundary, verify:**
131- Authentication required?
132- Authorization checks enforced?
133- Data encrypted?
134- Inputs validated?
135- Actions logged?
136
137## Practical Workflow
138
139### 1. Scope Definition (30 min)
140- Identify system components in scope
141- Define trust boundaries
142- List assets requiring protection
143- Identify compliance requirements
144
145### 2. Architecture Decomposition (1 hour)
146- Create data flow diagrams (DFDs)
147- Document external dependencies
148- Identify authentication/authorization points
149- Map data storage locations
150
151### 3. Threat Identification (1-2 hours)
152- Apply STRIDE to each DFD element
153- Create attack trees for high-value assets
154- Brainstorm threat scenarios with team
155- Use threat modeling tools for suggestions
156
157### 4. Risk Assessment (1 hour)
158- Apply DREAD scoring to each threat
159- Prioritize threats by risk score
160- Consider business context and compliance
161- Identify quick wins vs. long-term efforts
162
163### 5. Mitigation Planning (1 hour)
164- Design security controls (eliminate, reduce, transfer, accept)
165- Document mitigation strategies
166- Create security requirements (SEC-### format)
167- Assign ownership for implementation
168
169### 6. Documentation (30 min)
170- Export threat model diagrams
171- Create security requirements document
172- Document risk acceptance decisions
173- Share with stakeholders
174
175## Common Mistakes
176
177**Avoid:**
178- Threat modeling too late (after implementation complete)
179- Focusing only on external threats (ignore insider threats)
180- Creating static threat models (never updating them)
181- Over-complicating diagrams (too much detail)
182- Ignoring low-likelihood, high-impact threats
183- Failing to document assumptions and decisions
184- Not following through on mitigations
185
186## Best Practices
187
188**Team Involvement:**
189- Developers: Implementation details, code-level threats
190- Architects: System design, integration points
191- Security Team: Threat expertise, attack scenarios
192- Operations: Deployment, monitoring, incident response
193- Product Owners: Business impact, risk acceptance decisions
194
195**Process Integration:**
196- Design phase: Threat model before implementation
197- Development: Implement controls, create security tests
198- Deployment: Verify controls, enable monitoring
199- Maintenance: Update model when features change
200
201## Tools
202
203**Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool**: Visual DFD editor, automated STRIDE threat generation
204**OWASP Threat Dragon**: Open source, cross-platform, web and desktop versions
205**IriusRisk**: Commercial platform, DevSecOps integration, compliance mapping
206**ThreatModeler**: Collaborative, cloud architecture support
207
208## Resources
209
210- **Microsoft Threat Modeling Tool**: https://aka.ms/threatmodelingtool
211- **OWASP Threat Dragon**: https://owasp.org/www-project-threat-dragon/
212- **STRIDE Documentation**: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/security/develop/threat-modeling-tool-threats
213- **Threat Modeling Manifesto**: https://www.threatmodelingmanifesto.org/
214- **NIST Threat Modeling**: https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/threat-modeling