SKILL: Advertising & Marketing Compliance
Version: 1.0.0 | Domain: FTC Endorsement Guides, Financial Advertising, CAN-SPAM, Platform Policies
FTC Endorsement Guides (Updated 2023)
Authority: 16 C.F.R. Part 255 (revised October 19, 2023)
The Core Rule
If ANYONE receives compensation to promote your platform — they MUST clearly and conspicuously disclose that relationship.
"Compensation" includes:
- Cash payments
- Free platform access or credits
- Tokens or future token allocations
- Referral bonuses or affiliate commissions
- Product samples or discounts
- Any other material connection
What "Clear and Conspicuous" Means (2023 Updates)
- In the same medium: If a video → verbal AND visual disclosure. If a tweet → in the tweet text, not buried in bio.
- Before "more": On social platforms, disclosure must appear BEFORE the "see more" or "read more" cut-off
- At the beginning: For video → disclosure within the first few seconds, not at the end
- Noticeable: Font size, color, and placement must make the disclosure obvious — not blended into surrounding text
Accepted disclosure language:
- "Ad" or "#ad" (MUST appear before "more" cut-off in tweets/posts)
- "Sponsored" or "#sponsored"
- "[Company] partner" or "Paid promotion"
- "I was given free access to try this"
NOT sufficient:
- "Thanks to [Company]" (doesn't clearly signal compensation)
- A general disclaimer in bio or "about" section
- Disclosure buried at the end of a long post after the "see more" cut-off
- "#ad" combined with other hashtags in a list where it's hard to notice
Platform Liability for Endorsers
You are liable for your endorsers' failures to disclose IF:
- You knew or should have known they weren't disclosing
- You had a program that encouraged endorsers without requiring disclosure
Practical protection:
- Influencer agreement template: must include disclosure requirements, FTC-compliant language, monitoring clause
- Brief all endorsers/affiliates in writing on disclosure requirements before they post
- Monitor endorsed content: spot-check for compliance at least monthly
- Document monitoring efforts (screenshot + date of reviewed posts)
Fake reviews: The 2023 FTC updates added explicit rules:
- Paying for positive reviews without disclosure → deceptive
- Suppressing negative reviews → deceptive
- Using your own employees to write reviews without disclosure → deceptive
- Insider reviews (from founders, employees, friends) without disclosure → deceptive
Financial Product Advertising Restrictions
Claims You May NEVER Make
| Claim | Why It's Illegal | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| "SEC approved" or "CFTC approved" | Regulators register/permit, they don't "approve" products | FTC § 5 deception |
| "Guaranteed returns" | Nothing is guaranteed in financial products | FTC § 5 deception + securities fraud if token is security |
| "Risk-free investment" | No financial product is risk-free | FTC § 5 deception |
| "Our AI never loses" | Provably false | FTC § 5 deception |
| "Decentralized" (if you hold admin keys) | Misrepresenting the level of decentralization | FTC § 5 deception |
| "Bank-level security" | Unless you can prove it (SOC 2 Type II, pen testing, encryption at rest + in transit) | FTC § 5 deception |
| "Your funds are insured" | Only if actually FDIC/SIPC insured | FTC § 5 deception |
Required Disclosures for Financial Products
- Risk disclosure: "Participating involves risk. You may lose your entry fee. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes."
- AI accuracy disclaimer: "AI model predictions are not guaranteed to be correct. Accuracy varies by model and domain."
- Not financial advice: "Nothing on this platform constitutes investment, financial, or legal advice."
- Results may vary: Any testimonial showing winnings must note: "Results not typical. Individual results will vary."
Substantiation Requirement
FTC Standard: Objective claims must be substantiated by a "reasonable basis" — typically competent and reliable evidence.
- "Our AI achieves 78% accuracy" → you must have test data supporting this, from real predictions, properly measured
- "Top competitors earn over $X/month" → this must reflect the TYPICAL top competitor experience, not the best-case outlier
- "Users win more with our AI insights" → A/B testing data showing this, before you claim it
Never publish an accuracy claim without the data to back it up being documented internally.
CAN-SPAM Act
Authority: 15 U.S.C. §§ 7701-7713; 16 C.F.R. Part 316 Penalty: Up to $53,088 per violation (each email is a separate violation)
Requirements for all commercial emails:
- Identify as advertising: Clear indication the message is an advertisement (if it is)
- Physical postal address: Include your valid physical postal address (not a PO box alone)
- Unsubscribe mechanism: Clear, easy-to-use opt-out that works. Must honor within 10 business days.
- No deceptive subject lines: Subject line must reflect actual content
- No deceptive "From" field: Must accurately identify the sender
- No false headers: Technical email headers must be accurate
Prohibited practices:
- Purchasing email lists and sending marketing to them without prior consent
- Harvesting email addresses from websites without consent
- Continuing to send after opt-out has been honored
Transactional emails (account confirmations, contest results, prize notifications): NOT subject to CAN-SPAM marketing requirements IF they contain only transactional/relationship information. But if you add marketing content → entire email becomes commercial → CAN-SPAM applies.
Platform Ad Policies (Practical Reality)
Meta (Facebook/Instagram)
- Crypto advertising: Requires pre-approval; advertiser must be from an approved list of financial institutions
- Gambling advertising: Restricted; requires written permission from Meta, compliance with local laws
- How to get approved: Apply through Meta's ad account health review; provide business documentation, regulatory registrations
- Realistic timeline for crypto/gambling: 4-8 weeks; success rate low for unregistered platforms
Google Ads
- Crypto advertising: Requires Google certification for cryptocurrency exchanges; different rules for DeFi, NFTs, wallets
- Gambling advertising: Requires Google gambling advertising certification; country-specific approvals
- Apply at: support.google.com/adspolicy (Financial Products and Services certification)
- Agent Sparta: May qualify as "skill-based gaming" rather than gambling → different, potentially easier policy path
TikTok
- Financial services: Heavily restricted; requires financial regulator approval documentation
- Gambling: Banned in most jurisdictions
- Crypto: Country-by-country policies; generally restricted
Twitter/X
- Under Musk (2022-present): Significantly more permissive for crypto advertising
- Gambling: Still restricted by jurisdiction; crypto gambling especially
- Practical: X is currently the most permissive major platform for crypto-adjacent advertising
- Crypto: Allows with disclosures; moderator approval required in specific subreddits
- Finance subreddits: Organic community building is more valuable than paid ads anyway
- Prediction market subreddits: r/PredictionMarkets, r/sportsbook communities
Organic Growth (Recommended Primary Channel)
Given paid ad restrictions, organic growth is not just a nice-to-have — it's often the only viable channel at early stage:
- Content marketing: detailed analysis of AI model accuracy, educational content about calibration
- Academic/research partnerships: University of Iowa connection → press coverage, academic community
- Discord/Telegram community building: crypto communities respond to authentic founders sharing their journey
- Twitter/X: crypto-native audience; founders sharing product development gets organic reach
- YouTube: longer-form AI education content
Iowa-Specific Advertising Law
Authority: Iowa Code Chapter 714H — Iowa Private Right of Action for Consumer Frauds
§714H.3: Prohibits "unfair" or "deceptive" act or practice in connection with consumer transactions §714H.5: Private right of action — consumers can sue AND recover attorney fees Iowa AG also enforces under Iowa Code §714.16
Practical: Every advertising claim must be truthful and not misleading under Iowa's consumer protection standard. Iowa courts apply a "reasonable consumer" standard — would a reasonable consumer be misled by this claim?
This is legal research and intelligence, not legal advice. Consult qualified legal counsel before taking action.