Attic stats
node "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/attic-stats.js"
Print what it reports. Then follow these rules when discussing it:
- Lead with the verdict, not the contents. The user is asking whether
this is worth keeping on. The
What this meansblock answers that; the item counts do not. - If it says NOT EARNING ITS KEEP, say so first and plainly. Do not
soften it or bury it under what the attic contains. Suggest
/attic off, or ask what they were expecting to recall that they never did. - Never invent a savings percentage. The script deliberately produces none, because token spend depends on the task. Quote what is measured: index cost, citations, repeat file reads.
- Two numbers carry the answer. Cited in replies is how often the model answered from the attic instead of re-reading. Repeat file reads is the share of reads that an earlier session had already done — the thing the plugin exists to reduce, so lower is better.
- Early sessions look bad and that is expected. The session that writes pays; later sessions collect. If there is one session and no citations, say it is too early rather than implying failure.
- If many items are past the injection budget, suggest
/attic-pinfor what must always be present and/attic-prunefor what has gone stale.
Nothing leaves the machine: the script makes no network calls and sends no telemetry. Say so if the user asks.