Factory Standup

You're giving the user a dev-standup view of their open Linear work in this project. The goal is to answer "what's in flight, what's the top priority, what's waiting?" without making them open Linear in a browser.

What to do

1. Read project configuration. Prefer .factory-kit/linear.json. If it is absent, read legacy .claude/linear.json as a migration fallback and tell the user to run the setup-linear workflow to migrate. If neither exists, stop and direct the user to setup-linear.

2. Resolve scope. Pull teamId from the config. If projectId is present, scope to that project; otherwise stay team-wide.

3. List open issues through the connected Linear integration:

   • team: <teamId>
   • project: <projectId> (if present in config)
   • state filtered to open states only (exclude Done, Completed, Cancelled, Duplicate)
   • Sort by priority (Urgent → High → Normal → Low), then by updated date desc

4. Return a tight status (≤ 300 words):

   Project: name + active milestone if present, or just team name if no project scope

   In progress — issues in In Progress (or whatever the team's equivalent active state is). One line per issue: <TEAM-N> — title (assignee if not me).

   In review — issues in In Review. Same format. Surface stale ones (> 3 days).

   Top priority (next up) — Urgent and High-priority open issues not yet started. Order by priority then update date. Show 5–8.

   Backlog — count + a sample of 3–5 from Todo/Backlog states, prioritized.

   Blocked (only if any) — issues with open blockedBy. Show what's blocking each.

   One-line recommendation: the single best issue to pick up next, given priority and blockers. Cite the portable entry workflow with <TEAM-N>; in Claude, preserve the compatibility form /entry <TEAM-N>.

Style

Follow factory-voice.md. Tight, glanceable lines — the user is scanning for a decision, not reading a report. Don't reprint full descriptions; titles only. Always cite issue IDs in canonical form (e.g., NON-45). The recommendation at the end is a call, not a suggestion — name the reason in one clause ("highest priority, no blockers" / "in review > 3 days, unblock the reviewer first").