Gsdl Create Spec

Create SPEC.md

Generates SPEC.md — the Step 3 checkpoint of the GSDL pipeline: Pick up source → Brainstorm → SPEC.md → Slices → Review → Branch → Execute → Verify → PR + bot → Close loop

SPEC.md is the single, canonical plan document for the project. It is designed to be clear and actionable enough for a junior developer — or an execution subagent — to implement from, and detailed enough for a human reviewer to approve or reject at the Step 5 checkpoint.

Tier

LARGE. This step absorbs Step 2 (brainstorm / clarify intent): asking the questions that actually matter, surfacing tradeoffs the source didn't consider, and turning fuzzy intent into a plan every downstream MEDIUM subagent implements against. Errors here propagate through the whole pipeline.

The gsdl orchestrator can be invoked from any session model, and routes this step to LARGE either way: inline when the session is already on a LARGE model (preferred — the Q&A is direct), otherwise in a LARGE subagent driven by the orchestrator's Question Relay protocol, which puts the clarifying questions to the user and feeds the answers back.

Never run this step on a smaller tier, and never ask the user to switch models themselves — that's the orchestrator's job. See the gsdl skill's models.md for the tier mapping.

Prerequisites

1. Project exists: .planning/[project-name]/
2. Seed file exists: .planning/[project-name]/seed.md — the Step 1 output

If the project structure doesn't exist, run gsdl-fetch-source first. It accepts a tracker item, a document, or a plain idea, so there is always a way in.

Process

Step 1: Read the Seed File from Disk

Read .planning/[project-name]/seed.md directly from disk — never rely on an in-context version. The user may have edited it since setup.

Use it to understand: the problem, rough feature ideas, references, and open questions. Note its ## Source block — a spec built from a tracked item should honour that item's acceptance criteria; a spec built from a plain idea has more room to shape scope with the user.

Step 2: Ask Clarifying Questions

Do not skip this step — it is the tail end of Step 2 (Brainstorm/Clarify Intent). Ask enough questions to remove ambiguity before writing anything.

Adapt questions to the seed content:

Focus on the "what" and "why" — the developer/subagent figures out the "how."

See examples.md for worked question sets and the specs they produced.

Step 3: Generate SPEC.md

# [Project Name] — SPEC

## 1. Introduction/Overview
Briefly describe the feature and the problem it solves. State the goal.

## 2. Goals
- Goal 1
- Goal 2

## 3. User Stories
- As a [type of user], I want to [action] so that [benefit]

## 4. Functional Requirements
1. The system must allow users to...
2. The system must validate...
3. The system must display...

## 5. Non-Goals (Out of Scope)
- Will not support...
- Future consideration: ...

## 6. Design Considerations (Optional)
Link to mockups, describe UI/UX requirements, or relevant components/styles.

## 7. Technical Considerations (Optional)
- Should integrate with...
- Consider using...

## 8. Verification Plan
How will this be verified at Step 7 (deterministic gates)? e.g. "existing `npm test` + `npm run lint`", "new unit tests for X", "manual QA: steps to reproduce".

## 9. Success Metrics
- Metric 1: ...
- Metric 2: ...

## 10. Open Questions
- [ ] Question 1
- [ ] Question 2

Step 4: Save SPEC.md

1. Save to: .planning/[project-name]/SPEC.md — always this exact filename, never per-feature variants
2. Confirm creation with the user, showing the file path
3. This is the checkpoint — do not silently proceed to decomposition. Show it to the user for review before Step 4 (Decompose) begins.

Target Audience

The reader is a junior developer or an execution subagent. Requirements should be:

• Explicit and unambiguous
• Free of unexplained jargon
• Detailed enough to understand purpose and core logic without asking follow-up questions

Important Rules

1. Do NOT start implementing after creating SPEC.md
2. Always ask clarifying questions before generating (Step 2 is not optional)
3. Iterate on SPEC.md based on user feedback — this file is re-read from disk by every later step, so edits are always picked up
4. One SPEC.md per project — if the project covers multiple features, use ## sections within the single file rather than multiple spec files, so decomposition (Step 4) always has one source of truth
5. The Verification Plan is not optional — Step 7 discovers gates from the repo, but this section is where the user's own expectations get recorded

Edge Cases

No Seed File

Run gsdl-fetch-source first rather than improvising a description — it handles the no-tracker case too, so there is no reason to skip it.

Vague Requirements

Ask more specific questions, suggest concrete options, break broad concepts into smaller specifics.

Multiple Features

Use separate ## sections within the one SPEC.md, each with its own goals/requirements/non-goals — decomposition will turn each section into its own slice(s).

Existing SPEC.md

• Default to updating it in place and noting the change in an "## Amendments" section with a date
• Only create a dated snapshot (SPEC-YYYYMMDD.md) if the user explicitly wants to preserve the prior version before a major rewrite

Output

• Format: Markdown (.md)
• Location: .planning/[project-name]/
• Filename: SPEC.md (always — not prd-*.md or feature-specific names)
• Example: .planning/eng-441-user-authentication/SPEC.md