> Tier 1 workflow base for statutory audit skills. Covers the audit lifecycle — engagement acceptance, risk assessment, audit planning, evidence gathering, fieldwork, opinion formulation, reporting — applied to the International Standards on Auditing (ISA) as issued by the IAASB plus country overlays (US GAAS for public co's, UK FRC ISA(UK), Germany IDW PS, France NEP, Italy ISA-Italia). Workflow architecture only — no engagement-specific procedures, materiality benchmarks, or audit programs. MUST be loaded alongside a content skill that provides the country-specific audit threshold rules, regulator inspection regime, statutory deadlines, and any non-ISA local standards. Assumes a qualified statutory auditor (RA, CPA, CA, Wirtschaftsprüfer, commissaire aux comptes, revisore legale, etc.) signs the audit report. Does NOT cover: internal audit, regulatory audit (banking, insurance prudential), tax audit by tax authority, IT general controls testing methodology, or forensic audit.
General reference only. This skill is general tax/accounting reference material for AI-assisted workflows. It has not been reviewed for any specific person's facts, documents, elections, deadlines, residency, filing status, or local procedures. Do not rely on it to file, pay, amend, or take a tax position without review by a qualified professional in the relevant jurisdiction.
What this file is
This is the Tier 1 workflow base for statutory audit content skills. It does not contain country-specific audit rules. It contains:
The audit lifecycle runbook aligned to ISA (IAASB)
The country audit threshold matrix (when an audit is required)
The engagement acceptance and continuance protocol
The ISA risk assessment and significance-determination framework
The reviewer-oriented audit file structure
The opinion formulation decision tree
The 21 self-checks
The global refusal catalogue
The slot contract for country statutory audit skills
Every statutory audit skill MUST be loaded alongside this base.
Understand the entity, its environment, and its system of internal control
Identify and assess Risks of Material Misstatement (RMM) at financial statement and assertion levels
Determine significant risks
Identify controls relevant to the audit
[T1] Significant risks receive enhanced procedures and cannot be addressed with substantive analytical procedures alone.
Phase 3 — Audit plan and materiality (ISA 320, 330)
[T1] Materiality:
Overall materiality — judgment based on benchmark and percentage (commonly 5% of PBT, 0.5-1% of revenue, 1-2% of equity, 1-2% of total assets, depending on user emphasis)
Performance materiality — typically 50-75% of overall materiality
Specific materiality — for particular classes of transactions / accounts / disclosures requiring lower threshold (e.g., related parties, executive compensation)
Clearly trivial threshold — typically 5% of performance materiality
Overall accountability; signs the report (ISA 220)
Engagement Quality Reviewer (EQR)
Independent objective evaluation (ISA 220R, ISQM 1) — required for PIEs, recommended for higher-risk
Manager
Day-to-day engagement leadership
Senior / In-charge
Field execution
Staff
Detailed testing
Specialists
Tax, IT, valuation, actuarial — internal or external (ISA 620)
Group auditor (parent)
Overall group opinion; relies on component auditors per ISA 600
Component auditor
Component audit work for inclusion in group audit
3.2 Independence (IESBA Code Part 4A)
[T1] Self-interest, self-review, advocacy, familiarity, intimidation threats must be evaluated. Specific prohibitions for PIEs:
Bookkeeping / accounting services
Internal audit outsourcing
Valuations relevant to the financial statements
Tax services involving advocacy
Certain corporate finance / advisory engagements
Rotation of engagement partner (typically 5 years on / 5 off; PIE rotation rules vary)
Audit firm rotation (EU mandatory rotation cap typically 10-24 years for PIEs)
Section 4 — Reviewer brief (audit working paper file)
Every audit produces a file containing:
1. Engagement acceptance / continuance file
- Independence declarations
- Risk acceptance
- Engagement letter
- Predecessor communications
2. Risk assessment file
- Entity understanding documentation
- Industry / regulatory environment
- Internal control walkthroughs and testing
- Risk identification and significance matrix
- Significant risks and response plan
3. Planning file
- Materiality determination (overall, performance, specific, trivial)
- Audit plan with timing and resources
- Component auditor instructions (group audits)
- Internal control reliance plan
4. Fieldwork file
- By assertion: procedures performed and conclusions
- Confirmations sent and received
- Inventory observation working papers
- Going concern assessment
- Estimates testing (ECL, pensions, goodwill, fair value)
- Related party identification and testing
- Litigation legal letters and management responses
- Subsequent events review
5. Completion file
- Final analytical procedures
- Management representation letter
- Going concern conclusion
- Subsequent events through report sign-off
- Engagement quality review (EQR) for PIE / listed
6. Reporting file
- Final financial statements signed by management
- Audit opinion (with KAMs for listed)
- Letter to those charged with governance / management letter
- Audit committee communications (ISA 260, 265)
Section 5 — Opinion formulation decision tree
[T1]
Misstatement detected?
No → Material uncertainty / scope limitation?
No → Unmodified opinion
Yes → Pervasive?
No → Qualified opinion (scope limitation)
Yes → Disclaimer of opinion
Yes → Corrected by management?
Yes → Unmodified opinion
No → Material?
No → Unmodified (track for clearly trivial threshold)
Yes → Pervasive?
No → Qualified opinion (disagreement)
Yes → Adverse opinion
Going concern material uncertainty?
Yes + Adequate disclosure → Unmodified + going concern paragraph
Yes + Inadequate disclosure → Qualified or adverse depending on materiality/pervasiveness
Section 6 — 21 self-checks
Before signing the opinion, verify:
Engagement acceptance / continuance documented and approved
Engagement letter signed before fieldwork
Independence — firm and engagement team — declared and threats assessed
Risk assessment per ISA 315 (Revised) — entity understanding, RMM, significant risks
Materiality — overall, performance, specific, trivial — determined and documented
Audit plan responsive to identified risks
Significant risks addressed with substantive procedures (analytical not alone sufficient)
Going concern assessment for at least 12 months from report date
Subsequent events review through report sign-off
Written representation letter from management received before report sign-off
Fraud risk assessment per ISA 240 with required journal entry testing
Estimates tested per ISA 540 (Revised)
Related parties identified and tested per ISA 550
Litigation legal letters obtained per ISA 501
Group audit — component auditor reliance documented per ISA 600
EQR review completed and reviewer concur for PIEs / required engagements
Annual report read and other information consistent with audited financial statements (ISA 720)
Communications to TCWG / management letter prepared
Opinion type confirmed via decision tree (Section 5)
KAMs identified and documented for listed entities (ISA 701)
Audit file assembled and archived per ISQM 1 and country regulations (typically 5+ years)
Section 7 — Global refusal catalogue
Refuse to act / escalate to firm leadership if:
Refusal
Trigger
R-AUDIT-1
Independence cannot be established or threats cannot be reduced to acceptable level
R-AUDIT-2
Predecessor auditor will not communicate or hostile transition
R-AUDIT-3
Management refuses to provide written representations
R-AUDIT-4
Material misstatement detected and management refuses to correct
R-AUDIT-5
Limitation on scope imposed by management
R-AUDIT-6
Suspected fraud — escalate per firm fraud protocols and ISA 240 ¶42
R-AUDIT-7
Suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations affecting financial statements — ISA 250 ¶27 escalation
R-AUDIT-8
Going concern material uncertainty with inadequate disclosure that management refuses to enhance
R-AUDIT-9
Component auditor refuses cooperation in group audit
R-AUDIT-10
Regulatory inspection finding against firm requires re-issuance of opinion
Section 8 — Slot contract for country audit content skills
Every country statutory audit content skill must populate:
[REGULATOR]
- National audit regulator (FRC, PCAOB, AOB, H3C, etc.)
- Auditor qualification body (ICAEW, AICPA, etc.)
- Auditor licensing process
[STANDARDS]
- Auditing standards in force (ISA-IAASB, ISA(UK), GAAS-PCAOB, NEP, IDW PS, etc.)
- Reporting standards in force (IFRS-IASB, IFRS-EU, FRS 102, US GAAP, local)
- Required audit reporting language and structure
[THRESHOLDS]
- Statutory audit trigger thresholds (assets, revenue, employees)
- PIE definition and additional requirements
- Audit committee requirements
- Audit firm rotation requirements (PIEs)
- Engagement partner rotation requirements
[FILING]
- Filing deadline (annual return, financial statements, audit report)
- Public access to financial statements (Companies House, BR, RCS, BOE, etc.)
- Late filing penalties
- Format requirements (XBRL, Inline XBRL, ESEF for listed)
[OPINION]
- Required language and structure
- Local KAM / equivalents
- Director's responsibilities statement requirements
- Subsequent event treatment specifics
[ANCILLARY]
- Country-specific procedures (US §404 ICFR opinion; UK FRC ISA(UK) 240/700/701 specific paragraphs; France lettre d'affirmation specifics; etc.)
- Tax / payroll / VAT / pension auditor responsibilities (where audit-related)
- Related-party disclosure local rules
[CROSS-REFERENCES]
- IFRS / local GAAP reconciliation (this skill if dual reporting)
- Pillar Two — auditor responsibility for tax provision and disclosure
Section 9 — Disclaimer
This workflow base produces working papers for audit engagement, not direct accounting or financial advice. Every audit opinion must be signed by a qualified statutory auditor in compliance with the local regulator's requirements.
The most up-to-date, verified version of this workflow base is maintained at openaccountants.com.
Source: OpenAccountants — open tax Guides for AI, reviewed by named CPAs/CAs/EAs. Quality: source-cited draft. For always-current figures and named-accountant backing, connect the OpenAccountants MCP server (openaccountants-mcp).
1---2name: statutory-audit-workflow-base3description: > Tier 1 workflow base for statutory audit skills. Covers the audit lifecycle — engagement acceptance, risk assessment, audit planning, evidence gathering, fieldwork, opinion formulation, reporting — applied to the International Standards on Auditing (ISA) as issued by the IAASB plus country overlays (US GAAS for public co's, UK FRC ISA(UK), Germany IDW PS, France NEP, Italy ISA-Italia). Workflow architecture only — no engagement-specific procedures, materiality benchmarks, or audit programs. MUST be loaded alongside a content skill that provides the country-specific audit threshold rules, regulator inspection regime, statutory deadlines, and any non-ISA local standards. Assumes a qualified statutory auditor (RA, CPA, CA, Wirtschaftsprüfer, commissaire aux comptes, revisore legale, etc.) signs the audit report. Does NOT cover: internal audit, regulatory audit (banking, insurance prudential), tax audit by tax authority, IT general controls testing methodology, or forensic audit.4license: AGPL-3.0-or-later (code) / OpenAccountants Guide License v1.0 (c5---67# Statutory Audit Workflow Base v0.189> **General reference only.** This skill is general tax/accounting reference material for AI-assisted workflows. It has not been reviewed for any specific person's facts, documents, elections, deadlines, residency, filing status, or local procedures. Do not rely on it to file, pay, amend, or take a tax position without review by a qualified professional in the relevant jurisdiction.1011## What this file is1213This is the **Tier 1 workflow base** for statutory audit content skills. It does not contain country-specific audit rules. It contains:1415- The audit lifecycle runbook aligned to ISA (IAASB)16- The country audit threshold matrix (when an audit is required)17- The engagement acceptance and continuance protocol18- The ISA risk assessment and significance-determination framework19- The reviewer-oriented audit file structure20- The opinion formulation decision tree21- The 21 self-checks22- The global refusal catalogue23- The slot contract for country statutory audit skills2425**Every statutory audit skill MUST be loaded alongside this base.**2627---2829## Section 1 — Audit lifecycle (ISA-aligned)3031### Phase 1 — Engagement acceptance / continuance (ISA 220, 220R, 210)3233**[T1]** Before accepting or continuing:3435| Test | Reference |36|---|---|37| Independence (firm-level + engagement team) | IESBA Code Part 4A; PCAOB Rule 3520; FRC ES 1; IDW PS 220 |38| Competence to perform the audit | ISA 220 ¶15 |39| Acceptance approval by appropriate partner | Firm policy; ISA 220 ¶16 |40| Engagement letter signed | ISA 210 ¶10 |41| Predecessor auditor communication | ISA 510 (initial engagements); communication with predecessor required |42| Audit fee not impaired (no contingent fees on the audit opinion) | IESBA Code 410 |4344### Phase 2 — Risk assessment (ISA 315 (Revised 2019))4546**[T1] Required activities:**47- Understand the entity, its environment, and its system of internal control48- Identify and assess Risks of Material Misstatement (RMM) at financial statement and assertion levels49- Determine significant risks50- Identify controls relevant to the audit5152**[T1] Significant risks** receive enhanced procedures and cannot be addressed with substantive analytical procedures alone.5354### Phase 3 — Audit plan and materiality (ISA 320, 330)5556**[T1] Materiality:**57- **Overall materiality** — judgment based on benchmark and percentage (commonly 5% of PBT, 0.5-1% of revenue, 1-2% of equity, 1-2% of total assets, depending on user emphasis)58- **Performance materiality** — typically 50-75% of overall materiality59- **Specific materiality** — for particular classes of transactions / accounts / disclosures requiring lower threshold (e.g., related parties, executive compensation)60- **Clearly trivial threshold** — typically 5% of performance materiality6162### Phase 4 — Fieldwork / procedures (ISA 330, 500, 501-540)6364**[T1] Audit evidence** must be sufficient (quantity) and appropriate (relevance + reliability). Per assertion (existence, completeness, valuation, rights/obligations, classification, presentation/disclosure, accuracy, cut-off), select procedures from:6566| Procedure | Type |67|---|---|68| Inspection of records or documents | Substantive / control |69| Inspection of tangible assets | Substantive (existence) |70| Observation | Control |71| Inquiry of management / others | Substantive / control / inquiry |72| External confirmation | Substantive (existence/valuation) |73| Recalculation | Substantive |74| Reperformance | Control |75| Analytical procedures | Substantive (when designed appropriately) |7677**[T1]** Specific ISA-required procedures:78- ISA 240 — fraud: testing journal entries, related party transactions, management override79- ISA 250 — laws and regulations: inquiries, document inspection, legal letters80- ISA 501 — inventory observation, litigation legal letters, segment information81- ISA 540 (Revised) — accounting estimates (including ECL, pensions, goodwill, fair value)82- ISA 550 — related party transactions83- ISA 560 — subsequent events review through report date84- ISA 570 — going concern (12 months from balance sheet date in most jurisdictions; 12 from report sign-off in some)85- ISA 600 — group audits and component auditor reliance8687### Phase 5 — Completion (ISA 700-720)8889**[T1] Completion checklist:**90- Going concern assessment (ISA 570)91- Subsequent events review (ISA 560)92- Written representations from management (ISA 580)93- Quality control review (ISA 220, 220R)94- Engagement Quality Review (EQR) for PIE / listed audits (ISA 220R, ISQM 1)95- Key Audit Matters (KAM) selection (ISA 701 — listed entities) / equivalent for unlisted in some jurisdictions96- Audit opinion formulation (ISA 700, 705, 706)97- Annual report or other information reading (ISA 720)9899### Phase 6 — Reporting (ISA 700/705/706/701/710)100101**[T1]** Opinion options:102- **Unmodified** — financial statements give a true and fair view103- **Qualified** — material but not pervasive misstatement OR scope limitation104- **Adverse** — material and pervasive misstatement105- **Disclaimer** — material and pervasive scope limitation106- **Emphasis of matter** — adds emphasis without modifying opinion (e.g., subsequent event after issuance)107- **Other matter** — additional matters not addressed in financial statements108- **Key Audit Matters** — significant matters in current period audit (listed and certain unlisted)109- **Going concern paragraph** — material uncertainty paragraph or going concern KAM110111### Phase 7 — Post-issuance (ISA 220R, ISQM 1)112113**[T1]**114- Engagement quality reviews115- Firm monitoring and remediation116- Inspections by regulators (PCAOB, FRC, AOB, etc.)117- Subsequent discovery of facts (ISA 560 ¶14-17)118119---120121## Section 2 — When is a statutory audit required?122123Each country sets size thresholds (typically two-of-three test on balance sheet total, revenue, employees) above which an audit is mandatory.124125**[T1] Illustrative thresholds (2025):**126127| Country | Total assets | Net revenue | Employees | Notes |128|---|---|---|---|---|129| **UK** | GBP 5.1m | GBP 10.2m | 50 | Two-of-three; PIEs/PLCs always audited |130| **Germany (BilanzRichtlinie umgesetzt §267 HGB)** | EUR 6m | EUR 12m | 50 | "Mittelgroße" company audited; "Kleine" exempt |131| **France** | EUR 5m | EUR 10m | 50 | Loi PACTE 2019 raised thresholds |132| **Italy** | EUR 5m | EUR 10m | 50 | art. 2477 CC |133| **Spain** | EUR 4m | EUR 8m | 50 | Plus de minimis tests |134| **Netherlands** | EUR 7.5m | EUR 15m | 50 | "Middelgroot" |135| **EU general (Accounting Directive 2013/34/EU as amended 2023)** | EUR 7.5m | EUR 15m | 50 | Raised by 25% in 2023 indexation; MS may modify |136| **Ireland** | EUR 7.5m | EUR 15m | 50 | Aligned EU |137| **Australia** | AUD 12.5m or grand-fund > 50 | AUD 25m | 50 | Various tests; large proprietary or grandfathered |138| **Canada** | Provincial CPCA / OBCA — most private companies opt out via unanimous shareholder waiver | n/a | n/a | Subject to public-company status |139| **United States** | No federal statutory audit for private companies | n/a | n/a | SEC: all listed companies. State LLC / corporation audit by election. |140| **India** | INR 100 crore (sales) or INR 50 crore (net profit) → 2017 audit thresholds; private cos with paid-up capital | n/a | n/a | Companies Act 2013 |141| **Japan** | JPY 500m capital OR JPY 20bn liabilities | n/a | n/a | Financial Instruments and Exchange Act for listed; Companies Act for large |142| **Brazil** | BRL 78m total assets | BRL 300m gross revenue | n/a | Listed always |143| **Singapore** | SGD 10m total assets | SGD 10m revenue | 50 | Two-of-three; Small Company Concept since 2014 |144145**[T1]** PIEs (Public Interest Entities — listed, banks, insurers): always audited, with additional partner rotation, audit firm rotation, and enhanced reporting (KAMs).146147---148149## Section 3 — Engagement structure150151### 3.1 Roles152153**[T1]**154155| Role | Responsibility |156|---|---|157| Audit engagement partner | Overall accountability; signs the report (ISA 220) |158| Engagement Quality Reviewer (EQR) | Independent objective evaluation (ISA 220R, ISQM 1) — required for PIEs, recommended for higher-risk |159| Manager | Day-to-day engagement leadership |160| Senior / In-charge | Field execution |161| Staff | Detailed testing |162| Specialists | Tax, IT, valuation, actuarial — internal or external (ISA 620) |163| Group auditor (parent) | Overall group opinion; relies on component auditors per ISA 600 |164| Component auditor | Component audit work for inclusion in group audit |165166### 3.2 Independence (IESBA Code Part 4A)167168**[T1] Self-interest, self-review, advocacy, familiarity, intimidation threats** must be evaluated. Specific prohibitions for PIEs:169- Bookkeeping / accounting services170- Internal audit outsourcing171- Valuations relevant to the financial statements172- Tax services involving advocacy173- Certain corporate finance / advisory engagements174- Rotation of engagement partner (typically 5 years on / 5 off; PIE rotation rules vary)175- Audit firm rotation (EU mandatory rotation cap typically 10-24 years for PIEs)176177---178179## Section 4 — Reviewer brief (audit working paper file)180181Every audit produces a file containing:182183```1841. Engagement acceptance / continuance file185 - Independence declarations186 - Risk acceptance187 - Engagement letter188 - Predecessor communications1891902. Risk assessment file191 - Entity understanding documentation192 - Industry / regulatory environment193 - Internal control walkthroughs and testing194 - Risk identification and significance matrix195 - Significant risks and response plan1961973. Planning file198 - Materiality determination (overall, performance, specific, trivial)199 - Audit plan with timing and resources200 - Component auditor instructions (group audits)201 - Internal control reliance plan2022034. Fieldwork file204 - By assertion: procedures performed and conclusions205 - Confirmations sent and received206 - Inventory observation working papers207 - Going concern assessment208 - Estimates testing (ECL, pensions, goodwill, fair value)209 - Related party identification and testing210 - Litigation legal letters and management responses211 - Subsequent events review2122135. Completion file214 - Final analytical procedures215 - Management representation letter216 - Going concern conclusion217 - Subsequent events through report sign-off218 - Engagement quality review (EQR) for PIE / listed2192206. Reporting file221 - Final financial statements signed by management222 - Audit opinion (with KAMs for listed)223 - Letter to those charged with governance / management letter224 - Audit committee communications (ISA 260, 265)225```226227---228229## Section 5 — Opinion formulation decision tree230231**[T1]**232233```234Misstatement detected?235 No → Material uncertainty / scope limitation?236 No → Unmodified opinion237 Yes → Pervasive?238 No → Qualified opinion (scope limitation)239 Yes → Disclaimer of opinion240 Yes → Corrected by management?241 Yes → Unmodified opinion242 No → Material?243 No → Unmodified (track for clearly trivial threshold)244 Yes → Pervasive?245 No → Qualified opinion (disagreement)246 Yes → Adverse opinion247248Going concern material uncertainty?249 Yes + Adequate disclosure → Unmodified + going concern paragraph250 Yes + Inadequate disclosure → Qualified or adverse depending on materiality/pervasiveness251```252253---254255## Section 6 — 21 self-checks256257Before signing the opinion, verify:2582591. [ ] Engagement acceptance / continuance documented and approved2602. [ ] Engagement letter signed before fieldwork2613. [ ] Independence — firm and engagement team — declared and threats assessed2624. [ ] Risk assessment per ISA 315 (Revised) — entity understanding, RMM, significant risks2635. [ ] Materiality — overall, performance, specific, trivial — determined and documented2646. [ ] Audit plan responsive to identified risks2657. [ ] Significant risks addressed with substantive procedures (analytical not alone sufficient)2668. [ ] Going concern assessment for at least 12 months from report date2679. [ ] Subsequent events review through report sign-off26810. [ ] Written representation letter from management received before report sign-off26911. [ ] Fraud risk assessment per ISA 240 with required journal entry testing27012. [ ] Estimates tested per ISA 540 (Revised)27113. [ ] Related parties identified and tested per ISA 55027214. [ ] Litigation legal letters obtained per ISA 50127315. [ ] Group audit — component auditor reliance documented per ISA 60027416. [ ] EQR review completed and reviewer concur for PIEs / required engagements27517. [ ] Annual report read and other information consistent with audited financial statements (ISA 720)27618. [ ] Communications to TCWG / management letter prepared27719. [ ] Opinion type confirmed via decision tree (Section 5)27820. [ ] KAMs identified and documented for listed entities (ISA 701)27921. [ ] Audit file assembled and archived per ISQM 1 and country regulations (typically 5+ years)280281---282283## Section 7 — Global refusal catalogue284285Refuse to act / escalate to firm leadership if:286287| Refusal | Trigger |288|---|---|289| **R-AUDIT-1** | Independence cannot be established or threats cannot be reduced to acceptable level |290| **R-AUDIT-2** | Predecessor auditor will not communicate or hostile transition |291| **R-AUDIT-3** | Management refuses to provide written representations |292| **R-AUDIT-4** | Material misstatement detected and management refuses to correct |293| **R-AUDIT-5** | Limitation on scope imposed by management |294| **R-AUDIT-6** | Suspected fraud — escalate per firm fraud protocols and ISA 240 ¶42 |295| **R-AUDIT-7** | Suspected non-compliance with laws and regulations affecting financial statements — ISA 250 ¶27 escalation |296| **R-AUDIT-8** | Going concern material uncertainty with inadequate disclosure that management refuses to enhance |297| **R-AUDIT-9** | Component auditor refuses cooperation in group audit |298| **R-AUDIT-10** | Regulatory inspection finding against firm requires re-issuance of opinion |299300---301302## Section 8 — Slot contract for country audit content skills303304Every country statutory audit content skill must populate:305306```307[REGULATOR]308- National audit regulator (FRC, PCAOB, AOB, H3C, etc.)309- Auditor qualification body (ICAEW, AICPA, etc.)310- Auditor licensing process311312[STANDARDS]313- Auditing standards in force (ISA-IAASB, ISA(UK), GAAS-PCAOB, NEP, IDW PS, etc.)314- Reporting standards in force (IFRS-IASB, IFRS-EU, FRS 102, US GAAP, local)315- Required audit reporting language and structure316317[THRESHOLDS]318- Statutory audit trigger thresholds (assets, revenue, employees)319- PIE definition and additional requirements320- Audit committee requirements321- Audit firm rotation requirements (PIEs)322- Engagement partner rotation requirements323324[FILING]325- Filing deadline (annual return, financial statements, audit report)326- Public access to financial statements (Companies House, BR, RCS, BOE, etc.)327- Late filing penalties328- Format requirements (XBRL, Inline XBRL, ESEF for listed)329330[OPINION]331- Required language and structure332- Local KAM / equivalents333- Director's responsibilities statement requirements334- Subsequent event treatment specifics335336[ANCILLARY]337- Country-specific procedures (US §404 ICFR opinion; UK FRC ISA(UK) 240/700/701 specific paragraphs; France lettre d'affirmation specifics; etc.)338- Tax / payroll / VAT / pension auditor responsibilities (where audit-related)339- Related-party disclosure local rules340341[CROSS-REFERENCES]342- IFRS / local GAAP reconciliation (this skill if dual reporting)343- Pillar Two — auditor responsibility for tax provision and disclosure344```345346---347348## Section 9 — Disclaimer349350This workflow base produces working papers for audit engagement, not direct accounting or financial advice. Every audit opinion must be signed by a qualified statutory auditor in compliance with the local regulator's requirements.351352The most up-to-date, verified version of this workflow base is maintained at [openaccountants.com](https://openaccountants.com).353354---355356_Source: [OpenAccountants](https://openaccountants.com/skills/statutory-audit-workflow-base) — open tax Guides for AI, reviewed by named CPAs/CAs/EAs. Quality: **source-cited draft**. For always-current figures and named-accountant backing, connect the OpenAccountants MCP server (`openaccountants-mcp`)._
Run npx skillmds@latest add openaccountants/statutory-audit-workflow-base in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.
> Tier 1 workflow base for statutory audit skills. Covers the audit lifecycle — engagement acceptance, risk assessment, audit planning, evidence gathering, fieldwork, opinion formulation, reporting — applied to the International Standards on Auditing (ISA) as issued by the IAASB plus country overlays (US GAAS for public co's, UK FRC ISA(UK), Germany IDW PS, France NEP, Italy ISA-Italia). Workflow architecture only — no engagement-specific procedures, materiality benchmarks, or audit programs. MUST be loaded alongside a content skill that provides the country-specific audit threshold rules, regulator inspection regime, statutory deadlines, and any non-ISA local standards. Assumes a qualified statutory auditor (RA, CPA, CA, Wirtschaftsprüfer, commissaire aux comptes, revisore legale, etc.) signs the audit report. Does NOT cover: internal audit, regulatory audit (banking, insurance prudential), tax audit by tax authority, IT general controls testing methodology, or forensic audit. It is listed under AI & ML on SkillMD.
This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.
This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.
Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free. This skill is licensed under AGPL-3.
openaccountants (@openaccountants) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.