Vc:team

Agent Teams - Parallel Orchestration Utility

Coordinate multiple independent Codex sessions. Each teammate has own context window, loads project context (AGENTS.md, skills, agents), communicates via shared task list and messaging.

Requires: Agent Teams enabled. Set CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1 in settings.json env. Requires: CLI terminal — TaskCreate/TaskUpdate/TaskGet/TaskList and TeamCreate/TeamDelete are disabled in VSCode extension (isTTY check). Agent Teams CANNOT run in VSCode. Model requirement: All teammates must run Opus 4.6 (Agent Teams constraint).

Usage

/vc:team <template> <context> [flags]

Templates: research, execute, review, debug

Flags:

• --devs N | --researchers N | --reviewers N | --debuggers N -- team size
• --plan-approval / --no-plan-approval -- plan gate (default: on for execute)
• --delegate -- lead only coordinates, never touches code
• --worktree -- use git worktrees for implementation isolation (default: on for execute)

Execution Protocol

Pre-flight (MANDATORY -- merged into step 2 of every template):

1. Step 2 of every template calls TeamCreate(team_name: "...", ...). Do NOT check whether the tool exists first -- just call it.
2. If the call SUCCEEDS: continue with the template.
3. If the call returns an ERROR or is unrecognized: STOP. Tell user: "Agent Teams requires CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1 in settings.json. Team mode is not available."
4. Do NOT fall back to subagents. /vc:team MUST use Agent Teams or abort.
5. Ensure TeamCreate was called before spawning teammates -- team association happens via session context.

When activated, first confirm team creation if the user has not already explicitly approved using agent teams for this task. Do not use this skill to bypass the repo's normal human approval gates. Execute the tool calls in order only after team usage is approved. Report progress after each major step.

--delegate Mode

When --delegate flag is passed:

• Lead enters delegate mode (Shift+Tab after TeamCreate)
• Lead ONLY: spawns teammates, manages tasks, sends messages, synthesizes reports
• Lead NEVER: edits files, runs tests, executes git commands directly
• For execute Step 7 MERGE: spawn a dedicated merge teammate instead of lead doing it
• For all templates: lead coordinates and reports, delegates ALL implementation work

Tool Reference (Quick)

Agent Tool (spawn teammates)

Agent(
  subagent_type: "research-agent" | "execute-agent" | "code-reviewer" | "debugger" | "tester" | ...,
  description: "short task summary",
  prompt: "full instructions + CK Context Block",
  model: "opus",                    # Required for Agent Teams teammates
  run_in_background: true,          # Non-blocking spawn
  isolation: "worktree"             # Git worktree isolation (execute devs)
)

Note: Task was renamed to Agent in v2.1.63. Both names work; prefer Agent for new code.

Team Management Tools

SendMessage Types

CK Context Block

Every teammate spawn prompt MUST include this context at the end:

CK Context:
- Work dir: {CK_PROJECT_ROOT or CWD}
- Feature: {CK_FEATURE or "none"}
- Reports: {CK_REPORTS_PATH or "process/general-plans/reports/"}
- Plans: {CK_PLANS_PATH or "process/general-plans/active/"}
- Branch: {CK_GIT_BRANCH or current branch}
- Naming: {CK_NAME_PATTERN or "YYMMDD-HHMM"}
- Active plan: {CK_ACTIVE_PLAN or "none"}
- Commits: conventional (feat:, fix:, docs:, refactor:, test:, chore:)
- Refer to teammates by NAME, not agent ID

ON /vc:team research <topic> [--researchers N]:

Coordinates parallel research-agent teammates plus shared helper skills where useful.

IMMEDIATELY execute in order:

1. Derive N angles from <topic> (default N=3):

   • Angle 1: Architecture, patterns, proven approaches
   • Angle 2: Alternatives, competing solutions, trade-offs
   • Angle 3: Risks, edge cases, failure modes, security
   • (If N>3, derive additional angles from topic context)

2. CALL TeamCreate(team_name: "<topic-slug>") after user approval to use agent teams

3. CALL TaskCreate x N -- one per angle:

   • Subject: Research: <angle-title>
   • Description: Investigate <angle> for topic: <topic>. Save report to: {CK_REPORTS_PATH}/research-agent-{N}-{CK_NAME_PATTERN}-{topic-slug}.md. Format: Executive summary, key findings, evidence, contradictions, unresolved questions. Do not recommend implementations. Mark task completed when done. Send findings summary to lead.

4. SPAWN teammates x N via Agent tool:

   • subagent_type: "research-agent", model: "opus"
   • run_in_background: true (non-blocking -- spawn all N concurrently)
   • name: "research-agent-{N}"
   • Prompt: task description + CK Context Block

5. MONITOR via TaskCompleted hook events + TaskList fallback:

   • TaskCompleted events auto-notify when research-agent subagents finish
   • Fallback: Check TaskList if no event received in 60s
   • If stuck >5 min, message teammate directly

6. READ all research-agent reports from {CK_REPORTS_PATH}/

7. SYNTHESIZE into: {CK_REPORTS_PATH}/research-summary-{CK_NAME_PATTERN}-{topic-slug}.md Format: exec summary, key findings, comparative analysis, trade-off evidence, unresolved questions, decision inputs for the orchestrator.

8. SHUTDOWN: SendMessage(type: "shutdown_request") to each teammate

9. CLEANUP: TeamDelete (no parameters -- just call it)

10. REPORT: Tell user Research complete. Summary: {path}. N reports generated.

11. FOLLOW-UP: If durable process/context learnings surfaced, suggest ENTER UPDATE PROCESS MODE.

ON /vc:team execute <plan-path> [--devs N]:

Coordinates approved-plan execution with parallel execute-agent teammates, testing, review, and final reporting without introducing a separate execution owner.

Do not use this template to flatten an entire multi-phase program into one execution wave. If the selected work is really a phase program, the lead must first pick one current phase plan and execute that phase only. See process/development-protocols/phase-programs.md.

IMMEDIATELY execute in order:

1. PRE-FLIGHT APPROVAL CHECK:

   • Require one explicit approved plan file path under process/general-plans/active/ or process/features/*/active/
   • If the user supplied only a description or an unapproved draft, STOP and tell the user to create/select a plan first, then return with ENTER EXECUTE MODE
   • Do not use vc:team execute to bypass the repo's explicit execute approval gate
   • If the selected plan is an umbrella/orchestration plan for a large program, STOP and require one explicit current phase plan instead of executing the whole program at once

2. READ the selected plan and parse it into N independent task groups with file ownership boundaries

3. CALL TeamCreate(team_name: "<feature-slug>") after user approval to use agent teams

4. CALL TaskCreate x (N + 1) -- N dev tasks + 1 tester task:

   • Dev tasks: include File ownership: <glob patterns> -- NO overlap between devs
   • Tester task: addBlockedBy all dev task IDs
   • Each task description includes: implementation scope, file ownership, acceptance criteria

5. SPAWN developer teammates x N via Agent tool:

   • subagent_type: "execute-agent", model: "opus"
   • isolation: "worktree" -- each dev gets isolated git worktree (no file conflicts)
   • run_in_background: true
   • name: "dev-{N}"
   • Prompt: task description + exact plan path + CK Context Block
   • If --plan-approval: require a short task-level implementation outline before coding, but do not reopen the top-level execute approval gate
   • REVIEW and APPROVE each developer's task outline via plan_approval_response before code changes

6. MONITOR dev completion via TaskCompleted events:

   • TaskCompleted hook notifies when each dev task finishes
   • When all N dev tasks show completed, spawn tester immediately
   • TeammateIdle events confirm devs are available for shutdown
   • Fallback: Check TaskList if no events received in 60s
   • Spawn tester: Agent(subagent_type: "tester", model: "opus", name: "tester")
   • Tester runs full test suite, reports pass/fail

7. MERGE worktree branches (if isolation: "worktree" was used):

   • Discover branches: check Agent result for branch names, or git worktree list
   • In --delegate mode, spawn a dedicated merge teammate for this step
   • Otherwise, for each dev branch: git merge <dev-branch> --no-ff
   • If conflict: resolve manually (lead owns shared files), then git add . && git merge --continue
   • Cleanup: git worktree remove <path> for each worktree
   • Verify: git log --oneline --graph to confirm merge topology

8. DOCS SYNC EVAL:

   Docs impact: [none|minor|major]
   Action: [no update needed -- <reason>] | [updated <page>] | [needs separate PR]
   

9. SHUTDOWN all teammates via SendMessage(type: "shutdown_request")

10. CLEANUP: TeamDelete (no parameters -- just call it)

11. REPORT: Tell user what was implemented, test results, docs impact, and any remaining concerns.

12. FOLLOW-UP: If durable process/context learnings surfaced, suggest ENTER UPDATE PROCESS MODE.

ON /vc:team review <scope> [--reviewers N]:

Coordinates parallel code-reviewer teammates using the absorbed review methodology now owned by the agent path.

IMMEDIATELY execute in order:

1. DERIVE N review focuses from <scope> (default N=3):

   • Focus 1: Security -- vulnerabilities, auth, input validation, OWASP
   • Focus 2: Performance -- bottlenecks, memory, complexity, scaling
   • Focus 3: Test coverage -- gaps, edge cases, error paths
   • (If N>3, derive from scope: architecture, DX, accessibility, etc.)

2. CALL TeamCreate(team_name: "review-<scope-slug>") after user approval to use agent teams

3. CALL TaskCreate x N -- one per focus:

   • Subject: Review: <focus-title>
   • Description: Review <scope> for <focus>. Output severity-rated findings only. Format: [CRITICAL|IMPORTANT|MODERATE] <finding> -- <evidence> -- <recommendation>. No "seems" or "probably" -- concrete evidence only. Save to: {CK_REPORTS_PATH}/reviewer-{N}-{CK_NAME_PATTERN}-{scope-slug}.md. Mark task completed when done.

4. SPAWN reviewers x N via Agent tool:

   • subagent_type: "code-reviewer", model: "opus"
   • run_in_background: true
   • name: "reviewer-{N}"
   • Prompt: task description + CK Context Block

5. MONITOR via TaskCompleted hook events + TaskList fallback:

   • TaskCompleted events auto-notify when reviewers finish
   • Fallback: Check TaskList if no event received in 60s

6. SYNTHESIZE into: {CK_REPORTS_PATH}/review-{scope-slug}.md

   • Deduplicate findings across reviewers
   • Prioritize by severity: CRITICAL > IMPORTANT > MODERATE
   • Create action items list with owners

7. SHUTDOWN all teammates via SendMessage(type: "shutdown_request")

8. CLEANUP: TeamDelete (no parameters -- just call it)

9. REPORT: Tell user Review complete. {X} findings ({Y} critical). Report: {path}.

10. FOLLOW-UP: If the review changes durable process/context guidance, suggest ENTER UPDATE PROCESS MODE.

ON /vc:team debug <issue> [--debuggers N]:

Coordinates parallel debugger teammates using the absorbed root-cause-first debug workflow now owned by the debugger path.

IMMEDIATELY execute in order:

1. GENERATE N competing hypotheses from <issue> (default N=3):

   • Each hypothesis must be independently testable
   • Each must predict different observable symptoms
   • Frame as: "If , then we should see "

2. CALL TeamCreate(team_name: "debug-<issue-slug>")

3. CALL TaskCreate x N -- one per hypothesis:

   • Subject: Debug: Test hypothesis -- <theory>
   • Description: Investigate hypothesis: <theory>. For issue: <issue>. ADVERSARIAL: actively try to disprove other theories. Message other debuggers to challenge findings. Report evidence FOR and AGAINST your theory. Save findings to: {CK_REPORTS_PATH}/debugger-{N}-{CK_NAME_PATTERN}-{issue-slug}.md. Mark task completed when done.

4. SPAWN debugger teammates x N via Agent tool:

   • subagent_type: "debugger", model: "opus"
   • run_in_background: true
   • name: "debugger-{N}"
   • Prompt: task description + CK Context Block

5. MONITOR via TaskCompleted events. Debuggers should message each other -- let them converge.

   • TaskCompleted events notify as each hypothesis is tested
   • TeammateIdle events indicate debugger awaiting peer input
   • Fallback: Check TaskList if no events in 60s

6. READ all debugger reports. Identify surviving theory as root cause.

7. WRITE root cause report: {CK_REPORTS_PATH}/debug-{issue-slug}.md Format: Root cause, evidence chain, disproven hypotheses, recommended fix.

8. SHUTDOWN all teammates via SendMessage(type: "shutdown_request")

9. CLEANUP: TeamDelete (no parameters -- just call it)

10. REPORT: Tell user Debug complete. Root cause: <summary>. Report: {path}.

11. FOLLOW-UP: If the debug session produced durable process/context learnings, suggest ENTER UPDATE PROCESS MODE.

When to Use Agent Teams vs Subagents

Token Budget

Agent Memory

Teammates with memory: project in their agent definition retain learnings across team sessions. Memory persists in .Codex/agent-memory/<name>/ (gitignored). Useful for:

• Code reviewer remembering project conventions
• Debugger recalling past failure patterns
• Tester tracking flaky tests and coverage gaps
• Researcher accumulating domain knowledge

Memory persists after team cleanup -- it's in .Codex/agent-memory/, not ~/.Codex/teams/.

Worktree Isolation (Execute Template)

For implementation teams, isolation: "worktree" on the Agent tool gives each dev:

• Own git worktree -- isolated working directory, staging area, HEAD
• Own branch -- auto-created, returned in agent result
• No file conflicts -- devs can edit same files independently
• Safe parallel editing -- .git dir shared, everything else isolated

After all devs complete, lead merges branches sequentially. This is the safest pattern for parallel code changes.

Error Recovery

1. Check status: Shift+Up/Down (in-process) or click pane (split)
2. Redirect: Send direct message with corrective instructions
3. Replace: Shut down failed teammate, spawn replacement for same task
4. Reassign: TaskUpdate stuck task to unblock dependents

Abort Team

Shut down all teammates. Then call TeamDelete (no parameters).

If unresponsive: close terminal or kill session. Clean orphaned configs at ~/.Codex/teams/ manually.

Display Modes

• auto (default): split panes if in tmux, otherwise in-process
• in-process: all in one terminal. Shift+Up/Down navigate. Ctrl+T task list.
• tmux/split: each teammate own pane. Requires tmux or iTerm2.

Rules Reference

See process/development-protocols/orchestration.md for teammate coordination, status handling, and context-isolation rules.

v3.0.0: Agent tool migration, worktree isolation for execute devs, run_in_background spawning, updated model requirements.