From breaking perspective
Contract
| Field |
Bound contract |
| Trigger |
User wants an answer only from the breaking seat (stakeholders, dependencies, accounting, compatibility under destructive pressure). |
| Authority |
Read-only. No file, VCS, credential, paid, published, deployed, or remote mutation. |
| Side effect |
Returns a breaking-perspective analysis in chat. |
| Done |
Returns a breaking-perspective answer without blending. |
Inputs
The subject to analyze (a decision, design, change, or situation). Optional: the specific destructive pressure to apply (cost, removal, dependency failure, stakeholder withdrawal). Everything else is derived from the subject.
Procedure
- Identify the subject and the destructive pressure the user named. If the user named none, apply the full breaking seat: stakeholders, dependencies, accounting, and compatibility under destructive pressure. Done when: the subject and destructive pressure are identified, or the full seat is applied by default.
- Answer only from the breaking seat. Treat the subject as if the destructive pressure is actually applied: which stakeholders break, which dependencies fail, what the accounting shows under loss, and what stays compatible when parts are removed. Done when: the breaking-seat analysis covers stakeholders, dependencies, accounting, and compatibility.
- Do not blend other perspectives (business, codebase, impact, career, rent-seeking, innovation, stability, moat, human, skeptic) into the answer. Each lens answers only from its named seat; lenses are compared after their independent outputs, never mid-answer. Done when: no content from another lens appears in the answer.
- Stop when the breaking-seat analysis is complete. Do not recommend a decision or reconcile with other lenses; that is a later comparison step outside this skill. Done when: the analysis is complete with no recommendation or cross-lens reconciliation.
Failure and recovery
- Blended answer: if the output mixes another lens, restart from step 2 and remove the non-breaking content. The done predicate requires no blending.
- Missing subject: if no subject is supplied, ask for one. Do not invent a subject.
- No destructive pressure named and none derivable: apply the full breaking seat by default; this is not a failure.
Output
A breaking-perspective analysis covering stakeholders, dependencies, accounting, and compatibility under destructive pressure, with no content from other lenses.
1---2name: from-breaking-perspective3description: Use when a user wants an answer only from the breaking seat (stakeholders, dependencies, accounting, compatibility under destructive pressure). Not for any other from-* seat or multi-lens synthesis.4---56# From breaking perspective78## Contract910| Field | Bound contract |11|---|---|12| Trigger | User wants an answer only from the breaking seat (stakeholders, dependencies, accounting, compatibility under destructive pressure). |13| Authority | Read-only. No file, VCS, credential, paid, published, deployed, or remote mutation. |14| Side effect | Returns a breaking-perspective analysis in chat. |15| Done | Returns a breaking-perspective answer without blending. |1617## Inputs1819The subject to analyze (a decision, design, change, or situation). Optional: the specific destructive pressure to apply (cost, removal, dependency failure, stakeholder withdrawal). Everything else is derived from the subject.2021## Procedure22231. Identify the subject and the destructive pressure the user named. If the user named none, apply the full breaking seat: stakeholders, dependencies, accounting, and compatibility under destructive pressure. Done when: the subject and destructive pressure are identified, or the full seat is applied by default.242. Answer only from the breaking seat. Treat the subject as if the destructive pressure is actually applied: which stakeholders break, which dependencies fail, what the accounting shows under loss, and what stays compatible when parts are removed. Done when: the breaking-seat analysis covers stakeholders, dependencies, accounting, and compatibility.253. Do not blend other perspectives (business, codebase, impact, career, rent-seeking, innovation, stability, moat, human, skeptic) into the answer. Each lens answers only from its named seat; lenses are compared after their independent outputs, never mid-answer. Done when: no content from another lens appears in the answer.264. Stop when the breaking-seat analysis is complete. Do not recommend a decision or reconcile with other lenses; that is a later comparison step outside this skill. Done when: the analysis is complete with no recommendation or cross-lens reconciliation.2728## Failure and recovery29- Blended answer: if the output mixes another lens, restart from step 2 and remove the non-breaking content. The done predicate requires no blending.30- Missing subject: if no subject is supplied, ask for one. Do not invent a subject.31- **No destructive pressure named and none derivable**: apply the full breaking seat by default; this is not a failure.3233## Output34A breaking-perspective analysis covering stakeholders, dependencies, accounting, and compatibility under destructive pressure, with no content from other lenses.
OutlineDriven