Add Ivs Indicators

Add indicators to the values-survey pipeline (IVS / WVS, no version bump)

Adds new question codes to OWID's values-survey pipeline without bumping the version — you extend the current ivs/<version> step in place. The dataset holds two tables, and you pick which one you're adding to:

• integrated_values_surveys — the IVS (WVS + EVS merged trend). Source: the IVS .dta.
• world_values_survey — WVS-only questions (asked in WVS but absent from IVS). Source: the WVS Time-Series .dta.

Both tables live in the same ivs/<v> garden + grapher dataset, so variable titles must be unique across both tables (Step 5/6). The two paths differ in only a handful of places; everything else in this skill is identical. Pick the target first, then read each step with the right column:

Find the active versions: ls etl/steps/data/garden/ivs/ (shared garden/grapher dataset → <v>) and ls snapshots/wvs/ (WVS snapshot/meadow → <wv>).

Why this pipeline is unusual

Neither snapshot is a downloaded file — each is a CSV produced by a Stata script (*_create_file.do) that collapses survey microdata into country×year response shares (we publish only the aggregated shares, not the microdata — this also respects the WVS "no redistribution" license). So adding indicators means editing the .do, having the user run it in Stata (Claude cannot run Stata), then flowing the new columns through meadow → garden → grapher.

End-to-end flow (same for both targets):

edit <ivs|wvs>_create_file.do  →  USER runs it in Stata → regenerates the csv
  → re-snapshot (same version)  →  meadow VARS_DICT  →  garden constants + checks
  →  garden .meta.yml  →  etlr (meadow→garden→grapher)  →  [IVS only: Notion Available flags]

Paths below use <v> for the shared garden/grapher version (e.g. 2025-06-27) and <wv> for the WVS snapshot/meadow version (e.g. 2026-06-30).

Reference docs (kept out of git — *.pdf/*.xlsx are git-ignored)

Two documents make scale/wording verification easy. They normally sit in snapshots/ivs/<v>/ during an IVS update but are git-ignored, so they're not in the repo. If they aren't in the snapshot folder, ask the user for them (or download from worldvaluessurvey.org → Data and documentation → Data Download):

• Common EVS/WVS dictionary (…Common_EVS_WVS_Dictionary_IVS.xlsx) — maps each IVS code to its WVS-7 / EVS variable name (the Q-number) and label (sheet IVS_EVS_and_WVS_Variables). Path: Data Download → WVS/EVS Trend 1981-2022 → IVS documentation: IVS Common EVS-WVS dictionary.
• WVS-7 master questionnaire (…WVS-7_Master_Questionnaire_…English.pdf) — verbatim question stems + answer-category wording (look up by Q-number). Path: Data Download → Wave 7 (2017-2022) (matches the current IVS version) → Questionnaire link.
• EVS 2017 field questionnaire (ZA7500_q_gb.pdf, the Great Britain master) — the fallback for older EVS-only items that never made it into WVS-7 (so they're absent from the WVS-7 PDF). Look up by the EVS variable name / question number (e.g. the IVS E158 "concern about humankind" = EVS Q60, item v216 "the living conditions of all humans all over the world"). Source: europeanvaluesstudy.eu → Methodology, data, documentation → Survey 2017 → full release EVS2017 → participating countries → questionnaires. Ask the user for it if it's not in the snapshot folder.

To find which questionnaire a code lives in, check the dictionary's WVS-7 vs EVS columns: if the WVS-7 variable name is blank for that IVS code, it's EVS-only — go to the EVS questionnaire.

The 878 MB .dta is likewise git-ignored and must be present in snapshots/ivs/<v>/ locally to regenerate the CSV.

Step 0 — Verify scales against the .dta (NEVER from memory)

Model-recalled survey wording/scales are unreliable — verify. The authoritative code→category mapping for each variable lives in the .dta value labels. Read every code you're adding in one pass:

import pandas as pd
# IVS: snapshots/ivs/<v>/Integrated_values_surveys_1981-2022.dta   → convert_categoricals=True
# WVS: snapshots/wvs/<wv>/WVS_Time_Series_1981-2022_stata_v5_0.dta → convert_categoricals=False, then
#      inspect raw codes: WVS codes missing as NEGATIVES (-1 DK, -2 NA, -4 not asked, -5 missing); the
#      positive codes (and 0 where it's a real category, e.g. immigration G05x) are the substantive answers.
path = "snapshots/ivs/<v>/Integrated_values_surveys_1981-2022.dta"
# .dta is row-major: each read_stata() streams the whole 878 MB file once. Read EVERY code you
# need in ONE pass, then inspect each from the in-memory frame — NOT one read_stata() per code
# (that re-streams the 878 MB file per code: ~24 full passes for 24 codes, ~10x slower).
codes = ["C001", "C002", "H002_01"]  # all the codes you're adding
df = pd.read_stata(path, columns=codes, convert_categoricals=True)
for c in codes:
    print(c, list(df[c].cat.categories))   # order == code 1, 2, 3, … (the IVS coding)

(StataReader.value_labels() mapping is unreliable for these vars — use convert_categoricals=True.)

Key gotchas:

• IVS often collapses the raw WVS scale. E.g. C001/C002 are 5-point in the WVS-7 questionnaire but 3 categories in the IVS .dta (1 Agree · 2 Disagree · 3 Neither). Trust the .dta categories.
• Look-alike questions can have different scales. H002 neighborhood frequency = Very / Quite / Not / Not at all frequently; H008_02 ("felt unsafe at home") = Often / Sometimes / Rarely / Never — don't lump them into one block.
• Missing codes differ by survey. IVS: .a Don't know, .b No answer, .c/.d/.e excluded (negatives unused). WVS: -1 Don't know, -2 No answer, -3 not applicable, -4 not asked, -5 missing.
• Confirm the Q-number + verbatim wording from the dictionary + questionnaire (see Reference docs).

For the user-facing wording, prefer the fuller questionnaire text; for the answer/category names the .dta labels and questionnaire may differ slightly ("some respect" vs "fairly much respect") — they mean the same; pick per the user's preference.

Step 1 — Stata: snapshots/ivs/<v>/ivs_create_file.do

The .do follows one idiom per question group: define a global listing codes → a preserve-scoped block (a foreach loop for multi-item groups, or a custom block for a single question) that recodes to 0/1 dummies → collapse (mean) … [w=S017], by(year country) → save a tempfile → later merge 1:1 year country in the "Combine all the saved datasets" section. New codes must also be added to the master keep S002VS S002EVS S003 S017 $questions line.

WVS target? Edit snapshots/wvs/<wv>/wvs_create_file.do instead — same idiom, but the master keep is keep S002VS S003 S017 $questions (no S002EVS) and the missing-value handling differs: per question use keep if \var' >= -2 & `var' < .(drops -5/-4/-3 and system-missing; keeps substantive + DK + NA), thendont_know_ = (`var' == -1), no_answer_ = (`var' == -2), substantive dummies on the positive codes, and for avg_score questions gen avg_score_ = `var' if `var' >= 0` (so negative DK/NA are excluded from the mean). The structural-twin table below still applies — only the keep / DK / NA lines change.

Reuse the closest existing structural twin instead of inventing a block:

For a 10-pt block the three aggregates (>=7, 5\|6, <=4) + dont_know + no_answer partition to 100% — that's what check_sum_100 checks (avg_score is extra). For multinomial, the N option dummies + dont_know + no_answer sum to 100%. When several questions share the same option codes (e.g. E001/E002 "aims of country: 1st/2nd choice" both map 1–4 to the same four goals), put them in one loop.

Aggregate-name collisions: an aggregate must not collide with a category name. The closeness 4-pt scale has a category close (code 2), so the high aggregate (1|2) must be named feel_close, not close. Similarly check any not_* aggregate vs a not_* category before naming.

Aggregates and avg_score are NOT part of the check_sum_100 partition — only the mutually-exclusive categories + dont_know + no_answer sum to 100. Aggregates (worry_, feel_close_, agree_, at_least_weekly_…) are derived extras layered on top.

Stata name limits (this WILL bite you): local-macro / tempfile names are capped at 31 chars (variable names at 32). tempfile neighborhood_frequency_\var'_file(35) errors withr(198). Keep tempfile macro names short, e.g. nbhd_freq_`var'_file`.

Continuous indices (e.g. Y022 Welzel equality): keep the native scale; keep if Y022 < .; gen avg_score_<name> = Y022; collapse (mean) …; no DK/NA, no aggregate. Naming it avg_score_* makes the final replace \var' = `var'*100step skip it (that step multiplies everything **except**avg_score*`).

Each block's generated columns are {answer}_{CODE} for loops (meadow renames the CODE), or directly named for single-question custom blocks (e.g. secure_neighborhood, very_secure_neighborhood).

The user runs the edited .do in Stata to regenerate ivs.csv. You can sanity-check by reading the .dta in pandas and recomputing a couple of weighted means to diff against the produced CSV.

Step 2 — Re-snapshot (same version, no bump)

After the user regenerates ivs.csv (next to the .dta), first confirm the Stata run actually emitted your new columns before snapshotting — cheap insurance against a botched/partial .do run:

import pandas as pd
cols = set(pd.read_csv("snapshots/ivs/<v>/ivs.csv", nrows=0).columns)
# pre-rename raw names, i.e. {prefix}_{CODE} for loops + literal names for custom blocks
assert {"at_least_weekly_E248B", "agree_E217", "better_off_science_world", "concerned_humankind"} <= cols

Then re-snapshot:

.venv/bin/etls ivs/<v>/integrated_values_surveys --path-to-file snapshots/ivs/<v>/ivs.csv

This overwrites the .dvc md5/size in place (commit that diff with a 📊🤖 message). Delete the local ivs.csv after.

Step 3 — Meadow: etl/steps/data/meadow/ivs/<v>/integrated_values_surveys.py

Add entries to VARS_DICT ("CODE": "Readable label") only for codes used as column suffixes — i.e. the loop groups. The rename works by column.endswith(code), then snake_cases. Custom single-question blocks already produce final names, so they get no VARS_DICT entry. Check that no new code is a suffix of another (e.g. H002_01 vs H002_1 — fine; just be deliberate).

Labels: avoid : and other punctuation. rename_vars snake_cases in two steps — first a crude .str.lower().str.replace(" ", "_"), then tb.format() applies the real underscore(). A label like "Information source: Daily newspaper" ends up as information_source__daily_newspaper (the colon becomes a second underscore). Use colon-free labels ("Information source daily newspaper") so the final suffix is clean single-underscore (information_source_daily_newspaper), and put the nicely punctuated wording in the .meta.yml title/description_short instead. Codes with trailing letters (e.g. E248B, G007_18_B) work fine with endswith.

Step 4 — Garden: etl/steps/data/garden/ivs/<v>/integrated_values_surveys.py

Per categorical group add:

1. a suffix-list constant (the snake-cased item names),
2. a replace_dont_know_by_null(...) call — answers = the individual response categories (no aggregate, no DK/NA),
3. a check_sum_100(...) call — answers = individual categories + dont_know + no_answer.

check_sum_100 is the correctness gate: it fails loudly if a recode is wrong (categories must sum to 100%).

Derive the exact garden column suffixes (so the constants match meadow output) with the same transform meadow uses:

from owid.catalog.core.utils import underscore   # owid.catalog.utils path is deprecated
suffix = underscore("Information source daily newspaper")  # -> "information_source_daily_newspaper"

(apostrophes are dropped, hyphens → _; a colon would leave a double __, so keep labels colon-free.)

avg_score and the replace(0, NaN) step. Only indices where 0 is a genuine value need to be excluded from the 0→null replacement (WELZEL_EQUALITY_INDEX_COLUMNS, the 0–1 Welzel index). An ordinary avg_score_* on a 1–N scale (frequency 1–5, closeness 1–4, agree 1–10, …) never equals 0, so the replacement is a no-op for it — do not add those to the exclusion set. A truly continuous block also gets no replace_dont_know/check_sum.

Step 5 — Metadata: etl/steps/data/garden/ivs/<v>/integrated_values_surveys.meta.yml

Every new column needs an entry: title, single-quoted description_short (quote the question stem + answer options, double internal apostrophes for YAML), and display.name + <<: *common-display. Source the wording from the questionnaire PDF; the code→category order from the .dta. Index/unit-less columns (the avg_score_*) override unit: "" / short_unit: "" and numDecimalPlaces: 2; share columns inherit unit: "%" from &common-display. Generate the entries programmatically (it's 100s of columns) and append to the variables: block. To re-run the generator after a wording fix, splice cleanly: find the first new key in the file, truncate from there, and re-append the regenerated block (don't blindly append twice).

Enumerate the possible answers in every description_short. Don't stop at naming the response(s) the indicator measures — append the full set of options the respondent could choose, so each indicator is self-describing. Follow the IVS pattern: for categorical / Likert scales end the sentence with Possible answers are "<a>", "<b>", … and "<z>". (list them in the source order from the .dta value labels); for an N-point numeric scale state the anchored range instead (e.g. on a scale from 1 ("never justifiable") to 10 ("always justifiable")). This applies to every column in the block — the aggregates (agree_agg_*, never_just_agg_*, …), each individual category, and the dont_know / no_answer / avg_score columns — they all carry the same possible-answer clause; only the measured-response part differs. Pull the exact option wording from the .dta value labels (verify per Step 0), never from memory — e.g. WVS D066_01's fifth point is literally Disagree strongly, and F114E labels only the 1 and 10 endpoints. Same rule for IVS and WVS. This is a rule for new indicators you add — apply it as you write each entry.

Do not attempt an automated bulk back-fill of the possible-answers clause across the existing IVS indicators. Most already convey their answers (often inside the question quote, e.g. important-in-life ends "…very important, rather important, not very important or not at all important?"), so a blanket append is redundant; and mapping an existing shortName back to its source .dta code is trap-laden — suffixes collide (*_democratic_political_system is E117, not the 1–10 E236 *_democratic; *_secure_neighborhood is the H001 security scale, not the G007_18_B neighborhood-trust scale), and value-label wording can diverge from the pipeline's recode wording (E124 human-rights: labels say "There is a lot of respect…" while the columns use "a great deal of respect…"). It was tried once and deliberately skipped for these reasons.

Keep IVS and WVS at metadata parity. Any description_short house-style or convention you apply to one table's indicators, apply to the other's too — e.g. the possible-answers clause above was added to both the IVS and WVS blocks. When you improve or restyle the IVS metadata, mirror the change on WVS (and vice-versa) so the two blocks stay consistent, differing only in the survey-specific anchors (*_wvs) and the question wording.

Canonical shape of a variable entry (a WVS entry = the IVS entry plus the three *_wvs override lines; everything else is inherited from definitions.common, so don't re-specify it):

definitions:
  common:                                 # applied dataset-wide → inherited by BOTH tables
    presentation: {attribution_short: Integrated Values Surveys}   # IVS-worded
    processing_level: major
    description_key: [ …IVS-worded (merged WVS+EVS, IVS waves)… ]
    description_processing: | …IVS-worded…
    display: &common-display
      numDecimalPlaces: 1
      tolerance: 5
      entityAnnotationsMap: |-
        United Kingdom: England, Scotland, and Wales
    unit: "%"
    short_unit: "%"
  # WVS overrides (common is IVS-specific) — referenced per WVS variable:
  attribution_short_wvs: &attribution_short_wvs World Values Survey
  description_key_wvs: &description_key_wvs [ …WVS-worded… ]
  description_processing_wvs: &description_processing_wvs | …WVS-worded…

tables:
  integrated_values_surveys:              # IVS variable — inherits all of common
    variables:
      <short_name>:
        title: '<unique across BOTH tables>'
        description_short: '% of respondents … "<question stem>". Possible answers are "<a>", …, "<z>".'
        display:
          name: <short label>
          <<: *common-display
        presentation:
          topic_tags: *topic_tags_<topic>

  world_values_survey:                    # WVS variable — SAME shape + the 3 *_wvs overrides
    variables:
      <short_name>:
        title: '<unique across BOTH tables>'
        description_short: '% of respondents … "<question stem>". Possible answers are "<a>", …, "<z>".'
        description_key: *description_key_wvs                 # ← WVS-only override
        description_processing: *description_processing_wvs   # ← WVS-only override
        display:
          name: <short label>
          <<: *common-display
        presentation:
          attribution_short: *attribution_short_wvs           # ← WVS-only override
          topic_tags: *topic_tags_<topic>

      avg_score_<q>:                        # unit-less average column (either table)
        title: '…: average score'
        description_short: 'Average score … on a scale from 1 ("…") to 10 ("…").'
        display: {name: '…: average score', numDecimalPlaces: 2, <<: *common-display}
        unit: ""
        short_unit: ""
        presentation: {topic_tags: *topic_tags_<topic>}       # + attribution_short: *attribution_short_wvs on WVS

Battery questions — separate the prompt from the item. Many WVS/EVS questions read a generic prompt then list items (e.g. "…with the following statements? - Work is a duty…"). In description_short never leave a raw " - " separator and never let the item dangle straight after the "?" (e.g. …statements? Work is a duty…) — both read as two sentences mashed together. End the prompt's quote and re-open a quote for the item, picking the connector by what the item is:

Rationale: the deciding factor for statements is singular vs plural — a singular "the following statement?" already names its one statement so a connector is redundant (just drop the dash), while a plural battery needs the connector to say which item. The connector noun must fit the item: "when the thing was" reads badly, so use "regarding" (or a clean noun like "situation"/"characteristic"). Always use the comma form ", when the … was ", matching the pre-existing justifiable battery.

YAML quoting in a Python generator: keep RAW apostrophes in your strings and run them through one single-quote helper that doubles '→''. Do not hand-write 'Don''t know' in Python source — that's adjacent-string-literal concatenation and silently yields Dont know. After appending, re-parse the file with ruamel_load and assert the count + that a new avg_score_* entry shows unit == "" and the &common-display anchor resolved (e.g. numDecimalPlaces).

title must be UNIQUE across the whole dataset — and the dataset holds BOTH tables. Because integrated_values_surveys and world_values_survey share one grapher dataset, a WVS title must not clash with any IVS title (or vice-versa). WVS shares many concepts with IVS (worries, confidence, justifiable, …), so when you add a WVS question that duplicates an IVS concept, suffix the WVS title (e.g. … (World Values Survey)) to keep it unique; display.name may still repeat. Grapher enforces this at the --grapher upload (_adapt_table_for_grapher), not at the garden build, so a clash sails through check_sum_100 and only explodes at upload (AssertionError: Variable titles are not unique). The trap: an aggregate and a category that describe the same thing collide on title even when their column names differ. Real example from this work — the closeness category close_* and the high aggregate feel_close_* both wanted title: "Feel close to X". Fix: disambiguate the aggregate title ("Feel close to X (very close or close)") and keep the short label in display.name (only title must be unique — display.name may repeat). Assert title uniqueness in the pre-flight (Step 6), don't wait for the upload to catch it: titles=[e["title"] for e in vars.values()]; assert len(titles)==len(set(titles)).

Audit gotcha: verify any stated scale range against the actual .do recode — a pre-existing entry had "6 to 10" where the recode was >= 7. Don't copy ranges blindly.

Topic tags — assign per indicator, from the curated enum

presentation.topic_tags is not free text. Valid values are the enum in schemas/dataset-schema.json (the ~128 OWID topic pages — e.g. Women's Rights, Human Rights, Migration, Democracy, Religion, Internet, Technological Change, Loneliness & Social Connections, War & Peace, Terrorism, Corruption, Marriages & Divorces, LGBT+ Rights, Happiness & Life Satisfaction, Economic Inequality, Economic Growth, Climate Change, Time Use, Working Hours). Tags that exist in the grapher tags table but have no topic page (Values, Crime, News, Communication Technology) are invalid — they're silently dropped at upload with a create_links.missing_tags warning. Check every tag against the enum before writing it (see the Step 6 assertion).

IVS spans many topics, so do not leave the whole dataset on one tag (the legacy default was a single topic_tags: [Trust] in definitions.common). Tag per indicator:

• Anchor per distinct tag-set under definitions (the undp_hdr.meta.yml idiom), referenced per variable — generate it programmatically by mapping each garden question-group → tag-set:

  definitions:
    topic_tags_women_rights: &topic_tags_women_rights
      - Women's Rights
  # …
      gender_roles_var:
        presentation:
          topic_tags: *topic_tags_women_rights
  

  A per-question override dict handles splits within a group: justifiable divorce→Marriages & Divorces, homosexuality→LGBT+ Rights, cheating_on_taxes/accepting_a_bribe→Corruption; worries war/civil_war→War & Peace, terrorist_attack→Terrorism, losing_job→Work & Employment; media internet/email/mobile_phone→Internet; jobs-scarce men_more_right_to_a_job→Women's Rights, priority_to_nationals→Migration.
• Multiple tags are allowed — e.g. environment-vs-economy → [Climate Change, Economic Growth].
• No matching topic page → OMIT topic_tags entirely. For the soft-attitude / crime-fear batteries (Schwartz, important-in-life, neighbors, most-serious-problem, crime fear, traditional media) there is no topic page. Do not write Uncategorized — it's a valid enum value but has no DB tag row, so it links to nothing and logs a missing_tags warning per variable. Omitting gives the same result with no noise. Drop the now-empty presentation block when topic_tags was its only key.
• attribution_short survives. Setting only topic_tags on a variable does not wipe a common presentation.attribution_short — the combiner merges presentation key-by-key (_merge_variable_metadata merge_fields), so the common value still inherits.
• Sanity-check choices against what existing IVS charts already use (chart tags can include non-topic-page tags, so still filter your final pick through the enum):

  SELECT t.name, COUNT(DISTINCT c.id) FROM charts c
  JOIN chart_dimensions cd ON cd.chartId=c.id JOIN variables v ON cd.variableId=v.id
  JOIN chart_tags ct ON ct.chartId=c.id JOIN tags t ON ct.tagId=t.id
  WHERE v.catalogPath LIKE '%ivs/<v>/%' GROUP BY t.name ORDER BY 2 DESC;
  

Sweep the untagged pool against the FULL enum — many items have a non-obvious nearest-fit page. Don't stop at the obvious group→tag map. Print the whole topic_tags enum and walk each remaining untagged question against it; surprisingly specific pages exist. Real matches found this way (2026-06-03): justifiable suicide→Suicides, political_violence→War & Peace, parents_beating_children→Violence Against Children & Children's Rights, man_beating_wife→Women's Rights, invitro_fertilization→Fertility Rate; neighbours immigrant_foreign_workers→Migration, aids→HIV/AIDS, drug_addicts/drug_sale_in_streets→Illicit Drug Use, heavy_drinkers→Alcohol Consumption, racist_behavior→Human Rights; important-in-life work→Work & Employment, politics→Democracy, leisure_time→Time Use, friends/family→Loneliness & Social Connections; worry not_being_able_to_provide_good_education→Global Education. Present the candidate fits (clear vs. judgment-call) to the user/topic owner and let them confirm — they often know which existing charts already carry a tag (e.g. "our political-violence charts use War & Peace").

Add topic tags as SECONDARY tags to already-tagged items that also touch that topic (multi-tag, primary first). E.g. items mentioning religion that are primarily something else get Religion added alongside: religious_authorities_interpret_the_laws→[Democracy, Religion], confidence_churches / confidence_organization_of_the_islamic_world / trust_another_religion→[Trust, Religion], E220 science-vs-faith→[Technological Change, Religion]. Each distinct combo is its own anchor (topic_tags_trust_religion, …); reuse the existing single-tag anchor object when a variable's tag-set matches it.

Judge by what the indicator measures, not a keyword. Literal keyword matching over-reaches: family_victim_ of_a_crime mentions "family" but is a crime-victimisation question, not a family/social-connections one — don't tag it Loneliness & Social Connections. Same for "faith" inside a science item, etc. Flag the ambiguous ones to the user instead of auto-tagging.

Re-routing a tag → delete the orphan anchor. If you move a variable from one tag to another (invitro_fertilization: Medicine & Biotechnology → Fertility Rate), and the old anchor is now referenced by nothing, remove it from definitions so no dead anchors linger.

Tag edits are metadata-only — the data://grapher dataset must be rebuilt or the DB won't update (see Step 7's gotcha): etlr grapher://… --grapher --force --only alone re-uploads the stale built dataset and every variable is skipped_no_changes. Rebuild data://grapher (delete its output dir if unsure), then upload, then verify links landed in tags_variables_topic_tags. It's normal and fine to leave a large share untagged when no page fits (values/morality batteries, generic crime-fear, traditional media) — don't force a bad tag.

Step 6 — Pre-flight cross-check (before running the pipeline)

Assert the set of new column names is identical across three places, or you get silent breakage: (a) what Stata+meadow produce, (b) the garden check_sum_100/replace_dont_know groups, (c) the .meta.yml keys. Reconstruct (a) directly from the .do collapse lists — every column the loop emits is {prefix}_{underscore(VARS_DICT_label)} for loop groups, or the literal name for custom blocks — then diff against the meta keys:

from owid.catalog.core.utils import underscore
from etl.files import ruamel_load

# the exact (prefix list) per group, mirroring each .do collapse line (incl. aggregates + avg_score)
GROUPS = {("E248B", "E254B", ...): ["at_least_weekly", "less_than_weekly", "daily", ..., "avg_score"], ...}
LABELS = {"E248B": "Information source daily newspaper", ...}  # == meadow VARS_DICT
stata = {f"{p}_{underscore(LABELS[c])}" for codes, prefs in GROUPS.items() for c in codes for p in prefs}
stata |= {f"{p}_humankind" for p in [...]}            # custom blocks: literal names, no rename

meta = ruamel_load(open("etl/steps/data/garden/ivs/<v>/integrated_values_surveys.meta.yml").read())
# Pick the table you're editing: "integrated_values_surveys" (IVS) or "world_values_survey" (WVS).
TABLE = "integrated_values_surveys"
metakeys = set(meta["tables"][TABLE]["variables"])
print("stata not meta:", sorted(stata - metakeys) or "none ✓")
print("meta not stata:", sorted(metakeys - stata) or "none ✓")   # restrict metakeys to the new ones
# also: assert no new code endswith another new code (rename ambiguity)
# and assert ALL titles are unique across BOTH tables (one shared grapher dataset — see Step 5):
titles = [v["title"] for t in meta["tables"].values() for v in t["variables"].values()]
assert len(titles) == len(set(titles)), "duplicate variable titles — grapher upload will fail"

# and: every topic_tag must be in the curated schema enum (else it's silently dropped at upload)
import json
schema = json.load(open("schemas/dataset-schema.json"))
TAG_ENUM = set(schema["properties"]["tables"]["additionalProperties"]["properties"]["variables"]
               ["additionalProperties"]["properties"]["presentation"]["properties"]["topic_tags"]["items"]["enum"])
for v in meta["tables"]["integrated_values_surveys"]["variables"].values():
    for t in (v.get("presentation") or {}).get("topic_tags", []):
        assert t in TAG_ENUM, f"invalid topic_tag {t!r} — not a topic page in dataset-schema.json"

A clean both-empty diff (counts equal) + unique titles means the Stata→meadow output, the garden groups, and the meta keys agree, and the grapher upload won't trip the title-uniqueness assert — all before a single pipeline step runs.

Step 7 — Run & verify

.venv/bin/etlr integrated_values_surveys  # meadow→garden→grapher
.venv/bin/etlr integrated_values_surveys --grapher  # upload to staging grapher

• Two separate gates: the build (first command) runs check_sum_100 in garden (green = recodes sum to 100%). The --grapher upload (second command) runs additional grapher-only validations — notably title uniqueness — so always run it too; a title clash only surfaces here. Don't stop at the build.
• Spot-check ranges by loading the garden dataset: share columns 0–100; each avg_score on its native scale (frequency 1–5, closeness 1–4, agree 1–10, index 0–1).
• The benign DisplayNameWarning about presentation.title_public (1000+ columns) is expected — IVS doesn't set title_public; not an error.
• Metadata-only changes (e.g. topic_tags) need the data://grapher dataset rebuilt — grapher://… --only is not enough. etlr grapher://… --grapher --force --only forces only the upload step, and --only skips its data://grapher build dependency, so it re-uploads the stale grapher dataset (every variable skipped_no_changes) and the new tags never reach the DB. Rebuild the built dataset itself — etlr data://grapher/ivs/<v>/integrated_values_surveys --force --only (delete data/grapher/ivs/<v>/integrated_values_surveys/ first if in doubt) — then run the --grapher upload. Confirm the links actually landed (and that omitted/Uncategorized columns produced no create_links.missing_tags warnings):

  from etl.config import OWID_ENV
  print(OWID_ENV.read_sql("""SELECT t.name, COUNT(DISTINCT v.id) n FROM variables v
    JOIN tags_variables_topic_tags tv ON tv.variableId=v.id JOIN tags t ON t.id=tv.tagId
    WHERE v.catalogPath LIKE '%%ivs/<v>/%%' GROUP BY t.name ORDER BY n DESC""").to_string())
  

• make check before committing.

Step 8 — Git (per repo CLAUDE.md)

.venv/bin/etl pr "Add … indicators to Integrated Values Surveys" data   # no emoji in title with a category
git add … && git commit -m "✨🤖 …"   # 📊🤖 for the snapshot/.dvc regen
git push

Post @codex review as a separate PR comment; keep the PR body in sync with substantial pushes.

Step 9 — Notion Available dictionary (required — IVS only)

WVS target: skip this step entirely — there is no Notion Available tracker for world_values_survey. For IVS this is not optional — always finish the job by flipping the flags so the dictionary reflects what's actually in the dataset.

The Integrated Values Surveys dictionary Notion DB (collection://fd3a1354-9da6-48e7-91bb-a0665ddd0f0b) has an Available checkbox per code. Flip Available = ✅ only for codes that survive into the garden dataset = the .do keep list minus items excluded in drop_indicators_and_replace_nans. The reliable way to get that set is to read the garden table columns and reverse-map to base codes — a .do-only list over-counts (e.g. ds E069* keeps E069_64/"Elections" which produces no column, and ~8 confidence items are dropped in garden). Beware substring false-positives when reverse-matching ("elections" matches ..._free_elections); verify the exact column exists before flipping. The Notion MCP has no bulk row query — fetch/update per row (notion-search returns titles only; notion-fetch returns Available; notion-update-page with command="update_properties", properties={"Available":"__YES__"}). The row's Answers field is a handy independent cross-check of your recode mapping.

Each row's title is exactly the code (the Variable title property). Find a row by searching the data source for the code (notion-search with data_source_url=collection://…), but match the title EXACTLY — search is fuzzy and returns look-alikes (E248B query also returns E248; G062 returns F062/D062; E001 returns Y001/F001). Updates are independent per page, so fire all of them in parallel (one notion-update-page per code). Verify with one notion-fetch afterward that Available reads "__YES__".

Step 10 — Indicator → admin-link table (share with reviewers / PR comment)

After the upload, produce a compact one-row-per-question table that links each response option to its Grapher admin page — handy for a PR comment or a hand-off to a topic reviewer. A generic script lives at scripts/indicator_admin_table.py (next to this skill) — it hardcodes no indicators. Edit only the small CONFIG block (VERSION, BRANCH, ENV) and run it:

.venv/bin/python .claude/skills/add-ivs-indicators/scripts/indicator_admin_table.py

It works in three moves, all auto-derived:

1. Which variables did the PR create? Diff the garden .meta.yml variable keys between master and the PR branch (one entry per variable): meta_keys(BRANCH) - meta_keys("master"). Robust even when the working tree is on master (it uses git show <ref>:<file>).
2. Resolve variable ids from the Grapher DB and cluster columns into questions. Loop-group columns → IVS code via the branch meadow VARS_DICT (it reverses {underscore(label): code} and matches the longest column suffix, so family_victim_of_a_crime beats victim_of_a_crime). Custom single-question blocks (no VARS_DICT entry, so the column carries no code) are clustered by stripping a generic IVS recode-prefix vocabulary and keyed by their column suffix; their label is derived from the variable names.
3. Label and order each option link. Link text is the option's real category name (strip the per-question shared prefix / a parenthetical suffix from the variable name; fixed text for dk/na/avg; humanised recode key as last resort) — so e.g. E124 shows "Fairly much respect", not the terse key some. Order within a question: aggregates first (positive rollup before negative), Yes before No, then the remaining categories, then Don't know / No answer / average score.
4. Emit | IVS code | Question | option links | rows — one flat table by default.

Three optional dicts in CONFIG add editorial polish without reintroducing hardcoded indicators: TOPICS = {"Human Rights": ["E124", ...], ...} (group/order rows), LABELS = {code_or_suffix: "…"} (nicer question wording), and CODE_FOR = {custom_suffix: "IVS_CODE"} (give custom blocks like humankind→E158, science_world→E234, secure_neighborhood→H001 their real code). PR #6180's output used all three; with them empty you still get a complete, correct table.

**Staging vs production differ only in the DB connection +

…(truncated)