AI Readiness!
Persona:!
AI Strategist — Inspired by the ai-readiness skill from anthropics/financial-services. Masters AI adoption frameworks, maturity assessment, and value creation through AI.
Core Philosophy: AI readiness isn't about having GPUs — it's about culture, data, and leadership. Assess the COMPANY, not the tech stack.
Overview
Assesses portfolio company AI readiness across 5 dimensions: Strategy, Data, Tech, Culture, ROI. Outputs maturity score (1-5) and roadmap.
Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "I'll figure it out as I go" | A structured approach saves time and reduces errors. Follow the workflow in this skill rather than improvising. |
| "I already know this topic" | Familiarity breeds shortcuts. Use the checklist to verify you haven't missed critical steps. |
| "This doesn't apply to my situation" | The patterns here generalize across contexts. Adapt, don't skip — the underlying principles hold. |
| "One more tool will fix it" | Adding complexity rarely solves process gaps. Master the core workflow first. |
When to Use
Trigger phrases:
"ai readiness"
"Due diligence (pre-investment)"
"Board presentation (AI strategy update)"
"Portfolio company assessment (annual)"
Due diligence (pre-investment)
Board presentation (AI strategy update)
Portfolio company assessment (annual)
Value creation planning (AI-driven)
Strategic review (underperforming AI adoption)
Investment committee memo (AI thesis)
When NOT to Use:!
- Earnings analysis (use
financial/earnings-viewer) - Building DCF models (use
financial/model-builder) - General portfolio monitoring (use
financial/portfolio-monitor) - Pitch deck creation (use
financial/pitch-deck)
Implementation:!
The implementation follows a phased approach: assess strategy, data, tech, culture, and ROI across the five AI readiness dimensions.
Phase 1: Strategy Assessment!
AI Strategy Scorecard:
strategy_assessment = {
"vision": {
"score": 4, # 1-5
"evidence": "CEO committed, AI-first messaging",
"gap": "No AI KPIs linked to exec comp"
},
"governance": {
"score": 3,
"evidence": "AI steering committee exists",
"gap": "No AI risk framework documented"
},
"roadmap": {
"score": 5,
"evidence": "3 AI products launched 2024",
"gap": "No 2026-2027 AI roadmap yet"
}
}
Phase 2: Data Maturity!
Data Readiness:
data_assessment = {
"infrastructure": {
"score": 3, # 1-5
"details": "Data lake exists, but siloed",
"gap": "No unified data warehouse"
},
"quality": {
"score": 4,
"details": "95% clean customer data",
"gap": "5% products missing category tags"
},
"governance": {
"score": 2,
"details": "No data lineage tracking",
"gap": "Implement data catalog + lineage"
}
}
Phase 3: Tech Stack!
AI/ML Capabilities:
tech_assessment = {
"mlops": {
"score": 3,
"tools": "Basic MLflow, limited automation",
"gap": "No model registry, no A/B testing"
},
"infrastructure": {
"score": 4,
"cloud": "AWS (SageMaker)",
"gap": "No GPU cluster for training"
},
"talent": {
"score": 3,
"headcount": "5 data scientists, 2 ML engineers",
"gap": "No Chief AI Officer"
}
}
Phase 4: ROI Analysis!
AI Value Creation:
roi_analysis = {
"cost_savings": {
"2023": 500000, # $500K
"2024": 1200000, # $1.2M
"2025_pct": 8000000, # $8M projected
"roi": "3.5x" # Return on AI investment
},
"revenue_growth": {
"ai_products": "$12M (15% of revenue)",
"growth_rate": "80% YoY",
"target": "25% of revenue by 2027"
}
}
Phase 5: Maturity Score!
Overall AI Readiness (1-5):
maturity_score = {
"overall": 3.4, # Weighted average
"strategy": 4.0,
"data": 3.0,
"tech": 3.5,
"culture": 3.0,
"roi": 4.0
}
# Interpretation:
# 1.0-1.9 = AI Novice (avoid or heavy discount)
# 2.0-2.9 = AI Explorer (monitor closely)
# 3.0-3.9 = AI Adopter (standard weighting)
# 4.0-4.9 = AI Leader (premium valuation)
# 5.0 = AI Native (top-tier valuation)
Phase 6: Roadmap!
AI Roadmap (100-Day Plan):
# AI Roadmap: [Company Name]
## Quick Wins (0-30 Days)
1. ✅ Appoint Chief AI Officer
2. ✅ Launch data catalog (lineage tracking)
3. ✅ Set AI KPIs for exec team
## Foundation (30-60 Days)
1. Build unified data warehouse (Snowflake/BigQuery)
2. Implement MLOps (model registry + A/B testing)
3. Hire 3 more ML engineers
## Scale (60-100 Days)
1. Launch 3 AI products (generative AI features)
2. Achieve $20M AI revenue run-rate
3. Target AI Readiness: 4.0+ (up from 3.4)
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "They have GPUs, they're AI-ready" | GPUs ≠ strategy/culture/data — assess ALL 5 dimensions |
| "AI readiness is a tech checklist" | Culture = #1 predictor of AI success (people, not tools) |
| "Startup, skip assessment" | Early-stage = biggest AI upsie potential OR downfall |
| "5.0 is the goal always" | 3.5-4.0 is plenty for most B2B companies |
Red Flags
- AI readiness < 2.0 (novice — heavy discount or pass)
- No AI strategy (CEO doesn't mention AI in earnings)
- Data quality < 80% (garbage in, garbage out)
- No AI talent (0 data scientists/ML engineers)
- ROI < 1.5x (AI investment losing money!)
- No AI KPIs (not measured = not managed)
- Culture score < 2.5 (leaders don't understand AI)
Verification
After completing AI readiness assessment, confirm:
- Strategy assessed: vision, governance, roadmap (all 1-5 scored)
- Data assessed: infrastructure, quality, governance (all scored)
- Tech assessed: MLOps, infrastructure, talent (all scored)
- Culture assessed: leadership, talent, adoption (all scored)
- ROI calculated: cost savings, revenue growth, ROI multiple
- Overall score: 1-5 with weighted breakdown
- Roadmap: 100-day plan with quick wins + foundation + scale
- Report generated: 3-5 pages, maturity score highlighted
- Investment thesis: AI impact assessed (strengthens/weakens/neutral)
Integration Points:!
Cross-Skill References:
financial/model-builder— For AI-driven revenue in DCFfinancial/meeting-prep— For board presentationtrading/black-edge— For AI competitive intelligencereferences/trading-checklist.md— For AI investment risk!
MCP Server Integrations:
- PitchBook MCP — For AI company comps
- S&P Global MCP — For AI sector analysis
- FactSet MCP — For AI adoption benchmarking!
Load references/trading-checklist.md for complete trading checklists (strategy, risk, execution, portfolio).
Cross-reference: For comprehensive multi-asset financial analysis, risk management, and institutional-grade frameworks, see financial/all-in-one-finance (16 modules) and financial/wolf-finance (22 modules).
Process
- Analyze the task requirements
- Apply domain expertise
- Verify output quality