Overview
API testing for REST and GraphQL endpoints. Covers contract testing, schema validation, authentication testing, error handling, and performance assertions.
Capabilities
- Write API contract tests for REST and GraphQL
- Validate response schemas and status codes
- Test authentication and authorization flows
- Check rate limiting and error handling
- Automate API regression testing in CI
When to Use
Trigger phrases:
"api testing"
"REST and GraphQL API testing — contract testing, schema validation, and integrat"
Building or consuming REST/GraphQL APIs
Need to verify API contracts between services
API breaking changes need detection before deploy
Testing auth flows and permission boundaries
When NOT to Use
- Task is about deployment, not development (use deploy skills)
- Task is about code review, not writing (use review skills)
- You need to understand existing code first (use research skills)
- Task is about testing only (use test skills)
- Requirements are unclear (clarify first)
- Task is trivially simple (single line fix)
Pseudo Code
The api-testing workflow follows a standard pipeline pattern.
Core flow:
# api-testing primary flow
input = prepare(raw_data)
result = process(input, config={api, automation, contract, graphql, integration})
validate(result)
deliver(result)
Error handling:
on error:
log(error_details)
retry_with_backoff(max=3)
if still_failing: alert_and_escalate()
REST Contract Test
def test_user_api_contract(response):
assert response.status_code == 200
assert response.json() == {
"id": int,
"email": str,
"name": str,
"created_at": str # ISO 8601
}
GraphQL Test
def test_graphql_query():
query = """
query GetUser($id: ID!) {
user(id: $id) { id name email }
}
"""
result = graphql_execute(query, variables={"id": "1"})
assert result["data"]["user"]["id"] == "1"
Common Patterns
- Contract first: Define API schema before implementation
- Status code coverage: Test 200, 201, 400, 401, 403, 404, 500
- Auth boundary tests: Verify protected endpoints reject unauthenticated requests
- Idempotency tests: POST requests should be safe to retry
How to Use
- Understand the requirement and existing codebase patterns
- Design the solution with error handling and testability in mind
- Implement incrementally with tests for each change
- Verify against expected outcomes (manual and automated)
- Document usage, edge cases, and integration points
- Review with team before merging to shared branches
Red Flags
- Skipping tests to ship faster: Untested code breaks in production when you least expect it
- No error handling in production code: Unhandled errors crash services and lose user data
- Hardcoded configuration values: Hardcoded values prevent environment switching and leak secrets
- Ignoring security implications: Missing input validation, auth bypasses, and injection vulnerabilities
- Over-engineering simple solutions: Premature abstraction adds complexity without proportional benefit
Verification
Process
- Analyze the task requirements
- Apply domain expertise
- Verify output quality
Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization |
Reality |
| "Tests slow me down" |
Bugs slow you down 10x more. Tests are speed, not overhead. |
| "I will refactor later" |
Technical debt compounds. Refactor as you go. |
| "It works on my machine" |
If it is not in CI, it does not work. Ship proof, not claims. |
1---2name: api-testing3description: Use when rEST and GraphQL API testing — contract testing, schema validation, and integration test automation. Use when working with api testing.4license: Apache-2.05---6789## Overview1011API testing for REST and GraphQL endpoints. Covers contract testing, schema validation, authentication testing, error handling, and performance assertions.1213## Capabilities1415- Write API contract tests for REST and GraphQL16- Validate response schemas and status codes17- Test authentication and authorization flows18- Check rate limiting and error handling19- Automate API regression testing in CI2021## When to Use22**Trigger phrases:**23- "api testing"24- "REST and GraphQL API testing — contract testing, schema validation, and integrat"252627- Building or consuming REST/GraphQL APIs28- Need to verify API contracts between services29- API breaking changes need detection before deploy30- Testing auth flows and permission boundaries3132## When NOT to Use3334- Task is about deployment, not development (use deploy skills)35- Task is about code review, not writing (use review skills)36- You need to understand existing code first (use research skills)37- Task is about testing only (use test skills)38- Requirements are unclear (clarify first)39- Task is trivially simple (single line fix)404142## Pseudo Code4344The api-testing workflow follows a standard pipeline pattern.4546Core flow:47```48# api-testing primary flow49input = prepare(raw_data)50result = process(input, config={api, automation, contract, graphql, integration})51validate(result)52deliver(result)53```5455Error handling:56```57on error:58 log(error_details)59 retry_with_backoff(max=3)60 if still_failing: alert_and_escalate()61```626364### REST Contract Test65```python66def test_user_api_contract(response):67 assert response.status_code == 20068 assert response.json() == {69 "id": int,70 "email": str,71 "name": str,72 "created_at": str # ISO 860173 }74```7576### GraphQL Test77```python78def test_graphql_query():79 query = """80 query GetUser($id: ID!) {81 user(id: $id) { id name email }82 }83 """84 result = graphql_execute(query, variables={"id": "1"})85 assert result["data"]["user"]["id"] == "1"86```8788## Common Patterns8990- **Contract first**: Define API schema before implementation91- **Status code coverage**: Test 200, 201, 400, 401, 403, 404, 50092- **Auth boundary tests**: Verify protected endpoints reject unauthenticated requests93- **Idempotency tests**: POST requests should be safe to retry9495## How to Use96971. Understand the requirement and existing codebase patterns982. Design the solution with error handling and testability in mind993. Implement incrementally with tests for each change1004. Verify against expected outcomes (manual and automated)1015. Document usage, edge cases, and integration points1026. Review with team before merging to shared branches103104## Red Flags105106- **Skipping tests to ship faster**: Untested code breaks in production when you least expect it107- **No error handling in production code**: Unhandled errors crash services and lose user data108- **Hardcoded configuration values**: Hardcoded values prevent environment switching and leak secrets109- **Ignoring security implications**: Missing input validation, auth bypasses, and injection vulnerabilities110- **Over-engineering simple solutions**: Premature abstraction adds complexity without proportional benefit111112## Verification113114- [ ] Skill output matches expected behavior115116## Process1171181. Analyze the task requirements1192. Apply domain expertise1203. Verify output quality121122## Anti-Rationalization Table123124| Rationalization | Reality |125|---|---|126| "Tests slow me down" | Bugs slow you down 10x more. Tests are speed, not overhead. |127| "I will refactor later" | Technical debt compounds. Refactor as you go. |128| "It works on my machine" | If it is not in CI, it does not work. Ship proof, not claims. |