Conducting Phishing Incident Response
Overview
Cybersecurity skill for conducting phishing incident response. Follows industry best practices and security standards.
When to Use
Trigger phrases:
"conducting phishing incident response"
"Responds to phishing incidents by analyzing reported emails, extracting indicato"
A user reports receiving a suspicious email via the phishing report button or abuse mailbox
Email gateway detects a malicious email that bypassed initial filtering
Threat intelligence indicates an active phishing campaign targeting the organization
A user confirms they clicked a link or opened an attachment from a suspicious email
Credentials have been entered on a suspected phishing page
Do not use for business email compromise (BEC) involving compromised internal accounts; use BEC response procedures which focus on account takeover investigation.
When NOT to Use
- When you lack proper authorization for testing
- For production systems without change management
- When the task requires legal or compliance expertise beyond technical scope
Prerequisites
- Email security gateway with message trace and quarantine capabilities (Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint, Mimecast)
- Microsoft 365 admin access or Google Workspace admin for mailbox search and purge
- Malware sandbox for attachment and URL analysis (ANY.RUN, Joe Sandbox, Hybrid Analysis)
- Email header analysis tools (MXToolbox Header Analyzer, Google Admin Toolbox)
- Identity provider access for account remediation (Azure AD, Okta, Duo)
- Phishing report intake process (dedicated mailbox or integrated report button)
Workflow
# Example: IOC detection
import re
IOC_PATTERNS = {
"ip": r"\b(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\b",
"domain": r"\b[a-z0-9-]+\.[a-z]{2,}\b",
"hash_md5": r"\b[a-f0-9]{32}\b",
"hash_sha256": r"\b[a-f0-9]{64}\b",
}
def extract_iocs(text: str) -> dict:
return {k: re.findall(v, text) for k, v in IOC_PATTERNS.items()}
- Scope the Analysis — Define what phishing incident response artifacts or data sources to examine and the investigation timeline.
- Preserve Evidence — Create forensic copies of relevant data. Maintain chain of custody documentation.
- Extract Key Indicators — Parse and extract relevant phishing incident response data points from collected artifacts.
- Correlate Findings — Cross-reference extracted data with other sources (threat intel, logs, timelines).
- Build Timeline — Construct a chronological sequence of events related to phishing incident response.
- Document Analysis — Write findings report with evidence, conclusions, and recommendations.
Tools
- Forensic Toolkit — Evidence collection and analysis
- Timeline Tools — Chronological event reconstruction
- Log Analysis Platform — Centralized log parsing and search
Process
- Reconnaissance — Gather target information, identify attack surface, enumerate services
- Analysis/Exploitation — Execute the technique, analyze results, document findings
- Reporting — Document IOCs, write findings, provide remediation recommendations
Verification
Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization |
Reality |
| "We are too small to be targeted" |
Automated attacks target everyone. Size does not matter. |
| "Security slows us down" |
A breach slows you down 100x more. Build security in from the start. |
| "We will fix it after launch" |
Vulnerabilities in production are exploited within hours. Fix before deploy. |
1---2name: conducting-phishing-incident-response3description: Use when responding to phishing incidents by analyzing reported emails, extracting indicators, assessing credential compromise, quarantining malicious messages across the organization, and remediating affected accounts. Covers email header analysis, URL/attachment sandboxing, and mailbox-wide purge operations. Activates for requests involving phishing response, email incident, credential phishing, spear phishing investigation, or phishing remediation.4license: Apache-2.05---67# Conducting Phishing Incident Response89## Overview1011Cybersecurity skill for conducting phishing incident response. Follows industry best practices and security standards.1213## When to Use14**Trigger phrases:**15- "conducting phishing incident response"16- "Responds to phishing incidents by analyzing reported emails, extracting indicato"171819- A user reports receiving a suspicious email via the phishing report button or abuse mailbox20- Email gateway detects a malicious email that bypassed initial filtering21- Threat intelligence indicates an active phishing campaign targeting the organization22- A user confirms they clicked a link or opened an attachment from a suspicious email23- Credentials have been entered on a suspected phishing page2425**Do not use** for business email compromise (BEC) involving compromised internal accounts; use BEC response procedures which focus on account takeover investigation.262728## When NOT to Use2930- When you lack proper authorization for testing31- For production systems without change management32- When the task requires legal or compliance expertise beyond technical scope333435## Prerequisites3637- Email security gateway with message trace and quarantine capabilities (Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Proofpoint, Mimecast)38- Microsoft 365 admin access or Google Workspace admin for mailbox search and purge39- Malware sandbox for attachment and URL analysis (ANY.RUN, Joe Sandbox, Hybrid Analysis)40- Email header analysis tools (MXToolbox Header Analyzer, Google Admin Toolbox)41- Identity provider access for account remediation (Azure AD, Okta, Duo)42- Phishing report intake process (dedicated mailbox or integrated report button)4344## Workflow4546```python47# Example: IOC detection48import re4950IOC_PATTERNS = {51 "ip": r"\b(?:\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}\b",52 "domain": r"\b[a-z0-9-]+\.[a-z]{2,}\b",53 "hash_md5": r"\b[a-f0-9]{32}\b",54 "hash_sha256": r"\b[a-f0-9]{64}\b",55}5657def extract_iocs(text: str) -> dict:58 return {k: re.findall(v, text) for k, v in IOC_PATTERNS.items()}59```60611. **Scope the Analysis** — Define what phishing incident response artifacts or data sources to examine and the investigation timeline.622. **Preserve Evidence** — Create forensic copies of relevant data. Maintain chain of custody documentation.633. **Extract Key Indicators** — Parse and extract relevant phishing incident response data points from collected artifacts.644. **Correlate Findings** — Cross-reference extracted data with other sources (threat intel, logs, timelines).655. **Build Timeline** — Construct a chronological sequence of events related to phishing incident response.666. **Document Analysis** — Write findings report with evidence, conclusions, and recommendations.6768## Tools6970- **Forensic Toolkit** — Evidence collection and analysis71- **Timeline Tools** — Chronological event reconstruction72- **Log Analysis Platform** — Centralized log parsing and search737475## Process76771. **Reconnaissance** — Gather target information, identify attack surface, enumerate services781. **Analysis/Exploitation** — Execute the technique, analyze results, document findings791. **Reporting** — Document IOCs, write findings, provide remediation recommendations8081## Verification8283- [ ] All phishing incident response procedures executed completely and documented84- [ ] Findings validated against multiple data sources85- [ ] False positives identified and filtered86- [ ] Results documented with evidence and timestamps87- [ ] Recommendations provided with risk-based prioritization8889## Anti-Rationalization Table9091| Rationalization | Reality |92|---|---|93| "We are too small to be targeted" | Automated attacks target everyone. Size does not matter. |94| "Security slows us down" | A breach slows you down 100x more. Build security in from the start. |95| "We will fix it after launch" | Vulnerabilities in production are exploited within hours. Fix before deploy. |