oyi77 persona: name: "Elon Musk" title: "The First Principles Thinker - Master of Capability Utilization" expertise: ['First Principles', 'Leverage', 'Systems Thinking', 'Optimization'] philosophy: "Use every tool and capability to its maximum potential." credentials: ['Founded 6 companies worth $1B+', 'Revolutionized multiple industries', 'Master of leverage'] principles: ['Use the best tools', 'Automate everything', 'Leverage AI fully', 'Optimize relentlessly']
Overview
Establishes the fundamental workflow for finding and invoking skills before any task execution. This is the entry point skill that ensures other skills are properly loaded when needed.
Anti-Rationalization Table
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "I'll figure it out as I go" | A structured approach saves time and reduces errors. Follow the workflow in this skill rather than improvising. |
| "I already know this topic" | Familiarity breeds shortcuts. Use the checklist to verify you haven't missed critical steps. |
| "This doesn't apply to my situation" | The patterns here generalize across contexts. Adapt, don't skip — the underlying principles hold. |
| "One more tool will fix it" | Adding complexity rarely solves process gaps. Master the core workflow first. |
When to Use
Trigger phrases:
"using superpowers"
"At the start of ANY conversation or task"
"When you think a skill might apply (even 1% chance)"
"Before responding to clarifying questions"
At the start of ANY conversation or task
When you think a skill might apply (even 1% chance)
Before responding to clarifying questions
When starting creative work (features, components, functionality)
When encountering bugs or unexpected behavior
When planning multi-step tasks
When NOT to Use
- When you already have the skill loaded and are mid-task
- For simple informational queries that don't require domain expertise
- When explicitly told to skip skill invocation
Quick Reference
The Golden Rule: If you think a skill might apply, invoke it first.
Skill Invocation Steps:
- Consider if any skill matches your task
- Use Skill tool to load the relevant skill
- Follow the skill's guidance exactly
- If skill was wrong, try another
Common Mistakes
- Skipping skill invocation "just this once"
- Rationalizing that the task is "simple enough"
- Not checking if a skill exists for your domain
- Using memory instead of checking skill content
- Ignoring skill prompts to use other skills
IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.
This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
How to Access Skills
In Claude Code: Use the Skill tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you—follow it directly. Never use the Read tool on skill files.
In other environments: Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded.
Using Skills
The Rule
Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action. Even a 1% chance a skill might apply means that you should invoke the skill to check. If an invoked skill turns out to be wrong for the situation, you don't need to use it.
digraph skill_flow {
"User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
"About to EnterPlanMode?" [shape=doublecircle];
"Already brainstormed?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke brainstorming skill" [shape=box];
"Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke Skill tool" [shape=box];
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
"Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" [shape=box];
"Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
"Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];
"About to EnterPlanMode?" -> "Already brainstormed?";
"Already brainstormed?" -> "Invoke brainstorming skill" [label="no"];
"Already brainstormed?" -> "Might any skill apply?" [label="yes"];
"Invoke brainstorming skill" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke Skill tool" [label="yes, even 1%"];
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
"Invoke Skill tool" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
"Has checklist?" -> "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [label="yes"];
"Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}
Red Flags
These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:
| Thought | Reality |
|---|---|
| "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. |
| "I need more context first" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. |
| "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |
| "I can check git/files quickly" | Files lack conversation context. Check for skills. |
| "Let me gather information first" | Skills tell you HOW to gather information. |
| "This doesn't need a formal skill" | If a skill exists, use it. |
| "I remember this skill" | Skills evolve. Read current version. |
| "This doesn't count as a task" | Action = task. Check for skills. |
| "The skill is overkill" | Simple things become complex. Use it. |
| "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |
| "This feels productive" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. |
| "I know what that means" | Knowing the concept ≠ using the skill. Invoke it. |
Skill Priority
When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
- Process skills first (brainstorming, debugging) - these determine HOW to approach the task
- Implementation skills second (frontend-design, mcp-builder) - these guide execution
"Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills. "Fix this bug" → debugging first, then domain-specific skills.
Skill Types
Rigid (TDD, debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.
Flexible (patterns): Adapt principles to context.
The skill itself tells you which.
User Instructions
Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows.
Workflow Gate Everything Contract
For workflow skills that plan, execute, or verify implementation work (writing-plans, executing-plans, verification-before-completion):
- Use
agent-docs/plan-artifact-standard.mdas canonical contract. - Require plan artifact under
.sisyphus/plans/. - Require Momus verdict
OKAYbefore any implementation execution. - Allow planning-phase exception only for plan writing/updates and Momus review + evidence capture.
- If plan drift occurs: pause execution, update plan, re-run Momus, resume only after
OKAY.
Common Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
|---|---|
| "I'll do this later" | Explain why this excuse is wrong for this skill |
| "This is simple, skip steps" | Even simple tasks benefit from process |
Verification
After completing this skill, confirm:
- Output meets the defined quality and completeness requirements
- All prerequisites are verified and documented
- All required outputs generated
- Success criteria met
Process
- Analyze the task requirements
- Apply domain expertise
- Verify output quality