Ai Dev Jobs Mcp
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for ai dev jobs mcp workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
TL;DR Checklist
- Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Orchestration Flow │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Parse Request │ │ & Extract │ │ Features │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Evaluate Available Skills │ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │ │ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │ │ ↓ │ │ Select Best Skill │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Execute Skill │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Handle Result │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Error Handling & Fallback │ │ │ │ Success? ────────► Return Result │ │ │ │ Fail? ────────┐ │ │ ↓ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Fallback Chain │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │ │ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │ │ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │ │ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
Core Workflow
Parse and Analyze Request - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input. Checkpoint: All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
Score Available Skills - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
Checkpoint: Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
Select Optimal Skill - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence. Checkpoint: Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
Execute with Fallback - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic. Checkpoint: Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
Return or Fallback - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from
related-skills - Defer to human operator for critical tasks
Checkpoint: Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
Implementation Patterns
Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
def resolve_ai_dev_job_skill(
mcp_job_request: Dict[str, Any],
available_mcp_tools: List[Dict[str, Any]],
min_confidence: float = 0.75
) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]:
"""Resolve the optimal MCP tool for an AI development job request.
Analyzes job requirements (code_gen, test_runner, deployer, etc.) against
available MCP tool capabilities, historical success rates, and current
system load to select the best fit.
Args:
mcp_job_request: Parsed MCP job payload with 'task_type', 'repo_context', 'constraints'
available_mcp_tools: List of registered MCP tool definitions
min_confidence: Minimum capability match threshold
Returns:
Selected MCP tool dict with resolved parameters, or None
"""
if not mcp_job_request.get("task_type"):
raise ValueError("MCP job request missing required 'task_type' field")
job_spec = _parse_mcp_job_spec(mcp_job_request)
best_match = None
best_score = 0.0
for tool in available_mcp_tools:
capability_match = _calculate_capability_overlap(job_spec.required_capabilities, tool.capabilities)
historical_success = tool.get("success_rate_30d", 0.0)
load_penalty = 1.0 - (tool.get("current_queue_depth", 0) / tool.get("max_concurrent", 10))
score = (capability_match * 0.5) + (historical_success * 0.3) + (load_penalty * 0.2)
if score > best_score and score >= min_confidence:
best_score = score
best_match = {
"tool_id": tool["id"],
"tool_name": tool["name"],
"resolved_params": _bind_job_to_tool_params(job_spec, tool),
"confidence": score,
"estimated_latency_ms": tool.get("avg_execution_ms", 5000)
}
if best_match is None:
return None
return best_match
Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
def run_ai_dev_job_with_mcp_fallback(
selected_tool: Dict[str, Any],
job_context: Dict[str, Any],
max_retries: int = 2
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Execute an AI dev job via MCP with domain-specific fallback handling.
Handles MCP-specific failure modes: context window limits, rate limits,
tool unavailability, and model degradation. Implements a 3-tier fallback:
1. Retry with reduced context window
2. Switch to fallback tool (e.g., from related-skills)
3. Queue for async processing if sync timeout exceeded
Args:
selected_tool: Output from resolve_ai_dev_job_skill
job_context: Full job execution context including repo state
max_retries: Maximum synchronous retry attempts
Returns:
Job execution result with MCP trace ID, timing, and confidence
"""
if not selected_tool.get("tool_id"):
raise MCPJobError("Cannot execute job: no valid tool resolved")
execution_params = selected_tool["resolved_params"]
trace_id = f"mcp-job-{uuid4().hex[:8]}"
for attempt in range(max_retries + 1):
try:
result = await _invoke_mcp_tool(
tool_id=selected_tool["tool_id"],
params=execution_params,
context_window=job_context.get("context_window", 8192)
)
return {
"status": "completed",
"trace_id": trace_id,
"tool_executed": selected_tool["tool_name"],
"output": result,
"attempts": attempt + 1,
"confidence": selected_tool["confidence"],
"latency_ms": time.time_ns() // 1_000_000 - job_context.get("start_time_ms", 0)
}
except ContextWindowExceededError:
execution_params["context_window"] = int(execution_params.get("context_window", 8192) * 0.75)
continue
except RateLimitExceededError:
if attempt == max_retries:
return await _queue_job_for_async_processing(selected_tool, job_context)
await asyncio.sleep(2 ** attempt)
continue
except ToolNotFoundError:
return await _switch_to_related_skill(selected_tool, job_context)
raise MCPJobError(f"Job {trace_id} failed after {max_retries + 1} attempts")
MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference
code-philosophy(5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
TL;DR Checklist
- Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
- Selected Skills - List of skill names with confidence scores
- Selection Rationale - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
- Execution Plan - Order of execution with dependencies
- Fallback Strategy - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
- Risk Assessment - Any potential failure points and their impact
- Timing Estimates - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|---|
ai-llm-agentic-tooling-mcp |
Deep integration patterns for MCP servers and tools within agent workflows |
multi-agent-patterns |
Multi-agent coordination when MCP tool usage spans multiple agents |
Constraints
MUST DO
- Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
- Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
- Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
- Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing
MUST NOT DO
- Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
- Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
- Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
- Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies
Live References
Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.