Api Documentation
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for api documentation workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
TL;DR Checklist
- Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Orchestration Flow │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Parse Request │ │ & Extract │ │ Features │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Evaluate Available Skills │ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │ │ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │ │ ↓ │ │ Select Best Skill │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Execute Skill │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Handle Result │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Error Handling & Fallback │ │ │ │ Success? ────────► Return Result │ │ │ │ Fail? ────────┐ │ │ ↓ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Fallback Chain │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │ │ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │ │ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │ │ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
Core Workflow
Parse and Analyze Request - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input. Checkpoint: All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
Score Available Skills - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
Checkpoint: Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
Select Optimal Skill - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence. Checkpoint: Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
Execute with Fallback - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic. Checkpoint: Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
Return or Fallback - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from
related-skills - Defer to human operator for critical tasks
Checkpoint: Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
Implementation Patterns
Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
def parse_api_spec_and_extract_endpoints(
spec_path: str,
output_format: str = "markdown",
include_examples: bool = True
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Parse OpenAPI/Swagger specification and extract structured endpoint data.
Implements the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense:
- Early exit on invalid spec paths or unsupported formats
- Immutable parsing: spec is never mutated, only read
- Fail fast on missing required fields (paths, info)
- Atomic output generation with fallback to default templates
"""
# Law 1: Early Exit / Guard Clauses
if not spec_path or not os.path.exists(spec_path):
raise FileNotFoundError(f"API spec not found: {spec_path}")
if output_format not in ("markdown", "html", "json"):
raise ValueError(f"Unsupported format: {output_format}. Use markdown, html, or json.")
# Law 2: Parse at boundary, make illegal states unrepresentable
try:
with open(spec_path, 'r') as f:
raw_spec = json.load(f)
except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
raise ValueError(f"Invalid JSON in spec file: {e}") from e
# Validate required OpenAPI structure
if "openapi" not in raw_spec or "paths" not in raw_spec:
raise ValueError("Spec missing required 'openapi' or 'paths' fields")
# Law 3: Atomic Predictability - Build new structure, never mutate raw_spec
doc_structure = {
"title": raw_spec.get("info", {}).get("title", "Untitled API"),
"version": raw_spec.get("info", {}).get("version", "0.0.0"),
"endpoints": [],
"metadata": {
"format": output_format,
"generated_at": datetime.now().isoformat(),
"include_examples": include_examples
}
}
# Process endpoints
for path, methods in raw_spec["paths"].items():
for method, details in methods.items():
if method.upper() in ("GET", "POST", "PUT", "DELETE", "PATCH"):
doc_structure["endpoints"].append({
"path": path,
"method": method.upper(),
"summary": details.get("summary", ""),
"parameters": details.get("parameters", []),
"responses": details.get("responses", {})
})
return doc_structure
Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
def assemble_documentation_with_fallback(
doc_structure: Dict[str, Any],
fallback_strategy: str = "auto-generate",
cache_dir: str = "./doc_cache"
) -> str:
"""Assemble final documentation with resilience patterns for missing data.
Implements fallback chain for missing examples or rendering failures:
1. Use provided examples if available
2. Auto-generate stub examples from parameter schemas
3. Fall back to cached version if external tools fail
4. Fail loud with clear error if all strategies exhausted
"""
# Law 1: Validate input structure
if not doc_structure or "endpoints" not in doc_structure:
raise ValueError("Invalid doc structure provided for assembly")
rendered_docs = []
rendered_docs.append(f"# {doc_structure['title']} Documentation\n")
rendered_docs.append(f"**Version:** {doc_structure['version']}\n")
for ep in doc_structure["endpoints"]:
# Law 2: Parse/validate endpoint data at boundary
method = ep["method"]
path = ep["path"]
summary = ep.get("summary", f"Auto-generated summary for {method} {path}")
# Fallback Chain: Example Generation
examples = ep.get("examples", [])
if not examples and fallback_strategy == "auto-generate":
# Generate stub from parameters
examples = _generate_stub_examples(ep.get("parameters", []))
elif not examples:
examples = [{"note": "No examples available"}]
# Law 3: Atomic output construction
section = f"## {method} `{path}`\n\n{summary}\n\n"
section += "### Parameters\n" + _format_parameters(ep.get("parameters", [])) + "\n"
section += "### Examples\n" + _format_examples(examples) + "\n"
rendered_docs.append(section)
final_output = "\n".join(rendered_docs)
# Law 4: Fail loud if output is empty or corrupted
if not final_output.strip():
raise RuntimeError("Documentation assembly produced empty output")
return final_output
MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference
code-philosophy(5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
TL;DR Checklist
- Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
- Selected Skills - List of skill names with confidence scores
- Selection Rationale - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
- Execution Plan - Order of execution with dependencies
- Fallback Strategy - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
- Risk Assessment - Any potential failure points and their impact
- Timing Estimates - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|---|
api-security-testing |
Security-focused API documentation and testing workflows |
Constraints
MUST DO
- Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
- Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
- Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
- Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing
MUST NOT DO
- Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
- Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
- Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
- Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies
Live References
Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.