Conversation Memory
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for conversation memory workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
TL;DR Checklist
- Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Orchestration Flow │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Parse Request │ │ & Extract │ │ Features │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Evaluate Available Skills │ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │ │ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │ │ ↓ │ │ Select Best Skill │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Execute Skill │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Handle Result │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Error Handling & Fallback │ │ │ │ Success? ────────► Return Result │ │ │ │ Fail? ────────┐ │ │ ↓ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Fallback Chain │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │ │ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │ │ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │ │ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
Core Workflow
Parse and Analyze Request - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input. Checkpoint: All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
Score Available Skills - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
Checkpoint: Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
Select Optimal Skill - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence. Checkpoint: Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
Execute with Fallback - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic. Checkpoint: Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
Return or Fallback - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from
related-skills - Defer to human operator for critical tasks
Checkpoint: Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
Implementation Patterns
Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
def score_and_select_memory_context(
current_query: str,
conversation_history: List[Dict],
max_context_turns: int = 10,
relevance_threshold: float = 0.65
) -> List[Dict]:
"""Score conversation history turns against the current query.
Implements multi-factor scoring for memory retrieval:
- Semantic similarity between query and past turns
- Recency weighting (Law 1: Early Exit for empty history)
- Entity overlap and constraint matching
Args:
current_query: The active user prompt requiring context
conversation_history: List of past message dicts with 'role', 'content', 'timestamp'
max_context_turns: Maximum turns to include in context window
relevance_threshold: Minimum semantic score to include a turn
Returns:
Filtered and sorted list of relevant conversation turns
"""
# Guard clause - Early Exit (Law 1)
if not current_query or not conversation_history:
return []
# Parse input - Make Illegal States Unrepresentable (Law 2)
parsed_query = _normalize_text(current_query)
scored_turns = []
for turn in conversation_history:
# Calculate semantic similarity using embedding model
similarity = _compute_embedding_similarity(parsed_query, turn["content"])
# Apply recency decay and entity overlap bonus
recency_score = _calculate_recency_weight(turn["timestamp"])
entity_overlap = _count_shared_entities(parsed_query, turn["content"])
composite_score = (similarity * 0.6) + (recency_score * 0.25) + (entity_overlap * 0.15)
if composite_score >= relevance_threshold:
scored_turns.append({
"turn": turn,
"relevance_score": composite_score,
"factors": {"similarity": similarity, "recency": recency_score, "overlap": entity_overlap}
})
# Atomic Predictability (Law 3) - Return new sorted list, never mutate history
scored_turns.sort(key=lambda x: x["relevance_score"], reverse=True)
return scored_turns[:max_context_turns]
Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
def execute_memory_orchestration(
selected_context: List[Dict],
current_query: str,
memory_store: MemoryBackend,
fallback_strategy: str = "recent_history"
) -> Dict:
"""Execute memory retrieval with fallback chain for resilience.
Implements Fail Fast, Fail Loud (Law 4):
- Invalid memory states halt immediately with descriptive errors
- No silent context assembly failures
Fallback chain:
1. Retrieve from vector store with semantic search
2. Fallback to recent chronological history
3. Defer to default system prompt with minimal context
Args:
selected_context: Pre-scored memory turns from Pattern 1
current_query: Active prompt requiring context
memory_store: Initialized memory backend instance
fallback_strategy: Fallback mode when primary retrieval fails
Returns:
Execution result with assembled context, timing, and confidence metadata
"""
# Guard clause - validate memory store (Early Exit)
if not memory_store or not memory_store.is_healthy():
raise MemoryOrchestrationError("Memory backend is unavailable or unhealthy")
# Parse context - Ensure trusted state (Law 2)
validated_context = _assemble_context_payload(selected_context, current_query)
try:
# Primary execution - Semantic memory retrieval
retrieved_memory = memory_store.query_context(validated_context)
# Success - Atomic Predictability (Law 3)
return {
"success": True,
"context_turns": len(retrieved_memory),
"assembled_context": retrieved_memory,
"confidence": _calculate_context_confidence(retrieved_memory),
"latency_ms": _measure_execution_time()
}
except MemoryStoreTimeoutError as e:
# Fail Fast - Don't retry indefinitely (Law 4)
if fallback_strategy == "recent_history":
return _apply_recent_history_fallback(memory_store, current_query)
raise MemoryOrchestrationError(f"Primary memory retrieval failed: {str(e)}") from e
except ContextAssemblyError as e:
# Invalid state - halt immediately (Law 4)
raise MemoryOrchestrationError(f"Context assembly failed: {str(e)}") from e
MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference
code-philosophy(5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
TL;DR Checklist
- Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
- Selected Skills - List of skill names with confidence scores
- Selection Rationale - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
- Execution Plan - Order of execution with dependencies
- Fallback Strategy - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
- Risk Assessment - Any potential failure points and their impact
- Timing Estimates - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
Constraints
MUST DO
- Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
- Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
- Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
- Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing
MUST NOT DO
- Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
- Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
- Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
- Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies
Live References
Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.
- Conversation History Management Patterns
- LangChain Memory Module Docs
- State Machines in Conversational AI (Wikipedia)
- Context Window Optimization Techniques
- Conversational State Management Survey
Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose | |