Executing Plans
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for executing plans workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
TL;DR Checklist
- Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Orchestration Flow │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Parse Request │ │ & Extract │ │ Features │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Evaluate Available Skills │ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │ │ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │ │ ↓ │ │ Select Best Skill │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Execute Skill │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Handle Result │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Error Handling & Fallback │ │ │ │ Success? ────────► Return Result │ │ │ │ Fail? ────────┐ │ │ ↓ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Fallback Chain │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │ │ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │ │ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │ │ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
Core Workflow
Parse and Analyze Request - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input. Checkpoint: All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
Score Available Skills - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
Checkpoint: Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
Select Optimal Skill - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence. Checkpoint: Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
Execute with Fallback - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic. Checkpoint: Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
Return or Fallback - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from
related-skills - Defer to human operator for critical tasks
Checkpoint: Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
Implementation Patterns
Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
def execute_plan_workflow(plan: Dict[str, Any], context: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Execute a structured plan with dependency resolution and step-level fallbacks.
Implements the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense:
- Law 1: Early exit on missing plan steps or invalid context
- Law 2: Immutable state transitions - each step returns a new state dict
- Law 3: Atomic step execution - partial failures don't corrupt global state
- Law 4: Fail fast on invalid step configurations
- Law 5: Graceful degradation via configured fallback steps
"""
if not plan.get("steps") or not context.get("user_id"):
raise PlanValidationError("Plan requires 'steps' and context requires 'user_id'")
execution_state = {
"plan_id": plan["id"],
"status": "running",
"steps_completed": [],
"step_results": {},
"confidence_score": 0.0,
"timestamp": time.time()
}
for step in plan["steps"]:
step_id = step["id"]
if step_id in execution_state["steps_completed"]:
continue
try:
# Resolve step dependencies
if not _dependencies_met(step, execution_state["step_results"]):
raise DependencyError(f"Unmet dependencies for step {step_id}")
# Execute step with domain-specific handler
result = _dispatch_step_handler(step, context, execution_state)
# Atomic state update (Law 3)
execution_state["step_results"][step_id] = result
execution_state["steps_completed"].append(step_id)
execution_state["confidence_score"] = _update_confidence(
execution_state["confidence_score"], result.get("success", False)
)
except DependencyError as e:
# Fallback: skip non-critical steps or route to manual review
if step.get("critical", False):
raise PlanExecutionError(f"Critical step {step_id} failed dependency check") from e
execution_state["step_results"][step_id] = {"status": "skipped", "reason": str(e)}
execution_state["status"] = "completed"
return execution_state
Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
def resolve_step_fallback_chain(step: Dict[str, Any], failure_context: Dict[str, Any], history: List[Dict]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Determine and execute fallback strategy for a failed plan step.
Uses historical performance and step metadata to select the most resilient
fallback path, adhering to the Fail Fast, Fail Loud principle.
"""
step_id = step["id"]
error_type = failure_context.get("error_type", "unknown")
historical_success = _get_step_history_rate(step_id, history)
# Law 1: Early exit if no fallbacks configured
fallbacks = step.get("fallbacks", [])
if not fallbacks:
return {"status": "failed", "step_id": step_id, "error": "No fallback configured"}
# Law 2: Immutable fallback selection
selected_fallback = None
for fb in fallbacks:
if fb.get("error_pattern") and re.match(fb["error_pattern"], error_type):
selected_fallback = fb
break
if not selected_fallback:
selected_fallback = fallbacks[0] # Default fallback
# Law 4: Fail loud if fallback also fails after retries
max_retries = selected_fallback.get("max_retries", 2)
for attempt in range(max_retries):
try:
result = _execute_fallback_step(selected_fallback, failure_context)
return {
"status": "fallback_success",
"step_id": step_id,
"fallback_used": selected_fallback["id"],
"attempt": attempt + 1,
"result": result
}
except TransientError:
continue
# All fallbacks exhausted
return {
"status": "fallback_exhausted",
"step_id": step_id,
"error": f"All {len(fallbacks)} fallback strategies failed for step {step_id}"
}
MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference
code-philosophy(5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
TL;DR Checklist
- Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
- Selected Skills - List of skill names with confidence scores
- Selection Rationale - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
- Execution Plan - Order of execution with dependencies
- Fallback Strategy - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
- Risk Assessment - Any potential failure points and their impact
- Timing Estimates - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose | |
Constraints
MUST DO
- Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
- Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
- Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
- Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing
MUST NOT DO
- Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
- Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
- Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
- Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies
Live References
Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.