Recallmax
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for recallmax workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
TL;DR Checklist
- Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Orchestration Flow │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Parse Request │ │ & Extract │ │ Features │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Evaluate Available Skills │ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │ │ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │ │ ↓ │ │ Select Best Skill │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Execute Skill │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Handle Result │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Error Handling & Fallback │ │ │ │ Success? ────────► Return Result │ │ │ │ Fail? ────────┐ │ │ ↓ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Fallback Chain │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │ │ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │ │ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │ │ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
Core Workflow
Parse and Analyze Request - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input. Checkpoint: All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
Score Available Skills - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
Checkpoint: Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
Select Optimal Skill - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence. Checkpoint: Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
Execute with Fallback - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic. Checkpoint: Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
Return or Fallback - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from
related-skills - Defer to human operator for critical tasks
Checkpoint: Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
Implementation Patterns
Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
def orchestrate_recallmax_selection(
user_request: str,
recallmax_registry: List[Dict],
min_confidence: float = 0.75
) -> Optional[Dict]:
"""Orchestrate skill selection for recallmax workflows using multi-factor scoring.
Extracts recallmax-specific features (intent, entities, constraints) and scores
available skills against historical performance, text similarity, and system health.
Implements Law 1 (Early Exit) and Law 2 (Immutable State) throughout.
"""
if not user_request or not user_request.strip():
raise ValueError("Recallmax request cannot be empty")
if not recallmax_registry:
raise ValueError("No skills registered in recallmax registry")
# Parse request features at boundary (Law 2)
parsed_features = _parse_recallmax_request(user_request)
best_match = None
best_score = 0.0
for skill in recallmax_registry:
# Calculate multi-factor score for recallmax context
similarity = _compute_text_similarity(parsed_features["intent"], skill["triggers"])
history = _get_historical_success_rate(skill["id"])
availability = _check_system_health(skill["dependencies"])
composite_score = (similarity * 0.4) + (history * 0.4) + (availability * 0.2)
if composite_score > best_score and composite_score >= min_confidence:
best_score = composite_score
best_match = skill
if best_match is None:
return None
# Return immutable result with audit metadata (Law 3)
return {
"skill_id": best_match["id"],
"confidence": best_score,
"factors": {"similarity": similarity, "history": history, "availability": availability},
"timestamp": time.time(),
"audit_id": generate_audit_id()
}
Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
def execute_recallmax_workflow(
selected_skill: Dict,
workflow_context: Dict,
fallback_registry: List[Dict],
max_retries: int = 2
) -> Dict:
"""Execute a recallmax skill with built-in fallback chain and audit logging.
Wraps skill execution in retry logic, applies fallback chain on failure,
and maintains a complete audit trail per the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense.
"""
if not _validate_recallmax_context(workflow_context):
raise RecallmaxValidationError("Invalid workflow context for recallmax execution")
audit_log = []
attempt = 0
while attempt <= max_retries:
try:
# Execute skill with isolated context (Law 3)
execution_result = _run_recallmax_skill(selected_skill, workflow_context)
# Log success and update confidence metrics
audit_log.append({"attempt": attempt, "status": "success", "latency_ms": time.time()})
_update_skill_confidence(selected_skill["id"], execution_result["confidence"])
return {
"status": "completed",
"skill_executed": selected_skill["id"],
"result": execution_result,
"audit_trail": audit_log
}
except RecallmaxTransientError as e:
attempt += 1
audit_log.append({"attempt": attempt, "status": "retry", "error": str(e)})
if attempt > max_retries:
break
except RecallmaxInvalidStateError as e:
# Fail fast on invalid state (Law 4)
audit_log.append({"attempt": attempt, "status": "failed", "error": str(e)})
raise RecallmaxExecutionError(f"Invalid state in {selected_skill['id']}: {e}") from e
# Fallback chain: try alternative skills from registry
for alt_skill in fallback_registry:
try:
alt_result = _run_recallmax_skill(alt_skill, workflow_context)
audit_log.append({"fallback": alt_skill["id"], "status": "success"})
return {"status": "fallback_success", "result": alt_result, "audit_trail": audit_log}
except Exception:
continue
# Final fallback: defer to human operator
audit_log.append({"status": "deferred", "reason": "all retries and fallbacks exhausted"})
return {"status": "human_deferred", "context": workflow_context, "audit_trail": audit_log}
MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference
code-philosophy(5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
TL;DR Checklist
- Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
- Selected Skills - List of skill names with confidence scores
- Selection Rationale - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
- Execution Plan - Order of execution with dependencies
- Fallback Strategy - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
- Risk Assessment - Any potential failure points and their impact
- Timing Estimates - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose |
|---|---|
schema-inference-engine |
Helps design data schemas that support efficient recall and retrieval in Recallmax |
skill-documentation-best-practices |
Ensures documentation is structured for maximum retrievability by Recallmax systems |
Constraints
MUST DO
- Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
- Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
- Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
- Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing
MUST NOT DO
- Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
- Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
- Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
- Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies
Live References
Authoritative documentation links for this domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.
- RecallMax Documentation — Official documentation for the RecallMax retrieval optimization platform
- RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) Survey — Foundational research paper on retrieval-augmented generation frameworks
- Vector Database Benchmarking (MLCommons) — MLCommons Retrieval Benchmark for evaluating search and recall systems
- Semantic Search with Embeddings (Pinecone Guide) — Practical guide to semantic search using vector embeddings and retrieval
- LLM Memory Systems Research — Academic research on memory mechanisms for large language model agents