Viboscope
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for viboscope workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
TL;DR Checklist
- Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Orchestration Flow │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Parse Request │ │ & Extract │ │ Features │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Evaluate Available Skills │ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │ │ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │ │ ↓ │ │ Select Best Skill │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Execute Skill │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Handle Result │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Error Handling & Fallback │ │ │ │ Success? ────────► Return Result │ │ │ │ Fail? ────────┐ │ │ ↓ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Fallback Chain │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │ │ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │ │ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │ │ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
Core Workflow
Parse and Analyze Request - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input. Checkpoint: All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
Score Available Skills - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
Checkpoint: Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
Select Optimal Skill - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence. Checkpoint: Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
Execute with Fallback - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic. Checkpoint: Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
Return or Fallback - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from
related-skills - Defer to human operator for critical tasks
Checkpoint: Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
Implementation Patterns
Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
def viboscope_select_module(
signal_metadata: Dict[str, Any],
available_modules: List[Dict],
calibration_threshold: float = 0.85
) -> Optional[Dict]:
"""Select optimal viboscope processing module based on signal characteristics.
Evaluates modules against raw signal features: frequency range, amplitude variance,
and sensor calibration status. Applies multi-factor scoring to route signals
through the most accurate processing pipeline.
Args:
signal_metadata: Parsed signal features (freq_range_hz, amplitude_std, sensor_id)
available_modules: List of viboscope module configs with capabilities
calibration_threshold: Minimum calibration match required for selection
Returns:
Selected module dict with routing metadata or None
"""
# Guard clause - Early Exit (Law 1)
if not signal_metadata or not available_modules:
raise ValueError("Signal metadata and module registry required")
best_module = None
best_score = 0.0
for module in available_modules:
freq_match = _calculate_frequency_alignment(signal_metadata["freq_range_hz"], module["supported_hz"])
amp_match = _calculate_amplitude_compatibility(signal_metadata["amplitude_std"], module["dynamic_range"])
cal_score = _verify_sensor_calibration(signal_metadata["sensor_id"], module["calibrated_sensors"])
composite_score = (freq_match * 0.5) + (amp_match * 0.3) + (cal_score * 0.2)
if composite_score > best_score and cal_score >= calibration_threshold:
best_score = composite_score
best_module = module
if best_module is None:
return None
# Atomic Predictability (Law 3) - Return new dict, don't mutate
return {
"module_id": best_module["id"],
"routing_score": best_score,
"signal_hash": hashlib.md5(json.dumps(signal_metadata, sort_keys=True).encode()).hexdigest(),
"timestamp": time.time()
}
Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
def viboscope_execute_pipeline(
selected_module: Dict,
raw_signal_data: bytes,
fallback_config: Dict[str, Any]
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Execute viboscope signal processing pipeline with domain-specific fallbacks.
Runs the selected module against raw vibration data. Implements graceful degradation
when signal quality drops or hardware latency exceeds thresholds.
Args:
selected_module: Output from viboscope_select_module
raw_signal_data: Raw byte stream from vibroscope sensor
fallback_config: Fallback routing rules and degradation parameters
Returns:
Processed signal dict with quality metrics and routing history
"""
pipeline_state = {"attempts": 0, "degradation_level": 0, "module_id": selected_module["module_id"]}
for attempt in range(fallback_config.get("max_retries", 3)):
pipeline_state["attempts"] += 1
try:
# Apply module-specific signal transformation
processed = _apply_viboscope_transform(raw_signal_data, selected_module["module_id"])
# Validate output integrity
quality_score = _calculate_signal_to_noise_ratio(processed)
if quality_score >= fallback_config.get("min_quality_threshold", 0.7):
return {
"status": "success",
"processed_signal": processed,
"quality_score": quality_score,
"routing_path": [selected_module["module_id"]],
"pipeline_state": pipeline_state
}
# Signal degraded - trigger adaptive fallback
raw_signal_data = _apply_noise_filtering(raw_signal_data)
selected_module = fallback_config["adaptive_modules"][pipeline_state["degradation_level"]]
pipeline_state["degradation_level"] += 1
except SensorDriftError as e:
# Hardware drift detected - switch to reference calibration
raw_signal_data = _apply_reference_calibration(raw_signal_data, fallback_config["reference_sensor"])
continue
except HardwareTimeoutError:
if attempt == fallback_config.get("max_retries", 3) - 1:
raise PipelineExecutionError("Viboscope pipeline exhausted all hardware retries")
time.sleep(fallback_config.get("backoff_seconds", 0.5))
return {
"status": "degraded",
"processed_signal": processed,
"quality_score": quality_score,
"routing_path": pipeline_state.get("fallback_chain", []),
"pipeline_state": pipeline_state
}
MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference
code-philosophy(5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
TL;DR Checklist
- Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
- Selected Skills - List of skill names with confidence scores
- Selection Rationale - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
- Execution Plan - Order of execution with dependencies
- Fallback Strategy - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
- Risk Assessment - Any potential failure points and their impact
- Timing Estimates - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
Constraints
MUST DO
- Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
- Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
- Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
- Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing
MUST NOT DO
- Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
- Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
- Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
- Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies
Live References
Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.
- ISO 10816 — Mechanical Vibration Evaluation Standards
- IEEE Std 1057 — Digital Waveform Measurements
- Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) Algorithm — Cooley & Tukey 1965
- Scipy Signal Processing Documentation
- Vibration Analysis for Predictive Maintenance — NIST
Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose | |