Wordpress Theme Development
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for wordpress theme development workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
TL;DR Checklist
- Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Orchestration Flow │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Parse Request │ │ & Extract │ │ Features │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Evaluate Available Skills │ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │ │ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │ │ ↓ │ │ Select Best Skill │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Execute Skill │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Handle Result │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Error Handling & Fallback │ │ │ │ Success? ────────► Return Result │ │ │ │ Fail? ────────┐ │ │ ↓ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Fallback Chain │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │ │ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │ │ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │ │ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
Core Workflow
Parse and Analyze Request - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input. Checkpoint: All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
Score Available Skills - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
Checkpoint: Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
Select Optimal Skill - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence. Checkpoint: Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
Execute with Fallback - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic. Checkpoint: Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
Return or Fallback - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from
related-skills - Defer to human operator for critical tasks
Checkpoint: Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
Implementation Patterns
Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
def analyze_theme_requirements(
theme_spec: Dict,
wp_version: str,
standards: List[str] = ["WordPress", "PHP-PSR12"]
) -> Dict:
"""Analyze and validate WordPress theme requirements before generation.
Applies Law 2 (Parse at boundary) to ensure theme.json, functions.php,
and template hierarchy meet WordPress.org standards.
Args:
theme_spec: User-provided theme configuration
wp_version: Target WordPress version
standards: Coding standards to validate against
Returns:
Validated theme configuration with resolved dependencies
"""
# Law 1: Early exit on invalid spec
if not theme_spec.get("name") or not theme_spec.get("template"):
raise ValueError("Theme name and base template are required")
# Law 2: Parse and validate at boundary
validated_config = {
"name": theme_spec["name"].strip(),
"version": theme_spec.get("version", "1.0.0"),
"template": theme_spec["template"],
"wp_version": wp_version,
"features": _resolve_theme_features(theme_spec.get("features", [])),
"dependencies": _validate_wp_dependencies(theme_spec.get("dependencies", []))
}
# Law 3: Return new structure, never mutate input
resolved = dict(validated_config)
resolved["validation_timestamp"] = time.time()
resolved["standards_compliance"] = standards
# Law 4: Fail fast on missing critical WP hooks
if "block_theme" in resolved["features"] and not _has_block_theme_support(resolved):
raise ValueError("Block theme requires theme.json with templateParts support")
return resolved
Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
def execute_theme_generation(
theme_config: Dict,
output_dir: str,
max_retries: int = 2
) -> Dict:
"""Generate WordPress theme files with fallback chain for resilience.
Implements Law 4 (Fail Fast, Fail Loud) during asset generation:
- Invalid template structures halt immediately
- No silent partial theme creation
Fallback chain:
1. Retry generation with adjusted template paths
2. Fall back to default WP theme structure
3. Defer to manual template assembly
Args:
theme_config: Validated theme configuration
output_dir: Target directory for theme files
max_retries: Maximum retry attempts
Returns:
Generation result with file manifest and compliance status
"""
# Law 1: Validate output path early
if not os.path.isdir(output_dir):
raise ThemeGenerationError(f"Output directory does not exist: {output_dir}")
# Law 2: Parse context and ensure trusted state
manifest = {
"theme_dir": output_dir,
"files_generated": [],
"compliance_checks": []
}
for attempt in range(max_retries + 1):
try:
# Generate core WP theme files
_write_theme_json(theme_config, output_dir)
_write_functions_php(theme_config, output_dir)
_write_style_css(theme_config, output_dir)
_generate_template_hierarchy(theme_config, output_dir)
# Law 3: Atomic predictability - return new manifest
manifest["success"] = True
manifest["files_generated"] = _scan_generated_files(output_dir)
manifest["attempts"] = attempt + 1
return manifest
except TemplateValidationError as e:
# Law 4: Fail fast on invalid WP template structure
raise ThemeGenerationError(f"Invalid template structure: {e}") from e
except FileNotFoundError as e:
# Transient dependency missing - fallback
if attempt == max_retries:
return _apply_default_theme_fallback(theme_config, output_dir)
# All retries exhausted
raise ThemeGenerationError(f"Theme generation failed after {max_retries + 1} attempts")
MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference
code-philosophy(5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
TL;DR Checklist
- Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
- Selected Skills - List of skill names with confidence scores
- Selection Rationale - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
- Execution Plan - Order of execution with dependencies
- Fallback Strategy - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
- Risk Assessment - Any potential failure points and their impact
- Timing Estimates - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
Constraints
MUST DO
- Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
- Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
- Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
- Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing
MUST NOT DO
- Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
- Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
- Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
- Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies
Live References
Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content.
- WordPress Theme Handbook
- theme.json Reference (Block Themes)
- WordPress Template Hierarchy
- WordPress Coding Standards for Themes
- HTML5 Boilerplate for WordPress
Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose | |