Perdolique GitHub release workflow
Use this skill to create GitHub releases from existing tags and repository history.
The goal is to publish release notes that match the style of recent releases while staying grounded in verified changes.
Required checks
Start by verifying the release target:
git status --short --branch
gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner
git fetch --tags origin
git tag --list '<target-tag>'
git ls-remote --tags origin '<target-tag>'
gh release list --limit 20
If the project has a machine-readable version file, inspect it too. Examples:
node -p "require('./package.json').version"
cargo metadata --no-deps --format-version 1
If the working tree is dirty, do not edit or commit anything as part of release creation unless the user explicitly asks for that separate work. A GitHub release should normally be created from an existing tag.
If the project version is 1.2.3, the release tag is usually v1.2.3, but verify the repository's existing tag naming convention before assuming the v prefix.
After checking the repository's tag convention, use the verified tag name as <target-tag> in later commands. Stop and ask the user before publishing if the target tag does not exist on the remote.
Inspect existing GitHub releases
Always inspect the releases already published on GitHub before drafting or creating a new release. This is useful because it reveals:
- the latest stable release
- prerelease naming patterns
- whether the target tag already has a GitHub release
- whether recent releases are marked as latest, draft, or prerelease
- the note structure users already expect in that repository
Use the table view for a quick human scan:
gh release list --limit 20
Use JSON when you need reliable fields for reasoning:
gh release list --limit 20 \
--json tagName,name,isDraft,isPrerelease,isLatest,publishedAt
Treat the latest non-draft, non-prerelease release as the default previous stable release for changelog comparisons unless the user gives a different base tag.
Inspect previous releases
Read at least the latest two stable releases before drafting notes:
gh release view <latest-tag> --json tagName,name,isDraft,isPrerelease,publishedAt,targetCommitish,body
gh release view <previous-tag> --json tagName,name,isDraft,isPrerelease,publishedAt,targetCommitish,body
Use their structure as guidance, but do not copy text blindly. Common release note shapes include:
## What's Changed## Summary,## Added ...,## Dependency updates,## Notes
Prefer the simpler shape that fits the actual diff. Include only sections with concrete content.
If the repository has fewer than two stable releases, inspect every stable release that exists. If there is no previous stable release, compare the target tag against the first commit or use gh release create --generate-notes --notes-start-tag <base-tag> only when the repository has an explicit base tag.
Gather release facts
Compare the previous stable tag to the target tag:
git log --oneline <previous-tag>..<target-tag>
git diff --stat <previous-tag>..<target-tag>
repo=$(gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner)
gh api "repos/$repo/compare/<previous-tag>...<target-tag>" \
--jq '{files: [.files[] | {filename, status}], commits: [.commits[] | {sha: .sha[0:7], message: .commit.message}]}'
Use the compare output, commits, and changed files as the source of truth.
Do not invent motivations, breaking changes, migration notes, or dependency changes. Only include them when the diff, commit body, package files, or previous conversation clearly supports them.
Dependency updates
When dependency manifests or lockfiles change between tags, list dependency updates explicitly when the old and new versions are clear. Include both old and new versions.
Use this format:
## Dependency updates
- `package-name`: `old-version` -> `new-version`
Include package manager changes too:
- `packageManager`: `npm@old` -> `npm@new`
Do not replace the package list with vague wording like "updated dependencies".
Release notes style
Use English for release titles and release notes.
Keep release notes concise and concrete:
## What's Changed
- Added the new release-facing feature or configuration change.
- Updated related tests, fixtures, or documentation that verify the change.
- Removed or replaced outdated behavior when the diff clearly shows it.
## Dependency updates
- `package-name`: `old-version` -> `new-version`
**Full Changelog**: https://github.com/<owner>/<repo>/compare/<previous-tag>...<target-tag>
- Describe only substantive changes between the compared tags. Even if previous releases contain one, do not add a bullet whose only information is the project, package, or workspace version bump represented by the release tag; the title and tag already identify the version.
- Use nested bullets inside generated release notes when they make the GitHub release easier to read.
Create the release
If the remote tag exists and no release exists yet, create a stable release:
gh release create <target-tag> \
--title <target-tag> \
--notes-file <notes-file> \
--latest \
--verify-tag
Create a prerelease only when the tag itself is a prerelease version such as v1.2.0-beta.1, or when the user explicitly asks for a prerelease:
gh release create <target-tag> \
--title <target-tag> \
--notes-file <notes-file> \
--prerelease \
--verify-tag
Use a temporary notes file and remove it after the command finishes.
Avoid shell variable names that can be read-only in zsh, such as status. Use names like release_rc if command status needs to be preserved.
Verify after publishing
After creating the release, verify it:
gh release view <target-tag> --json url,name,tagName,isDraft,isPrerelease,isLatest,publishedAt
Report the release URL, tag, and whether it is stable/latest or prerelease.
If a release already exists
If gh release create fails because the release already exists, inspect it:
gh release view <target-tag> --json url,name,tagName,isDraft,isPrerelease,isLatest,body
Then tell the user it already exists and summarize whether it matches the target version. Do not overwrite release notes unless the user asks to update them.