Requirements Reuse Skill Guidance
Use When
- curating approved reusable requirement patterns and product-line variants after a stable baseline exists; use requirements-patterns to structure one project's complex behaviour.
- Use this procedure when the required source artefacts are available and
Reusable requirements library is the next lifecycle deliverable.
Do Not Use When
- Use
requirements-patterns when that neighbouring route owns the decision or deliverable.
- Do not invent missing project evidence, standards clauses, thresholds, or stakeholder decisions.
Required Inputs
| Artefact |
Source or provider |
Required? |
Behaviour when missing |
| Approved requirements, applicability context, variability rules, and provenance |
Requirements baselines and product-line owner |
Yes |
Stop the affected step, name the missing source, and return only a qualified gap record. |
Workflow
- Inspect the required inputs and log the exact sources, versions, and unresolved assumptions.
- Apply this skill's existing domain workflow and decision rules to produce
Reusable requirements library.
- Stop when a required source, accountable decision owner, or deterministic test oracle is absent.
- Recover by preserving valid work, marking the blocked scope, and returning the narrowest qualified artefact plus the next evidence needed.
Outputs
| Artefact |
Consumer |
Acceptance condition |
| Reusable requirements library |
Future project teams and requirements governance |
Required sections are populated, source links resolve, and every material requirement or decision has an observable review or test oracle. |
Evidence Produced
| Evidence |
Reviewer |
Acceptance condition |
Source, decision, trace, and validation record for Reusable requirements library |
Requirements quality reviewer |
Inputs used, decisions made, checks run, failures, and unassessed items are explicit. |
Capability and permission boundaries
Read and search are required. Editing is allowed only when the request authorises creation or repair of the named requirements artefact. Publishing, production mutation, destructive action, spending, and certification require explicit authority.
Degraded mode
Fallback: if a required file, reviewer, standard source, network check, renderer, or execution capability is unavailable, return the narrowest useful qualified result and mark the affected check not assessed; never convert an unassessed check into a pass.
Decision Rules
| Choice or condition |
Action |
Failure or risk avoided |
| A candidate requirement depends on hidden project-specific context |
Keep it local or parameterise and test the variability explicitly. |
Reused requirements that import wrong assumptions. |
| Required inputs and test oracles are complete |
Continue through the existing workflow and record evidence. |
A deliverable whose acceptance cannot be reproduced. |
| A mandatory source or owner is missing |
Stop the affected branch and issue a qualified gap record. |
Fabricated context or unauthorised decisions. |
Quality Standards
- Preserve stable identifiers and bidirectional traceability from project evidence to
Reusable requirements library and its acceptance checks.
- Apply ISO/IEEE measures only with a named metric, method, threshold, evidence source, and responsible reviewer; run the anti-slop gate before release.
Anti-Patterns
- Producing
Reusable requirements library from assumed context. Fix: cite the project source or mark the scope blocked.
- Accepting a material requirement without a deterministic oracle. Fix: add a measurable result, boundary, and verification method.
- Crossing into
requirements-patterns without routing the decision. Fix: hand off the named input and preserve trace links.
- Treating an unavailable check as passed. Fix: mark it
not assessed and state the release consequence.
- Claiming standards, statutory, or stakeholder approval without evidence. Fix: cite the source and reviewer or qualify the claim.
References
Overview
This skill is OPTIONAL and intended for organizations building multiple related products or maintaining a portfolio of applications. It scans existing requirements artifacts, identifies candidates for reuse, classifies them by reuse type, and generates a requirements library catalog. The library accelerates future projects by providing vetted, parameterized requirements templates.
When to Use This Skill
- After requirements have been baselined and validated for at least one project.
- When an organization is starting a second or subsequent product that shares domain characteristics.
- During product line engineering to establish commonality and variability models.
- When regulatory requirements (GDPR, HIPAA, SOX) recur across multiple systems.
Quick Reference
- Inputs: All artifacts in
projects/<ProjectName>/<phase>/<document>/, projects/<ProjectName>/_context/vision.md
- Outputs:
projects/<ProjectName>/<phase>/<document>/requirements_library.md
- Tone: Cataloging, systematic, pattern-oriented
Input Files
| File |
Source |
Required? |
All *.md artifacts |
projects/<ProjectName>/<phase>/<document>/ |
Yes |
vision.md |
projects/<ProjectName>/_context/ |
Yes |
requirements_baseline.md |
projects/<ProjectName>/<phase>/<document>/ |
Recommended |
traceability_matrix.md |
projects/<ProjectName>/<phase>/<document>/ |
Recommended |
Output Files
| File |
Contents |
Destination |
requirements_library.md |
Reusable requirements catalog with classification and adaptation guidelines |
projects/<ProjectName>/<phase>/<document>/ |
Core Instructions
Step 1: Read All Artifacts
Read every file in projects/<ProjectName>/<phase>/<document>/ and projects/<ProjectName>/_context/vision.md. Log each file path read. Build a consolidated list of all requirements with their full definitions, acceptance criteria, and trace links.
Step 2: Identify Reuse Candidates
Scan all requirements for patterns that indicate reuse potential. Candidates fall into three categories:
Cross-Cutting Concerns
Requirements that appear in virtually every software system:
| Domain |
Examples |
| Authentication |
User registration, login, password reset, session management, MFA |
| Authorization |
Role-based access control, permission matrices, privilege escalation prevention |
| Logging |
Audit trails, event logging, log retention policies, log format standards |
| Error Handling |
Error codes, user-facing error messages, retry logic, graceful degradation |
| Data Validation |
Input sanitization, format validation, boundary checks, encoding rules |
| Notification |
Email dispatch, SMS alerts, in-app notifications, notification preferences |
Domain Patterns
Requirements specific to a business domain but recurring across products in that domain:
| Domain |
Examples |
| E-Commerce |
Shopping cart, checkout flow, payment processing, order tracking, returns |
| Healthcare |
Patient registration, appointment scheduling, prescription management, HIPAA consent |
| Finance |
Account management, transaction processing, regulatory reporting, fraud detection |
| Education |
Course enrollment, grade management, attendance tracking, learning management |
Regulatory and Compliance
Requirements mandated by law or regulation that apply to any system within scope:
| Regulation |
Requirements |
| GDPR |
Consent management, right to erasure, data portability, privacy impact assessment |
| HIPAA |
Business Associate Agreement, PHI encryption, access logging, breach notification |
| SOX |
Financial controls, audit trails, segregation of duties, data retention |
| PCI DSS |
Cardholder data protection, network segmentation, vulnerability management |
| WCAG 2.1 |
Perceivable, operable, understandable, robust accessibility requirements |
Step 3: Classify Reuse Type
For each candidate requirement, classify the reuse type:
| Reuse Type |
Definition |
When to Use |
| Verbatim |
Copy the requirement as-is into the new project |
Regulatory mandates, universal standards |
| Parameterized |
Use a template with variables to fill in |
Domain patterns with project-specific values |
| Pattern |
Adapt the structure and intent but rewrite specifics |
Cross-cutting concerns with varying implementations |
Verbatim Reuse Example
[LIB-SEC-001] The system shall encrypt all data at rest using AES-256.
Type: Verbatim | Domain: Security | Regulation: HIPAA, PCI DSS
Parameterized Reuse Example
[LIB-AUTH-001] The system shall lock the user account after
{MAX_ATTEMPTS} consecutive failed login attempts for {LOCKOUT_DURATION}.
Type: Parameterized | Domain: Authentication
Parameters: MAX_ATTEMPTS (integer, default: 5), LOCKOUT_DURATION (minutes, default: 15)
Pattern Reuse Example
[LIB-NOTIFY-001] The system shall deliver {NOTIFICATION_TYPE} notifications
to {RECIPIENT_ROLE} within {DELIVERY_SLA} of {TRIGGER_EVENT}.
Type: Pattern | Domain: Notification
Structure: Trigger -> Channel -> Recipient -> SLA
Step 4: Generate Library Catalog
For each reusable requirement, create a catalog entry:
| Field |
Description |
| Library ID |
LIB-[DOMAIN]-[NNN] |
| Category |
Cross-cutting, Domain, or Regulatory |
| Domain |
Authentication, Security, E-Commerce, etc. |
| Reuse Type |
Verbatim, Parameterized, or Pattern |
| Description |
The requirement text or template |
| Parameters |
Variables that must be filled (parameterized/pattern only) |
| Defaults |
Default values for parameters |
| Constraints |
Conditions under which this requirement applies |
| Source Projects |
Projects where this requirement has been used |
| Usage Count |
Number of times reused across projects |
| Last Used |
Date of most recent reuse |
| Validation Status |
Verified, Unverified, or Deprecated |
| Standards |
Applicable IEEE/ISO/regulatory standards |
Step 5: Define Adaptation Guidelines
Document the process for reusing requirements from the library in new projects:
- Search: Query the library by domain, category, or keyword.
- Evaluate: Assess applicability to the target project context.
- Adapt: For parameterized and pattern types, fill in project-specific values.
- Validate: Verify the adapted requirement against the target project's vision and constraints.
- Register: Add the new usage to the library's usage tracking.
- Trace: Establish trace links from the reused requirement to target project business goals.
Step 6: Commonality and Variability Analysis
For product line engineering, perform commonality/variability analysis:
- Common Requirements: Requirements shared by all products in the product line (mandatory inclusion).
- Variable Requirements: Requirements that differ between products (variation points).
- Optional Requirements: Requirements included only in specific product variants.
Document variation points with:
| Field |
Description |
| Variation Point ID |
VP-[NNN] |
| Description |
What varies across products |
| Variants |
List of possible options |
| Binding Time |
Design-time, build-time, or runtime |
| Default Variant |
The variant used when no explicit choice is made |
Step 7: Generate Output
Write projects/<ProjectName>/<phase>/<document>/requirements_library.md following the output format below.
Output Format
requirements_library.md
# Requirements Library: [Project Name]
**Generated:** [Date]
**Standards:** IEEE 29148-2018, Laplante Ch.9
---
## Library Summary
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Total Library Entries | N |
| Cross-Cutting Concerns | N |
| Domain Patterns | N |
| Regulatory Requirements | N |
| Verbatim Reuse | N |
| Parameterized Reuse | N |
| Pattern Reuse | N |
---
## Library Catalog
### Cross-Cutting Concerns
| Library ID | Domain | Reuse Type | Description | Parameters |
|------------|--------|-----------|-------------|------------|
| LIB-AUTH-001 | Authentication | Parameterized | Account lockout | MAX_ATTEMPTS, LOCKOUT_DURATION |
### Domain Patterns
| Library ID | Domain | Reuse Type | Description | Parameters |
|------------|--------|-----------|-------------|------------|
| LIB-ECOM-001 | E-Commerce | Pattern | Checkout flow | PAYMENT_METHODS, TAX_RULES |
### Regulatory Requirements
| Library ID | Regulation | Reuse Type | Description | Applicability |
|------------|-----------|-----------|-------------|---------------|
| LIB-GDPR-001 | GDPR | Verbatim | Consent management | All EU-facing systems |
---
## Adaptation Guidelines
[Step-by-step process for reusing library entries]
---
## Commonality/Variability Analysis
| VP ID | Description | Variants | Binding Time |
|-------|-------------|----------|-------------|
| VP-001 | Payment processing | Stripe, PayPal, Square | Build-time |
---
## Usage Tracking
| Library ID | Source Project | Target Project | Date Reused | Adaptation Notes |
|------------|---------------|----------------|-------------|-----------------|
| LIB-AUTH-001 | Project A | Project B | [Date] | MAX_ATTEMPTS=3 |
Common Pitfalls
- Premature generalization: Do not extract a pattern from a single instance. A requirement is a reuse candidate only after it has appeared in at least one project and has clear cross-project applicability.
- Over-parameterization: Too many parameters make a template harder to use than writing from scratch. Limit parameterized templates to 5 or fewer variables.
- Stale library entries: Requirements that reference obsolete technologies or superseded regulations shall be marked Deprecated and excluded from new project reuse.
- Ignoring context: A requirement that works in one domain may be harmful in another. Always validate adapted requirements against the target project's specific constraints.
- Copy without trace: Reused requirements must still be traced to the target project's business goals. Reuse does not exempt a requirement from traceability obligations.
Verification Checklist
Integration
- Upstream:
08-requirements-management, 09-traceability-engineering, 10-requirements-metrics
- Downstream: Future project initialization skills, product line engineering
- Optional: This skill is not required for single-product organizations
Standards
- IEEE Std 29148-2018: Requirements reuse and product line provisions.
- Laplante Ch.9: Software product line engineering and requirements reuse.
- Wiegers Practice 20: Requirements process improvement and institutionalization.
- IEEE Std 610.12-1990: Terminology definitions.
Resources
references/reuse-patterns.md: Requirements reuse pattern taxonomy and decision criteria.
references/product-line-requirements.md: SPL commonality/variability analysis guide.
Last Updated: 2026-03-07
Skill Version: 1.0.0
1---2name: 11-requirements-reuse3description: Use when curating approved reusable requirement patterns and product-line variants after a stable baseline exists; use requirements-patterns to structure one project's complex behaviour.4---56# Requirements Reuse Skill Guidance78<!-- local-contract-start -->9<!-- dual-compat-start -->10## Use When1112- curating approved reusable requirement patterns and product-line variants after a stable baseline exists; use requirements-patterns to structure one project's complex behaviour.13- Use this procedure when the required source artefacts are available and `Reusable requirements library` is the next lifecycle deliverable.1415## Do Not Use When1617- Use `requirements-patterns` when that neighbouring route owns the decision or deliverable.18- Do not invent missing project evidence, standards clauses, thresholds, or stakeholder decisions.1920## Required Inputs2122| Artefact | Source or provider | Required? | Behaviour when missing |23| --- | --- | --- | --- |24| Approved requirements, applicability context, variability rules, and provenance | Requirements baselines and product-line owner | Yes | Stop the affected step, name the missing source, and return only a qualified gap record. |2526## Workflow27281. Inspect the required inputs and log the exact sources, versions, and unresolved assumptions.292. Apply this skill's existing domain workflow and decision rules to produce `Reusable requirements library`.303. Stop when a required source, accountable decision owner, or deterministic test oracle is absent.314. Recover by preserving valid work, marking the blocked scope, and returning the narrowest qualified artefact plus the next evidence needed.3233## Outputs3435| Artefact | Consumer | Acceptance condition |36| --- | --- | --- |37| Reusable requirements library | Future project teams and requirements governance | Required sections are populated, source links resolve, and every material requirement or decision has an observable review or test oracle. |3839## Evidence Produced4041| Evidence | Reviewer | Acceptance condition |42| --- | --- | --- |43| Source, decision, trace, and validation record for `Reusable requirements library` | Requirements quality reviewer | Inputs used, decisions made, checks run, failures, and unassessed items are explicit. |4445## Capability and permission boundaries4647Read and search are required. Editing is allowed only when the request authorises creation or repair of the named requirements artefact. Publishing, production mutation, destructive action, spending, and certification require explicit authority.4849## Degraded mode5051Fallback: if a required file, reviewer, standard source, network check, renderer, or execution capability is unavailable, return the narrowest useful qualified result and mark the affected check `not assessed`; never convert an unassessed check into a pass.5253## Decision Rules5455| Choice or condition | Action | Failure or risk avoided |56| --- | --- | --- |57| A candidate requirement depends on hidden project-specific context | Keep it local or parameterise and test the variability explicitly. | Reused requirements that import wrong assumptions. |58| Required inputs and test oracles are complete | Continue through the existing workflow and record evidence. | A deliverable whose acceptance cannot be reproduced. |59| A mandatory source or owner is missing | Stop the affected branch and issue a qualified gap record. | Fabricated context or unauthorised decisions. |6061## Quality Standards6263- Preserve stable identifiers and bidirectional traceability from project evidence to `Reusable requirements library` and its acceptance checks.64- Apply ISO/IEEE measures only with a named metric, method, threshold, evidence source, and responsible reviewer; run the anti-slop gate before release.6566## Anti-Patterns6768- Producing `Reusable requirements library` from assumed context. Fix: cite the project source or mark the scope blocked.69- Accepting a material requirement without a deterministic oracle. Fix: add a measurable result, boundary, and verification method.70- Crossing into `requirements-patterns` without routing the decision. Fix: hand off the named input and preserve trace links.71- Treating an unavailable check as passed. Fix: mark it `not assessed` and state the release consequence.72- Claiming standards, statutory, or stakeholder approval without evidence. Fix: cite the source and reviewer or qualify the claim.7374## References7576- [Skill authoring and release standard](../../../../docs/skill-authoring-standard.md)77- [Product Line Requirements](references/product-line-requirements.md)78- [Reuse Patterns](references/reuse-patterns.md)79<!-- dual-compat-end -->80<!-- local-contract-end -->8182## Overview8384This skill is OPTIONAL and intended for organizations building multiple related products or maintaining a portfolio of applications. It scans existing requirements artifacts, identifies candidates for reuse, classifies them by reuse type, and generates a requirements library catalog. The library accelerates future projects by providing vetted, parameterized requirements templates.8586## When to Use This Skill8788- After requirements have been baselined and validated for at least one project.89- When an organization is starting a second or subsequent product that shares domain characteristics.90- During product line engineering to establish commonality and variability models.91- When regulatory requirements (GDPR, HIPAA, SOX) recur across multiple systems.9293## Quick Reference9495- **Inputs:** All artifacts in `projects/<ProjectName>/<phase>/<document>/`, `projects/<ProjectName>/_context/vision.md`96- **Outputs:** `projects/<ProjectName>/<phase>/<document>/requirements_library.md`97- **Tone:** Cataloging, systematic, pattern-oriented9899## Input Files100101| File | Source | Required? |102|------|--------|-----------|103| All `*.md` artifacts | `projects/<ProjectName>/<phase>/<document>/` | Yes |104| `vision.md` | `projects/<ProjectName>/_context/` | Yes |105| `requirements_baseline.md` | `projects/<ProjectName>/<phase>/<document>/` | Recommended |106| `traceability_matrix.md` | `projects/<ProjectName>/<phase>/<document>/` | Recommended |107108## Output Files109110| File | Contents | Destination |111|------|----------|-------------|112| `requirements_library.md` | Reusable requirements catalog with classification and adaptation guidelines | `projects/<ProjectName>/<phase>/<document>/` |113114## Core Instructions115116### Step 1: Read All Artifacts117118Read every file in `projects/<ProjectName>/<phase>/<document>/` and `projects/<ProjectName>/_context/vision.md`. Log each file path read. Build a consolidated list of all requirements with their full definitions, acceptance criteria, and trace links.119120### Step 2: Identify Reuse Candidates121122Scan all requirements for patterns that indicate reuse potential. Candidates fall into three categories:123124#### Cross-Cutting Concerns125126Requirements that appear in virtually every software system:127128| Domain | Examples |129|--------|----------|130| Authentication | User registration, login, password reset, session management, MFA |131| Authorization | Role-based access control, permission matrices, privilege escalation prevention |132| Logging | Audit trails, event logging, log retention policies, log format standards |133| Error Handling | Error codes, user-facing error messages, retry logic, graceful degradation |134| Data Validation | Input sanitization, format validation, boundary checks, encoding rules |135| Notification | Email dispatch, SMS alerts, in-app notifications, notification preferences |136137#### Domain Patterns138139Requirements specific to a business domain but recurring across products in that domain:140141| Domain | Examples |142|--------|----------|143| E-Commerce | Shopping cart, checkout flow, payment processing, order tracking, returns |144| Healthcare | Patient registration, appointment scheduling, prescription management, HIPAA consent |145| Finance | Account management, transaction processing, regulatory reporting, fraud detection |146| Education | Course enrollment, grade management, attendance tracking, learning management |147148#### Regulatory and Compliance149150Requirements mandated by law or regulation that apply to any system within scope:151152| Regulation | Requirements |153|------------|-------------|154| GDPR | Consent management, right to erasure, data portability, privacy impact assessment |155| HIPAA | Business Associate Agreement, PHI encryption, access logging, breach notification |156| SOX | Financial controls, audit trails, segregation of duties, data retention |157| PCI DSS | Cardholder data protection, network segmentation, vulnerability management |158| WCAG 2.1 | Perceivable, operable, understandable, robust accessibility requirements |159160### Step 3: Classify Reuse Type161162For each candidate requirement, classify the reuse type:163164| Reuse Type | Definition | When to Use |165|------------|-----------|-------------|166| Verbatim | Copy the requirement as-is into the new project | Regulatory mandates, universal standards |167| Parameterized | Use a template with variables to fill in | Domain patterns with project-specific values |168| Pattern | Adapt the structure and intent but rewrite specifics | Cross-cutting concerns with varying implementations |169170#### Verbatim Reuse Example171172```173[LIB-SEC-001] The system shall encrypt all data at rest using AES-256.174Type: Verbatim | Domain: Security | Regulation: HIPAA, PCI DSS175```176177#### Parameterized Reuse Example178179```180[LIB-AUTH-001] The system shall lock the user account after181{MAX_ATTEMPTS} consecutive failed login attempts for {LOCKOUT_DURATION}.182Type: Parameterized | Domain: Authentication183Parameters: MAX_ATTEMPTS (integer, default: 5), LOCKOUT_DURATION (minutes, default: 15)184```185186#### Pattern Reuse Example187188```189[LIB-NOTIFY-001] The system shall deliver {NOTIFICATION_TYPE} notifications190to {RECIPIENT_ROLE} within {DELIVERY_SLA} of {TRIGGER_EVENT}.191Type: Pattern | Domain: Notification192Structure: Trigger -> Channel -> Recipient -> SLA193```194195### Step 4: Generate Library Catalog196197For each reusable requirement, create a catalog entry:198199| Field | Description |200|-------|-------------|201| Library ID | LIB-[DOMAIN]-[NNN] |202| Category | Cross-cutting, Domain, or Regulatory |203| Domain | Authentication, Security, E-Commerce, etc. |204| Reuse Type | Verbatim, Parameterized, or Pattern |205| Description | The requirement text or template |206| Parameters | Variables that must be filled (parameterized/pattern only) |207| Defaults | Default values for parameters |208| Constraints | Conditions under which this requirement applies |209| Source Projects | Projects where this requirement has been used |210| Usage Count | Number of times reused across projects |211| Last Used | Date of most recent reuse |212| Validation Status | Verified, Unverified, or Deprecated |213| Standards | Applicable IEEE/ISO/regulatory standards |214215### Step 5: Define Adaptation Guidelines216217Document the process for reusing requirements from the library in new projects:2182191. **Search:** Query the library by domain, category, or keyword.2202. **Evaluate:** Assess applicability to the target project context.2213. **Adapt:** For parameterized and pattern types, fill in project-specific values.2224. **Validate:** Verify the adapted requirement against the target project's vision and constraints.2235. **Register:** Add the new usage to the library's usage tracking.2246. **Trace:** Establish trace links from the reused requirement to target project business goals.225226### Step 6: Commonality and Variability Analysis227228For product line engineering, perform commonality/variability analysis:229230- **Common Requirements:** Requirements shared by all products in the product line (mandatory inclusion).231- **Variable Requirements:** Requirements that differ between products (variation points).232- **Optional Requirements:** Requirements included only in specific product variants.233234Document variation points with:235236| Field | Description |237|-------|-------------|238| Variation Point ID | VP-[NNN] |239| Description | What varies across products |240| Variants | List of possible options |241| Binding Time | Design-time, build-time, or runtime |242| Default Variant | The variant used when no explicit choice is made |243244### Step 7: Generate Output245246Write `projects/<ProjectName>/<phase>/<document>/requirements_library.md` following the output format below.247248## Output Format249250### requirements_library.md251252```markdown253# Requirements Library: [Project Name]254255**Generated:** [Date]256**Standards:** IEEE 29148-2018, Laplante Ch.9257258---259260## Library Summary261262| Metric | Value |263|--------|-------|264| Total Library Entries | N |265| Cross-Cutting Concerns | N |266| Domain Patterns | N |267| Regulatory Requirements | N |268| Verbatim Reuse | N |269| Parameterized Reuse | N |270| Pattern Reuse | N |271272---273274## Library Catalog275276### Cross-Cutting Concerns277278| Library ID | Domain | Reuse Type | Description | Parameters |279|------------|--------|-----------|-------------|------------|280| LIB-AUTH-001 | Authentication | Parameterized | Account lockout | MAX_ATTEMPTS, LOCKOUT_DURATION |281282### Domain Patterns283284| Library ID | Domain | Reuse Type | Description | Parameters |285|------------|--------|-----------|-------------|------------|286| LIB-ECOM-001 | E-Commerce | Pattern | Checkout flow | PAYMENT_METHODS, TAX_RULES |287288### Regulatory Requirements289290| Library ID | Regulation | Reuse Type | Description | Applicability |291|------------|-----------|-----------|-------------|---------------|292| LIB-GDPR-001 | GDPR | Verbatim | Consent management | All EU-facing systems |293294---295296## Adaptation Guidelines297298[Step-by-step process for reusing library entries]299300---301302## Commonality/Variability Analysis303304| VP ID | Description | Variants | Binding Time |305|-------|-------------|----------|-------------|306| VP-001 | Payment processing | Stripe, PayPal, Square | Build-time |307308---309310## Usage Tracking311312| Library ID | Source Project | Target Project | Date Reused | Adaptation Notes |313|------------|---------------|----------------|-------------|-----------------|314| LIB-AUTH-001 | Project A | Project B | [Date] | MAX_ATTEMPTS=3 |315```316317## Common Pitfalls318319- **Premature generalization:** Do not extract a pattern from a single instance. A requirement is a reuse candidate only after it has appeared in at least one project and has clear cross-project applicability.320- **Over-parameterization:** Too many parameters make a template harder to use than writing from scratch. Limit parameterized templates to 5 or fewer variables.321- **Stale library entries:** Requirements that reference obsolete technologies or superseded regulations shall be marked Deprecated and excluded from new project reuse.322- **Ignoring context:** A requirement that works in one domain may be harmful in another. Always validate adapted requirements against the target project's specific constraints.323- **Copy without trace:** Reused requirements must still be traced to the target project's business goals. Reuse does not exempt a requirement from traceability obligations.324325## Verification Checklist326327- [ ] All cross-cutting concerns in output artifacts have been evaluated for reuse potential.328- [ ] Each library entry has a unique LIB-[DOMAIN]-[NNN] identifier.329- [ ] Reuse type is classified as Verbatim, Parameterized, or Pattern.330- [ ] Parameterized templates include parameter definitions with defaults.331- [ ] Adaptation guidelines define the search-evaluate-adapt-validate-register-trace workflow.332- [ ] Variation points are documented for product line requirements.333- [ ] No library entry references undefined or subjective terms.334335## Integration336337- **Upstream:** `08-requirements-management`, `09-traceability-engineering`, `10-requirements-metrics`338- **Downstream:** Future project initialization skills, product line engineering339- **Optional:** This skill is not required for single-product organizations340341## Standards342343- **IEEE Std 29148-2018:** Requirements reuse and product line provisions.344- **Laplante Ch.9:** Software product line engineering and requirements reuse.345- **Wiegers Practice 20:** Requirements process improvement and institutionalization.346- **IEEE Std 610.12-1990:** Terminology definitions.347348## Resources349350- `references/reuse-patterns.md`: Requirements reuse pattern taxonomy and decision criteria.351- `references/product-line-requirements.md`: SPL commonality/variability analysis guide.352353---354**Last Updated:** 2026-03-07355**Skill Version:** 1.0.0