Validate

Validation Orchestrator

Run all applicable validators against recent code changes.

Step 1: Determine which validators to run

Check what files have changed. Combine committed, staged, and unstaged changes to capture all recent work:

{ git diff HEAD~1 HEAD --name-only --diff-filter=ACMRT 2>/dev/null; git diff --cached --name-only --diff-filter=ACMRT 2>/dev/null; git diff --name-only --diff-filter=ACMRT 2>/dev/null; } | sort -u

Based on file extensions, select validators:

• .go files → run go-effective, go-proverbs
• .py files → run python-style
• .ts or .tsx files → run typescript-style
• All files → run security
• All files → run state-machine
• All files → run error-handling

Step 2: Run validators in parallel

Use the Task tool to spawn validators in parallel. For each applicable validator, create a Task with:

• subagent_type: "general-purpose"
• prompt: Use the Skill tool to invoke the validator. The prompt must explicitly require skill invocation and verbatim JSON output.

Example Task prompt for each validator:

Invoke the `go-effective` skill using the Skill tool (skill: "go-effective"). Return its JSON output verbatim — do not summarize, reformat, or re-implement the validation logic.

Go files changed:

1. Task: Invoke go-effective skill and return JSON output verbatim.
2. Task: Invoke go-proverbs skill and return JSON output verbatim.
3. Task: Invoke security skill and return JSON output verbatim.
4. Task: Invoke state-machine skill and return JSON output verbatim.
5. Task: Invoke error-handling skill and return JSON output verbatim.

Python files changed:

1. Task: Invoke python-style skill and return JSON output verbatim.
2. Task: Invoke security skill and return JSON output verbatim.
3. Task: Invoke state-machine skill and return JSON output verbatim.
4. Task: Invoke error-handling skill and return JSON output verbatim.

TypeScript files changed:

1. Task: Invoke typescript-style skill and return JSON output verbatim.
2. Task: Invoke security skill and return JSON output verbatim.
3. Task: Invoke state-machine skill and return JSON output verbatim.
4. Task: Invoke error-handling skill and return JSON output verbatim.

Mixed languages: Combine all applicable validators. Security, state-machine, and error-handling always run exactly once regardless of how many languages are detected.

Run all applicable Tasks in parallel (multiple Task calls in one response).

Step 3: Aggregate and present results

Collect all validator outputs and present a human-readable summary. Do NOT display raw validator JSON to the user — interpret and summarise the results.

# Validation Results

| Validator | Result | HARD | SHOULD | WARN |
|-----------|--------|------|--------|------|
| {validator} | {✓ pass / ✗ fail} | {count} | {count} | {count} |

## HARD violations (must fix)
- **{validator}** `{file}:{line}` — {rule description}

## SHOULD violations (fix or justify)
- **{validator}** `{file}:{line}` — {rule description}
  - *Accepted:* {reason — e.g., pre-existing code outside diff scope, justified trade-off}

## Warnings
- {count} advisory warnings from {validator} ({brief context})

## Verdict
**PASS / PASS with warnings / FAIL** — {1-2 sentence summary with reasoning}

Important formatting rules:

• One line per validator in the summary table.
• List HARD violations with file location and rule.
• For each SHOULD violation, explain why it was accepted or flag it for fixing.
• Group warnings concisely — don't list every warning individually unless actionable.
• The verdict must explain the reasoning (e.g., "all violations are in pre-existing code outside the diff scope").
• Omit empty sections (e.g., if no HARD violations, don't include the HARD violations heading).

Step 4: Verdict

If any HARD violations or unjustified SHOULD violations:

• FAIL - list what must be fixed

If only warnings:

• PASS with warnings - note them but don't block

If clean:

• PASS - ready for commit