PIXARTSeu Writing Plans
Overview
Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.
Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.
Announce at start: "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."
Context: This should be run in a dedicated worktree (created by brainstorming skill).
Save plans to: docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md
Bite-Sized Task Granularity
Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):
- "Write the failing test" - step
- "Run it to make sure it fails" - step
- "Implement the minimal code to make the test pass" - step
- "Run the tests and make sure they pass" - step
- "Commit" - step
Plan Document Header
Every plan MUST start with this header:
# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan
> **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.
**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]
**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]
**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]
---
Task Structure
### Task N: [Component Name]
**Files:**
- Create: `exact/path/to/file.py`
- Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145`
- Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py`
**Step 1: Write the failing test**
```python
def test_specific_behavior():
result = function(input)
assert result == expected
```
**Step 2: Run test to verify it fails**
Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`
Expected: FAIL with "function not defined"
**Step 3: Write minimal implementation**
```python
def function(input):
return expected
```
**Step 4: Run test to verify it passes**
Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`
Expected: PASS
**Step 5: Commit**
```bash
git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py
git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"
```
Remember
- Exact file paths always
- Complete code in plan (not "add validation")
- Exact commands with expected output
- Reference relevant skills with @ syntax
- DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits
Execution Handoff
After saving the plan, offer execution choice:
"Plan complete and saved to docs/plans/<filename>.md. Two execution options:
1. Subagent-Driven (this session) - I dispatch fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration
2. Parallel Session (separate) - Open new session with executing-plans, batch execution with checkpoints
Which approach?"
If Subagent-Driven chosen:
- REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development
- Stay in this session
- Fresh subagent per task + code review
If Parallel Session chosen:
- Guide them to open new session in worktree
- REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: New session uses superpowers:executing-plans
Examples
Example 1: Simple Feature Plan
Feature: "Add dark mode toggle" Plan structure: 1. Create toggle component, 2. Add theme context, 3. Update CSS variables, 4. Test all pages Output: 4-task plan with exact file paths and code snippets
Example 2: Complex Feature Plan
Feature: "Implement user authentication" Plan structure: 1. Database schema, 2. Auth API endpoints, 3. Login form, 4. Session management, 5. Protected routes, 6. Tests Output: 6-task plan with dependencies and integration points
Example 3: Refactoring Plan
Feature: "Reorganize component folder structure" Plan structure: 1. Create new structure, 2. Move files, 3. Update imports, 4. Run tests, 5. Delete old folders Output: 5-task plan with exact mv commands and import patterns
Troubleshooting
Issue: Plan seems too detailed
Solution: Bite-sized tasks are intentional. Each step should take 2-5 minutes. This prevents context loss and enables parallel execution.
Issue: Plan is missing dependencies
Solution: Add explicit "depends on Task X" notes. Clarify which tasks can run in parallel vs sequentially.
Issue: Code examples in plan are incomplete
Solution: Complete code is required. Don't write "add validation" — write the exact validation code. Implementer should copy-paste, not guess.