Enforce Policy As Code

Enforce Policy as Code

Implement declarative policy enforcement using OPA Gatekeeper or Kyverno for Kubernetes resource validation and mutation.

When to Use

• Enforce organizational standards for resource configuration (labels, annotations, limits)
• Prevent security misconfigurations (privileged containers, host namespaces, insecure images)
• Ensure compliance requirements are met before resources deployed
• Standardize resource naming conventions and metadata
• Implement automated remediation through mutation policies
• Audit existing cluster resources against policies without blocking
• Integrate policy validation into CI/CD pipelines for shift-left approach

Inputs

• Required: Kubernetes cluster with admin access
• Required: Choice of policy engine (OPA Gatekeeper or Kyverno)
• Required: List of policies to enforce (security, compliance, operational)
• Optional: Existing resources to audit
• Optional: Exemption/exclusion patterns for specific namespaces or resources
• Optional: CI/CD pipeline configuration for pre-deployment validation

Procedure

See Extended Examples for complete configuration files and templates.

Step 1: Install Policy Engine

Deploy OPA Gatekeeper or Kyverno as admission controller.

For OPA Gatekeeper:

# Install Gatekeeper using Helm
helm repo add gatekeeper https://open-policy-agent.github.io/gatekeeper/charts
helm repo update

# Install with audit enabled
helm install gatekeeper gatekeeper/gatekeeper \
  --namespace gatekeeper-system \
  --create-namespace \
  --set audit.replicas=2 \
  --set replicas=3 \
  --set validatingWebhookFailurePolicy=Fail \
  --set auditInterval=60

# Verify installation
kubectl get pods -n gatekeeper-system
kubectl get crd | grep gatekeeper

# Check webhook configuration
kubectl get validatingwebhookconfigurations gatekeeper-validating-webhook-configuration -o yaml

For Kyverno:

# Install Kyverno using Helm
helm repo add kyverno https://kyverno.github.io/kyverno/
helm repo update

# Install with HA setup
helm install kyverno kyverno/kyverno \
  --namespace kyverno \
  --create-namespace \
  --set replicaCount=3 \
  --set admissionController.replicas=3 \
  --set backgroundController.replicas=2 \
  --set cleanupController.replicas=2

# Verify installation
kubectl get pods -n kyverno
kubectl get crd | grep kyverno

# Check webhook configurations
kubectl get validatingwebhookconfigurations kyverno-resource-validating-webhook-cfg
kubectl get mutatingwebhookconfigurations kyverno-resource-mutating-webhook-cfg

Create namespace exclusions:

# gatekeeper-config.yaml
apiVersion: config.gatekeeper.sh/v1alpha1
kind: Config
metadata:
  name: config
  namespace: gatekeeper-system
spec:
  match:
    - excludedNamespaces:
      - kube-system
      - kube-public
      - kube-node-lease
      - gatekeeper-system
      processes:
      - audit
      - webhook
  validation:
    traces:
      - user: system:serviceaccount:gatekeeper-system:gatekeeper-admin
        kind:
          group: ""
          version: v1
          kind: Namespace

Expected: Policy engine pods running with multiple replicas. CRDs installed (ConstraintTemplate, Constraint for Gatekeeper; ClusterPolicy, Policy for Kyverno). Validating/mutating webhooks active. Audit controller running. Excluded namespaces are exempt from both the webhook and the audit process — they do NOT report violations because they are never evaluated, not because they are compliant, so over-excluding hides risk rather than surfacing it.

On failure:

• Check pod logs: kubectl logs -n gatekeeper-system -l app=gatekeeper --tail=50
• Verify webhook endpoints reachable: kubectl get endpoints -n gatekeeper-system
• Check for port conflicts or certificate issues in webhook logs
• Ensure cluster has sufficient resources (policy engines need ~500MB per replica)
• Review RBAC permissions: kubectl auth can-i create constrainttemplates --as=system:serviceaccount:gatekeeper-system:gatekeeper-admin

Step 2: Define Constraint Templates and Policies

Create reusable policy templates and specific constraints.

OPA Gatekeeper Constraint Template:

# required-labels-template.yaml
apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
  name: k8srequiredlabels
  annotations:
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Kyverno ClusterPolicy:

# kyverno-policies.yaml
apiVersion: kyverno.io/v1
kind: ClusterPolicy
metadata:
  name: require-labels
  annotations:
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Apply policies:

# Apply Gatekeeper templates and constraints
kubectl apply -f required-labels-template.yaml

# Apply Kyverno policies
kubectl apply -f kyverno-policies.yaml

# Verify constraint/policy status
kubectl get constraints
kubectl get clusterpolicies

# Check for any policy errors
kubectl describe k8srequiredlabels require-app-labels
kubectl describe clusterpolicy require-labels

Expected: ConstraintTemplates/ClusterPolicies created successfully. Constraints show status "True" for enforcement. No errors in policy definitions. Webhook begins evaluating new resources against policies.

On failure:

• Validate Rego syntax (Gatekeeper): Use opa test locally (or gator for offline testing) or check constraint status
• Check policy YAML syntax: kubectl apply --dry-run=client -f policy.yaml
• Review constraint status: kubectl get constraint -o yaml | grep -A 10 status
• Test with simple policy first, then add complexity
• Verify match criteria (kinds, namespaces) are correct

Step 3: Test Policy Enforcement

Validate policies block non-compliant resources and allow compliant ones.

Create test manifests:

# test-non-compliant.yaml
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: test-no-labels
  namespace: production
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Test policies:

# Attempt to create non-compliant resource (should fail)
kubectl apply -f test-non-compliant.yaml
# Expected: Error with policy violation message

# Create compliant resource (should succeed)
kubectl apply -f test-compliant.yaml
# Expected: deployment.apps/test-compliant created

# Test with dry-run for validation
kubectl apply -f test-non-compliant.yaml --dry-run=server
# Shows policy violations without actually creating resource

# Clean up
kubectl delete -f test-compliant.yaml

Test with policy reporting (Kyverno):

# Check policy reports
kubectl get policyreports -A
kubectl get clusterpolicyreports

# View detailed report
kubectl get policyreport -n production -o yaml

# Check policy rule results
kubectl get policyreport -n production -o jsonpath='{.items[0].results}' | jq .

Expected: Non-compliant resources rejected with clear violation messages. Compliant resources created successfully. Policy reports show pass/fail results. Dry-run validation works without creating resources.

On failure:

• Check if policy is in audit mode instead of enforce: validationFailureAction: audit
• Verify webhook is processing requests: kubectl logs -n gatekeeper-system -l app=gatekeeper
• Check for namespace exclusions that might exempt test namespace
• Test webhook connectivity: kubectl run test --rm -it --image=busybox --restart=Never
• Review webhook failure policy (Ignore vs Fail)

Step 4: Implement Mutation Policies

Configure automatic remediation through mutation.

Gatekeeper mutation:

# gatekeeper-mutations.yaml
apiVersion: mutations.gatekeeper.sh/v1beta1
kind: Assign
metadata:
  name: add-default-labels
spec:
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Kyverno mutation policies:

# kyverno-mutations.yaml
apiVersion: kyverno.io/v1
kind: ClusterPolicy
metadata:
  name: add-default-labels
spec:
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Apply and test mutations:

# Apply mutation policies
kubectl apply -f gatekeeper-mutations.yaml
# OR
kubectl apply -f kyverno-mutations.yaml

# Test mutation with a deployment
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Expected: Mutations automatically add labels, resources, or modify images. Deployed resources show mutated values. Mutations logged in policy engine logs. No errors during mutation application.

On failure:

• Check mutation webhook is enabled: kubectl get mutatingwebhookconfiguration
• Verify mutation policy syntax: especially JSON paths and conditions
• Review logs: kubectl logs -n kyverno deploy/kyverno-admission-controller
• Test mutations don't conflict (multiple mutations on same field)
• Ensure mutation applied before validation (order matters — validations evaluate the mutated resource, not the original)

Step 5: Enable Audit Mode and Reporting

Configure audit to identify violations in existing resources without blocking.

Gatekeeper audit:

# Audit runs automatically based on auditInterval setting
# Check audit results
kubectl get constraints -o json | \
  jq '.items[] | {name: .metadata.name, violations: .status.totalViolations}'

# Get detailed violation information
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Kyverno audit and reporting:

# Generate policy reports for existing resources
kubectl create job --from=cronjob/kyverno-cleanup-controller -n kyverno manual-report-gen

# View policy reports
kubectl get policyreport -A
kubectl get clusterpolicyreport
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Create dashboard for policy compliance:

# prometheus-rules.yaml
apiVersion: monitoring.coreos.com/v1
kind: PrometheusRule
metadata:
  name: policy-alerts
  namespace: monitoring
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Expected: Audit identifies violations in existing resources without blocking deployments. Policy reports generated with pass/fail counts. Violations exportable for review. Metrics exposed for monitoring. Alerts fire on increasing violations.

On failure:

• Verify audit controller running: kubectl get pods -n gatekeeper-system -l gatekeeper.sh/operation=audit
• Check audit interval setting in installation
• Review audit logs for errors: kubectl logs -n gatekeeper-system -l gatekeeper.sh/operation=audit
• Ensure RBAC permissions allow reading all resource types for audit
• Verify CRD status field being populated: kubectl get constraint -o yaml | grep -A 20 status

Step 6: Integrate with CI/CD Pipeline

Add pre-deployment policy validation to shift-left policy enforcement.

CI/CD integration script:

#!/bin/bash
# validate-policies.sh

set -e

echo "=== Policy Validation for CI/CD ==="
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

GitHub Actions workflow:

# .github/workflows/policy-validation.yaml
name: Policy Validation

on:
  pull_request:
    paths:
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Pre-commit hook:

#!/bin/bash
# .git/hooks/pre-commit

# Validate Kubernetes manifests against policies
if git diff --cached --name-only | grep -E 'manifests/.*\.yaml$'; then
  echo "Validating Kubernetes manifests against policies..."
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete configuration)

Expected: CI/CD pipeline validates manifests before deployment. Policy violations fail pipeline with clear messages. Policy reports attached to PR. Pre-commit hooks catch violations early. Developers notified of policy issues before reaching cluster.

On failure:

• Verify CLI tools installed and in PATH
• Check kubeconfig credentials valid for fetching policies
• Test policy validation locally first: kyverno apply policy.yaml --resource manifest.yaml
• Ensure policies synced from cluster are complete
• Review policy CLI logs for specific validation errors

Validation

• Policy engine pods running with HA configuration
• Validating and mutating webhooks active and reachable
• Constraint templates and policies created without errors
• Non-compliant resources rejected with clear violation messages
• Compliant resources deploy successfully
• Mutation policies automatically remediate resources
• Audit mode identifies violations in existing resources
• Policy reports generated and accessible
• Metrics exposed for policy compliance monitoring
• CI/CD pipeline validates manifests pre-deployment
• Pre-commit hooks prevent policy violations
• Namespace exclusions configured appropriately

Common Pitfalls

• Webhook Failure Policy: failurePolicy: Fail blocks all resources if webhook unavailable. Use Ignore for non-critical policies, but understand security implications. Test webhook availability before enforcing.

• Too Restrictive Initial Policies: Starting with enforcement mode on strict policies breaks existing workloads. Begin with audit mode, review violations, communicate with teams, then enforce gradually.

• Missing Resource Specifications: Policies must specify API groups, versions, and kinds correctly. Use kubectl api-resources to find exact values. Wildcards (*) convenient but can cause performance issues.

• Performance Impact: Policy evaluation adds latency to admission. Keep policies efficient, use appropriate matching criteria, monitor webhook latency metrics.

• Background Scanning: Background audit scans entire cluster. Can be resource-intensive in large clusters. Adjust audit interval based on cluster size and policy count.

• Version Compatibility: Policy CRD versions change. Gatekeeper v3 uses v1beta1 constraints, Kyverno v1.11 uses kyverno.io/v1. Check docs for your version.

Related Skills

• manage-kubernetes-secrets - Secret validation policies
• security-audit-codebase - Complementary security scanning
• deploy-to-kubernetes - Application deployment with policy validation
• setup-service-mesh - Service mesh authorization policies complement admission policies
• configure-api-gateway - Gateway policies work alongside admission policies
• implement-gitops-workflow - GitOps with policy validation in pipeline