Create Prd

Create PRD Workflow

Your job is to work with the user through an interactive wizard to create a high-level PRD using language that is easy to understand for non-technical people. The PRD defines a [feature] with all [tasks] to be created in [PRODUCT_MANAGEMENT_TOOL].

Team leads: execute this workflow directly. Do not delegate it.

Mandatory Preparation

1. Read [PRODUCT_MANAGEMENT_TOOL]-specific guide at /.claude/reference/product-management/[PRODUCT_MANAGEMENT_TOOL].md to understand terminology, status mapping, ID format, and MCP configuration.

Workflow

Follow the steps below to create the PRD.

Step 1: Initialize [PRODUCT_MANAGEMENT_TOOL]

Follow initialization steps in /.claude/reference/product-management/[PRODUCT_MANAGEMENT_TOOL].md.

Step 2: Ask what [feature] to build

Use the AskUserQuestion tool to ask the user what [feature] they want to build:

AskUserQuestion with:
- question: "What feature would you like to build?"
- header: "Feature"
- multiSelect: false
- options:
  - label: "New feature", description: "Create a new feature"
  - label: "Enhancement", description: "Enhance existing functionality"

Users will typically use the custom text option to describe their [feature].

If the user's answer comes back empty:

• Tell the user to enable Plan Mode and try again
• STOP the workflow

If you receive a valid answer:

• Use the text they entered as the [feature] description for research

Step 3: Research and understand the [feature]

Conduct deep research for a feasible solution that takes the existing codebase and [features] into consideration:

• Understand the user's requirements and business context
• Investigate the current state and implementation in the codebase:
  • Specify which self-contained system (e.g., main, account) the [feature] belongs to. Back-office features live under account/Core/Features/BackOffice/ and are served on the back-office host.
  • Respect the multi-tenant nature: design [features] to work for one tenant by default, unless otherwise specified
• Use MCP tools (like context7 for library docs), Perplexity for online research, or web research for best practices and technologies
• Read relevant code files and rule files to understand patterns and conventions

Step 4: Interactive requirements wizard

Now that you've done research, ask the user ALL required questions in ONE single AskUserQuestion call:

AskUserQuestion with 3 questions:

Question 1 - Feature name:
- question: "What is the name of this feature? (Use sentence case, e.g., 'User management' not 'User Management')"
- header: "Feature name"
- multiSelect: false
- options:
  - label: "Custom name", description: "Enter your feature name"

Question 2 - Self-contained system (put the most likely SCS first based on research):
- question: "Which self-contained system (SCS) should this feature belong to?"
- header: "SCS"
- multiSelect: false
- options:
  - label: "account", description: "Tenant and user management system (also hosts the back-office surface for support and system admin tools)"
  - label: "main", description: "Primary shell application where you build your product"
  - label: "[Suggested SCS based on research]", description: "Based on my analysis"

Question 3 - E2E tests:
- question: "Should this PRD include Playwright end-to-end tests?"
- header: "E2E Tests"
- multiSelect: false
- options:
  - label: "Yes", description: "Include E2E tests as a separate [task]"
  - label: "No", description: "Skip E2E tests for now"

Ask additional questions:

After the first 3 questions, ask additional relevant questions to gather comprehensive requirements. Use multiple AskUserQuestion calls (max 4 questions per call, max 4 options per question).

Ask as many questions as needed to understand:

• User roles and permissions
• Complexity level (simple CRUD, workflow-based, complex logic)
• Integration points with existing features
• Validation rules and constraints
• Edge cases to consider
• Data relationships and dependencies

The more questions you ask, the better the PRD.

Implementation approach:

AskUserQuestion with:
- question: "Should we create frontend mockups first for UI/UX exploration?"
- header: "Approach"
- multiSelect: false
- options:
  - label: "Yes", description: "Frontend mockups first to validate UI/UX before backend"
  - label: "No", description: "Backend-first approach (default)"

Step 5: Draft the complete PRD and get approval

Based on all the research and user answers, draft the complete PRD.

Create the PRD content following the example PRD structure:

1. High-level PRD description:

   • Use sentence case for level-1 headers
   • Stay at a high level—no implementation details or code examples
   • Use correct domain terminology: multi-tenant, self-contained system, shared kernel, tenant, user, etc.
   • Specify which self-contained system(s) are in scope
   • Avoid repetition

2. [Tasks] section structured based on wizard answers:

   Examples based on common patterns:

   Example 1 - Backend-first approach (default):

   • Backend implementation
   • Frontend implementation
   • E2E tests (if E2E tests selected)

   Example 2 - Frontend-first approach:

   • Frontend mockups/prototypes with static data
   • Backend implementation based on frontend contract
   • Integration (connect frontend to backend)
   • E2E tests (if E2E tests selected)

   Example 3 - Backend-only [feature]:

   • Backend implementation (API endpoints, commands, queries, migrations, tests)

   Example 4 - Large complex [feature]:

   • Backend core functionality
   • Frontend core UI
   • Backend advanced functionality
   • Frontend advanced features
   • E2E tests (if E2E tests selected)

   Note: These are examples only. Adapt the [task] structure to match the actual [feature] requirements, scope, and user answers. All work is sequential -- one [task] fully completed before the next starts.

3. [Task] guidelines:

   • Each [task] should be a logical grouping (e.g., "all backend", "all frontend", "all e2e tests")
   • Keep [tasks] focused (one commit per [task])
   • Write a clear paragraph describing what each [task] delivers
   • Each [task] represents a complete vertical slice that can be implemented, reviewed, and committed independently
   • Repeat all relevant business rules in each task description (permissions, validations, constraints)
   • Engineers/reviewers only read the task description, not the feature overview
   • List [tasks] in implementation order (the order they should be implemented)
   • E2E tests should typically be the final [task]
   • Important: When using MCP-based [PRODUCT_MANAGEMENT_TOOL], create [tasks] in the same order they appear in the PRD—this defines the implementation sequence

Example of WRONG task description (missing business rules):

### 1. Backend for team management

This task implements team CRUD operations with API endpoints and tests.

- Create Team aggregate
- Create CreateTeam command
- Create API endpoints
- Create tests

Example of CORRECT task description (includes business rules):

### 1. Backend for team management

This task implements team CRUD operations with API endpoints and tests. Teams are managed by Tenant Owners and Admins only. Team names must be unique within a tenant.

- Create Team aggregate with name uniqueness validation
- Create CreateTeam command with Owner/Admin permission guard
- Create UpdateTeam command with Owner/Admin permission guard
- Create DeleteTeam command with Owner/Admin permission guard
- Create API endpoints for all operations
- Create tests covering permissions (403 for non-owners/admins), name uniqueness, tenant isolation

4. Frontend task descriptions - use ASCII art fat marker sketches:

For frontend tasks, include ASCII art fat marker sketches showing UI layout and components:

### 2. Frontend for user management

This task implements the Users page UI. Users can only be managed by Tenant Owners or Admins.

┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Users                   [+ Invite user] │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Email           Name         Role   │ │
│ ├─────────────────────────────────────┤ │
│ │ admin@...       John Doe     Owner  │ │
│ │ member@...      Jane Smith   Member │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘

- Add Users navigation menu item
- Create Users page with table
- Create CreateUserDialog (validates email uniqueness)
- Show/hide [+ Invite user] button based on role (Owner/Admin only)
- Create UserDetailsSidePane
- Integrate all API operations

ASCII sketches help engineers visualize the UI before coding.

Show the complete PRD to the user - display the full content including all [tasks] with their descriptions.

Ask for approval: "Does this PRD look good?" (Yes/No)

• If No: Ask what to change, update the PRD content, show again, repeat approval
• If Yes: Continue to Step 6

Step 6: Create [feature] and [tasks] in [PRODUCT_MANAGEMENT_TOOL]

Follow your [PRODUCT_MANAGEMENT_TOOL]-specific guide at /.claude/reference/product-management/[PRODUCT_MANAGEMENT_TOOL].md to understand how to create items based on the PRD.

Create:

• [feature] with name=[feature name from Step 4 wizard], assign to "me"
• [task] for each [task] in the PRD with:
  • Title: [task title] (sentence case)
  • Description: [task description paragraph] + [subtask bullets] (use bullets, NOT checkboxes)
  • Link to parent [feature]
  • Assign to "me"
• Initialize all items in [Planned] status, in the current iteration/sprint

Each [task] description must include:

1. A paragraph explaining what the task delivers
2. Bullet points (NOT checkboxes) listing the subtasks for implementation guidance

After creating all [tasks], update each [feature]'s description in [PRODUCT_MANAGEMENT_TOOL] with the full PRD content for that [feature] -- the intro paragraph, overview section, and core changes section (everything above the "Tasks overview" heading). This ensures the PRD context is available to anyone viewing the [feature] in [PRODUCT_MANAGEMENT_TOOL].

Inform user: The [feature] and all [tasks] have been created in [PRODUCT_MANAGEMENT_TOOL]. Ask the user if they would like to start implementing the first task now.

Guidelines

✅ DO:

• Follow the exact structure in the example PRD
• Conduct deep research by reading code, consulting rule files, and using MCP tools
• Specify the self-contained system for the [feature]
• Respect multi-tenant design by default
• Keep the PRD high level without code snippets
• Ask comprehensive questions in Step 4 to gather all requirements
• Show PRD for approval (Step 5) before creating anything
• Use the AskUserQuestion tool for all wizard questions in Plan Mode

❌ DON'T:

• Write PRDs as user stories—use the example structure
• Include implementation details or code examples in the PRD
• Skip research—always understand the problem first
• Ignore rule files
• Repeat information across sections
• Write titles in Title Case—use sentence case
• Create [feature] or [tasks] in [PRODUCT_MANAGEMENT_TOOL] before getting PRD approval in Step 5
• Rename the file—must be prd.md
• Save questions in the PRD file
• Create [tasks] that split tests, implementation, and migrations across separate [tasks]—each [task] must be a complete vertical slice
• Ask the user clarifying questions before Step 4

Do the research. Read code and rule files. Ask comprehensive questions. Create excellent PRDs.