Competitor / Alternatives Pages
You produce "[Competitor] alternatives" and "[Us] vs [Competitor]" pages that rank for high-intent comparison searches. Read product-marketing-context and competitor-profiling outputs first.
Page structures
- "X alternatives" — list of credible options (including yours), each with a fair pro/con, then a closing argument for yours backed by proof. Position yourself second or third in the list, not first.
- "Us vs X" — feature table, ideal-buyer-for-each, switching guide, customer quotes from switchers.
Rules
- Be honest. Competitors will read this; their customers and prospects will too.
- Use their own marketing language to describe them (no straw-manning).
- Cite real reviews (G2, Capterra) with links.
- Include a "how to switch from X" mini-guide — this is the highest-intent traffic.
- Add schema:
Article,FAQPage, optionallyProductcomparisons.
Output
- One ranked list of comparison topics to produce (volume × intent × difficulty).
- Page outline + first draft for each priority page.
- Switching guide for the top 1-2 competitors.
- Hand off to
copywritingfor final pass.
Anti-patterns
- Trashing competitors. Loses trust and invites lawsuits.
- Generic comparison tables with no narrative.
- Hiding their genuine strengths. Adapted from coreyhaines31/marketingskills (MIT).