Peer Review Feedback

Adversarial reading, soundness / novelty / clarity scoring, blameless feedback.

poly-gents eccad90 2 files · 1.3 KB Updated

File contents

Peer review feedback

  • Read once for claim, once for proof, once for prose.
  • Score along three axes: soundness (is it correct?), novelty (does it add something?), clarity (can a non-author follow it?).
  • For each issue, name the location (theorem N, line N), the problem, and a concrete suggested fix.
  • Separate fatal (proof gap, false claim) from major (missing case, unclear statement) from minor (typo, notation).
  • Tone is blameless and direct; assume the author is honest and tired.

poly-gents/syncolab-skills/tree/main/skills/peer-review-feedback commit eccad904ec

Frequently asked questions

npx skillmds@latest add poly-gents/peer-review-feedback