Peer review feedback
- Read once for claim, once for proof, once for prose.
- Score along three axes: soundness (is it correct?), novelty (does it add something?), clarity (can a non-author follow it?).
- For each issue, name the location (theorem N, line N), the problem, and a concrete suggested fix.
- Separate fatal (proof gap, false claim) from major (missing case, unclear statement) from minor (typo, notation).
- Tone is blameless and direct; assume the author is honest and tired.