pproenca Linguistic and Semantic Algorithms Best Practices
Reference of 40 algorithms an agent should reach for when extracting structure, meaning, history, or risk signals from source code and commit data. Categories are ordered by insight-per-effort — how much non-obvious truth the technique exposes relative to how easy it is to apply. The first two categories target the highest-leverage questions: what business entities live in this code? and where else does this concept already exist? — questions that grep and intuition cannot answer.
When to Apply
Reach for these algorithms when:
- Orienting in an unfamiliar codebase: PageRank the import graph to find the core, run LDA over identifier tokens to discover business themes, mine change coupling to surface hidden architectural couplings.
- Hunting a bug from a description: BM25 + history prior + embedding re-rank produces a ranked file shortlist far better than grep.
- Scoping a feature: find prior PRs that did similar work via embedding similarity; map the feature's vocabulary against the codebase's domain via TF-IDF and noun-phrase mining.
- Reviewing a refactor: AST-level GumTree diff reveals semantic impact text diff hides; PDG isomorphism finds the "same logic, different code" twin you should also update.
- Auditing risk: hotspots (churn × complexity), bus factor, defect-magnet density, dead-code candidates — together they direct attention to the parts of the codebase that pay back attention.
- Identifying domain entities and bounded contexts: noun-phrase mining + TF-IDF rare-term extraction + Louvain communities + Jensen-Shannon divergence on per-cluster vocabulary.
Rule Categories by Priority
| Priority |
Category |
Impact |
Prefix |
Question answered |
| 1 |
Concept & Domain Extraction |
CRITICAL |
concept- |
What business entities live in this code? |
| 2 |
Semantic Similarity & Feature Mapping |
CRITICAL |
sim- |
Where else does this concept already exist? |
| 3 |
Architectural Topology |
HIGH |
graph- |
What is the shape of this codebase? |
| 4 |
Co-Change & Temporal Mining |
HIGH |
mine- |
What hidden couplings does history reveal? |
| 5 |
Clone & Duplication Detection |
MEDIUM-HIGH |
clone- |
Where are we repeating ourselves? |
| 6 |
Bug & Feature Localization |
MEDIUM-HIGH |
local- |
Given a description, where in code? |
| 7 |
Identifier Linguistics |
MEDIUM |
ling- |
How to prepare tokens so the other algorithms work? |
| 8 |
Complexity & Risk Metrics |
MEDIUM |
risk- |
Where is the danger concentrated? |
Quick Reference
1. Concept & Domain Extraction (CRITICAL)
concept-lda-topic-modeling — LDA over identifier tokens surfaces latent business themes
concept-noun-phrase-mining — POS-tag + chunk identifiers to extract entity candidates
concept-tfidf-rare-terms — IDF against a generic corpus isolates domain vocabulary from framework noise
concept-identifier-cooccurrence-network — PMI-weighted co-occurrence graph reveals conceptual neighborhoods
concept-entity-name-resolution — Cluster name variants (user/usr/u/userAccount) via embedding + edit distance
concept-bounded-context-detection — Louvain + Jensen-Shannon divergence detects DDD bounded contexts
2. Semantic Similarity & Feature Mapping (CRITICAL)
sim-codebert-embeddings — CodeBERT + cosine for semantic code search across renames
sim-pdg-semantic-clones — Program Dependence Graph isomorphism finds Type-4 clones
sim-cross-pr-feature-mapping — Embed merged PRs once, retrieve precedent at feature-design time
sim-cosine-vsm-files — TF-IDF VSM file similarity when no GPU is available
sim-call-pattern-similarity — N-grams on call-sequence find behavioral twins
sim-doc-code-alignment — Joint code-doc embedding flags drift between docs and code
3. Architectural Topology (HIGH)
graph-pagerank-core — PageRank the import graph to find the codebase core
graph-betweenness-bottlenecks — Betweenness centrality surfaces bottleneck modules
graph-louvain-modules — Louvain community detection reveals natural module boundaries
graph-scc-cycle-tangles — Tarjan's SCC algorithm exposes circular-dependency tangles
graph-feedback-arcs — Eades-Lin-Smyth FAS chooses the smallest cycle-breaking cut
4. Co-Change & Temporal Mining (HIGH)
mine-change-coupling — Conditional probability over commit history exposes hidden coupling
mine-hotspots-churn-complexity — Churn × complexity = canonical hotspot score (Tornhill)
mine-bus-factor — Per-file authorship Gini coefficient surfaces knowledge concentration
mine-commit-topic-modeling — LDA on commit messages reveals quarterly themes
mine-bug-fix-density — Classify commits, rank files by fix-density to find defect magnets
mine-codebase-aging — Last-modified age + reachability splits stable code from dead code
5. Clone & Duplication Detection (MEDIUM-HIGH)
clone-minhash-lsh — MinHash + LSH for sub-linear near-duplicate retrieval
clone-simhash — SimHash 64-bit fingerprints for O(1) Hamming-distance lookups
clone-suffix-array-cpd — Token-level suffix array (PMD CPD) for precise clone boundaries
clone-ast-gumtree — GumTree algorithm for fine-grained AST differencing
clone-zhang-shasha-ted — Zhang-Shasha tree edit distance for exact subtree similarity
6. Bug & Feature Localization (MEDIUM-HIGH)
local-tfidf-bug-reports — TF-IDF rank source files against bug report tokens
local-bm25-saturation — BM25 handles length normalization and TF saturation
local-history-prior-localization — Bayesian fusion of IR score with bug-history prior
local-embedding-bug-text — Two-stage BM25 + embedding re-rank for semantic localization
7. Identifier Linguistics (MEDIUM)
ling-camel-snake-split — Split camelCase, snake_case, digit-boundaries before any analysis
ling-abbreviation-expansion — Expand idx→index, mgr→manager via dictionary + mining
ling-porter-stemming — Apply Porter stemmer to unify singular/plural forms
ling-pos-tagging-identifiers — POS-tag identifier heads to flag misnamed functions/classes
8. Complexity & Risk Metrics (MEDIUM)
risk-cyclomatic-mccabe — McCabe cyclomatic complexity for branch-test surface
risk-cognitive-complexity — SonarSource Cognitive Complexity for readability gates
risk-halstead-volume — Halstead volume for language-agnostic size and effort
risk-shannon-entropy-naming — Per-token entropy flags overloaded names
How to Use
Pick the category that matches the user's question, then read one or two specific rules from that category. Most rules cite combinable partners ("Combine with mine-change-coupling...") that compound the signal — read the partner rule when you need higher precision.
For unfamiliar repos, the highest-ROI starting sequence is:
graph-pagerank-core → read the top-20 most central files
concept-lda-topic-modeling + concept-tfidf-rare-terms → identify the business themes
mine-hotspots-churn-complexity → find where the bugs concentrate
mine-change-coupling → uncover hidden architectural couplings
For a single-task bug or feature, the pipeline is:
local-bm25-saturation (broad candidates) → local-embedding-bug-text (semantic re-rank) → local-history-prior-localization (fix-history boost)
sim-cross-pr-feature-mapping for prior precedent on new features
mine-change-coupling to surface partner files that historically move together
Always preprocess identifier tokens via ling-camel-snake-split → ling-abbreviation-expansion → ling-porter-stemming before any vocabulary-based algorithm. Skipping this step silently degrades every downstream signal.
Cross-language parsing. Most rule code examples use Python's built-in ast module for brevity. For real cross-language work (Go, Rust, Java, TS, C++ in the same repo), use tree-sitter — it provides robust parsers for 40+ languages with a uniform API. Every AST-based rule in this skill (PDG clones, GumTree, Zhang-Shasha, POS-tag heads, identifier co-occurrence) maps cleanly onto tree-sitter ASTs.
Reference Files
| File |
Description |
| references/_sections.md |
Category definitions and impact ordering |
| assets/templates/_template.md |
Template for adding new algorithm rules |
| metadata.json |
Version and reference information |
1---2name: linguistic-semantic-algorithms3description: Mapping out an unfamiliar codebase via NLP and graph algorithms — 40 algorithms across topic modelling, semantic embeddings, code graphs, repository mining, clone detection, IR-based bug localization, identifier linguistics, and complexity metrics. Trigger when hunting bugs across many files, scoping a new feature, identifying domain entities, or analyzing commit history — even if the user doesn't explicitly mention algorithms — apply when they ask "where does X live in this codebase?", "what is this codebase about?", "find duplicated logic", "what changed recently?", "who owns this code?", or "is this function risky?".4---5# pproenca Linguistic and Semantic Algorithms Best Practices
6
7Reference of 40 algorithms an agent should reach for when extracting structure, meaning, history, or risk signals from source code and commit data. Categories are ordered by **insight-per-effort** — how much non-obvious truth the technique exposes relative to how easy it is to apply. The first two categories target the highest-leverage questions: *what business entities live in this code?* and *where else does this concept already exist?* — questions that grep and intuition cannot answer.
8
9## When to Apply
10
11Reach for these algorithms when:
12
13- **Orienting in an unfamiliar codebase**: PageRank the import graph to find the core, run LDA over identifier tokens to discover business themes, mine change coupling to surface hidden architectural couplings.
14- **Hunting a bug from a description**: BM25 + history prior + embedding re-rank produces a ranked file shortlist far better than grep.
15- **Scoping a feature**: find prior PRs that did similar work via embedding similarity; map the feature's vocabulary against the codebase's domain via TF-IDF and noun-phrase mining.
16- **Reviewing a refactor**: AST-level GumTree diff reveals semantic impact text diff hides; PDG isomorphism finds the "same logic, different code" twin you should also update.
17- **Auditing risk**: hotspots (churn × complexity), bus factor, defect-magnet density, dead-code candidates — together they direct attention to the parts of the codebase that pay back attention.
18- **Identifying domain entities and bounded contexts**: noun-phrase mining + TF-IDF rare-term extraction + Louvain communities + Jensen-Shannon divergence on per-cluster vocabulary.
19
20## Rule Categories by Priority
21
22| Priority | Category | Impact | Prefix | Question answered |
23|---|---|---|---|---|
24| 1 | Concept & Domain Extraction | CRITICAL | `concept-` | What business entities live in this code? |
25| 2 | Semantic Similarity & Feature Mapping | CRITICAL | `sim-` | Where else does this concept already exist? |
26| 3 | Architectural Topology | HIGH | `graph-` | What is the shape of this codebase? |
27| 4 | Co-Change & Temporal Mining | HIGH | `mine-` | What hidden couplings does history reveal? |
28| 5 | Clone & Duplication Detection | MEDIUM-HIGH | `clone-` | Where are we repeating ourselves? |
29| 6 | Bug & Feature Localization | MEDIUM-HIGH | `local-` | Given a description, where in code? |
30| 7 | Identifier Linguistics | MEDIUM | `ling-` | How to prepare tokens so the other algorithms work? |
31| 8 | Complexity & Risk Metrics | MEDIUM | `risk-` | Where is the danger concentrated? |
32
33## Quick Reference
34
35### 1. Concept & Domain Extraction (CRITICAL)
36
37- [`concept-lda-topic-modeling`](references/concept-lda-topic-modeling.md) — LDA over identifier tokens surfaces latent business themes
38- [`concept-noun-phrase-mining`](references/concept-noun-phrase-mining.md) — POS-tag + chunk identifiers to extract entity candidates
39- [`concept-tfidf-rare-terms`](references/concept-tfidf-rare-terms.md) — IDF against a generic corpus isolates domain vocabulary from framework noise
40- [`concept-identifier-cooccurrence-network`](references/concept-identifier-cooccurrence-network.md) — PMI-weighted co-occurrence graph reveals conceptual neighborhoods
41- [`concept-entity-name-resolution`](references/concept-entity-name-resolution.md) — Cluster name variants (`user/usr/u/userAccount`) via embedding + edit distance
42- [`concept-bounded-context-detection`](references/concept-bounded-context-detection.md) — Louvain + Jensen-Shannon divergence detects DDD bounded contexts
43
44### 2. Semantic Similarity & Feature Mapping (CRITICAL)
45
46- [`sim-codebert-embeddings`](references/sim-codebert-embeddings.md) — CodeBERT + cosine for semantic code search across renames
47- [`sim-pdg-semantic-clones`](references/sim-pdg-semantic-clones.md) — Program Dependence Graph isomorphism finds Type-4 clones
48- [`sim-cross-pr-feature-mapping`](references/sim-cross-pr-feature-mapping.md) — Embed merged PRs once, retrieve precedent at feature-design time
49- [`sim-cosine-vsm-files`](references/sim-cosine-vsm-files.md) — TF-IDF VSM file similarity when no GPU is available
50- [`sim-call-pattern-similarity`](references/sim-call-pattern-similarity.md) — N-grams on call-sequence find behavioral twins
51- [`sim-doc-code-alignment`](references/sim-doc-code-alignment.md) — Joint code-doc embedding flags drift between docs and code
52
53### 3. Architectural Topology (HIGH)
54
55- [`graph-pagerank-core`](references/graph-pagerank-core.md) — PageRank the import graph to find the codebase core
56- [`graph-betweenness-bottlenecks`](references/graph-betweenness-bottlenecks.md) — Betweenness centrality surfaces bottleneck modules
57- [`graph-louvain-modules`](references/graph-louvain-modules.md) — Louvain community detection reveals natural module boundaries
58- [`graph-scc-cycle-tangles`](references/graph-scc-cycle-tangles.md) — Tarjan's SCC algorithm exposes circular-dependency tangles
59- [`graph-feedback-arcs`](references/graph-feedback-arcs.md) — Eades-Lin-Smyth FAS chooses the smallest cycle-breaking cut
60
61### 4. Co-Change & Temporal Mining (HIGH)
62
63- [`mine-change-coupling`](references/mine-change-coupling.md) — Conditional probability over commit history exposes hidden coupling
64- [`mine-hotspots-churn-complexity`](references/mine-hotspots-churn-complexity.md) — Churn × complexity = canonical hotspot score (Tornhill)
65- [`mine-bus-factor`](references/mine-bus-factor.md) — Per-file authorship Gini coefficient surfaces knowledge concentration
66- [`mine-commit-topic-modeling`](references/mine-commit-topic-modeling.md) — LDA on commit messages reveals quarterly themes
67- [`mine-bug-fix-density`](references/mine-bug-fix-density.md) — Classify commits, rank files by fix-density to find defect magnets
68- [`mine-codebase-aging`](references/mine-codebase-aging.md) — Last-modified age + reachability splits stable code from dead code
69
70### 5. Clone & Duplication Detection (MEDIUM-HIGH)
71
72- [`clone-minhash-lsh`](references/clone-minhash-lsh.md) — MinHash + LSH for sub-linear near-duplicate retrieval
73- [`clone-simhash`](references/clone-simhash.md) — SimHash 64-bit fingerprints for O(1) Hamming-distance lookups
74- [`clone-suffix-array-cpd`](references/clone-suffix-array-cpd.md) — Token-level suffix array (PMD CPD) for precise clone boundaries
75- [`clone-ast-gumtree`](references/clone-ast-gumtree.md) — GumTree algorithm for fine-grained AST differencing
76- [`clone-zhang-shasha-ted`](references/clone-zhang-shasha-ted.md) — Zhang-Shasha tree edit distance for exact subtree similarity
77
78### 6. Bug & Feature Localization (MEDIUM-HIGH)
79
80- [`local-tfidf-bug-reports`](references/local-tfidf-bug-reports.md) — TF-IDF rank source files against bug report tokens
81- [`local-bm25-saturation`](references/local-bm25-saturation.md) — BM25 handles length normalization and TF saturation
82- [`local-history-prior-localization`](references/local-history-prior-localization.md) — Bayesian fusion of IR score with bug-history prior
83- [`local-embedding-bug-text`](references/local-embedding-bug-text.md) — Two-stage BM25 + embedding re-rank for semantic localization
84
85### 7. Identifier Linguistics (MEDIUM)
86
87- [`ling-camel-snake-split`](references/ling-camel-snake-split.md) — Split camelCase, snake_case, digit-boundaries before any analysis
88- [`ling-abbreviation-expansion`](references/ling-abbreviation-expansion.md) — Expand `idx→index`, `mgr→manager` via dictionary + mining
89- [`ling-porter-stemming`](references/ling-porter-stemming.md) — Apply Porter stemmer to unify singular/plural forms
90- [`ling-pos-tagging-identifiers`](references/ling-pos-tagging-identifiers.md) — POS-tag identifier heads to flag misnamed functions/classes
91
92### 8. Complexity & Risk Metrics (MEDIUM)
93
94- [`risk-cyclomatic-mccabe`](references/risk-cyclomatic-mccabe.md) — McCabe cyclomatic complexity for branch-test surface
95- [`risk-cognitive-complexity`](references/risk-cognitive-complexity.md) — SonarSource Cognitive Complexity for readability gates
96- [`risk-halstead-volume`](references/risk-halstead-volume.md) — Halstead volume for language-agnostic size and effort
97- [`risk-shannon-entropy-naming`](references/risk-shannon-entropy-naming.md) — Per-token entropy flags overloaded names
98
99## How to Use
100
101Pick the category that matches the user's question, then read one or two specific rules from that category. Most rules cite combinable partners ("Combine with `mine-change-coupling`...") that compound the signal — read the partner rule when you need higher precision.
102
103For unfamiliar repos, the highest-ROI starting sequence is:
1041. `graph-pagerank-core` → read the top-20 most central files
1052. `concept-lda-topic-modeling` + `concept-tfidf-rare-terms` → identify the business themes
1063. `mine-hotspots-churn-complexity` → find where the bugs concentrate
1074. `mine-change-coupling` → uncover hidden architectural couplings
108
109For a single-task bug or feature, the pipeline is:
1101. `local-bm25-saturation` (broad candidates) → `local-embedding-bug-text` (semantic re-rank) → `local-history-prior-localization` (fix-history boost)
1112. `sim-cross-pr-feature-mapping` for prior precedent on new features
1123. `mine-change-coupling` to surface partner files that historically move together
113
114Always preprocess identifier tokens via `ling-camel-snake-split` → `ling-abbreviation-expansion` → `ling-porter-stemming` before any vocabulary-based algorithm. Skipping this step silently degrades every downstream signal.
115
116**Cross-language parsing.** Most rule code examples use Python's built-in `ast` module for brevity. For real cross-language work (Go, Rust, Java, TS, C++ in the same repo), use [tree-sitter](https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/) — it provides robust parsers for 40+ languages with a uniform API. Every AST-based rule in this skill (PDG clones, GumTree, Zhang-Shasha, POS-tag heads, identifier co-occurrence) maps cleanly onto tree-sitter ASTs.
117
118## Reference Files
119
120| File | Description |
121|------|-------------|
122| [references/_sections.md](references/_sections.md) | Category definitions and impact ordering |
123| [assets/templates/_template.md](assets/templates/_template.md) | Template for adding new algorithm rules |
124| [metadata.json](metadata.json) | Version and reference information |