How do I install the Aeo Pack AI Tools skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add psyduckler/aeo-pack-ai-tools in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Aeo Pack AI Tools safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. Capability flags: makes network calls. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Aeo Pack AI Tools?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Aeo Pack AI Tools free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Aeo Pack AI Tools?

psyduckler (@psyduckler) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Aeo Pack AI Tools by psyduckler — Agent Skill

Name: Aeo Pack AI Tools
Rating: 4.5 (4 reviews)
Author: psyduckler

Aeo Pack AI Tools

Curated prompt pack for AI tool brands tracking their visibility in AI answer engines. 17 prompts covering AI-task discovery, alternatives to incumbents (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.), free-vs-paid framing, accuracy claims, privacy positioning, and vertical use cases. Variables (task, competitor, use_case, domain) fill per workspace. Use when a user is tracking visibility for an AI product, building an AEO baseline for AI-tool category, or asks for prompt ideas for an AI startup.

psyduckler Updated Sep 10, 2026

File contents

AEO Pack: AI Tools

Source: github.com/psyduckler/aeo-skills Part of: AEO Skills Suite (v2 prompt packs) Schema: prompt-pack-v1

17 ready-to-track prompts for AI-tool visibility. The AI-tool space has its own retrieval patterns — buyers compare against incumbents (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini), worry about hallucination, and care about pricing/privacy more than typical B2B SaaS.

Template variables

Variable	Required	Example
`task`	yes	`content writing`, `code generation`, `image editing`, `customer support`, `legal research`
`competitor`	no	`ChatGPT`, `Claude`, `Midjourney`, `GitHub Copilot`
`use_case`	no	`long-form blog posts`, `unit test generation`, `legal contract review`
`domain`	no	`legal`, `medical`, `finance`, `education`

How to use this pack

npx skills add psyduckler/aeo-skills --skill aeo-pack-ai-tools

Then fill in variables and merge into your aeo.config.json. Example for a content-writing AI tool competing with ChatGPT:

Template	Filled
`Best AI tools for {{task}}`	`Best AI tools for content writing`
`{{competitor}} alternatives for {{task}}`	`ChatGPT alternatives for content writing`
`Most accurate AI {{task}} tool`	`Most accurate AI content writing tool`
`AI {{task}} tools that don't hallucinate`	`AI content writing tools that don't hallucinate`

Why these prompts

AI-tool AEO has unique retrieval characteristics:

Incumbent comparison is dominant. Almost every category-discovery prompt eventually narrows to "X vs ChatGPT" or "X vs Claude". Tracking these directly is essential.
Hallucination concerns are a category-defining trust signal. Pages addressing accuracy/reliability get higher citation rates for "most accurate" prompts.
Pricing transparency matters because AI tools vary widely (free, freemium, pay-per-use, subscription). The "free vs paid" comparison is a high-traffic prompt.
Vertical positioning ("AI for legal", "AI for medical") gets surfaced when domain-specific accuracy/compliance constraints matter.
Open-source / privacy alternatives are a distinct retrieval cluster — buyers who care about self-hosting or data sovereignty.

Notes

If your tool is a Gemini-based product, expect Gemini to be measurably more generous about citing pages that mention Gemini directly. Don't game this — but be aware of the recurring retrieval set bias.
The "doesn't hallucinate" prompts are noisy — citation rates fluctuate as Gemini's framing of hallucination changes. Sample at N=50 here for tighter signal.
Pair with aeo-schema using Product or SoftwareApplication JSON-LD to make your pricing/features machine-readable.
Suggested first-baseline scope: 10 prompts × 20 samples = ~$0.06 estimated cost.

---name: aeo-pack-ai-toolsdescription: Curated prompt pack for AI tool brands tracking their visibility in AI answer engines. 17 prompts covering AI-task discovery, alternatives to incumbents (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.), free-vs-paid framing, accuracy claims, privacy positioning, and vertical use cases. Variables (task, competitor, use_case, domain) fill per workspace. Use when a user is tracking visibility for an AI product, building an AEO baseline for AI-tool category, or asks for prompt ideas for an AI startup.---# AEO Pack: AI Tools> **Source:** [github.com/psyduckler/aeo-skills](https://github.com/psyduckler/aeo-skills/tree/main/aeo-pack-ai-tools)> **Part of:** [AEO Skills Suite](https://github.com/psyduckler/aeo-skills) (v2 prompt packs)> **Schema:** [prompt-pack-v1](https://github.com/psyduckler/aeo-skills/blob/main/schemas/prompt-pack-v1.json)17 ready-to-track prompts for AI-tool visibility. The AI-tool space has its own retrieval patterns — buyers compare against incumbents (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini), worry about hallucination, and care about pricing/privacy more than typical B2B SaaS.## Template variables| Variable | Required | Example ||---|---|---|| `task` | yes | `content writing`, `code generation`, `image editing`, `customer support`, `legal research` || `competitor` | no | `ChatGPT`, `Claude`, `Midjourney`, `GitHub Copilot` || `use_case` | no | `long-form blog posts`, `unit test generation`, `legal contract review` || `domain` | no | `legal`, `medical`, `finance`, `education` |## How to use this pack```bashnpx skills add psyduckler/aeo-skills --skill aeo-pack-ai-tools```Then fill in variables and merge into your `aeo.config.json`. Example for a content-writing AI tool competing with ChatGPT:| Template | Filled ||---|---|| `Best AI tools for {{task}}` | `Best AI tools for content writing` || `{{competitor}} alternatives for {{task}}` | `ChatGPT alternatives for content writing` || `Most accurate AI {{task}} tool` | `Most accurate AI content writing tool` || `AI {{task}} tools that don't hallucinate` | `AI content writing tools that don't hallucinate` |## Why these promptsAI-tool AEO has unique retrieval characteristics:- **Incumbent comparison** is dominant. Almost every category-discovery prompt eventually narrows to "X vs ChatGPT" or "X vs Claude". Tracking these directly is essential.- **Hallucination concerns** are a category-defining trust signal. Pages addressing accuracy/reliability get higher citation rates for "most accurate" prompts.- **Pricing transparency** matters because AI tools vary widely (free, freemium, pay-per-use, subscription). The "free vs paid" comparison is a high-traffic prompt.- **Vertical positioning** ("AI for legal", "AI for medical") gets surfaced when domain-specific accuracy/compliance constraints matter.- **Open-source / privacy alternatives** are a distinct retrieval cluster — buyers who care about self-hosting or data sovereignty.## Notes- If your tool is a Gemini-based product, expect Gemini to be measurably more generous about citing pages that mention Gemini directly. Don't game this — but be aware of the recurring retrieval set bias.- The "doesn't hallucinate" prompts are noisy — citation rates fluctuate as Gemini's framing of hallucination changes. Sample at N=50 here for tighter signal.- Pair with [aeo-schema](../aeo-schema/) using `Product` or `SoftwareApplication` JSON-LD to make your pricing/features machine-readable.- Suggested first-baseline scope: 10 prompts × 20 samples = ~$0.06 estimated cost.

Frequently asked questions