Profile My skills Saved Collections Edit profile Submit a skill

Reflect

Compare meaning candidates from Wonder with the user's intended meaning, one pair at a time. In the Socrates loop, Reflect writes only the current cycle's ### Reflect section. Triggers (EN): reflect, compare meanings, surface meaning gap, check what I meant Do NOT use when: expanding meanings (-> wonder), merging meanings into shared meaning (-> refine), restating a goal (-> restate), or running the full Seed loop (-> socrates) vs wonder: Wonder expands candidates; Reflect checks where each candidate matches or diverges from the user's intention.

Q00 e5c1c28 3 files · 2.7 KB Updated
Coding & Dev Tools

File contents

Reflect

Details

Reflect takes the active cycle's ### Wonder candidates and asks the user whether each one matches what they meant.

Ask one comparison at a time. Do not decide which meaning is correct. Do not invent missing user intent.

Question Style

Prefer multiple-choice checks so the user can classify each meaning quickly. Always allow a free-form correction.

Use this shape:

Does this candidate match what you meant?
Candidate: <meaning candidate>
A. Yes, this is close
B. Partly, but the nuance is different
C. No, this is not what I meant
D. Other / correct the nuance in your own words

Use the user's selected or written nuance in the User's intended nuance field.

Output

Write a comparison list:

- Meaning A
  - User's intended nuance: ...
  - Model's interpreted nuance: ...
  - Same / different: ...

Scratch Contract

Read from .symposium/scratch/socrates.md under the active cycle's ### Wonder.

Write to the same cycle's ### Reflect.

When every meaning candidate has a visible same/different comparison, stop and hand off to refine.

q00/symposium/tree/main/skills/reflect commit e5c1c287e4

Browse category

Frequently asked questions

npx skillmds@latest add q00/reflect